Connect with us

Opinion

The Unifier Perspective: Unifier Project Formally Contests the Evidentiary Basis of Amnesty International’s Claims Regarding the May 5 Kano Incident

Published

on

Amnesty International Logo

 

Issued by the Unifier Project, Kano State

May 7, 2026

The Unifier Project, a strategic grassroots coordination and civic engagement initiative with operational structures across all 44 Local Government Areas of Kano State, has formally and comprehensively contested the evidentiary basis, the methodological framework, and the investigative rigour of the claims recently circulated by Amnesty International regarding the unfortunate events of May 5, 2026. In a statement issued from its State Secretariat in Kano, the organisation expressed serious concern about what it characterises as a pattern of premature conclusion-drawing that privileges the velocity of digital content circulation over the deliberate, community-engaged, and forensically grounded verification processes that responsible human rights documentation demands.

The Unifier Project wishes to state unequivocally that its position in this matter is not one of reflexive institutional defensiveness or partisan political alignment. It is a principled insistence on the application of the same evidentiary standards, the same contextual rigour, and the same methodological discipline that credible human rights advocacy demands of the governments and institutions it monitors. The organisation stands firmly for truth, due process, and the protection of community peace, and it is precisely those values that compel it to challenge characterisations of the May 5 incident that, in its assessment, rely disproportionately on fragmented viral content and speculative interpretive frameworks rather than verified, independently corroborated, and contextually grounded investigative evidence.

The incident of May 5, 2026, as assessed by local security institutions, community stakeholders, and civil society organisations with direct knowledge of the affected communities, involved individuals and groups with longstanding criminal histories, territorial disputes, and inter-factional rivalries whose origins significantly predate the current administration and whose dynamics are embedded in the specific social and geographic conditions of the communities in which they operate. The Unifier Project maintains that any credible and responsible investigation of events in these communities must engage substantively with this documented local context before advancing conclusions about political motivation, institutional complicity, or state-level orchestration. To assign political causation to events whose most proximate and most documented explanation is criminal confrontation, in the absence of forensic evidence establishing direct operational linkages between political decision-making and the conduct alleged, is to substitute analytical convenience for investigative integrity.

The organisation draws particular attention to the documented policy commitments of the Kano State Government as a body of institutional evidence that any serious investigative framework is obligated to engage with rather than treat as irrelevant background. The administration has pursued a structured, programmatically defined, and resource-backed approach to addressing youth restiveness and street violence through the Safe Corridor initiative, a rehabilitative framework explicitly designed to create pathways for the social reintegration, vocational empowerment, and psychosocial recovery of vulnerable young people previously associated with organised criminality and street violence. The internal coherence of any allegation of state-sponsored violence must be evaluated against the totality of a government’s documented institutional behaviour. An administration that has invested public resources, political capital, and programmatic infrastructure in a deescalation framework of this scope cannot credibly be implicated, without compelling forensic evidence, in the simultaneous engineering of the very instability that its own institutional architecture is demonstrably designed to eliminate.

The Unifier Project also draws attention to the broader governance context within which the events of May 5, 2026, must be situated. The Kano State Government is currently implementing its most ambitious development budget in the state’s recorded history, a N1.477 trillion appropriation for 2026 with 68 percent directed at capital expenditure spanning education, infrastructure, healthcare, and social protection. It has invested over N800 million in youth empowerment programmes benefiting more than 5,300 young people across the state, disbursed over N334 million directly to 6,680 women entrepreneurs across all 44 local government areas, and deployed 2,000 trained Neighbourhood Watch operatives as a community-centred security intervention explicitly designed to reduce violent confrontations and strengthen civilian-security cooperation at the grassroots level. These are not abstract policy commitments. They are documented, verifiable, and independently assessable institutional actions that constitute the operational context within which any characterisation of this administration’s relationship to violence and instability must be rigorously evaluated.

Advert

With respect to the methodological concerns that this incident raises for the broader practice of international human rights monitoring, the Unifier Project wishes to articulate clearly the evidentiary standards that it considers non-negotiable for any responsible investigative conclusion regarding events of this nature. These include credible forensic evidence establishing verifiable operational linkages between institutional decision-making authority and the specific conduct alleged, verified intelligence assessments from recognised and accountable security structures with direct knowledge of the affected communities, a demonstrated and documented understanding of the longstanding rivalries, territorial histories, and criminal network dynamics operating among youth groups in the specific localities concerned, and independent on-the-ground verification processes that meaningfully engage traditional authorities, community leaders, civil society organisations, and relevant law enforcement institutions before conclusions are formed and publicly disseminated. Without these foundational standards, investigative outputs risk functioning not as instruments of accountability but as mechanisms of institutional narrative-building that may, whether intentionally or otherwise, distort rather than illuminate the complex realities they purport to document.

