Connect with us

Opinion

The Proliferation of National ‘Honours’

Published

on

 

By: Amir Abdulazeez

If we can recall, on 7th October, 2015 a 19-year-old student, Hassan Mohammed Damagum sacrificed himself to save others from a suicide bomber who attempted to attack a mosque during the Subh (Dawn) prayer at Buhari Housing Estate in Yobe State.

Hassan had sensed that the individual standing next to him was a suicide bomber trying to kill people. The boy was said to have confronted the bomber which blew both of them off. Again, on 25th January 2017, Yakubu Fannami, another student from Borno State who was just in SS1 died a hero while preventing a suicide bomber from entering at the Darrusalam Science and Islamic Academy in Maiduguri. Fannami tackled the female suicide bomber, preventing her from reaching the mosque and detonating her explosives, thus saving the lives of many worshippers.

To the best of my research which may be inadequate, none of the two boys were publicly given a significant national recognition. The story of Nigeria is replete with the neglect of brave and heroic citizens who had sacrificed a lot and even laid down their lives to save others. Since 1999, Nigeria has always chosen to reward and honour many lazy elites who had contributed virtually nothing, but rather became huge beneficiaries of government patronage and corruption. Every President has made it a duty to dash out national honours to his choice elites in a manner one would do with his personal property.

In line with the routine tradition of his predecessors, President Bola Tinubu used the June 12, 2025 Democracy Day to confer over 100 national honourssome of them posthumously. As expected, many awardees are members of his administration and personalities very close to him. A section of the awardees list portrays a belated compensation package to a gang of Abacha victims, who actually need justice more than honour. While people like Prof. Humphrey Nwosu (CON), Prof. Wole Soyinka (GCON), Alhaji Balarabe Musa (CFR), Bishop Matthew Hassan Kukah (CON) and Femi Falana, SAN (CON) truly deserve their awards, it would have been wiser and more balanced to include people like Late Bashir Tofa (Abiolas NRC opponent), Late Abubakar Rimi and Magaji Abdullahi (two important SDP figures who miraculously delivered Kano, Tofas State to Abiola) and of course M.D. Yusufu, the presidential candidate of MDJ who was Abachas sole challenger in his bid to undemocratically transform to a civilian president, among others. Perhaps, they would be remembered by this or another President in the next set of awards, for at this rate, every political household name, dead or alive, may soon have a national honour in Nigeria by 2030.

What exactly is this national honour and who are those who deserve it? The honouring system was originally envisioned as a prestigious recognition of exceptional service to the nation and was formally established by the National Honours Act No. 5 of 1964 to inspire patriotism, reward merit and foster national unity. The structure of national honours, divided into two orders (Order of the Federal Republic and Order of the Niger) and eight ranks (GCFR, GCON, CFR, CON, OFR, OON, MFR, MON), was designed to reflect degrees of national impact. However, the systems proliferation and indiscriminate distribution have undermined these distinctions, often placing true heroes, statesmen and national icons equal or below some presidential sycophants, political loyalists and officeholders, regardless of their performance or public standing.

The early years of Nigeria’s national honours system reflected its original purpose. Recipients such as Dr. Nnamdi Azikiwe, Sir Ahmadu Bello, Chief Obafemi Awolowo and Mrs. Funmilayo Ransome-Kuti were honoured for verifiable and transformative contributions.

Advert

However, over time, the politicization and personalization of the awards diminished its integrity, giving way to an annual ritual often characterised by hundreds of questionable awardees whose contributions to the nation are neither tangible nor verifiable. In the past 15 years, things have gotten worse as the selection system itself have been incompetently reduced to a mechanism marred by political patronage, duplication and credibility crises.

Today, the integrity of this noble initiative is in serious jeopardy, with widespread skepticism about its selection process and relevance. Ideally, recipients should be individuals whose lives exemplify ethical integrity, measurable public impact and selfless service. However, the current trend favours tenure over achievement and proximity to power over merit. Politicians under corruption investigation, individuals with no tangible contributions and business moguls with opaque wealth have all made their way into the honours roll.

