Connect with us

Opinion

Trump Threatens Nigeria: A Reckless Assault on Sovereignty

Published

on

President Donald Trump

 

By: Lamara Garba Azare

President Donald Trump’s threat to invade Nigeria over alleged “Christian killings” has sent tremors far beyond diplomatic corridors, revealing a dangerous double standard in global morality. While Washington threatens to brandish the sword in Nigeria, it remains silent or worse, actively complicit over Israeli attacks that have claimed thousands of Palestinian lives, including Christians.

Indeed, this selective outrage by the US is not just hypocrisy; it is a mirror reflecting the perilous dance of power, where might masquerades as right, and morality bends to political expedience.

Therefore, Trump’s words, bolstered by the U.S. House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee’s clearance for punitive steps, are more than empty rhetoric, instead, they are a reckless trumpet call that threatens the sanctity of national sovereignty.

To suggest that the United States could intervene “guns-a-blazing” in a country of over 200 million people is to treat a sovereign nation as if it were a playground for foreign experiments. Nigeria is no pawn, no weakling in need of salvation; it is a proud nation, steeped in history, culture, and resilience. It should be noted that the United Nations Charter is not a parchment of convenience, rather it is a covenant, declaring that no nation may trespass on another without cause or international mandate.

Perhaps, threatening Nigeria flagrantly disregards this moral compass and challenges the very order of the civilized world.

The hypocrisy on display is breathtaking. America professes outrage over alleged “Christian cleansing” in Nigeria while standing shoulder to shoulder with Israel in the bombardment of Palestinian lands, where civilians including men, women, children, and both Muslims as well as Christians have perished under the weight of unrelenting violence. Weapons, funding, and diplomatic shields flow freely, yet when confronted with the plight of ordinary Nigerians facing a web of insecurity, Washington brandishes moral judgment as a cudgel. The moral ledger is unbalanced, the scales tipped not by justice but by political convenience.

If true concern for human life guided America’s hand, it would speak with the same voice for Gaza, the West Bank, Sudan. Yemen, and beyond. Yet Nigeria, a nation grappling with Boko Haram insurgents, bandits, and extremist groups that have taken lives across religious and ethnic lines, becomes the stage for selective indignation. Christians and Muslims alike have bled; the land itself is a witness to centuries of struggle. Conflicts over land, resources, climate pressures, and governance failures intertwine to produce tragedies that cannot be reduced to a single, convenient narrative. To call this merely “Christian cleansing” is to see the world in black and white when it is painted in shades of complexity.

Advert

Congressman Chris Smith’s testimony, portraying Nigeria’s crisis as a one-sided religious assault, is a reminder of how stories can be twisted into weapons. Claims that militants act with impunity while the government turns a blind eye ignore ongoing efforts by Nigerian authorities, security agencies, and local communities striving to restore peace.

Oversimplification in the service of foreign political narratives is a sword that cuts both truth and trust, leaving Nigeria exposed to interference and destabilization.

It should be noted that sanctions and threats of military action will not heal wounds; rather, they will deepen them. They will shatter livelihoods, stoke fear, and empower the very extremists they purport to punish.

At the moment, Nigeria needs partners who build, not pawns who strike; guidance, not guns. Long-term collaboration, intelligence-sharing, and governance reforms are the true instruments of peace which are far more potent than the hollow clatter of foreign threats.

Therefore, President Trump’s words cross a red line drawn in the sand of history. Nigeria must rise to defend its sovereignty, calling on ECOWAS, the African Union, and global allies to repel threats cloaked in morality. No nation should be forced to bow to external whims, nor treated as a laboratory for foreign experiments. Pride, history, and destiny demand that Nigeria speak with one voice: sovereignty is non-negotiable.

African nations carry scars from centuries of external meddling from colonial plunder to post-independence interventions disguised as “humanitarian missions.”

Therefore, Nigeria, the giant of Africa, cannot permit the ghosts of history to dictate the present. To threaten invasion while excusing or supporting violence elsewhere is not merely hypocrisy it is moral decay, a reminder that power untempered by principle is a poison to civilization.

Certainly, the United States’ selective advocacy for human rights exposes a philosophical contradiction. Threatening military action in Nigeria under the guise of protecting Christians while remaining silent or complicit in the deaths of Palestinians, including Palestinian Christians, strips its moral authority of legitimacy. Israel’s campaigns in Gaza and the West Bank have claimed countless lives, yet Washington provides shield and sword in equal measure. To pivot that same moral outrage on Nigeria while ignoring these truths is not justice, but it is pretense.