The organisation further notes that the long-term credibility and institutional authority of global human rights bodies depend critically on the perceived consistency, proportionality, and methodological evenhandedness of their monitoring activities across different regions, different administrations, and different categories of political actor. Investigative patterns that appear to apply differential evidentiary thresholds or differential levels of scrutiny to different communities generate, among those communities, a perception of selective activism that is difficult to distinguish from politically motivated monitoring, and that ultimately undermines the culture of civic accountability that responsible human rights organisations exist to strengthen rather than selectively deploy. The Unifier Project does not raise this concern to deflect legitimate scrutiny. It raises it because the integrity of international human rights advocacy as a global public good depends on its practitioners holding themselves to the same standards of evidence, consistency, and contextual honesty that they demand of others.

Kano State is a community in active, measurable, and documented transformation. Its urban renewal programmes, governance reforms, public sector modernisation initiatives, and community stabilisation efforts represent a sustained and verifiable commitment to building a safer, more inclusive, and more prosperous society for its more than 20 million residents. The Unifier Project, with its operational presence across all 44 Local Government Areas and its direct engagement with ward-level civic structures throughout the state, is positioned to affirm, from direct community knowledge, that this transformation is real, that it is generating tangible improvements in the daily lives of ordinary citizens, and that it deserves to be assessed on the basis of its documented outcomes rather than characterised through the lens of allegations that remain forensically unsubstantiated and contextually inadequate.

The Unifier Project reaffirms its commitment to civic accountability, community protection, and the defence of due process as foundational values of democratic governance. It respectfully but firmly urges Amnesty International to engage in a more collaborative, locally informed, and forensically rigorous investigative process, one that prioritises direct engagement with community stakeholders, traditional authorities, security institutions, and civil society actors with verifiable local knowledge, before issuing globally amplified conclusions whose reputational, political, and institutional consequences for the communities concerned are significant and lasting. Allegations of the gravity advanced in this instance should carry only one weight, the weight of independently verified, contextually grounded, and forensically corroborated evidence. The Unifier Project will continue to discharge its responsibility to the people of Kano State by ensuring that the state’s story is told with the accuracy, the balance, and the contextual integrity that its communities deserve.

About the Unifier Project: The Unifier Project is a strategic grassroots coordination and civic engagement initiative committed to community mobilisation, administrative transparency, civic participation, and the strengthening of socio-political unity across Kano State. With operational structures spanning all 44 Local Government Areas and active engagement at ward and polling unit levels throughout the state, the organisation serves as a community-anchored platform for informed civic advocacy, responsible public discourse, and the protection of Kano’s social and institutional integrity.

Signed:

Unifier Project, Kano State

Media and Strategic Communications Unit

May 7, 2026

Opinion

The missing commissioner :Unraveling The Controversy Behind The Arewa Media Summit

Published

on

 

 

By Shariff Aminu Ahlan

It is outrageous, disturbing, unimaginable, undeserved, and simply difficult to comprehend how such a high-profile and well-attended event, organized to celebrate media excellence and promote discussions on strengthening media platforms that advance the Northern agenda, could deliberately exclude the Commissioner for Information of the host state, a man widely acknowledged as one of the most competent and outstanding Information Commissioners in Northern Nigeria.

The wave of criticism that followed the event was massive and centered on several noticeable shortcomings, including poor coordination, misplaced priorities, organizational lapses, and a lack of professionalism. However, the most ironic aspect of the entire event was the deliberate exclusion of the State Commissioner for Information.

As the summit was organized under the leadership of the Senior Special Assistant to the President on Media, the apparent lapses and alleged collaboration with disgruntled elements pursuing hidden agendas ultimately diminished what should have been a historic gathering. Despite the presence of governor, commissioners of information from various states, media practitioners, academics, and other distinguished personalities, the event failed to make the impact many had anticipated.

Advert

To be fair, the organizers made considerable efforts to ensure the summit achieved its objectives. The discussions focused on Northern Nigeria and explored practical ways through which the media could contribute to the region’s development by promoting constructive narratives, intellectual engagement, and effective information dissemination.

Unfortunately, avoidable organizational shortcomings prevented the event from fully meeting expectations. More importantly, the exclusion of the host state’s Commissioner for Information became one of the most talked-about controversies surrounding the summit.

