Connect with us

Opinion

Ballon dOr and the Credibility Question-Amir Abdulazeez

Published

on

 

By: Amir Abdulazeez

I am writing on this not because I have any significant concern for the award or its credibility or because it has any correlation with the wellbeing of anybody in need (which I am often more concerned about). I am rather doing so due to the massive perennial debate it generates especially among youths in Nigeria as well as the misinformed opinions around it. Again, the Ballon dOr like football itself has transcended sport to become part of international politics and history. I became shocked when I saw a globally renowned Muslim scholar congratulating Ousmane Dembele for winning the 2025 version and hailing its award to a practicing Muslim. Obviously, the crown now carries political significance that stretches well beyond the pitch.

Since its inception in 1956, the Ballon dOr has been regarded as footballs most prestigious individual award. Founded by France Football (conceived by sports writers Gabriel Hanot and Jacques Ferran), the award was initially designed to honour the best European player annually, with Stanley Matthews of Blackpool becoming the pioneer winner. Later, it evolved into a global prize, celebrating many other icons. Many have rightly questioned the credibility of the award but mostly on myopic grounds centred around player and club sentiments. However, as a long time football observer, I believe there are much broader issues regarding the credibility of the award that are worth discussing.
Let us start with the politics. During the Cold War (1947-1991), Eastern European players (more aligned to the Soviet Union) often struggled to receive equal recognition despite dazzling performances, while Western European stars (more aligned to the United States and friends) enjoyed more favourable media attention. Although Russian goalkeeper Lev Yashin won the award in 1963, many argue that his case was only the exception that proved the unwritten rule of ‘politics, geography and media exposure consistently play decisive roles’. Today, the award continues to reflect broader inequalities in football. European clubs dominate global coverage, which inflates the recognition of their stars. Players performing in less visible leagues whether in South America, Africa, or Asia rarely receive consideration, even if their contributions are extraordinary.

Another concern is the awards inconsistent eligibility rules over time. Until 1995, only European players competing in European clubs were considered, excluding legendary figures like Pelé and Diego Maradona from getting even a nomination. It was only after a rule change that non-Europeans in European leagues became eligible, allowing George Weah to win in 1995. Yet, by then, the award had already excluded decades of worthy non-European and non-European based winners. Mild allegations of racism also cast a dark shadow over the award.

Many believe players like Didier Drogba, Samuel Etoo, Yaya Touré, Sadio Mané and Mohammed Salah were routinely ranked below their pedigree. In 2021, French pundit Emmanuel Petit openly questioned whether African players were judged by double standards.

The selection of voters itself raises concerns. Initially restricted to journalists, it later expanded between 2010 and 2015 after a merger with FIFAs World Player of the Year, adding coaches and captains to the electorate whose votes often reflected tribal, national or club loyalties rather than merit. The 2016 reversion to journalist-only voting is perhaps a tacit admission of voting flaws thereby creating difficulties in comparisons across eras. For example, Lionel Messis consecutive wins (2009-2013) under a global, mixed electorate cannot be objectively compared to Michel Platinis (1983-1985) under a European-only jury. The current co-organization with UEFA, which began in 2024, signifies another attempt to lend the award more institutional weight. However, the constant changes in its format and governing alliances suggest an award in search of a stable identity, struggling to balance its commercial ambitions with its original purpose.

Advert

Bias towards attacking players has been an emerging hallmark of Ballon dOr selections. Legendary defenders like Paolo Maldini, Alessandro Nesta, Sergio Ramos and Roberto Carlos, who defined an era of defensive excellence, always fell short. The exception of Fabio Cannavaro in 2006 along with few others in the past, after a World Cup-winning campaign with Italy, serves as a testament to the rarity of a defender being recognized. More recently, Virgil van Dijks 2019 narrow runner-up finish sparked debate about whether non-attacking players could ever realistically win in a sport increasingly obsessed with goals and flair. The award relies heavily on football journalists who often prioritize goal highlight reels, statistics and global recognition over tactical nuance and defensive brilliance. Strikers and playmakers dominate the headlines that directly feeds into voting behaviour.

