Connect with us

Opinion

The ZAZZAU Games Of Throne Is a Threat To The Entire Arewa TRADITIONAL INSTITUTIONS.

Published

on

 

Zaid Ayuba Alhaji.

Gradually, kingdoms in the North are falling, not because the kings are dying but because the political players with the key are applying the western ideological formula in handling our traditional institutions. Over the years, we’ve seen lots of unbelievable events happening in Arewa emirates, most recent of them is the one currently happening in Zazzau, more of a drama or politics, bureaucratic procedure or toss of dice in a game of interest.

The twists of events about the emergence of a new emir of Zazzau have provoked questions of weather ‘Masarautar Zazzau is in Politics’ or ‘Politics is in Masarautar Zazzau’?. The last 8 days kept surprising the world; in the name of due process, rule of traditional law and concerns for choosing the best emir for Zazzau, we’re gradually becoming an insulted people, events unfolding are abusing the sanctity of Zazzau and the Arewa traditional institution, the whole system is becoming mocked and embarrassed; the values, tradition and the entire chronicles of our preserved system is passing through a ‘systematic recolonization’ process.

Something is wrong somewhere; either from the state Governor, the kingmakers of Zazzau Emirate or possibly there is a complete plan to violate or overhaul the existing traditional system of Zazzau emirate that’s historically grounded far back to 1456. Historically, we cannot forget the british for crippling our traditional system; but most importantly we can never forgive these ambitious modern politicians that kept rubbishing the system into a more ‘politically scrambled circle’.

A popular quote from the Game of thrones says “A lion doesn’t concern himself with the opinions of a sheep.”-Tywin Lannister. These lines should be reflected while analyzing the ‘behind the scene roles’ of the Governor and the Zazzau emirate Kingmakers; let’s ask ourselves why can’t Zazzau have a new king several days after the death of our late father and king?.

From 1696-1701 era of Bako dan Musa to the era of Musa dan Suleiman 1808-1821 and down to 1903 which is the beginning of colonial domination of our traditional system, never had the kingdom of Zazzau faced a ravaging effect as the one happening now. Even when Sarki Muhammadu Amin Usmam died on 4th February 1975, Sarki Shehu Idris immediately assumed the throne on the 8th February 1975. What is keeping the throne vacant this long, is it that the kingdom now want to have a golden king or a diamond Emir?.

Advert

The kingdom of Zazzau is silently crying for days witrhout a successor, 8 consecutive days without a King is like a conquest and indirect collapse of a Kingdom, this is simply because politicians with western ideologies are the ones to decide the fate of the kingdom. As an Islamic institutions, instead of searching from the Qur’an, Hadith and the existing tradition of the Zazzau people, the chief king maker chose to be gallivanting from one less relevant book to another; yet we expect to have a suitable and reliable result in Zazzau emirate, forgetting that even when conventional books are sources of inspiration and guidance, they can never guide you on issues related to religious values and traditional norms.

How can the chief king maker who is also an ambitious politician chose to rely on reading western books while searching for the new King? What was he doing all these years without reading such books if at all the books are truly relevant to the traditional institution of Zazzau?. How can one refer back to an outdated “New Nigeria Newspaper” of February 1975 in deciding the fate of a kingdom in 2020?.

In a sacrosanct matter like selection of a king that may likely lead Zazzau for the next 5-6 decades, Instead of the Governor to declare 3 days fasting and prayers with consultation from religious scholars, we ended with one reader of a book in libraries displaying on social media, isn’t it funny and insulting to be reading western oriented books written by colonial scholar like “THE BRITISH IN NORTHERN NIGERIA by Robert Heussler written in 1968 while reflecting on a Hausa/Fulani traditional institution in Zaria?.

What is the direct rational of reading the “Principles of leadership: according to the founding fathers of the Sokoto Caliphate” by Hamid Bobboyi in 2011 and how practically relevant is it to crowning an emir chosen by the king makers?. Innalillahi Wainna Ilaihirrajiun!! Arewa have fallen, so much that an almighty Kingdom like Zazzau Emirate is left flinging emptily, while the chief politician is busy playing his chess in a comfortable chessboard.

It is evidently clear that in all the 19 state of the North, nobody can call a governor back to order!. The Cartoonists, writers, youth activists, traditional rulers, religious scholars, respected elders and every serious stakeholders have kept mute; just for a fear or love of one politician, so much that nonone can shout to save the image and cultural heritage of Zazzau emirate. Let me additionally drop a very important quote from the Games of thrones “Power resides where men believe it resides. It’s a trick, a shadow on the wall. And a very small man can cast a very large shadow.” — Lord Varys

2 days ago, Friday Sermons just past and no Imam could dare speak over what is happening. Today is sunday, all the Pastors in Arewa especially Zaria will never say a word toward whats happening, simply because of fear from the almighty Governor. Powerful Northern elites kept dead silence over what they know is an insult to the traditional practice of an emirate like Zazzau. Its alright!, let’s keep watching how the drama may end, i just want to remind all of us that “the same silence that sparks thunder to our neighbors can equally spark sandstorm in our homes”. May Allah save Arewa from the hands of Ambitious politicians. Ameen.

