Connect with us

Opinion

When Insecurity Meets An Inept Government: A Brief Insight into Buhari’s Nigeria

Published

on

 

By Ali Sabo

Today (Tuesday, 9th December, 2020) I woke up to a very traumatic post on Facebook from a friend who was narrating how armed bandits invaded his village and carted away more than 20 people including two of his siblings.

Anas is the second person I know personally who have been affected by this dangerous wave of banditry. Back in 2019, another friend of mine was abducted alongside his friend at their village which led to the death of the other person who at the time of the abduction was sick and couldn’t get medical attention.

As could be envisaged, in the absence of the medical attention he needed, he fell for his sickness. While my friend was only released after his family had paid a handsome ransom to the bandits.

Fighting Banditry :Zamfara Involves Traditional Rulers
This particular attack on Gamji village, Sabuwa local government area of Katsina state is different because traditionally the bandits would attack villages on motorcycles, but this time they trekked to the villages, opened fire on everyone on sight and abducted many including the Village Head thereby proudly advertising their newly found narcissistic audacity.

#

What they did, in effect, has exposed the level of unseriousness, negligence, poor attention to the deepening calamity and lack of sympathy from those in power to the agonizing distresses of poor, rural inhabitants.

The issue of security in the North Western part of the country is deteriorating with an alarming consistency to the extent that in many villages in Zamfara and Katsina States people have to pay bandits before they can till and or harvest their farms produce and even when the pay, sometimes the bandits would destroy the crops before it is due for harvest and no one would dare to speak.

This has become a brutal norm because security personnel who are saddled with responsibilities of defending these innocent citizens have for long failed and abandoned them, leaving them cowering at the mercy of these heartless beasts, who are themselves, products of bad and corrosive governance in Nigeria.

The Kano-Kaduna-Abuja road has long became a no go area, for more than three years, the road has become a nightmare for its users forcing the rich and the middle class to seek an air travel alternative.

Bandits on this axis have become so emboldened by the systemic failure of governance that they can operate two or three times in a broad day light within a day without being interrupted by security operatives.

This has led many citizens to start asking whether or not we have a responsive and responsible leader in this country. To add salt to an already fatal injury, airline owners have also found a way of milking the helpless citizens by tripling their air tickets, though Economists will tell us that this is only a practical illustration of the famous law of “Demand and Supply”. A ticket that costs 27,000 to 35,000 Naira from Abuja to Kano is now being sold at 65,000 to 95,000 Naira even at that price you have to book it for at least 3 to 5 days ahead.

Gory stories coming from the North Eastern part of the country are also heart broken, last month, Boko Haram slaughtered more than 60 farmers in their farms at a time when government spin doctors, social media gladiators and paid agents are telling the citizens and foreign governments that Nigerian security forces have eliminated the terrorists in the region.

The president, who is fairly notorious for his unsettling and irresponsible silence on matters like these took many days to even sympathize with the bereaved families despite sustained pressures from media users, civil society organizations and International Organizations (and still he is yet to address the country on the matter).

To further aggravate an already tensed situation, the President’s Senior Special Assistant on Media, Malam Garba Shehu announced on his social media handles that the slaughtered farmers didn’t seek for clearance before going to the farms, to him he is protecting the government he is being paid to protect while in actual sense he is indirectly reaffirming the claims made by experts that Boko Haram is still in control of many villages in Borno State just like bandits are now in control of many communities in Katsina and Zamfara.

Another trending topic in the country is the well thought out agitations demanding the immediate sacking of Service Chiefs by the Buhari led federal government.

This has been on the forefront of Nigerian’s agenda for over two years due to their ineffectiveness, overstayed and failure to address the persistent attacks, killings and abductions of people in the country.

This call is not only coming from the ordinary citizens who have been affected by the acts of these bandits, the National Assembly who is the second highest organ of government in the country has for many times recommended the sacking of these Service Chiefs but the president for reasons best known to him has refused to heed to these calls and advice. This has left the citizens with only three assumptions; the president is not in-charge of the affairs of the country; the president is afraid of the service chiefs; or he is happy with what is happening in the country.