To combat positional bias, a more revolutionary approach could be implemented; nomination by quota. Why not have separate shortlists and voting panels for goalkeepers, defenders, midfielders and forwards? The top three or five of these categories could then be considered for the overall voting and eventual award. This would ensure that the unique skills of each position are evaluated by those who best understand them, guaranteeing that players are judged on their specializations rather than against others with contrasting roles.

The criteria for judgment also lack clarity and consistency. Officially, the award considers individual performance, team achievements, talent, fair play and career consistency. In practice, however, voters often seem swayed by a single outstanding tournament or by sentimental narratives. Luka Modrić’s 2018 victory after Croatia’s World Cup run exemplified this. While Modrić was superb, critics argued that other players had stronger year-round performances, but the emotional weight of Croatia’s fairy tale run tilted the scales. But how comes, this same emotion did not sway voters to select any player from Leicester Citys 2016 Premier League incredible winning team? A pervasive, though often unstated, criterion for many voters is team success. To win the Champions League or a major international tournament has become almost a prerequisite for contention. This creates an inherent unfairness, elevating players in dominant teams while punishing extraordinary individuals in less successful sides. This inconsistency reveals a fundamental confusion: is the award for the “best player”, most popular player or the “most successful player”?
The timing and calendar controversies is another issue. International tournaments occur every two years, creating periods where national team success heavily influences voting. World Cup years traditionally favour tournament winners, regardless of club form. The recent calendar change to August-July aimed to address this imbalance but created new problems, with voters now contending with assessing performances from overlapping seasons and tournaments. This temporal confusion affects not just voting patterns but public understanding of what the award actually represents; is it recognition for calendar year performance, season achievement or tournament success? The 2013 Ballon d’Or win by Cristiano Ronaldo was critiqued following timing inconsistencies from odd deadline extensions. The current system, which can see a player win a major tournament in the summer and have their performance rewarded a year later, creates a disjointed narrative.

The question of authority is another big one. FIFA represents 211 national associations, UEFA oversees European football’s institutional framework, yet it is a private French publication that bestow football’s most prestigious individual honour. The comparison with FIFAs The Best awards and UEFAs Player of the Year exposes this imbalance. This raises the paradox: why should a magazine possess such outsized influence in determining footballs most prestigious individual accolade, overshadowing awards backed by governing institutions? While there is nothing fundamentally wrong with this, it only emphasizes the need for France Football to show more responsibility by sanitizing and standardizing its award.
I am not in a position to coach France Football on how to reform its awards to minimize the credibility dilemma, they have much better experts who can do that. My concern is to see young football followers and analysts become more informed and equipped for deeper debates that are beyond sentiments. My other concern which has little to do with the Ballon dOr is to see football giving a little back to its estimated 3.5 billion fans that have made it powerful. While fans give it a lot, the sport appears to be giving almost nothing significant in return. It is sad to see football remaining silent, bias and indifferent in the face of global oppression and injustice. While it took FIFA and UEFA just four days to suspend Russia after its invasion of Ukraine in 2022, both bodies have remained criminally silent over two years since Israel launched its genocide on the football supporting people of Palestine.

24-09-2025

Opinion

Dry Taps Gone, Kano Flows Again: The Abba Yusuf Water Comeback By Abba Anwar

Published

on

 

By Abba Anwar

It is evidently clear and on record to understand that Kano thirsty decade is ending, as how His Excellency the Governor of Kano State, Eng Abba Kabir Yusuf is turning 95 years of ruin into a N21.3 Billion revival. This is leadership, commitment, display of patriotic political will and understanding of complexities and peculiarities of human existence.

What Kano is experiencing now, in terms of redirecting the water industry into human face, calls for global gist and account. For example in Cape Town, they called perennial shortage of water Day Zero – the day the taps would run dry.

In Flint, Michigan, history tells us that it was a lead poisoning crisis that shocked America. While in Kano, Africa’s most populous city, situated in Northern Nigeria, it was slower, quieter, and more painful. Very pathetic and heartbreaking, for over ten years, the taps simply stopped. No announcement. No Day Zero. Just air.

