Connect with us

Opinion

Waiya’s Blindness Over Buhari, Isma’l : Difference Between Professionalism and Activism

Published

on

 

By Abba Anwar

Neither Abba Anwar, then Chief Press Secretary to the Governor of Kano State, nor Saluhu Tanko Yakasai, then Special Adviser, Media, to the Governor, petitioned the then noise maker, Ibrahim Waiya, who was busy making drum beats, to attract recognition from, the political opponents of the then Governor, Abdullahi Umar Ganduje, when Waiya organised a press conference, under the guise of an emotionless group, Renaissance Coalition, describing Anwar and Yakasai, as elements threatening the peace of the state. Over face-off between Ganduje and then Emir of Kano, Sanusi Lamido Sanusi.

Waiya was the spokesperson of the Coalition then, as reported by Daily Trust newspaper of Tuesday 11th June, 2019, by Richard Ngbokai, when he blamed Anwar and Yakasai of fueling crisis between governor and the then Emir, “… over alleged insensitivity in handling information concerning the lingering crisis between the governor and the emir of Kano, Muhammadu Sanusi II.”

He made the wild allegation against us reacting to, as reported by Daily Trust and other national papers,”… a statement credited to the governor’s Chief Press Secretary, Abba Anwar about the reconciliation moves initiated by the Nigerian Governors’ Forum in collaboration with Alhaji Aliko Dangote to broker peace between the two leaders.”

He concluded that, I, as Chief Press Secretary denied that there was a move in process for reconciliation, which the organization considered as insensitive and dangerous to the peace of the state.

Daily Trust continued that” According to Waiya, “As concerned citizens of Kano state we wonder how some elements of the society will be so determined to fuel the crisis between the emir and the governor of Kano which is capable of threatening the peace and security of the state.”

The noise maker continued that,” Our major concern is more on the people who are officially recognized as the spokespersons, the image makers of the Kano state government, who included Salihu Tanko Yakasai… and Abba Anwar who had recently exposed their incompetence and sense of immaturity and diligence in the discharge of their official duties in reaction to the widely circulated report on the reconciliation efforts by the government of the federation and some other individuals claiming that there was no reconciliation effort between governor and the emir of Kano.”

Hear the relevance seeker,” It is on this note we wish to state that Nigeria is facing many challenges bothering on security and peace, it is therefore un-call-for (sic) for some people to be making some unguarded utterances that are capable of jeopardizing the peace we enjoy in Kano.”

Pleading Governor Ganduje that,” We therefore request the governor to disregard their statement and relief them of their appointments immediately because they are not fit to be there.”

Advert

When the story was published by many newspapers at the time, I personally took all the papers to my Boss, Ganduje and showed him the story requesting him to sack us, myself and Saluhu Tanko Yakasai. Baba Ganduje read through all the story and laughed. He said “Press Secretary you are doing a good job!

Myself and Saluhu did not raise an eye brow for Waiya. Talk less of taking him to the Police, with all his frustration to the extent of showcasing us as becoming threat to the peace of the state. Because we knew he didn’t deserve any attention from us.

So I wonder when I heard that the same Waiya, who is now Commissioner for Information is at cross road with some two young journalists Buhari Abba and Isma’l Auwal for publishing and expressing an opinion, captioned “Dear Governor, Yusuf Beware of Kano Information Commissioner, Ibrahim Waiya,” published in Kano Times.

It is just my thinking being vindicated. When Waiya was appointed Commissioner for Information, I said to myself, this is one the messier appointments, of this administration. I understood that the Governor was not provided with the platform to differentiate between professionalism (journalism) and activism.

Waiya is nowhere close to journalism profession. He is only an “activist”. I believe very firmly that, with all the shortcomings of Sanusi Bature Dawakin Tofa, he can make “a good” Commissioner than Waiya. No two ways about this. Talk less of Mustapha Muhammad, the recently appointed Chief Press Secretary to the Governor, whose pedigree is neater than all media related people of this administration. I mean all of them. That is why I still wonder, why is he Deputy Spokesperson. Very summersaulting.

