Connect with us

News

Gbajabiamila Sues ‘Fake’ Agency DG Adeyemi, Demands N15bn over Defamation

Published

on

 

By Yusuf Danjuma Yunusa

The Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila, has filed a N15 billion defamation suit against Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi Matthew at the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, over allegations that he demanded a 48 per cent kickback from a N27.3bn take-off grant approved for a federal agency.

In the suit, Gbajabiamila is seeking N10 bn in general damages, N5bn in aggravated damages, N200m as the cost of the action, and an order directing Matthew to publish a full retraction and apology in five national newspapers.

He is also asking the court to compel the defendant to pin the apology on all social media platforms and online channels where the alleged defamatory statements were published for 30 days.

The suit was filed by Gbajabiamila’s legal team from Pinheiro LP, led by Kemi Pinheiro, with Folu Oguntade, Olukayode Enitan and Chukwudi Enebeli, who described the allegations as false, malicious and defamatory.

According to the statement of claim, Matthew had alleged during a press conference that a dispute arose after Gbajabiamila purportedly demanded a 48 per cent kickback from the agency’s N27.3 bn take-off grant.

He also claimed that N400m had already been paid through a proxy allegedly acting for the Chief of Staff, while an additional N200m was required to secure presidential approvals.

However, Gbajabiamila denied ever meeting or communicating with Matthew or authorising anyone to act on his behalf.

“The claimant has never met the defendant, never held any meeting with him and has never authorised any intermediary, representative, agent or proxy to demand or receive money on his behalf,” the court filing stated.

The suit also referenced Adeyemi’s allegations concerning the death of one Babatunde Tanimola, whom he claimed acted as an intermediary between himself and the Chief of Staff.

Advert

Adeyemi alleged that Tanimola died in a hotel fire in Utako, Abuja, on October 22, 2025, a day after Gbajabiamila allegedly petitioned the police.

He further claimed he survived an assassination attempt along the Abuja-Kaduna Expressway in September 2025 and alleged that a “directive from above” instructed the Department of State Services and the Nigeria Police Force to discontinue efforts to recover his stolen mobile phones, which he said contained vital evidence.

Court documents revealed that Gbajabiamila’s solicitors issued a cease-and-desist letter dated July 6, 2026, which was published in THISDAY and other national newspapers on July 7, demanding an immediate retraction and apology.

Rather than withdraw the allegations, the claimant alleged that Adeyemi granted an interview to social media influencer VeryDarkMan, where he made admissions that contradicted his earlier claims.

According to Gbajabiamila’s witness statement on oath, Adeyemi admitted during the interview that he had never met the Chief of Staff in person, never held a video call with him, and had no independent means of verifying the identity of the individual he believed to be Gbajabiamila.

The claimant said Adeyemi further admitted that all communications were conducted through the late Tanimola.

Gbajabiamila also told the court that Adeyemi stated he could neither say the Chief of Staff was lying nor confirm that he was telling the truth, adding that he intended to submit his documents to law enforcement agencies for verification.

Despite those admissions, Gbajabiamila alleged that Adeyemi repeated the allegations during an appearance on Politics Today on Channels Television on July 13, 2026.

The court filings further disclosed that Adeyemi was already standing trial before the Federal High Court, Abuja, in Charge No. FHC/ABJ/CR/652/2026: Federal Republic of Nigeria v. Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi Matthew & others, over allegations involving forged presidential documents and forged appointment letters.

According to the claimant, those documents formed the basis of Matthew’s public allegations against him.

The FCT High Court has directed Adeyemi, whose address was listed as unknown but who is deemed to be within the court’s jurisdiction, to enter an appearance within 14 days after being served with the originating processes, failing which judgment may be entered against him in default.

In his witness statement, Gbajabiamila maintained that he had never met Matthew or had any personal, official or professional dealings with him.

He denied demanding any kickback, receiving N400m through a proxy, requesting an additional N200m, abusing his office, manipulating security agencies, intimidating media organisations or interfering with investigations involving the defendant.

He also denied instructing the Nigeria Police Force, DSS, Economic and Financial Crimes Commission Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission, or any other law enforcement agency to harass or investigate Matthew.

News

Atiku Abubakar Demands Inquiry into Suspicious Bank Alert

Published

on

 

By Yusuf Danjuma Yunusa

 

Atiku Abubakar, the 2027 presidential candidate of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), has raised concerns over an unsolicited credit alert to his private bank account, describing the transaction as a severe breach of financial privacy.

In a statement posted on X on Friday, Mr. Abubakar’s media aide, Phrank Shaibu, disclosed that the former Vice President received the funds from an unknown individual, with the payment narration reading “Contribution Electioneering Campaign.” Shaibu emphasized that neither Mr. Abubakar nor his campaign team solicited, authorized, or had any prior knowledge of the sender or the transaction.

Advert

The aide underscored the gravity of the incident by pointing out that the account involved is a strictly private one, the details of which are not in the public domain.

“This raises a fundamental question: How did unknown persons obtain the confidential banking details of a private citizen?” Shaibu queried.

While the credited amount could not independently be verified, Shaibu warned that the circumstances carry troubling implications for national security.

“If the private banking information of a former Vice President and a leading presidential candidate can be accessed and deployed for reasons yet unknown, then no Nigerian’s financial privacy is safe,” he stated.