Ali Sabo is the Campaigns and Communication Officer of the Centre for Information Technology and Development and he can be reached either by his email address: aliyunce@gmail.com or twitter handle: @a_sabo12

Opinion

President Tinubu’s Visit to Katsina: A Missed Opportunity Wrapped in Songs and Handshakes

Published

on

Jamilu Abdussalam Hajaj

 

By Jamilu Abdussalam Hajaj

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s visit to Katsina should have been a pivotal moment—an opportunity for the state to draw national attention to its pressing challenges, developmental milestones, and future aspirations. Unfortunately, what should have been a strategic communication moment for the state turned into a viral distraction.

From the streets of Katsina to the corners of social media, two things dominated the narrative: a campaign-style song from singer Rarara and a casual handshake between the President and Aisha Humaira. These moments, while lighthearted and culturally expressive, overshadowed the very essence of a presidential visit—governance, development, and accountability.

It raises a critical question: Was the state’s PR machinery asleep, or was the leadership not interested in framing the visit within a narrative that could catalyze national interest, policy focus, or even investment in Katsina?

#

In a time when states are competing for federal attention, donor support, and private capital, optics matter. Yet, in Katsina, a sitting governor was cheering a singer on and clapping joyfully to impress the President. A presidential visit is not just a ceremonial tour; it is a platform. It’s the time to walk the President through pressing realities— insecurity in rural areas, the economic potential in agriculture, the struggles with education, the underfunded health sector, the resilience of the people, and the efforts already underway to tackle these issues.

Instead, the silence around these important issues was deafening.

No strategic documentaries. No impactful speeches. No high-level stakeholder engagements positioned in the media. No community interactions that could inspire federal interventions. Not even a strong visual presentation of the state’s development agenda.

Governance is not just about doing the work; it’s about telling the story. And in that regard, Katsina missed the moment.

This visit should have been used to showcase the hard work of the administration (if there is any to show), to call for more support where needed, and to galvanize public interest and empathy. But when all that trends from a presidential visit are a song and a handshake, it’s safe to say the moment was poorly managed or, worse, completely misunderstood.

Moving forward, states must take public relations seriously—not for propaganda, but for perception, engagement, and strategic positioning. Because if you don’t control the narrative, someone else will. And often, they will focus on the trivial and mundane parts, not the transformational.

 

Continue Reading

Opinion

EFCC Probe on Refineries: Transparency or Political Witch-Hunt

Published

on

 

By Aminu Umar

The recent move by Nigeria’s anti-corruption agency, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), to probe the handling of finances and contracts related to the Port Harcourt and Warri refineries has stirred a heated debate on whether the investigation represents a genuine drive for transparency or a politically motivated witch-hunt.

At the heart of the issue is the EFCC’s request for salary records and allowances of 14 key officials who served during the refinery rehabilitation period. These include high-ranking executives such as Abubakar Yar’Adua, Mele Kyari, Isiaka Abdulrazak, Umar Ajiya, Dikko Ahmed, Ibrahim Onoja, Ademoye Jelili, and Mustapha Sugungun.

Others listed are Kayode Adetokunbo, Efiok Akpan, Babatunde Bakare, Jimoh Olasunkanmi, Bello Kankaya, and Desmond Inyama. The commission appears focused on payments and administrative decisions linked to the multi-billion naira refinery resuscitation program.

However, conspicuously absent from the list of those summoned is Adedapo Segun, the current Chief Financial Officer (CFO) of the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPCL), who served as Executive Vice President for Downstream and was directly in charge of treasury, refinery operations, shipping, and trading. During this time, all payments related to the Port Harcourt and Warri refineries were made under his financial supervision.

This omission has raised several questions: Why is Segun not being invited or questioned if the goal is transparency? Why is the probe appearing selective?

Equally puzzling is the inclusion of Abubakar Yar’Adua, whose role is administrative rather than operational, while high-profile former Group Managing Directors (GMDs) such as Andrew Yakubu, and Emmanuel Ibe Kachikwu, who played central roles in refinery policy and contracts in previous administrations, appear to have been bypassed.