Prominent Nigerians have rejected national honours in protest. Chinua Achebe, Gani Fawehinmi and Wole Soyinka famously turned down honours in the past, citing corruption, misgovernance and the lack of transparency in the process. Their principled refusals sent powerful messages about the need to restore the credibility of the system. As Achebe aptly put it, ‘a government that fails its people cannot in good conscience bestow honours’.

Numerous scandals have exposed the flaws of the system. In 2022, the conferment of awards to serving ministers during a prolonged ASUU strike and the inclusion of people accused of corruption represented a new low. Even more embarrassing were administrative blunders such as conferring posthumous awards to please certain intersts and duplication of awards to the same person under different titles. Meanwhile, countless unsung heroes remain ignored.

Rural teachers shaping future generations, healthcare workers battling epidemics without protection and community leaders mediating conflicts receive no recognition.

Some few non-elitist Nigerians have been reluctantly recognized by the establishment in the past. The belated honour to Dr. Ameyo Stella Adadevoh (posthumous OON, 2022), whose sacrifice averted an Ebola catastrophe in August, 2014, only came after sustained public pressure for about eight years. In August, 2018, then President Muhammadu Buhari and the United States Embassy honoured the Bauchi State-born 83-year old Malam Abubakar Abdullahi, a Muslim Imam in a village in Plateau State. He sheltered and fed 300 Christians for five days to prevent them from being killed in an uprising. The old man ran from one corner to the other stopping youths who wanted to break into the mosque to get hold of his guests.

Eventually, they gave up after realizing that the only way to execute their evil plan was to kill the old man. That was how he saved their lives. I am not sure whether the man was given any national honour beyond that presidential acknowledgement.

If we are to continue like this, I will suggest the renaming of the awards to Special Presidential Honours. The National Honours Act, last revised in 2004, offers the President near-total discretion, with little room for public input or institutional checks. With time, it has been turned to a presidential farewell affair as outgoing Presidents routinely populate honours lists upon leaving office to payback loyalists. Recent attempts at reform, such as the proposed National Honours and Merit Award Commission, represent a step forward but are insufficient on their own. Far-reaching legislative and administrative reforms are needed to restore the honours integrity. This includes public nominations, independent vetting panels, open selection criteria and mandatory justification of award decisions.

A critical reform must also introduce public objections and transparency mechanisms, such as publishing nominee shortlists and designing revocation protocols. Honours should be rescinded from individuals found guilty of crimes or misconduct post-conferment. The system should no longer shield disgraced figures or treat national honours as irrevocable symbols of status regardless of later behaviour. Furthermore, awards should be capped annually to preserve their exclusivity. Honouring fewer, more deserving Nigerians will increase the prestige of the titles and prevent undeserving awards Most importantly, the honours system must reconnect with the grassroots. By recognising farmers, nurses, teachers, inventors and humanitarian workers, Nigeria can turn the system into a true tool of national inspiration.

All these are by the way as ordinary Nigerians no longer care about leaders honouring themselves and their cronies. No impoverished Nigerian has the luxury of waiting to be honoured by someone whose honour is questionable himself. All Nigerians are asking for is guaranteed security to farm, stable power supply to produce, quality and affordable education to learn, reliable healthcare to survive and stable economy to thrive. When they can provide this, they can go on naming and renaming national monuments after their wives and continue with the vicious cycle of self-glorification in the name of national honours.

Twitter: @AmirAbdulazeez

Opinion

Tears For Our Youth-Inuwa Waya

Published

on

 

 

BY
INUWA WAYA

“You are the leaders of tomorrow”. “You are the future generation”. “ You are our hope”. “We are planning for your tomorrow”. These are the phrases society relied upon to give hope and aspirations to our youth. Being an aggregate of people living together, this article chooses the word “Society” as opposed to government or community which are narrow in scope.