The history of Kano water sector reveals that the city needs 700 million litres of water every single day to survive. Until last year, it was getting less than 300 million. A deficit of 400 million litres. That is not a shortage; it is a systemic collapse. Mothers woke up at 4 a.m. to queue at boreholes. Children trekked kilometres with jerry cans. Industries shut down. Cholera whispered in the background.

Identification of problem didn’t match with problem diagnosis. For years, successive administrations applied plaster to a cancer. The current administration of Governor Yusuf has chosen to perform open-heart surgery. A better and neater option. Surgical operation not plaster application. Which catches and punches the right button.
And the heart is now beating again as the Governor means business and genuine service delivery.

Kano’s 95-year-old legacy, which I term as The Soul of a City, is a deliberate presentation for proper
understanding of the magnitude of what is happening now. Hence we must understand what was lost.

Kano’s water story did not start yesterday. It started in 1927, when the British colonial administration, under Emir Abdullahi Bayero, broke ground for what would become the first waterworks in Northern Nigeria – the Challawa Water Works. Completed in 1930, with a modest 20 million litres per day, it was an engineering marvel of its time. It supplied Dorayi, Kabuga, Kofar Fanfo, Jan Bulo, Rijiyar Zaki, and even the Army Barracks in Janguza. It ran non-stop for 86 years.

Then came its younger brothers. The Old Tamburawa in 1986 – 9.6 million litres, later upgraded to 20 million. Then the New Tamburawa, a behemoth with a 150 million litre per day capacity. And anchoring them all, the legendary Goron Dutse reservoirs – five massive underground and surface reservoirs built between 1930 and 1974, with a combined storage of over 40 million litres. They were the lungs of Kano’s distribution.

By whatever standard and estimation this was a system built by visionaries, with clearly defined vision. But it was, unfortunately, killed by neglect. Year in year out all the donkey years witnessed terrifying reality when city’s lifeline was utterly and irresponsibly looted.

To tell my reader that, that experience was worrying our Governor deeply even before he came on board, before he took the oath of office on May 29, 2023, he set up a powerful Committee of Experts to look into the perennial nature of the water industry. Immediately after he came on board his engineers gave him a report on water that read like a war zone assessment.

Since then, when I discussed the concern with a friend from Darmanawa he quickly commended the effort and called for public support of the entire process and procedures.

It was fundamentally clear that in Challawa, the scene was “pathetic and disheartening,” in the official words of the Ministry. Out of six giant industrial generating sets that power the entire plant when the national grid fails, only two were limping. Water Works No. 1 and No. 2 were dead. No. 3 was gasping at 30% capacity. A call for action at whatever rate.

Advert

Worse than decay was destruction. Raw water pumps were gone. Electrical starters ripped from control rooms. Underground electrical facilities stolen. And in an act that shocked even veteran engineers, a 15-kilometre, 15.6 kilometre underground transmission pipeline – the artery that feeds Challawa – was excavated and stolen. Not vandalised. Stolen. Some individuals even walked into the premises claiming the federal government had sold the waterworks to them. A brazen dishonesty of the highest order.

At Goron Dutse, the story was even more symbolic. The reservoirs that had quenched Kano for nearly a century had not received a single drop of water for over ten years. Ten years! They were dry, cracked, and filled with silt. As bad as economies during conventional wars. Abandonment amid need for attention.

The total cost of decay was put at over N30 billion. An administration in the past had spent N5.6 billion in just 11 months for “maintenance” but it was maintenance without a soul. As pipes were not replaced, reservoirs were not desilted, pumps were not procured. The result? Tamburawa, designed for 150 million litres, was doing 27%. Challawa, designed for 220 million, was doing less than 30%. Together, they should produce 370 million litres. They were producing less than 90 million.

To revive just Challawa, an official told journalists that the state would need $3.5 million, later revised to over $10 million, because the 1930-era machines have to be custom-built in Europe on demand. They are not on any shelf in the world.

This is the rot Governor Yusuf inherited. To me, Governor Yusuf’s political will is doctrinal with no match in sight. Unmatched political will. It is glaring for all to know that great cities are not revived by press releases. They are revived by political will. This is where His Excellency separates himself from every administration in the last decade.