We are not saying Mele Kyari is innocent or guilty, but we must insist on a fair process,” a stakeholder familiar with the situation told this reporter. “This shouldn’t be a selective trial. The people who gave out the contracts and approved the funds must be investigated too.”

The tension is heightened by growing concerns that the probe is targeted at individuals from a specific region. Many observers fear this could deepen regional mistrust, especially if only northern executives are made scapegoats.

We are worried this is being used to paint Northerners as the only looters,” said one source. “You cannot fight corruption with bias. You need to look at all sides. This includes those who were ‘exonerated’ too quickly.”

Another burning question is why individuals such as Emmanuel Ibe Kachikwu, former Minister of State for Petroleum, and Andrew Yakubu, former GMD of NNPC, who had strategic influence on contract awards and rehabilitation policies, are not facing any scrutiny. Critics argue that anyone involved at any stage of the refinery rehabilitation—whether from policy, finance, or operational perspectives—should be equally held accountable.

Civil society groups and international anti-corruption bodies are now being urged to step in. The call is for an independent and thorough probe that includes all relevant stakeholders—without exception.

“We are calling on NGOs and international organisations to ensure that this is not a political trial. If you must clean up the refinery system, you must do it across the board,” the statement concluded.

In a country plagued by decades of failed refinery operations and opaque oil sector dealings, the public is watching this investigation closely. The EFCC is at a crossroads: its actions will either affirm its commitment to justice or expose it to accusations of being used as a tool for political vendettas.

For now, Nigerians wait—with growing skepticism.

#
Continue Reading

Opinion

Censoring the Uncensored: The irony behind Hisbah’s ban on Hamisu Breaker’s song

Published

on

 

By Ummi Muhammad Hassan

Following the ban by Hisbah on a new song titled “Amana Ta” by Hamisu Breaker, social media went into an uproar, capturing the attention of the public.

In the early hours of April 24, 2025, social media was filled with reactions following a press statement issued by the Deputy Commander of the Hisbah Board, Kano State chapter, Dr. Khadija Sagir, announcing the ban of Breaker’s new song. The reason cited was that the song allegedly contains obscene language.

This announcement, however, triggered a counterreaction from the public. Many became curious to know more about the song and the so-called obscene content, with some taking to their social media handles to express their opinions.

The irony of the situation is that Hisbah unintentionally gave the song more prominence, causing it to go viral. Many people who were previously unaware of the song searched for and listened to it, just to understand the controversy.

In my opinion, after listening to the song, it contains no obscene language. Rather, the issue seems to lie with some young women who mimed the song in a suggestive manner after hearing that Hisbah had labelled it as indecent—as though to dramatize or reinforce the claim. Some even appeared as if they were intoxicated.

To me, this is both devastating and concerning, as it reflects the erosion of the strong moral standards once upheld by Hausa women. Many young people are now making videos lip-synching the song in indecent ways. It made me pause and ask myself: where has our shyness gone? I believe this question deserves a deeper conversation on another day.

In Breaker’s case, thanks to the Hisbah ban, he became the most trending Kannywood artist in April, and his song went viral—and continues to trend.

A similar incident occurred earlier this year when the federal government banned Idris Abdulkareem’s song *Tell Your Papa*. That action unexpectedly brought the artist back into the spotlight, causing the song to trend widely.

Social media has made censorship increasingly difficult. Once a movie, text, or song reaches the internet, it becomes almost impossible to control—even by the creators themselves.

While social media censorship remains a challenge, this recent incident highlights the need for the government to intensify efforts against the spread of indecent content—through Hisbah and agencies like the Kano State Film Censorship Board.

Clear guidelines should be put in place, requiring artists and filmmakers to submit their content for review and approval before public release. This, among other strategies, could help reduce the spread of inappropriate material.

Additionally, Hisbah should be more mindful of how such announcements are made, as they may inadvertently promote the very content they seek to suppress.

Ummi Muhammad Hassan, Ph.D., is a lecturer in the Department of Mass Communication at Bayero University, Kano. She can be reached via email at: ummeemuhammadhassan@gmail.com.

#

Continue Reading

Trending