What is being discussed herein affect everyone and everything. Willy nilly, the youth are the future leaders. The issues to consider are the type of society they would lead, the level of their preparedness and what levers the society is using to prepare them for leadership. The term “youth” generally refers to the period between childhood and adulthood,its exact age range can vary depending on the context. The United Nations and the World Health Organisation put the age range between 18 to 24, while the African charter defined it between 18 to 35.

Clearly from the age brackets, the youth are the most productive class of any society. The way and manner the society treats these productive class is therefore of utmost interest to us. Ditto for the youth’s understanding of their role as first class materials in any society. From the way they conduct their affairs , the Nigerian youth it appears do not appropriate their importance.

They are weak, vulnerable and debased with very little sympathy and empathy. This class of otherwise proud people had embarked on a misadventure that would if care is not taken, destroy them for good. It is only a fraction of them that understood the purpose of their existence and are determined to make the best Use of it.
In the current dispensation, the youth’s involvement in political activities leaves much to be desired. They virtually contribute nothing in terms of political development. They are used as political hirelings and online mercenaries. They specialised in verbal attacks and acts of political thuggery. They lacked the initiative to establish a grassroots based political movement that would transform into a political party in order to wrestle power from the hands of the old brigade. The way their peers in other parts of the World liberated themselves. In their flock, our youth have shown appetite in acquiring wealth and depicting an ostentatious lifestyle. Acting as buffoons and nincompoops, they hardly surprise anybody whenever they act without civility and respect. Instead of focusing on productivity and securing their future, our youth had adopted a deviant behaviour. They resorted to taking drugs and other type of narcotics. 80% of the patients at the NDLEA rehabilitation centres and those in the psychiatric hospitals around the Country are youth receiving treatments for drugs and substance addiction. This particular problem is an epidemic of alarming proportion that is destroying the lives of our youth. The influence of drugs leads to all vices including the commission of crimes. From misdemeanours to capital offences, the number of our youth as inmates in various Correctional facilities in the Country are very troubling. From petty thieves and common criminals, many of them came out from the correctional facilities to become hardened criminals and fraudsters, thereby making their incarceration counterproductive.

Perhaps the major area where our tears must drop for our youth relates to their search for greener pasture in foreign Countries. Nigerian youth are scattered in the Middle East, Asia, Europe and the United States of America. A significant number of them, however, ended up in various prisons. The offences for which Nigerian youth are convicted in foreign lands are, drug-related offences, robbery, murder, wired fraud, identity theft, computer fraud, romance scam, fraudulent claims, email compromise, domestic violence and violence related to cultists activities. In most cases, our youth are deported upon completion of their prison terms. In recent months, substantial number of ex- convicts were deported from the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, India, United kingdom and United States of America to mention but a few. Almost all the deportees were brought to their mother land in a depressive condition having suffered indignities at the deportation camps. Apart from the toll such takes on the life of those affected, there is an enormous amount of damage that is caused to the green passport at the International arena. It was on account of the way our youth behaved abroad, that Nigerians are subjected to embarrassing searches and rigorous scrutiny at the International airports. It is also because of their behaviour that foreign investors are wary of coming to explore the Nigerian market.