Though I don’t share many parts of the opinion expressed by Isma’l, in his Letter to the Governor on Waiya, but I still don’t support any form of Intimidation meted on him, as a professional colleague. Because gagging the media is completely anti – people, anti-democracy and injustice.

So media anywhere in the world are partners in progress. I concur with Yakubu Musa, when he called on Waiya to be busy making friends than enemies. You just can’t fight the media and think you can succeed alone. Even if you are not a media man.

Throughout the Eight years administration of Ganduje, his Commissioner of Information, Malam Muhammad Garba never, for once, petitioned any journalist, to the Police. He believed in the freedom of opinion and expression. That didn’t mean all practitioners were ethical. But as a professional, he knew how to handle them professionally, without any rancor.

I suggest that Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf should look into Isma’l’s Letter and address issues raised. He is calling on the Governor to be very careful in handling issues related to Non Governmental Organizations (NGOs).

The letter says, “Let me be clear: if your intent is to have an overseer, someone to bridge the gap between your administration and these vocal groups, I understand the instinct. Governance thrives on harmony, and oversight can sharpen focus. But, sir, Ibrahim Waiya is not the man for this task. There are others in your circle—steady hands with proven mettle—who could mend this divide without lighting new fires.”

And Isma’l was very clear when he said,” Now, let me speak plainly about Waiya. I have nothing personal against him—none at all. This isn’t a vendetta; it’s a plea to save him from himself. He’s wading into a storm he may not weather, a clash that could tarnish his name and, by extension, yours. Picture this: a man stepping into quicksand, too proud to see the danger, while those around him shout warnings he won’t hear. That’s Waiya right now, Your Excellency. I’m throwing him a lifeline, not a stone.”

I salute my professional friends for standing behind the truth, Isma’l and Buhari in this respect.

 

Anwar was Chief Press Secretary to the former Governor of Kano State, Dr Abdullahi Umar Ganduje CON and can be reached at fatimanbaba1@gmail.com

 

Opinion

Dr Bello Matwallle: Why Dialogue Still Matters in the Fight Against Insecurity

Published

on

 

By Musa Iliyasu Kwankwaso

In the history of leadership, force may be loud, but wisdom delivers results. This is why security experts agree that while military action can suppress violence temporarily, dialogue is what permanently closes the door to conflict. It is a lesson the world has learned through blood, loss, and painful experience.

When Dr. Bello Matawalle, as Governor of Zamfara State, chose dialogue and reconciliation, it was not a sign of weakness. It was a different kind of courage one that placed the lives of ordinary citizens above political applause. A wise leader measures success not by bullets fired, but by lives saved.

Across conflict zones, history has consistently shown that force alone does not end insecurity. Guns may damage bodies, but they do not eliminate the roots of violence. This understanding forms the basis of what experts call the non-kinetic approach conflict resolution through dialogue, reconciliation, justice, and social reform.

When Matawalle assumed office, Zamfara was deeply troubled. Roads were closed, markets shut down, farmers and herders operated in fear, and citizens lived under constant threat. Faced with this reality, only two options existed: rely solely on military force or combine security operations with dialogue. Matawalle chose the path widely accepted across the world security reinforced by dialogue not out of sympathy for criminals, but to protect innocent lives.

Advert

This approach was not unique to Zamfara. In Katsina State, Governor Aminu Bello Masari led peace engagements with armed groups. In Maiduguri granted amnesty to repentant offenders of Boko Haram, In Sokoto, dialogue was also pursued to reduce bloodshed. These precedents raise a simple question: if dialogue is acceptable elsewhere, why is Matawalle singled out?

At the federal level, the same logic applies. Through Operation Safe Corridor, the Federal Government received Boko Haram members who surrendered, offered rehabilitation and reintegration, and continued military action against those who refused to lay down arms. This balance
rehabilitation for those who repent and force against those who persist is the core of the non-kinetic approach.