There is no gain saying the fact that Nigeria’s challenges are formidable, but the solution lies within, not in the thunder of foreign boots. Threats, sanctions, and coercion are a windstorm that will uproot communities and spread chaos. What Nigeria needs are bridges of cooperation, pillars of support, and hands extended in partnership, not clenched fists in intimidation. To intervene is to ignite a fire; to assist wisely is to sow lasting peace.

Perhaps, to say the least, Trump’s threats should be seen as reckless and destabilizing, a dangerous echo of a time when force dictated morality and expediency eclipsed principle. In this case, Nigeria must assert its independence, protect its citizens, and insist on respect from foreign powers. Anything less would embolden aggression, invite instability, and send a chilling message across Africa: sovereignty is negotiable, and justice is selective.

The world cannot allow might to masquerade as right. It cannot permit the powerful to choose whose lives matter, whose cries merit attention, and whose suffering is ignored. Nigeria stands at a crossroads: it must defend its dignity, assert its sovereignty, and demand consistency in the moral universe. The time for courage, clarity, and unity is now, lest silence and hesitation embolden those who mistake power for virtue.

Lamara Garba Azare writes from Kano

Opinion

To DSS Boss: What Was Good for Ese Oruru Must Also Be Good for Walida Abdulhadi-Yushau A. Shuaibu

Published

on

 

By Yushau A. Shuaib

Among the current crop of Nigeria’s security chiefs, perhaps none is as widely respected for his professional record as the Director General of the Department of State Services (DSS), Adeola Oluwatosin Ajayi. Since his assumption of office, he has been celebrated as a quintessential officer—one who is neither a religious bigot nor an ethnocentric partisan. His track record in states like Bauchi and Kaduna reflects a man who understands the delicate fabric of our diverse society and has often supported Muslim communal activities with the same zeal he applies to national security.

It is precisely because of this high regard that I find myself profoundly bewildered. Why is it that this same leadership, credited with a commitment to due process, appears to be wavering in the face of a clear court order? I am referring to the case of Walida Abdulhadi Ibrahim, a young Muslim girl from Jigawa State, and the stalled prosecution of a DSS operative, Ifeanyi Onyewuenyi, accused of her abduction, sexual exploitation, and forced conversion to Christianity.

This disturbing saga echoes the 2015–2016 Ese Oruru case. The nation vividly remembers how a teenage girl from Bayelsa was taken to Kano by Yunusa Dahiru (popularly known as “Yellow”), where she was allegedly converted to Islam and impregnated. The public outcry at the time was overwhelming. The media, civil society, and the international community demanded swift justice.

The Bayelsa State Government under Governor Seriake Dickson intervened decisively — providing medical care, insisting on a thorough investigation, and ensuring prosecution. Yunusa Dahiru was eventually convicted and jailed. Ese Oruru received rehabilitation and later graduated from the University of Ilorin in flying colour

In my recent essay, “From Ese Oruru to Walida: Unmasking Selective Outrage,” I asked a rhetorical question that now feels prophetic: Would Walida’s case attract the same moral panic? Or would it be quietly buried because it doesn’t fit a convenient narrative of religious persecution? My fears are being validated by the day.

A coalition of civil society and faith-based organisations recently raised the alarm in Abuja, accusing the DSS of violating a subsisting court order directing the release of 16-year-old Walida to her family. They specifically named DSS officer Ifeanyi Onyewuenyi as central to the allegations and called for his prosecution should any culpability be established.

A petition filed by Gamji Lawchain paints a disturbing picture: a minor allegedly abducted two years ago, held in unlawful custody, and denied access to her parents. Her father maintains that the trauma of this ordeal contributed directly to the untimely death of Walida’s mother.

Advert

At the heart of the controversy is the DSS acting simultaneously as custodian and investigator — a clear conflict of interest. Compounding this is a suspicious dispute over her age. While the family insists she is 16, there are attempts to portray her as a 22-year-old adult. An independent, document-based verification of her age is essential. Anything less would undermine the integrity of our child‑protection laws.

Strangely, a group known as the Arewa Youth Assembly (AYA) has issued a “counter‑message,” claiming that she left home in 2023 and was taken by a woman called Maryam — later identified as Chinaza — who allegedly converted her to Christianity. The AYA leader, Salihu Danlami, further asserted that Walida underwent a mental evaluation and is “stable” and “happy” with her captor. Such claims overlook the well‑documented psychological phenomenon known as Stockholm Syndrome.

We have seen this before in the North-East; rescued Chibok and Dapchi girls have, at times, expressed a desire to return to their abusers after rescue from ISWAP/Boko Haram, exhibiting emotional bonds with their captors as a survival-driven coping mechanism. A girl who has been serially abused and impregnated outside of matrimony cannot be declared “mentally stable” by a youth group in a press conference. She requires clinical rehabilitation, not media interviews.