Shaibu further expressed suspicion that the breach may have been facilitated by individuals with privileged access—a development he characterized as a grave abuse of power. Such exposure, he noted, could leave account holders vulnerable to kidnappers, terrorists, bandits, and fraudsters.

Consequently, Mr. Abubakar’s camp has placed the Nigerian public and security agencies on notice, citing this incident as the latest in a litany of suspicious occurrences ahead of next year’s general elections.

Continue Reading

News

Kano SUBEB: N1bn for 100 Classrooms But Not a Single Location Disclosed, Says Watchdog

Published

on

 

By Yusuf Danjuma Yunusa

A transparency advocacy group, Tracka, has raised serious concerns over the inability of the Kano State Universal Basic Education Board (SUBEB) to provide records showing where more than ₦1 billion reportedly spent on renovating 100 classrooms was actually executed.

According to Tracka’s findings from the Kano State 2025 Fourth Quarter Budget Implementation Report (BIR), over ₦1 billion was disbursed for the classroom renovation project. However, the organisation said the absence of specific project locations in the official report has rendered citizen oversight nearly impossible.

In a bid to obtain clarity, Tracka submitted a Freedom of Information (FOI) request to Kano SUBEB on May 19, 2026, seeking the names of contractors, specific project locations, and implementation statuses. The request was signed by Tracka State Officer, Maryam Usman, on behalf of the organisation’s Head, Joshua Osiyemi.

Advert

In a statement released to journalists, Tracka disclosed that rather than furnish the requested details, Kano SUBEB responded that it had no record of the locations where the renovations were carried out. The board reportedly directed the Tracka team to only one site – Jili Primary School in Rimin Gado Local Government Area – where repainting and repair works were confirmed to have been undertaken.

“The lack of specific location has made tracking very difficult,” Tracka stated. “We wrote an FOI to SUBEB Kano State Universal Basic Education Board in May 2026, but they responded saying they do not have a record of the locations where renovations have been done. The only school they directed us to was Jili Primary School, Rimin Gado, and we saw that repainting and repairs have been done at the school.”

Tracka further revealed that SUBEB referred the organisation to the Kano State Ministry of Education for information on the remaining project locations.

The advocacy group has now called on the Ministry of Education to urgently make public the full breakdown of the classroom renovation programme, including all project locations, contractor details, and complete expenditure records.

“We were directed to the Kano State Ministry of Education for information on the locations of this project. We implore the ministry to provide the public with the full breakdown of this project, including locations and spending,” the organisation added.

The development has reignited debates over budget implementation transparency in the state, particularly given that the reported sum – exceeding ₦1 billion for just 100 classrooms – averages roughly ₦10 million per classroom, a figure that Tracka suggests warrants thorough public scrutiny.

As of press time, the Kano State Ministry of Education had not issued an official response to Tracka’s demands.

Continue Reading

News

Tinubu’s Qualification Will Be Challenged in Court, Dalung Says

Published

on

 

 

By Yusuf Danjuma Yunusa

 

 

A chieftain of the African Democratic Congress, ADC, Solomon Dalung, has said he will institute a fresh legal challenge against President Bola Tinubu’s educational qualifications ahead of the 2027 general elections.

 

Mr Dalung, a former Minister of Youth and Sports Development, alleged that unresolved questions surrounding Tinubu’s qualifications remained the “greatest threat” to Nigeria’s democratic transition and vowed to challenge the President’s eligibility in court.

 

He made the remarks during a media briefing at his residence in Jos, Plateau State, where he also accused the All Progressives Congress, APC-led administration of weakening opposition parties and undermining Nigeria’s multiparty democracy.

 

According to him, the ruling party had intensified efforts to weaken the opposition by encouraging defections of elected officials.

Advert

 

“The political parties, who are actors in democracy, have also been destroyed. This attribute of destroying political parties started with the President buying governors to defect into his political party (APC). Thirty-one of them have gone there, yet he is still not certain of 2027,” Mr Dalung alleged.

 

He also accused the President’s Chief of Staff, Femi Gbajabiamila, of sponsoring litigation against opposition political parties to weaken them ahead of the next general election.

 

“The sponsor of all the litigation is Gbajabiamila; he should come out clean if he is denying it. The 2027 transition is under attack because democracy cannot exist with only one political party under a multiparty democracy constitutionally guaranteed,” he said.

 

Mr Dalung further alleged that President Tinubu was apprehensive about facing a united opposition because of what he described as unresolved issues surrounding the President’s educational qualifications.

 

“Tinubu is afraid of contesting election not because he didn’t want to contest, but because he is the most unqualified person to be nominated to contest election,” he said.

 

He claimed that legal challenges to Tinubu’s qualifications in 2023 failed because the Supreme Court held that the matter was a pre-election issue.

 

“And to the best of my knowledge, Tinubu has not gone to any school since 2023, so all the fake certificates that have been presented have not been remedied,” Mr Dalung alleged.

 

The former minister also made fresh allegations regarding Mr Tinubu’s educational records and National Youth Service Corps, NYSC, documentation, claiming they contained inconsistencies.

 

He insisted that the Constitution clearly stipulates the qualifications required to contest for the office of President and maintained that the ADC would seek judicial interpretation of Tinubu’s credentials as submitted to the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC.

 

“So the greatest threat to the transition is the qualification of Tinubu. We will go to court,” Mr Dalung declared.

Continue Reading

Trending