He did not send a committee. He went himself. Since from the start of the good re-engineering touch of the water facilities. For example just yesterday, he and his able Deputy H.E. Murtala Sule Garo alongside other top government functionaries visited water projects that are almost ready for good operations.

In a now-famous inspection tour, Governor Yusuf, in rain boots, walked the length of Challawa and Tamburawa with engineers from CGC Nigeria Limited and CCECC Nigeria Limited – the same Chinese engineering giants building Africa’s biggest dams and railways. He saw the leaking pipes. He saw the obsolete clarifiers. He saw the dead high-lift pumps. And there, on the spot, he made a decision that will define his legacy.

He approved without any hesitation, the sum of N21.29 billion. Wow! the single largest water investment in Kano in 15 years. Leadership by example. Viva our dear Governor Viva.

Not N21.89 billion in rumour. N21.29 billion in signed contracts. With N9.9 billion to CGC Nigeria Limited for the total rehabilitation of Tamburawa Water Treatment Plant and its raw water pump station. The sum of N11.39 billion to CCECC Nigeria Limited for the rehabilitation of Challawa Raw Water Pump Station, its treatment plant, and the total restoration of the Goron Dutse reservoirs. Action! Action!! Action!!!

This is not rehabilitation on paper. This is what is happening on the ground right now, as confirmed by Dr. Dahiru Muhammad Hashim, Acting Commissioner for Water Resources, Environment and Climate Change. That:

1. The critical 15.6-kilometre transmission line to Goron Dutse has been restored with modern ductile steel pipes, replacing the 1970s asbestos pipes that were poisoning the system.

2. Goron Dutse reservoirs have been fully desilted and repaired.

3. Clarifiers, filtration units, manifolds, and high-lift pumps have been restored.

4. Ten high-capacity 110-kilowatt pumps have been procured.

5. A full test run was completed in mid-September.

And beyond the metropolis, the Governor is doing what no one did – reviving the dead. Nine out of Kano’s 19 dormant regional water schemes are under restoration. Guzugu in Kabo is flowing. Joda in Gabasawa is flowing. Wudil Waterworks, dead for years, is alive. For the first time, rural Kano is part of the water equation. Government for all sections of the state.

On September 21, 2026, the Ministry officially announced: expanded distribution of potable water would commence within few days to come. All are waiting patiently Your Excellency Sir!

Why Kano must attract global communities? From London to Lagos, water is politics. The UN says water scarcity will displace 700 million people by 2030. What Governor Yusuf has done is a case study in how to reverse it without World Bank loans, without privatising your heritage.

He did not outsource the problem. He funded the solution. He did not blame the past. He fixed the future. Sometime in the past I spoke to Malam Musa in Tarauni, he was lamenting all over. When asked again, now, he simply smiles that Governor Yusuf is on the top of the situation. This is courageous.

When the taps in Kofar Mata sputter and then gush, when a child in Dala drinks from the tap for the first time in his life, when Goron Dutse reservoirs hold water again after a 10-year drought, Kano will not just be celebrating water. Kano will be celebrating a Governor who proved that a 95-year-old dream, buried under silt, stolen pipes, and failed promises, can still flow.

That is not just governance. That is unmatched and unwavering political will in action.

KANO FLOWS AGAIN UNDER GOVERNOR YUSUF!

Viva Kano. Viva Abba Gida-Gida.

Anwar writes from Kano
Tuesday, 29th September, 2026

Continue Reading

Opinion

The Tinubu Health Reset: A Consultant Examines Nigeria’s Healthcare Reforms

Published

on

 

By Dr. Usman Muhammad Shanawa

For decades, Nigeria’s healthcare system has faced a familiar set of challenges: inadequate infrastructure, limited access to specialised medical services, weak primary healthcare facilities, shortages of healthcare personnel and the rising financial burden of treatment on ordinary Nigerians.

Against this backdrop, the Federal Government under President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has pursued interventions across different levels of the healthcare system, ranging from primary healthcare and general hospitals to specialised tertiary facilities, digital health, emergency care and healthcare financing.

For Dr. Usman Muhammad Shanawa, a Consultant Obstetrician and Gynaecologist and specialist in Gynaecological Oncology with more than two decades of experience in clinical practice and healthcare management, the interventions deserve to be examined as part of a broader attempt to strengthen Nigeria’s healthcare architecture.