Advert

Direct foreign investment may become elusive if such criminal practices continue unabated. The exportation of crime to foreign countries tragically effected the position of our Country among the committee of Nations. It is because of that diminished status that many Countries refused to give entry visas to Nigerians. Innocent people who have genuine businesses abroad are prevented because of the cruel attitude of some Nigerians. There is no amount of plea or representation that would change the attitude any Country regarding entry visa to Nigerians, unless those responsible for these crimes repent. Based on the aforementioned, the task before the society is gigantic. First in preparing the youth for leadership and second in making them understand their pivotal role in the overall development of the society. The Federal, states and local governments should create the necessary synergy. They must review their policies especially as it affects the youth. Government should note that our youth have nowhere to call home but Nigeria. Its only in this Country they can enjoy rights and privileges. The global economic meltdown is forcing Countries to turn their back on foreigners. The United States had embarked on massive deportation of undocumented immigrants. They have introduced strict visa requirements to discourage economic migrants and students who may want to do a part-time job while studying in the US. The United Kingdom had equally carried out mass deportation and would soon introduce tougher visa rules. Generally in Europe, the nationalist parties are gaining popularity on daily basis because of their uncompromising stand on immigration. More than ever before, Nigerian governments at all levels must create wealth and distribute it evenly to assist our youth . Policies that would enhance job opportunities must be put in place as a matter of urgency. The current arrangements to tackle youth unemployment should be reviewed and fresh ideas injected. Commercial Banks should be brought in to handle all aspects of youth empowerment through loans for small scale and medium enterprises. The involvement of Banks would bring professionalism and ensure that appropriate mechanisms are put in place for judicious disbursement and repayment of these loans. Through the coordination of the three tiers of government, vast agricultural land should be carved out and allocated to our youth who are interested in farming. The Bank of agriculture should shortlist prospective applicants for loans, while its administration and disbursement should be handled by commercial Banks. Government should fully fund our universities and polytechnics and fast-track the development of science and technology. In order to fully engage our youth in education and scholarship, the government should declare a state of emergency on education by introducing free education in all government tertiary institutions for the next 10 years. That will enable qualified students from poor families to benefit from that intervention. The fight against drug abuse and trafficking must be vigorously pursued to save our youth from destruction. we must appreciate the efforts of the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA) for their doggedness in combating drug-related offences. In addition to fighting internal crimes, the law enforcement agencies must continue to fight crimes that bring shame and embarrassment to our nation. Here, we must salute the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) for its fight against the so-called “yahoo boys”. All other crimes such as banditry, kidnapping, murder, armed robbery, fraud and the rest of them must be completely eradicated by our security agencies. The Nigerian Correctional Services must be reformed to make it truly correctional and reformatory, such that inmates who are convicted on minor offences should not be release as hardened criminals. The administration of criminal justice must address the menace of prison congestion especially as it relates to the awaiting trial mates many of who spent years awaiting trail. Justice delayed is justice denied.

In conclusion and in as much as we implore the society to rescue our youth from the road to perdition, the bulk of the work lies with them. They must wake up from slumber and eject themselves from mental slavery. They must understand that their future is at stake. It is their responsibility to shape their destiny. It is time to have an attitudinal change. It is time for soul-searching. what they do today would make or mar
their future and by extension, the future of the society. All we require our youth to do is to be patriotic, to be obedient to the constituted authority and to participate in the political process by championing accountability and governance. Period.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Guardians of Tradition: Why Gidan Rumfa Casts Out the Disloyal in Defence of the Throne

Published

on

Kofar Kudu gate of Kano Emirs Palace

 

By Abdulkadir Aliyu Shehu

The ancient city of Kano, a cradle of Islamic civilisation and one of the oldest surviving traditional emirates in sub-Saharan Africa, has once again demonstrated the enduring strength of its cultural institutions. With the reinstatement of His Highness Malam Muhammadu Sanusi II as the 16th Emir of Kano, a necessary purge of disloyal palace servants has taken place rooted not in politics, but in sacred custom and historical continuity.

Galadiman Sallama, Sarkin Yakin Danrimi, and Sarkin Tafarki, as well as several others whose refusal to pay “Mubayi’a “the traditional pledge of allegiance placed them in direct contradiction to centuries of palace protocol, were among those recently required to vacate the Emir’s palace, Gidan Rumfa.

Gidan Rumfa, established circa 1480 by Sultan Muhammadu Rumfa, is not merely a residence; it embodies Kano’s royal heritage. Serving as the heart of the Emirate’s political, spiritual, and judicial authority, it has historically been home only to those who recognise and serve the sitting Emir with complete loyalty.

The structure of Kano’s traditional institution is deeply hierarchical and meticulously organised. Titleholders known as masu sarauta are assigned roles that reflect the Emir’s trust and the Emirate’s values. These roles are more than titles; they are historical obligations passed down across dynasties. Loyalty is not symbolic it is operational and functional.