The DSS must comply fully with judicial directives concerning Walida’s custody and potential reunification with her family. A neutral, independent inquiry into the allegations against the DSS operative should be conducted. If found guilty, he must face the full weight of the law—just as Yunusa Dahiru did in the Ese Oruru case.

There must also be transparent verification of Walida’s age through credible documentation and independent scrutiny. NAPTIP should assume a leading role, given the child-protection and trafficking dimensions.

Equally, the Jigawa State Government under Governor Umar Namadi must not remain on the sidelines. A decade ago, Governor Seriake Dickson of Bayelsa did not treat Ese Oruru’s case as someone else’s burden. He intervened decisively and stood by the victim. Jigawa should do no less for Walida.

The media and the public must resist the urge to frame this matter in inflammatory religious terms. During the Ese Oruru case, northern traditional rulers and religious leaders were hastily accused of complicity. We must not repeat that mistake or allow this situation to be cast as a religious confrontation. Just as many argued in 2016 that Yunusa’s actions did not represent Islam, we must also acknowledge that the alleged actions of Onyewuenyi do not represent Christianity or the DSS.

We cannot afford another cycle of collective suspicion. Responsible communication — not sensationalism — must guide public discourse. This is not a religious contest. It is a child‑rights issue. Justice must never depend on religious identity.

If Nigeria is to remain a nation governed by law rather than sentiment, then institutions — especially the DSS — must uphold due process, transparency, and accountability. This case must follow the same standard of judicial openness and constitutional procedure that defined the high‑profile Ese Oruru investigation, which the police handled with commendable neutrality.

I therefore respectfully appeal to the Director‑General of the DSS to act swiftly, transparently, and in full fidelity to the rule of law. As a man of established integrity, he must ensure that justice is neither delayed nor distorted. Let it never be said that under his leadership, the law became a respecter of persons or uniforms.

In cases involving alleged child exploitation or forced conversion, justice delayed is justice questioned. Institutional integrity is measured not by rhetoric but by response.

What was good for Ese Oruru must, in the interest of fairness and equity, also be good for Walida.

Yushau A. Shuaib is the author of An Encounter with the Spymaster and can be reached via yashuaib@yashuaib.com.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Ahmad Gambo Saleh:Catalyst Of A Virtuous Judiciary

Published

on

 

By Ahmad Muhammad Danyaro

 

“All the rights secured to the citizens under the Constitution are worth nothing, and a mere bubble, except guaranteed to them by an independent and virtuous Judiciary|” Andrew Jackson.irria.

 

 

The judiciary in Nigeria, as established by Section 6 of the 1999 Constitution, is crucial for interpreting laws, defending the constitution, and enforcing the rule of law. It acts as an independent arbiter, protecting human rights, settling disputes between government branches and citizens, and ensuring democratic accountability through judicial review.

 

According to the words of Ronald Reagan, Former President of the United States of America, “the greatest leader is not necessarily the one who does greatest things .He is the one that gets the people to do the greatest things.”

 

Ahmed Gambo Saleh ,Esq, is one of the most accomplished judicial administrators in Nigeria recognized for his transformational leadership, technical expertise and unwavering commitment to judicial reforms in Nigeria.

 

Since 30th June, 2017 when Ahmed Gambo Saleh took over as Secretary of the National Judicial Council, he has become a leading voice in shaping the future of the nation’s judiciary.

 

The National Judicial Council is one of the Federal Executive Bodies created by virtue of Section 153 of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria in order to insulate the Judiciary from the whims and caprices of the Executive; hence guarantee the independence of this Arm of Government, which is a sine qua non for any democratic Government. The National Judicial Council was created and vested with enormous powers and functions of the erstwhile Advisory Judicial Committee (AJC) which it replaced.

Ahmed Gambo Saleh, Esq, was born on June 3, 1969, in Hadejia, Jigawa State. He is a seasoned legal administrator with over 20 years of experience, who previously served as the Chief Registrar of the Supreme Court of Nigeria. Saleh holds first and second degrees in Law from the Usman Danfodio University, Sokoto and Bayero University, Kano, respectively.

 

He worked briefly as a Private Legal Practitioner before joining the service of Jigawa State Ministry of Justice as a Senior State Counsel in 1998, where he rose to become Director of Legal Drafting in 2002.

 

Mr. Saleh was a one-time Chairman of the Nigerian Bar Association, Dutse Branch in 2008.

 

In the later part of 2008, he was appointed as a Special Assistant to Former Chief Justice of Nigeria, Hon .Justice Idris Legbo Kutigi ,GCON. Two years later, he was appointed the Deputy Director Litigation before his appointment as the 16th Chief Registrar of the Supreme Court of Nigeria.