Zaid Ayuba Alhaji (Sir. Kuli Kuli). ND, PDDPIT, PDDPGD, HPDDPIT and B. Sc International Relations. 08069835881 comradezaid6@gmail.com.com.

Opinion

Dr Bello Matwallle: Why Dialogue Still Matters in the Fight Against Insecurity

Published

on

 

By Musa Iliyasu Kwankwaso

In the history of leadership, force may be loud, but wisdom delivers results. This is why security experts agree that while military action can suppress violence temporarily, dialogue is what permanently closes the door to conflict. It is a lesson the world has learned through blood, loss, and painful experience.

When Dr. Bello Matawalle, as Governor of Zamfara State, chose dialogue and reconciliation, it was not a sign of weakness. It was a different kind of courage one that placed the lives of ordinary citizens above political applause. A wise leader measures success not by bullets fired, but by lives saved.

Across conflict zones, history has consistently shown that force alone does not end insecurity. Guns may damage bodies, but they do not eliminate the roots of violence. This understanding forms the basis of what experts call the non-kinetic approach conflict resolution through dialogue, reconciliation, justice, and social reform.

When Matawalle assumed office, Zamfara was deeply troubled. Roads were closed, markets shut down, farmers and herders operated in fear, and citizens lived under constant threat. Faced with this reality, only two options existed: rely solely on military force or combine security operations with dialogue. Matawalle chose the path widely accepted across the world security reinforced by dialogue not out of sympathy for criminals, but to protect innocent lives.

Advert

This approach was not unique to Zamfara. In Katsina State, Governor Aminu Bello Masari led peace engagements with armed groups. In Maiduguri granted amnesty to repentant offenders of Boko Haram, In Sokoto, dialogue was also pursued to reduce bloodshed. These precedents raise a simple question: if dialogue is acceptable elsewhere, why is Matawalle singled out?

At the federal level, the same logic applies. Through Operation Safe Corridor, the Federal Government received Boko Haram members who surrendered, offered rehabilitation and reintegration, and continued military action against those who refused to lay down arms. This balance
rehabilitation for those who repent and force against those who persist is the core of the non-kinetic approach.

Security experts globally affirm that military force contributes only 20 to 30 percent of sustainable solutions to insurgency. The remaining 70 to 80 percent lies in dialogue, justice, economic reform, and addressing poverty and unemployment. Even the United Nations states clearly: “You cannot kill your way out of an insurgency.”

During Matawalle’s tenure, several roads reopened, cattle markets revived, and daily life began to normalize. If insecurity later resurfaced, the question is not whether dialogue was wrong, but whether broader coordination failed.

Today, critics attempt to recast past security strategies as crimes. Yet history is not blind, and truth does not disappear. Matawalle’s actions were rooted in expert advice, national precedent, and global best practice.

The position of Sheikh Ahmad Gumi, who publicly affirmed that Matawalle’s approach was appropriate and that military force accounts for only about 25 percent of counterinsurgency success, further reinforces this reality. Such views cannot be purchased or manufactured; they reflect established security thinking.

In the end, dialogue is not a betrayal of justice it is often its foundation. And no amount of political noise can overturn decisions grounded in evidence, experience, and the priority of human life.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Matawalle: The Northern Anchor of Loyalty in Tinubu’s Administration

Published

on

 

By Adebayor Adetunji, PhD

In the broad and competitive terrain of Nigerian politics, loyalty is often spoken of, yet rarely sustained with consistency, courage and visible action. But within the administration of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, one Northern appointee has demonstrated this quality not as a slogan, but as a lifestyle, as a political principle and as a national duty — Hon. (Dr.) Bello Muhammad Matawalle, Minister of State for Defence.

Since his appointment, Matawalle has stood out as one of the most loyal, outspoken and dependable pillars of support for the Tinubu administration in the North. He has never hesitated, not for a moment, to stand firmly behind the President. At every turn of controversy, in moments of public misunderstanding, and at times when political alliances waver, Matawalle has continued to speak boldly in defence of the government he serves. For him, loyalty is not an occasional gesture — it is a commitment evidenced through voice, alignment, and sacrifice.

Observers within and outside the ruling party recall numerous occasions where the former Zamfara State Governor took the front line in defending the government’s policies, actions and direction, even when others chose neutrality or silence. His interventions, always direct and clear, reflect not just loyalty to a leader, but faith in the future the President is building, a future anchored on economic reform, security revival, institutional strengthening and renewed national unity.

Advert

But Matawalle’s value to the administration does not stop at loyalty. In performance, visibility and active delivery of duty, he stands among the most engaged ministers currently serving in the federal cabinet. His portfolio, centred on defence and security, one of the most sensitive sectors in the country, demands expertise, availability and unbroken presence. Matawalle has not only embraced this responsibility, he has carried it with remarkable energy.