Dr. Shanawa’s assessment moves across the three levels of healthcare delivery, ranging from primary, secondary and tertiary, while drawing particular attention to diagnostics, maternal healthcare, hospital infrastructure, health insurance and the growing role of technology.

For him, the real significance of healthcare reform lies not simply in the announcement of new projects, but in whether the changes improve access to quality medical care for Nigerians.

*Zamfara: A local window into the reforms*
Dr. Shanawa’s assessment begins from Zamfara State, where he says federal support and collaboration with state authorities have provided a local perspective on the changing healthcare landscape.

He recalled that financial constraints had historically affected the implementation of several healthcare projects at the state level.

According to him, increased federal financial support and policy interventions under the Tinubu administration created room for renewed investment, with 2025 emerging as a particularly significant period for healthcare development in the state.

He views the experience as an illustration of how government intervention can translate into improved access to healthcare when funding, policy and implementation converge.

*At the top: Expanding tertiary healthcare*
At the apex of Nigeria’s healthcare system are tertiary institutions, where patients with complex medical conditions are expected to receive specialised treatment and advanced diagnostic services.

Yet these institutions have historically faced technological and infrastructural gaps.

Dr. Shanawa identifies improved diagnostic capacity as one of the areas requiring sustained attention.

He points to technologies such as Computerised Tomography (CT) scanners and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) as critical tools for modern medical practice.

For a specialist in gynaecological oncology, the issue carries particular weight.

Cancer care, he explains, depends heavily on timely and accurate diagnosis. The availability of sophisticated diagnostic and oncology services closer to patients can reduce the need for long-distance travel in search of specialised treatment.

He also points to the development of oncology facilities in states such as Katsina, Enugu and Edo as examples of efforts to expand specialised cancer services beyond traditional medical centres.

The broader implication, in his assessment, is that advanced healthcare should not remain concentrated in only a few locations.

*The missing link: Strengthening secondary healthcare*
Between the primary healthcare centre and the highly specialised tertiary hospital lies another crucial layer, that is the secondary healthcare.

For Dr. Shanawa, general and state hospitals remain an indispensable part of the healthcare chain.

These facilities often receive patients referred from primary healthcare centres and provide services beyond the capacity of frontline facilities, while also serving as important points for emergency treatment.

He particularly highlights emergency obstetric care.

For women experiencing complications during pregnancy or childbirth, he argues, the availability of properly equipped secondary hospitals and effective referral systems can be critical.

This makes the strengthening of general hospitals more than an infrastructure issue. It is also a question of how quickly the healthcare system can respond when lives are at risk.

*Primary healthcare: Rebuilding from the foundation*
If tertiary healthcare represents the peak of the system, primary healthcare is its foundation.

And this, according to Dr. Shanawa, is where one of the most important aspects of the current reforms lies.

Nigeria’s healthcare system has historically been characterised by patients bypassing weak or poorly equipped primary healthcare centres and seeking treatment directly at secondary and tertiary institutions.

Advert

The result has been pressure on higher-level hospitals, with facilities already handling complicated cases also having to deal with conditions that could have been managed closer to patients’ communities.

Dr. Shanawa sees the renewed emphasis on primary healthcare as an attempt to reverse this pattern.

He argues that strengthening the base of the healthcare pyramid while maintaining improvements at the tertiary level is essential to creating a more functional system.

The Federal Government has reported the deployment of National Health Fellows and Public Financial Management Officers across all 774 local government areas under the health-sector renewal programme, alongside the revitalisation of primary healthcare facilities in priority areas.

For Dr. Shanawa, the importance of such interventions lies in bringing healthcare closer to the people before illnesses become more complicated.

*Maternal mortality: The doctor’s particular concern*
For an obstetrician, the discussion inevitably returns to maternal health.

Dr. Shanawa describes maternal mortality as one of Nigeria’s most persistent public-health challenges, one that has affected generations of Nigerian women.

He argues that strengthening primary healthcare, improving referral systems, expanding the frontline health workforce and ensuring access to emergency obstetric care are essential to addressing pregnancy-related complications.