The Mubayi’a a rite dating back to the 14th century is more than a handshake or public appearance. It is a solemn vow rooted in Islamic and traditional authority, echoing bay’ah practices seen throughout Islamic dynasties. Without it, no palace official is recognised, and their residence in Gidan Rumfa is considered both illegitimate and sacrilegious.

In this context, the refusal of the aforementioned palace titleholders to pay Mubayi’a to Emir Muhammadu Sanusi II is a violation not just of tradition, but of spiritual and constitutional legitimacy. By instead offering allegiance to the deposed Emir Aminu Ado Bayero whose removal was duly executed through legislative and executive authority these individuals chose to defy the very institution they once served.

Historical precedent supports this outcome. When Emir Muhammadu Tukur was dethroned in 1893, several chiefs who remained loyal to him were removed from office and banished from the palace under the new Emir Aliyu Babba. Similarly, during the colonial transition and reorganisation of native authorities in the early 20th century, allegiance to the colonial-approved Emir became a requirement for continued service in Gidan Rumfa.

The recent exit of these servants, therefore, is not new it is a continuation of a long-standing principle: the palace belongs to the Emir, and those who reside within must recognise no other master.

Advert

What intensifies the matter is that some of these individuals were allegedly involved in the disturbance that occurred at the palace gates during the illegal visit of the deposed Emir, in what many described as an attempted forceful entry. This act was not only provocative but also placed the lives of palace guards and loyalists at risk, further justifying their dismissal.

The Kano State Government, under the leadership of Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf, reaffirmed its constitutional right to restructure the traditional institution. This was executed through a lawful repeal of the Kano Emirates Law (2019), which had fragmented the historical Emirate. With the reconstitution of a unified Kano Emirate and the return of Sanusi II, allegiance became the only path to continuity for palace officials.

The implications of refusing allegiance go beyond symbolic defiance. It erodes the moral fabric of the Emirate, challenges lawful authority, and introduces political instability into a sacred institution. It is for this reason that elders, historians, and Islamic scholars across Northern Nigeria have voiced support for the cleansing of the palace.

The late Alhaji Ado Bayero, father of the deposed Emir, upheld this very principle during his reign. Several disloyal aides who failed to recognise his authority upon his appointment in 1963 were stripped of their titles. Loyalty was not only expected it was enforced.

Therefore, the removal of Galadiman Sallama, Sarkin Yakin Danrimi, and Sarkin Tafarki is neither revenge nor political intimidation. It is a return to principle, a restoration of discipline, and a reaffirmation of the Emirate’s spiritual purity.

Many in Kano have applauded this action, describing it as necessary to protect Gidan Rumfa from betrayal have rallied behind Emir Sanusi II, asserting that those who undermine him are, by extension, undermining the very dignity of Kano.

The Emir, known for his intellect, humility, and justice, has resumed his duties with grace and poise. Traditional court sessions have returned to the palace, and emissaries from across the country have begun to restore ties severed during the turbulence of the past four years.

Meanwhile, the Emirate Council has opened the door for appointments to fill the vacated positions. It is expected that loyal, educated, and culturally grounded individuals will be considered those who understand the weight of serving the throne.

Calls have also grown louder for the Federal Government and political elites to respect Kano’s sovereignty and allow its traditional institutions to function without manipulation or interference. “Let Kano breathe,” has become a rallying cry, echoing from the palace to the streets.

This moment in Kano’s history is more than an administrative adjustment it is a cultural reset. It reasserts the supremacy of tradition over personal ambition, and of legitimacy over factional loyalty.

The legacy of Kano’s traditional leadership rests on an unbroken chain of loyalty, stretching from the era of Bagauda in the 10th century to the modern era. That chain must not be weakened by disloyalty, opportunism, or political convenience.

The events of the past weeks show clearly: Gidan Rumfa is not a place for divided loyalty. It is the fortress of tradition, guarded by those who see service to the Emir as service to the people, history, and God.

In preserving the sanctity of the palace, Emir Sanusi II has demonstrated statesmanship, patience, and a deep understanding of his forebears’ vision. The Emirate he leads is not built on transient power, but on values that have stood the test of time.

