Connect with us

Opinion

Nigerian Judges, Lawyers, Politicians, Clerics and Security Agencies: A Parade of Callous Pretenders Masquerading as the Virtuous

Published

on

Prof. Nasiru Adamu Aliyu, SAN

Prof. Nasiru Adamu Aliyu, SAN

In his play The Tragedy of Hamlet, William Shakespeare wrote, “God has given you one face, and you make yourself another.” Shakespeare’s words highlight the duplicity of pretenders, a theme that echoes through history. Aristotle, one of history’s greatest thinkers, also addressed the nature of pretenders in his ethical writings, stating, “The least deviation from truth will be multiplied later.” He emphasized the importance of authenticity, warning that pretence can lead to serious consequences. This concept resonates in Nigeria, where the elites appear caught in duplicity, while ordinary people suffer from poverty, subjugation, and ignorance of their fundamental rights.

Nigerians at all levels exhibit selfishness and self-centeredness, contributing to the nation’s issues. Shame on our Nigerian Police, DSS, Military, and other Security agencies, as well as Lawyers, whether from the Public or Private Bar, for complicity in turning a blind eye to the plight of ordinary citizens. Currently, the thorny issue concerns the so-called treason charges against minors before the Federal High Court in Abuja. Judges, politicians, lawyers, police, DSS, correctional officers, clerics, governorsthe President, and other stakeholders have the responsibility to discern right from wrong, particularly when minors are involved. Yet, self-preservation remains paramount among the Nigerian elites, who lack the courage and fear of God to act truthfully.

It is not the writer’s contention that people who commit crimes should evade justice; rather, justice should be administered with decorum, fairness, and equality, with no preferential treatment for white-collar crimesThe Nigerian Government struggles to address corruption, banditry, and kidnappings across various regions effectively. While successive administrations have claimed to combat these menaces, criminal activities remain rampant. Instead, authorities focus on arresting and prosecuting protesters. The situation highlights Nigeria’s collective failure, as even the controversial treason charges against minors indicate the systemic injustice faced by “ordinary” citizens. These children are seen as “sons of nobody,” making their mistreatment by politicians, the judiciary, and law enforcement more permissible.

The government has yet to make substantial progress in addressing these societal issues. A legitimate expectation remains for leaders to demonstrate accountability and empathy, especially towards young protesters detained under questionable charges. President Tinubu eventually ordered the release of the minors, but only after significant national and international embarrassment. Leaders in Nigeria must abandon pretence and start genuinely considering the plight of their people.

#

This issue of duplicity among Nigeria’s elite extends into the judiciary. Nigerian courts are quick to prioritize political cases over cases that defend the fundamental human rights of ordinary citizens. Surprisingly, the prosecutor handling the treason charges against these minors confidently dismissed them as adults attempting to undermine democracy. Such audacity highlights a broader lack of empathy within the justice system. Nigerian democracy has, to date, yielded limited benefits for the general populace, benefiting primarily those in power.

Nigeria’s judiciary must be fearless, uphold justice, and show independence. The Nigerian Supreme Court recently ruled that state governors must hold local government elections to access federal allocations, a decision reflecting the type of bold action required to curb abuse of power. Courageous judges exist within Nigeria’s judicial system; however, they are often restricted from handling cases involving significant government interests. Politicians frequently employ blackmail tactics to maintain control over judiciary decisions.

The Nigerian media and journalists have played a crucial role in highlighting the plight of these minors, despite their initial silence. The journalists’ work brought national attention to the injustices faced by these young detainees, compelling politicians, lawyers, and clergymen to address the issue, even if for political gain. The origin of banditry by Fulani herders, for instance, stemmed from injustice and neglect, issues that Nigerian leaders have yet to address effectively.

In closing, whether readers accept or dismiss this piece, the truth will eventually prevail. As a nation, Nigeria must learn from history and confront these injustices if it hopes to move forward.

Prof. Nasiru Adamu Aliyu, SAN, writes from the Department of Public Law, Bayero University, Kano: nasiraliyu@gmail.com, +2348035883225.