Security experts globally affirm that military force contributes only 20 to 30 percent of sustainable solutions to insurgency. The remaining 70 to 80 percent lies in dialogue, justice, economic reform, and addressing poverty and unemployment. Even the United Nations states clearly: “You cannot kill your way out of an insurgency.”

During Matawalle’s tenure, several roads reopened, cattle markets revived, and daily life began to normalize. If insecurity later resurfaced, the question is not whether dialogue was wrong, but whether broader coordination failed.

Today, critics attempt to recast past security strategies as crimes. Yet history is not blind, and truth does not disappear. Matawalle’s actions were rooted in expert advice, national precedent, and global best practice.

The position of Sheikh Ahmad Gumi, who publicly affirmed that Matawalle’s approach was appropriate and that military force accounts for only about 25 percent of counterinsurgency success, further reinforces this reality. Such views cannot be purchased or manufactured; they reflect established security thinking.

In the end, dialogue is not a betrayal of justice it is often its foundation. And no amount of political noise can overturn decisions grounded in evidence, experience, and the priority of human life.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Matawalle: The Northern Anchor of Loyalty in Tinubu’s Administration

Published

on

 

By Adebayor Adetunji, PhD

In the broad and competitive terrain of Nigerian politics, loyalty is often spoken of, yet rarely sustained with consistency, courage and visible action. But within the administration of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, one Northern appointee has demonstrated this quality not as a slogan, but as a lifestyle, as a political principle and as a national duty — Hon. (Dr.) Bello Muhammad Matawalle, Minister of State for Defence.

Since his appointment, Matawalle has stood out as one of the most loyal, outspoken and dependable pillars of support for the Tinubu administration in the North. He has never hesitated, not for a moment, to stand firmly behind the President. At every turn of controversy, in moments of public misunderstanding, and at times when political alliances waver, Matawalle has continued to speak boldly in defence of the government he serves. For him, loyalty is not an occasional gesture — it is a commitment evidenced through voice, alignment, and sacrifice.

Observers within and outside the ruling party recall numerous occasions where the former Zamfara State Governor took the front line in defending the government’s policies, actions and direction, even when others chose neutrality or silence. His interventions, always direct and clear, reflect not just loyalty to a leader, but faith in the future the President is building, a future anchored on economic reform, security revival, institutional strengthening and renewed national unity.

Advert

But Matawalle’s value to the administration does not stop at loyalty. In performance, visibility and active delivery of duty, he stands among the most engaged ministers currently serving in the federal cabinet. His portfolio, centred on defence and security, one of the most sensitive sectors in the country, demands expertise, availability and unbroken presence. Matawalle has not only embraced this responsibility, he has carried it with remarkable energy.

From high-level security meetings within Nigeria to strategic engagements across foreign capitals, Matawalle has represented the nation with clarity and confidence. His participation in defence summits, international cooperation talks, and regional security collaborations has positioned Nigeria as a voice of influence in global security discourse once again. At home, his involvement in military policy evaluation, counter-terrorism discussions and national defence restructuring reflects a minister who understands the urgency of Nigeria’s security needs, and shows up to work daily to address them.

Away from partisan battles, Matawalle has proven to be a bridge — between North and South, civilian leadership and military institutions, Nigeria and the wider world. His presence in government offers a mix of loyalty, performance and deep grounding in national interest, the type of partnership every President needs in turbulent times.

This is why calls, campaigns and whisperings aimed at undermining or isolating him must be resisted. Nigeria cannot afford to discourage its best-performing public servants, nor tighten the atmosphere for those who stand firmly for unity and national progress. The nation must learn to applaud where there is performance, support where there is loyalty, and encourage where there is commitment.

Hon. Bello Matawalle deserves commendation, not suspicion. Support — not sabotage. Encouragement, not exclusion from political strategy or power alignment due to narrow interests.

History does not forget those who stood when it mattered. Matawalle stands today for President Tinubu, for security, for loyalty, for national service. And in that place, he has earned a space not only in the present political equation, but in the future judgment of posterity.