Had the organizers involved the Commissioner from the planning stage, his vast experience, administrative competence, and institutional knowledge could have significantly improved the coordination of the event. His contributions might have transformed the summit into a model gathering and eliminated many of the shortcomings that attracted widespread criticism.

Ironically, those blaming the Commissioner for his absence are not being fair. Such accusations only strengthen the belief that certain individuals are pursuing a carefully orchestrated agenda aimed at discrediting him. According to available information, the Commissioner was not invited to an event held within his own official domain. In keeping with professional ethics and protocol, he chose not to attend an event from which he had been deliberately excluded. The consequences of that decision. and of the organizers’ actions, were evident for everyone to see.

As for those working tirelessly to push the Commissioner into political irrelevance, they should understand that their alleged campaign has become increasingly obvious. More importantly, the Governor has continued to demonstrate confidence in him. Beyond that, the Commissioner has continued to receive recognition and commendation for his dedication, professionalism, and unwavering commitment to the responsibilities entrusted to him.

History has repeatedly shown that competence, professionalism, and integrity ultimately outlast conspiracy, manipulation, and political scheming.

Shariff Aminu Ahlan
APC Intellectual Warrior
Realahlan0101@gmail.com

Continue Reading

Opinion

eHealth Bill: How DSP Barau, the Digital Senator, is Driving Nigeria’s Health Tech Future

Published

on

 

By Abba Anwar

Only advanced minds and globally exposed political leaders can think of the necessity and relevance of E-Health regulatory framework in the nation’s healthcare system.

The National E-Health Bill, 2026, presented to the Senate plenary session some weeks back, by His Excellency the Deputy Senate President, Barau I Jibrin, CFR, PhD, is a clear testimony that, this Distinguished Senator knows the right button to press when it comes to compliance with the global practice in the healthcare sector.

As the Bill passed second reading three days ago, it has become clearer that our National Assembly houses refined legislators, who behave as and are global citizens. Who understand what is obtained elsewhere across the globe in many sectors, including health.

On his Facebook page DSP disclosed that, “During today’s plenary of the Senate, my Bill, the National E-Health Bill, 2026, scaled second reading in our bid to establish a comprehensive legal and institutional framework for the development, regulation, coordination and integration of electronic health services in the Federal Republic of Nigeria.”

He was supported unanimously by his Distinguished colleagues, during the plenary. After which it has been referred to the Committee on Health (Secondary and Tertiary) for the remaining legislative process. Two weeks was given for the Committee to report back to the plenary.

To tell you that DSP is soundly familiar with the digital terrain in the healthcare sector, with deep interest and unwavering care for all Nigerians, he argued on the floor of the Senate, that, “… the healthcare sector globally is undergoing an unprecedented digital transformation. Across developed and emerging economies, digital technologies have become indispensable tools for improving healthcare delivery, expanding access to medical services, reducing costs and enhancing health outcomes.

Nations are increasingly deploying electronic medical records, telemedicine platforms, artificial intelligence, mobile health applications, electronic prescriptions, wearable health technologies and integrated health information systems to improve efficiency and quality of care.”

The above argument advanced by Senator Jibrin, tells us in broader terms and unhindered breakthrough in the thinking, action, deep philosophy and glaring global comprehension of this noble legislator in pushing for the advancement of our healthcare system. With reference to global experience.

In his added capacity as an astute administrator, a focused Pan-African legislator and a high profile researcher he was able to capture bit-by-bit reasons why digital healthcare system is a prerequisite of modern healthcare administration and management.

The attention of my readers is needed here, where he argued brilliantly that, “Nigeria cannot afford to remain on the margins of this global transformation. Despite significant investments in healthcare infrastructure and reforms over the years, our healthcare delivery system continues to face enormous challenges.

Advert

Medical records remain largely paper-based, resulting in loss of patient information, duplication of diagnostic tests, delayed treatment and avoidable medical errors. Healthcare facilities often operate in isolation, making it difficult to exchange patient information securely across institutions.”

Because of his glued attachment to the grassroot, he was able to remember that, millions of our citizens are residing in rural, underreported, hard-to-reach and underserved communities, which make them to continue facing enormous barriers in accessing specialist medical care due to shortages of healthcare professionals and geographical limitations.

As a scholar with real and genuine academic Doctorate Degree (PhD) he was able to draw a scientific curtain for the need to have regulations governing the operationalization procedures of digital healthcare. Our esteemed Digital Legislator of repute.

That was when he said, “… the COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated beyond doubt that digital health technologies are no longer optional but essential components of resilient healthcare systems. During the pandemic, telemedicine, remote consultations and electronic health information systems became indispensable in maintaining continuity of healthcare services while reducing unnecessary physical contact.”