Opinion

President Tinubu’s Visit to Katsina: A Missed Opportunity Wrapped in Songs and Handshakes

Published

on

Jamilu Abdussalam Hajaj

 

By Jamilu Abdussalam Hajaj

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s visit to Katsina should have been a pivotal moment—an opportunity for the state to draw national attention to its pressing challenges, developmental milestones, and future aspirations. Unfortunately, what should have been a strategic communication moment for the state turned into a viral distraction.

From the streets of Katsina to the corners of social media, two things dominated the narrative: a campaign-style song from singer Rarara and a casual handshake between the President and Aisha Humaira. These moments, while lighthearted and culturally expressive, overshadowed the very essence of a presidential visit—governance, development, and accountability.

It raises a critical question: Was the state’s PR machinery asleep, or was the leadership not interested in framing the visit within a narrative that could catalyze national interest, policy focus, or even investment in Katsina?

In a time when states are competing for federal attention, donor support, and private capital, optics matter. Yet, in Katsina, a sitting governor was cheering a singer on and clapping joyfully to impress the President. A presidential visit is not just a ceremonial tour; it is a platform. It’s the time to walk the President through pressing realities— insecurity in rural areas, the economic potential in agriculture, the struggles with education, the underfunded health sector, the resilience of the people, and the efforts already underway to tackle these issues.

Instead, the silence around these important issues was deafening.

No strategic documentaries. No impactful speeches. No high-level stakeholder engagements positioned in the media. No community interactions that could inspire federal interventions. Not even a strong visual presentation of the state’s development agenda.

Governance is not just about doing the work; it’s about telling the story. And in that regard, Katsina missed the moment.

This visit should have been used to showcase the hard work of the administration (if there is any to show), to call for more support where needed, and to galvanize public interest and empathy. But when all that trends from a presidential visit are a song and a handshake, it’s safe to say the moment was poorly managed or, worse, completely misunderstood.

Moving forward, states must take public relations seriously—not for propaganda, but for perception, engagement, and strategic positioning. Because if you don’t control the narrative, someone else will. And often, they will focus on the trivial and mundane parts, not the transformational.

 

#
Continue Reading

Opinion

EFCC Probe on Refineries: Transparency or Political Witch-Hunt

Published

on

 

By Aminu Umar

The recent move by Nigeria’s anti-corruption agency, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), to probe the handling of finances and contracts related to the Port Harcourt and Warri refineries has stirred a heated debate on whether the investigation represents a genuine drive for transparency or a politically motivated witch-hunt.

At the heart of the issue is the EFCC’s request for salary records and allowances of 14 key officials who served during the refinery rehabilitation period. These include high-ranking executives such as Abubakar Yar’Adua, Mele Kyari, Isiaka Abdulrazak, Umar Ajiya, Dikko Ahmed, Ibrahim Onoja, Ademoye Jelili, and Mustapha Sugungun.

Others listed are Kayode Adetokunbo, Efiok Akpan, Babatunde Bakare, Jimoh Olasunkanmi, Bello Kankaya, and Desmond Inyama. The commission appears focused on payments and administrative decisions linked to the multi-billion naira refinery resuscitation program.

However, conspicuously absent from the list of those summoned is Adedapo Segun, the current Chief Financial Officer (CFO) of the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPCL), who served as Executive Vice President for Downstream and was directly in charge of treasury, refinery operations, shipping, and trading. During this time, all payments related to the Port Harcourt and Warri refineries were made under his financial supervision.

#

This omission has raised several questions: Why is Segun not being invited or questioned if the goal is transparency? Why is the probe appearing selective?

Equally puzzling is the inclusion of Abubakar Yar’Adua, whose role is administrative rather than operational, while high-profile former Group Managing Directors (GMDs) such as Andrew Yakubu, and Emmanuel Ibe Kachikwu, who played central roles in refinery policy and contracts in previous administrations, appear to have been bypassed.