The Federal Ministry of Health has reported improvements in maternal and newborn health indicators in areas targeted under its intervention programmes.

For Dr. Shanawa, however, the importance of such interventions ultimately comes down to whether a pregnant woman can obtain appropriate care at the time she needs it.

The journey from pregnancy to safe delivery, he suggests, depends on the strength of the entire healthcare chain, from community-level services to emergency and specialist hospitals.

Healthcare needs people, not just buildings
Infrastructure may be the visible face of healthcare investment, but Dr. Shanawa stresses that facilities cannot function without the professionals who operate them.

Doctors, nurses, midwives, community health workers, laboratory scientists, pharmacists and other healthcare professionals are central to translating infrastructure and equipment into actual medical services.

The Federal Government has reported recruitment and retraining initiatives for frontline and community-based health workers as part of its health-sector renewal efforts.

But recruitment is only one part of the challenge.

For the reforms to be sustained, healthcare workers must also be retained, properly deployed and supported with the equipment and working environment required to provide quality care.

*The cost of getting sick*
Another dimension of Nigeria’s healthcare challenge is affordability.

For many families, the question is not only whether a hospital exists, but whether they can afford the treatment available there.

Dr. Shanawa therefore places health insurance and healthcare financing alongside infrastructure and medical technology in his assessment of the reforms.

He points to the Basic Health Care Provision Fund and broader efforts to expand health insurance coverage as mechanisms that could reduce the financial burden on patients.

The Federal Ministry of Health has reported significant increases in health insurance enrolment, while also acknowledging that out-of-pocket expenditure remains high.

This presents one of the central tests for healthcare reform: expanding services while ensuring that the people who need those services are not priced out of the system.

Healthcare goes digital
The transformation is also taking place beyond hospital walls.

Digital health and electronic medical records are increasingly becoming part of the effort to modernise Nigeria’s healthcare system.

Dr. Shanawa highlights electronic medical records and health-information exchange systems as important tools for improving the management and continuity of patient care.

The Federal Government’s Nigeria Digital in Health Initiative is intended to improve interoperability between healthcare facilities and facilitate the secure sharing of health information.

For a healthcare system spread across a vast country, better digital connectivity could help bridge some of the gaps between facilities and levels of care.

Measuring the Tinubu health reset
For Dr. Shanawa, the ultimate measure of healthcare reform is not the number of projects announced or facilities commissioned.

It is what happens to the patient.

Can a woman access skilled care when she needs it?

Can a patient obtain an accurate diagnosis without travelling hundreds of kilometres?

Can an emergency case receive timely treatment?

Can a family afford the cost of care?

Can healthcare professionals work with the equipment, personnel and systems they require?

These questions bring the debate back to the heart of healthcare delivery.

The Federal Government has reported progress across areas including infrastructure, digital health, primary healthcare, workforce development and maternal-health interventions.

But sustaining such gains will require continued financing, effective implementation, maintenance of infrastructure, retention of skilled professionals and stronger coordination among federal, state and local authorities.

For Dr. Shanawa, Nigeria’s healthcare system cannot be transformed by focusing on only one level.

The primary healthcare centre, the general hospital and the specialist tertiary institution must function as parts of the same system.

That, ultimately, is the test of the health reset, and whether the reforms can move beyond policy and infrastructure to create a healthcare system in which quality, affordable and accessible medical care is closer to the Nigerian who needs it most.

Continue Reading

Opinion

RE:WE ARE UNDER SIEGE: TARABA MONARCH BREAKS SILENCE AS FULANI BANDITS OVERRUN THE ANCIENT KWARARAFA KINGDOM:

Published

on

Wukari Traditional Council
Aku Uka’s Palace, Wukari, Taraba State

RE:WE ARE UNDER SIEGE: TARABA MONARCH BREAKS SILENCE AS FULANI BANDITS OVERRUN THE ANCIENT KWARARAFA KINGDOM:

The attention of the Aku Uka’s Palace has been drawn to a piece in the Social Media titled, “‘We Are Under Siege ‘: Taraba Monarch Breaks Silence as Fulani Bandits Overrun the Ancient Kwararafa Kingdom.”