From high-level security meetings within Nigeria to strategic engagements across foreign capitals, Matawalle has represented the nation with clarity and confidence. His participation in defence summits, international cooperation talks, and regional security collaborations has positioned Nigeria as a voice of influence in global security discourse once again. At home, his involvement in military policy evaluation, counter-terrorism discussions and national defence restructuring reflects a minister who understands the urgency of Nigeria’s security needs, and shows up to work daily to address them.

Away from partisan battles, Matawalle has proven to be a bridge — between North and South, civilian leadership and military institutions, Nigeria and the wider world. His presence in government offers a mix of loyalty, performance and deep grounding in national interest, the type of partnership every President needs in turbulent times.

This is why calls, campaigns and whisperings aimed at undermining or isolating him must be resisted. Nigeria cannot afford to discourage its best-performing public servants, nor tighten the atmosphere for those who stand firmly for unity and national progress. The nation must learn to applaud where there is performance, support where there is loyalty, and encourage where there is commitment.

Hon. Bello Matawalle deserves commendation, not suspicion. Support — not sabotage. Encouragement, not exclusion from political strategy or power alignment due to narrow interests.

History does not forget those who stood when it mattered. Matawalle stands today for President Tinubu, for security, for loyalty, for national service. And in that place, he has earned a space not only in the present political equation, but in the future judgment of posterity.

Nigeria needs more leaders like him. And Nigeria must say so openly.

Adebayor Adetunji, PhD
A communication strategist and public commentator
Write from Akure, Ondo State, Nigeria

Continue Reading

Opinion

Drug Abuse Among People With Disabilities: The Hidden Crisis Nigeria Is Yet to Address

Published

on

 

By Abdulaziz Ibrahim

Statistically Invisible, Persons with Disabilities feel shut out of Nigeria’s drug abuse war as a report from Adamawa reveals lacks data and tailored support needed, forcing a vulnerable group to battle addiction alone.

In Adamawa State, the fight against drug abuse is gaining attention, but for many people living with disabilities (PWDs), their struggles remain largely unseen. A new report has uncovered deep gaps in support, treatment, and data tracking for PWDs battling addiction despite official claims of equal access.

For nearly three decades, Mallam Aliyu Hammawa, a visually impaired resident of Yola, navigated a world increasingly shrouded by drug dependency. He first encountered psychoactive substances through friends, and what began as casual use quickly escalated into long-term addiction.

“I used cannabis, tramadol, tablets, shooters everything I could get my hands on,” he recalled. “These drugs affected my behaviour and my relationship with the people close to me.”

Family members say his addiction changed him entirely. His friend, Hussaini Usman, described feeling “sad and worried” when he realized Aliyu had fallen into drug use.

Aliyu eventually made the decision to quit. It was marriage and the fear of hurting his wife that finally forced him to seek a new path. “Whenever I took the drugs, I felt normal. But my wife was confused about my behaviour,” he said. “I decided I had to stop before she discovered the full truth of what I was taking.”

A National Problem With Missing Data

Advert

Nigeria has one of the highest drug-use rates in West Africa, according to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). Over 14 million Nigerians between the ages of 15 and 64 use psychoactive substances. Yet, within that massive user base, PWDs are statistically invisible.

There is almost no national data on drug abuse among persons with disabilitiesa critical gap that experts warn makes it impossible to design effective, inclusive rehabilitation programmes.

Ibrahim Idris Kochifa, the Secretary of the Adamawa State Association of Persons with Physical Disability, told this reporter that PWDs face unique, systemic pressures that intensify their vulnerability to drug abuse, specifically citing poverty, unemployment, isolation, and social discrimination.

“Whenever a person with disability is caught with drugs, the common decision is to seize the drugs and let him go,” Kochifa said, speaking on behalf of the disabled community leadership. “But if they consult us, we have advice to offer on how they can be treated and rehabilitated. Without involving us, no programme will fully benefit people with disabilities.”

NDLEA Responds

At the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA) Command in Adamawa, officials insist their services are open to everyone without discrimination.

Mrs. Ibraham Nachafia, the Head of Media and Advocacy for the NDLEA Adamawa State Command, said during an interview, “Our rehabilitation centre is open to all. There is no discrimination. Anyone including persons with disabilities can access treatment.”

While the official position suggests inclusiveness, disability advocates call it “tokenistic.” They argue that equal access on paper does not translate to tailored support in practice. True rehabilitation for PWDs requires specialized counselling that understands their unique traumas, physically accessible facilities, and significantly stronger community engagement to prevent relapse.

A Call for More Inclusive Action

Advocates are now urging the Nigerian government and drug-control agencies to build a response framework that recognizes PWDs as a vulnerable group in need of targeted support.

The advocate Goodness Fedrick warns that until rehabilitation and prevention programmes reflect the realities faced by people with disabilities, Nigeria’s battle against drug abuse will remain incomplete.

For people like Aliyu Hammawa, who managed to recover without structured support, the message is clear: many others may not be as fortunate.

This story highlights the urgent need for inclusive, data-driven, and community-supported approaches in Nigeria’s fight against drug addiction. Until the nation sees and serves this ‘hidden crisis,’ its overall battle against addiction will continue to be fought with one hand tied behind its back.

Continue Reading

Trending