We are not saying Mele Kyari is innocent or guilty, but we must insist on a fair process,” a stakeholder familiar with the situation told this reporter. “This shouldn’t be a selective trial. The people who gave out the contracts and approved the funds must be investigated too.”

The tension is heightened by growing concerns that the probe is targeted at individuals from a specific region. Many observers fear this could deepen regional mistrust, especially if only northern executives are made scapegoats.

We are worried this is being used to paint Northerners as the only looters,” said one source. “You cannot fight corruption with bias. You need to look at all sides. This includes those who were ‘exonerated’ too quickly.”

Another burning question is why individuals such as Emmanuel Ibe Kachikwu, former Minister of State for Petroleum, and Andrew Yakubu, former GMD of NNPC, who had strategic influence on contract awards and rehabilitation policies, are not facing any scrutiny. Critics argue that anyone involved at any stage of the refinery rehabilitation—whether from policy, finance, or operational perspectives—should be equally held accountable.

Civil society groups and international anti-corruption bodies are now being urged to step in. The call is for an independent and thorough probe that includes all relevant stakeholders—without exception.

“We are calling on NGOs and international organisations to ensure that this is not a political trial. If you must clean up the refinery system, you must do it across the board,” the statement concluded.

In a country plagued by decades of failed refinery operations and opaque oil sector dealings, the public is watching this investigation closely. The EFCC is at a crossroads: its actions will either affirm its commitment to justice or expose it to accusations of being used as a tool for political vendettas.

For now, Nigerians wait—with growing skepticism.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Censoring the Uncensored: The irony behind Hisbah’s ban on Hamisu Breaker’s song

Published

on

 

By Ummi Muhammad Hassan

Following the ban by Hisbah on a new song titled “Amana Ta” by Hamisu Breaker, social media went into an uproar, capturing the attention of the public.

In the early hours of April 24, 2025, social media was filled with reactions following a press statement issued by the Deputy Commander of the Hisbah Board, Kano State chapter, Dr. Khadija Sagir, announcing the ban of Breaker’s new song. The reason cited was that the song allegedly contains obscene language.

This announcement, however, triggered a counterreaction from the public. Many became curious to know more about the song and the so-called obscene content, with some taking to their social media handles to express their opinions.

The irony of the situation is that Hisbah unintentionally gave the song more prominence, causing it to go viral. Many people who were previously unaware of the song searched for and listened to it, just to understand the controversy.

#

In my opinion, after listening to the song, it contains no obscene language. Rather, the issue seems to lie with some young women who mimed the song in a suggestive manner after hearing that Hisbah had labelled it as indecent—as though to dramatize or reinforce the claim. Some even appeared as if they were intoxicated.

To me, this is both devastating and concerning, as it reflects the erosion of the strong moral standards once upheld by Hausa women. Many young people are now making videos lip-synching the song in indecent ways. It made me pause and ask myself: where has our shyness gone? I believe this question deserves a deeper conversation on another day.

In Breaker’s case, thanks to the Hisbah ban, he became the most trending Kannywood artist in April, and his song went viral—and continues to trend.

A similar incident occurred earlier this year when the federal government banned Idris Abdulkareem’s song *Tell Your Papa*. That action unexpectedly brought the artist back into the spotlight, causing the song to trend widely.

Social media has made censorship increasingly difficult. Once a movie, text, or song reaches the internet, it becomes almost impossible to control—even by the creators themselves.

While social media censorship remains a challenge, this recent incident highlights the need for the government to intensify efforts against the spread of indecent content—through Hisbah and agencies like the Kano State Film Censorship Board.

Clear guidelines should be put in place, requiring artists and filmmakers to submit their content for review and approval before public release. This, among other strategies, could help reduce the spread of inappropriate material.

Additionally, Hisbah should be more mindful of how such announcements are made, as they may inadvertently promote the very content they seek to suppress.

Ummi Muhammad Hassan, Ph.D., is a lecturer in the Department of Mass Communication at Bayero University, Kano. She can be reached via email at: ummeemuhammadhassan@gmail.com.

Continue Reading

Trending