The piece being referred to is credited to the Aku Uka, Dr. Ishaku Adda Ali, Matakhitswen, said to be contained in the speech he read at the recent Assembly of the ethnic nationalities of the old Kwararafa Confederacy organised by the Kwararafa Development Forum (KDF) in Abuja on Saturday, 19th September, 2026.
Below is the full text of the anonymous writer/commentator’s piece as it appeared in the Social Media, on Tuesday, 22nd September, 2026:

“The Aku-Uka of Wukari, HRM, Dr Ishaku Adda Ali, has raised a desperate alarm over the escalating security crisis engulfing the historic Kwararafa kingdom in Taraba State, declaring that the situation has reached a point where silence is no longer an option. Speaking at the 2026 Kwararafa People’s Assembly in Abuja, the monarch revealed that the old Kwararafa Confederacy—one of the oldest and most culturally significant traditional institutions in Nigeria—has come under sustained Fulani bandit siege, with communities living in constant fear. His intervention is significant because traditional rulers rarely speak this bluntly in public; when they do, it usually means the violence has overwhelmed local capacity and the state has failed to protect its people.

“The deeper implication is what this says about Nigeria’s widening security vacuum. Taraba sits at the crossroads of the North-East and North-Central, a corridor where Fulani bandits, kidnappers, and separatist militias operate with frightening impunity. If an ancient kingdom with deep historical roots and a sitting monarch can be “under siege” in 2026, then the federal government’s claims of progress against insecurity ring hollow. For the Tinubu administration, this is another embarrassing data point ahead of 2027: the violence is not confined to a few flashpoints—it is spreading into communities that once considered themselves safe. The Aku-Uka’s alarm is not just a Taraba problem; it is a warning that Nigeria’s security architecture is failing across multiple regions at once. And when kings begin to cry out, it is usually because the people have already been abandoned.”

Advert

Our observations on the above piece are as follows:
1. The piece in question is not only mischievous, false and blatant lies but cowardly, as the writer has not the courage to disclose his or her identity. The speech read by the Aku Uka never mentioned any ethnic group, as the perpetrators of insecurity or violence as mentioned by the anonymous writer.

Let me quote exactly what the Aku Uka read in his speech on security:
“Our people have contributed immensely to Nigerian development in such areas as agriculture, the armed forces, natural resources, and culture, among others. Yet, many of our communities continue to suffer deprivation in areas such as infrastructure, economic opportunities, and general marginalization and discrimination in the nation’s political set up. Our appeal and clarion call is therefore simple: we seek for fairness, equity, justice, security and inclusion in all spheres of our national life.”
Why the writer made this blatant assertion by putting words into the mouth of the Aku Uka for something he (Aku) never said can not be fathomed to any sane person, except this mischief maker. The intention is to clearly create communal disharmony. The Aku Uka is a peace maker and would never be a party to anything that will bring about conflict among various groups in the country.

2. Aku Uka’s speech was not about Taraba State, but concerning the whole old Kwararafa Confederacy in modern Nigeria and the challenge of security generally, being experienced in a number of States in the country.

3. It is clear that the Federal Government under leadership of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, has been making strenuous effort to address the various security issues across the whole country. The Aku Uka deeply appreciates such efforts and will continue to pledge his support in tackling and bringing to an end the security challenge.

4. Let me emphatically state that the Aku Uka’s speech he read was not about politics or the 2027 election. The Aku Uka is a traditional ruler who does not dabble into politics. It is therefore the height of irresponsibility and mischief to drag His Majesty into political matters. Furthermore, nowhere did Aku Uka make any reference to 2027 election in the speech he read or politics generally for that matter.
It is possible that the anonymous hack writer is fronting for his or her political masters agenda and so believe that by dragging the revered monarch into the political issues, they would reap political mileage out of this falsehood. If this is the intention of the mischievous writer, no doubt he or she has failed in this regard woefully. His Majesty, Dr Ishaku Adda Ali, Aku Uka’s sole concern is about fairness, justice, equity and progress of the descendants of the old Kwararafa Confederacy and indeed, the country as a whole.

DANJUMA A. ADAMU, Esq.
The NENE of the Jukun People

Continue Reading

Trending