It is through proper legislation that any system strives, cements its parts, provides goodies, enhances benefits and maintains advantages. Thinking in the same way Senator Jibrin believes that, with the negation of clear legislation there is every likelihood that, what becomes the outputs are “… fragmented implementation, inconsistent standards, inadequate interoperability, weak governance structures and uncertainty regarding legal responsibilities of healthcare providers operating digital platforms.”

During his presentation or rather arguments, he behaved as if he was a medical personnel. When he raised the issue of data confidentiality and management. One of the core behavior of health workers, to safeguard the privacy and health history of patients.

Too tantalizing for a non-medical person, when he argued that, “Distinguished Colleagues, data protection remains one of the cornerstones of this legislation. Health information is among the most sensitive categories of personal information. The Bill therefore establishes robust safeguards to ensure confidentiality, integrity and security of patients’ medical records.”

Thinking from informed position ab initio, to show to all that, DSP Jibrin knew his starting point, he knows where he was heading to and knows the clear message involved in digitalizing healthcare system, with relevant stakeholders, he identified possible collaborators who are critical in the implementation of this all-important Bill.

He said, “… this Bill aligns with the Federal Government’s digital transformation agenda, the National Digital Health Strategic Framework, the National Health Act, Universal Health Coverage objectives, the Nigeria Data Protection Act and our broader commitment to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals, particularly Goal 3 on Good Health and Well-being and Goal 9 on Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure.”

Before the Bill scaled the second reading, DSP urged his colleagues to see wisdom in the Bill and support him for its passage. Understanding the critical need for the Bill, having gone far and wide across the globe he believes that this 21st century digital era should be reflected in our healthcare sector.

In his urge to colleagues he said, “This Bill represents a bold legislative response to the realities of twenty-first-century healthcare. It provides the legal foundation necessary for building a modern, efficient, inclusive and technology-driven healthcare system that will serve present and future generations of Nigerians.
I therefore urge my Distinguished Colleagues to support this very important Bill and allow it to proceed to Second Reading.”

Anwar writes from Kano
Sunday, 12th July, 2026

Continue Reading

Opinion

Alhaji Tijjani Rabiu Spikin: A Neighbour, Philanthropist, and Friend of Children

Published

on

 

BY
MUDASSIR ALIYU YUNUSA (MSNB)
mudassiray@gmail.com

Alhaji Tijjani Rabiu Spikin, popularly known as ‘Tijjani Spikin,’ is one of the most respected elders of the Kofar Nassarawa and Sabuwar Kofa communities. A successful businessman with an outstanding reputation, he is admired not only for his business accomplishments but also for his kindness, humility, and generosity toward those around him, especially children.

He is widely regarded as a man of peace who values harmonious relationships. He believes that good neighbourliness is built on mutual respect, compassion, and the willingness to uphold the rights of others. His home has always been a place where people feel welcome, particularly children, and he has earned the trust and admiration of both the young and the old through his exemplary character.

What distinguishes Alhaji Tijjani most is his genuine love for children. He has always shown special affection to every child living in his neighbourhood, regardless of family background. It has long been his habit to brighten their day by giving them small gifts, including cash, biscuits, sweets, and other treats. To many children, these gestures were not merely gifts but expressions of love and encouragement that made them feel valued and appreciated.

Advert

Those who grew up in the area could bear me witness. I can vividly remember the excitement whenever Alhaji Tijjani came out in the morning or afternoon on his way to his daily routine. Children would eagerly and joyously gather around him, knowing that he would never send them away empty-handed. Because of this remarkable generosity to the children, they affectionately gave him the nickname “Mai Raba Kwandala Kwandala,” meaning “the man who shared coins.” It was a title born out of admiration for his habit of distributing small denominations of the Nigerian naira to every boy or girl he met.

Today, Alhaji Tijjani Rabiu (Spikin) remains a shining example of how kindness, generosity, and good neighbourliness can leave a lasting impact on a community, especially in the minds of the children who have now become youths and stakeholders in society. His legacy is reflected not only in the lives he has touched but also in the fond memories cherished by generations of children who experienced his compassion firsthand.

May Almighty Allah (SWT) continue to bless Alhaji Tijjani Rabiu and his entire family abundantly. May He increase him in wealth, grant him sound health, strengthen him in Iman (faith), protect him from all harm, and reward his kindness with His endless mercy in this world and in the Hereafter. Ameen.

Mudassir can be reached via:
mudassiray@gmail.com

Continue Reading

Trending