In conclusion, the removal of the disloyal palace servants is a testament to the strength of tradition in Kano a tradition that refuses to bend to politics, fear, or faction. As the Emirate restores its rhythm under a revered and legitimate monarch, the people of Kano look forward with hope, unity, and renewed trust in their heritage.

May Gidan Rumfa continue to flourish as the beacon of justice, wisdom, and unwavering loyalty.

Abdulkadir Aliyu Shehu is a journalist and public commentator, and writes from Gombe and can be reached via danfodio247@gmail.com.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Waiya’s Transformative Impact On Kano’s Public Image

Published

on

 

By Umar Danliti

Since taking over as the Commissioner for Information in Kano State, Ibrahim Waiya has been on a mission to redefine the way the government interacts with the public. With a background as an activist, Waiya brings a unique perspective to the role.

Replacing Baba Halilu Dantiye, Waiya has wasted no time in implementing his vision for a more open and responsive government. His approach has been met with enthusiasm from both government officials and the general public.

One of Waiya’s key strategies has been to foster good working relationships with the media and other stakeholders. He believes that building trust and credibility is essential for effective governance.

Under Waiya’s leadership, the Ministry of Information has become more proactive in engaging with the public. The commissioner has made himself available to the press, providing timely and accurate information on government policies and initiatives.

Waiya’s experience as an activist has given him a deep understanding of the importance of public relations. He has leveraged this expertise to generate positive publicity for the state, highlighting its achievements and potential.

The results of Waiya’s efforts are already becoming apparent. The government’s image has begun to shift, with many Nigerians now viewing Kano State as a hub of progress and innovation.

Waiya’s approach is not limited to just spin doctoring; he is committed to ensuring that government policies and programs are people-centered. He believes that effective communication is key to building trust and support for government initiatives.

Advert

By engaging directly with the public, Waiya has been able to gauge their concerns and feedback. This information is being used to inform policy decisions, making government more responsive to the needs of the people.

One of the key challenges facing Waiya is managing the government’s online presence. He has taken steps to revamp the ministry’s social media platforms, ensuring that they are used effectively to engage with the public.

Waiya’s team has also been working to improve the government’s crisis communication strategy. By being proactive and transparent, they aim to minimize the impact of any potential crises on the government’s reputation.

The commissioner has also been working closely with other government agencies to ensure that their messages are consistent and effective. This coordination has helped to project a unified image of the government.

Under Waiya’s leadership, the Ministry of Information has become a hub of creativity and innovation. The commissioner encourages his team to think outside the box and come up with new ideas for engaging with the public.

Waiya’s vision for the ministry extends beyond just government publicity. He believes that the ministry should also play a role in promoting Kano State’s rich cultural heritage and tourism potential.

To achieve this, Waiya has been working with local artists, musicians, and other creatives to showcase the state’s unique identity. This initiative has helped to promote a sense of pride and ownership among the people.

The dividends of Waiya’s approach are already being felt. The government’s approval ratings have improved, and there is a growing sense of optimism about the state’s future.

Waiya’s commitment to transparency and accountability has also helped to build trust between the government and the people. Citizens are now more confident in the government’s ability to deliver on its promises.

As a seasoned activist, Waiya is well aware of the power of social media. He has used this knowledge to engage with the public and promote government initiatives.

The commissioner’s team has also been working to improve the government’s offline engagement with the public. Town hall meetings and other public forums have been organized to provide citizens with a platform to air their views.

Waiya’s leadership style is characterized by his willingness to listen and adapt. He is open to feedback and willing to make changes when necessary.

As Kano State looks to the future, it is clear that Ibrahim Waiya’s appointment as Commissioner for Information has been a game-changer. His unique approach and commitment to public relations have set a new standard for government communication in the state. With Waiya at the helm, the prospects for greater Kano look brighter than ever.

Umar Liti, is a concern Kano citizen, and can be reached at umarliti@yahoo.com

Continue Reading

Trending