Advert

 

It was during his tenure as the Chief Registrar that the process of Court Automation commenced, and the interviews of candidates who applied for the conferment of Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) were streamed live on the website of the Supreme Court, to enable members of the public to view and assess the suitability or otherwise of qualified candidates to forestall allegation of bias or preferential treatment.

 

Mr Saleh introduced technologies which enabled the Courtrooms to connect to a unified system that has a central repository for all audio/video of proceedings. This includes: the transcripts, audio/video recording of any hearing, appearances and courtroom proceedings.

 

He also installed in the court a device called the document camera with the capacity to display exhbits ,which can be viewed by judges, registrars and lawyers. This device converts a paper document camera or physical exhibit to an electronic image with the aim to enlarge or reduce the image.

 

Ahmed Gambo Saleh, LL.B, BL, LLM combines years in Management and Administrative experience. He is a member of several professional bodies and has served on quite a number of Judiciary Committees, among which are: Secretary, Legal Practitioners’ Privileges Committee; Chairman, Chief Registrars of Nigeria Forum; Chairman, Nigerian Bar Association, Dutse Branch; Member, Presidential Swearing-in Committee – 2015; Member, Judiciary Information Technology Policy Committee; Member, Federal Judiciary Tenders Board; Secretary, Jigawa State Shari’ah Implementation Committee, etc.

 

To put Saleh’s commendable feat into proper perspective, the Office of the Secretary he currently occupies is the pivot around which all the activities of the National Judicial Council revolve. It is the administrative office of the Council. The Office co-ordinates and supervises all activities of the Council including Council Meetings, disbursement and monitoring of funds. The success or failure of the Departments & Units in the Council depends on the Office. The Office liaises with other Arms of Government and Agencies to achieve the goals of the Council, among others.

 

As NJC Secretary, he oversees administrative functions of the judiciary, including serving as Secretary to the Legal Practitioners’ Privileges Committee.He continues to serve as a key administrative figure in the Nigerian judiciary.

 

Ahmed Gambo Saleh’s achievements as the Secretary of NJC are indelible and focused on areas characterized by technocratic, behind –the-secne reforms rather than high-profile public actions.

 

He is working assiduously to achieve the NJC’s set goals such as: an entrenched and preserved independent judiciary, a judiciary that is committed to the rule law, a financially autonomous judiciary, a proactive and vibrant judiciary that has judicial officers and staff with proven integrity and impeccable character, a dynamic judiciary manned by officers with various background, discipline, experience and competence and a judiciary that is information technology driven.

 

Humility is his defining character, Barrister Gambo Saleh is humble to a fault.God-fearing, gentle, peaceful, generous; yet unassuming and exceptionally intelligent. A natural leader and never pretentious. For anyone who knows Saleh, things are easily discernible about his character – humility, courage and a calm spirit.

 

As a scribe of NJC, an important arm of government –the judiciary – in the last nine years, it is on record that Gambo Saleh has brought new meaning to the position working diligently and honestly to enshrine a vibrant judiciary. To borrow from Greek writer Homer, “he is both a speaker of words of doers of deeds, benevolent and highly spirited.”

 

 

Danyaro is a Media and Public Affairs Specialist based in Abuja and can be reached via: @adanyaro202@gmail.com.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Waiya As An An Apostle Of Kano First-Kabo

Published

on

 

Hon (Amb) Ibrahim Abdullahi Waiya the Kano State Commissioner for Information and Internal Affairs, has clearly emerged as one of the most celebrated, outspoken, dynamic, and eloquent members of the cabinet of Abba Kabir Yusuf, not only within government circles but across Kano State. This perfectly aligns with the expectations many of us held at the time of his appointment two years ago. Given his background, experience, and unwavering commitment to the people, it was evident that he would bring something exceptional to governance.

What truly sets Waiya apart, however, is not just his competence, but the rare confidence and closeness he enjoys with the Governor. He stands as one of the most trusted allies of His Excellency, someone who understands the Governor’s vision deeply and communicates it with clarity, conviction, and loyalty. His ability to interpret, defend, and passionately project the policies and intentions of the administration reflects a strong working relationship built on trust and mutual respect. In many ways, he operates not just as a Commissioner, but as a central pillar in advancing and protecting the image and direction of the government.

Advert

With his activism roots, intellectual depth, and fearless loyalty, Waiya has positioned himself as a “super Commissioner”, a dependable voice and a strategic force within the cabinet. As the KANO FIRST agenda unfolds, one cannot ignore his role as one of its foremost drivers, standing firmly beside the Governor and reinforcing his vision at every level.

We pray that Almighty Allah continues to protect and guide him, strengthen his capacity, and elevate him to even greater heights in service. Ameen.
@highlight

Continue Reading

Trending