Nigeria needs more leaders like him. And Nigeria must say so openly.

Adebayor Adetunji, PhD
A communication strategist and public commentator
Write from Akure, Ondo State, Nigeria

Continue Reading

Opinion

Drug Abuse Among People With Disabilities: The Hidden Crisis Nigeria Is Yet to Address

Published

on

 

By Abdulaziz Ibrahim

Statistically Invisible, Persons with Disabilities feel shut out of Nigeria’s drug abuse war as a report from Adamawa reveals lacks data and tailored support needed, forcing a vulnerable group to battle addiction alone.

In Adamawa State, the fight against drug abuse is gaining attention, but for many people living with disabilities (PWDs), their struggles remain largely unseen. A new report has uncovered deep gaps in support, treatment, and data tracking for PWDs battling addiction despite official claims of equal access.

For nearly three decades, Mallam Aliyu Hammawa, a visually impaired resident of Yola, navigated a world increasingly shrouded by drug dependency. He first encountered psychoactive substances through friends, and what began as casual use quickly escalated into long-term addiction.

“I used cannabis, tramadol, tablets, shooters everything I could get my hands on,” he recalled. “These drugs affected my behaviour and my relationship with the people close to me.”

Family members say his addiction changed him entirely. His friend, Hussaini Usman, described feeling “sad and worried” when he realized Aliyu had fallen into drug use.

Aliyu eventually made the decision to quit. It was marriage and the fear of hurting his wife that finally forced him to seek a new path. “Whenever I took the drugs, I felt normal. But my wife was confused about my behaviour,” he said. “I decided I had to stop before she discovered the full truth of what I was taking.”

A National Problem With Missing Data

Advert

Nigeria has one of the highest drug-use rates in West Africa, according to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). Over 14 million Nigerians between the ages of 15 and 64 use psychoactive substances. Yet, within that massive user base, PWDs are statistically invisible.

There is almost no national data on drug abuse among persons with disabilitiesa critical gap that experts warn makes it impossible to design effective, inclusive rehabilitation programmes.

Ibrahim Idris Kochifa, the Secretary of the Adamawa State Association of Persons with Physical Disability, told this reporter that PWDs face unique, systemic pressures that intensify their vulnerability to drug abuse, specifically citing poverty, unemployment, isolation, and social discrimination.

“Whenever a person with disability is caught with drugs, the common decision is to seize the drugs and let him go,” Kochifa said, speaking on behalf of the disabled community leadership. “But if they consult us, we have advice to offer on how they can be treated and rehabilitated. Without involving us, no programme will fully benefit people with disabilities.”

NDLEA Responds

At the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA) Command in Adamawa, officials insist their services are open to everyone without discrimination.

Mrs. Ibraham Nachafia, the Head of Media and Advocacy for the NDLEA Adamawa State Command, said during an interview, “Our rehabilitation centre is open to all. There is no discrimination. Anyone including persons with disabilities can access treatment.”

While the official position suggests inclusiveness, disability advocates call it “tokenistic.” They argue that equal access on paper does not translate to tailored support in practice. True rehabilitation for PWDs requires specialized counselling that understands their unique traumas, physically accessible facilities, and significantly stronger community engagement to prevent relapse.

A Call for More Inclusive Action

Advocates are now urging the Nigerian government and drug-control agencies to build a response framework that recognizes PWDs as a vulnerable group in need of targeted support.

The advocate Goodness Fedrick warns that until rehabilitation and prevention programmes reflect the realities faced by people with disabilities, Nigeria’s battle against drug abuse will remain incomplete.

For people like Aliyu Hammawa, who managed to recover without structured support, the message is clear: many others may not be as fortunate.

This story highlights the urgent need for inclusive, data-driven, and community-supported approaches in Nigeria’s fight against drug addiction. Until the nation sees and serves this ‘hidden crisis,’ its overall battle against addiction will continue to be fought with one hand tied behind its back.

Continue Reading

Trending