Connect with us

Opinion

Ballon dOr and the Credibility Question-Amir Abdulazeez

Published

on

 

By: Amir Abdulazeez

I am writing on this not because I have any significant concern for the award or its credibility or because it has any correlation with the wellbeing of anybody in need (which I am often more concerned about). I am rather doing so due to the massive perennial debate it generates especially among youths in Nigeria as well as the misinformed opinions around it. Again, the Ballon dOr like football itself has transcended sport to become part of international politics and history. I became shocked when I saw a globally renowned Muslim scholar congratulating Ousmane Dembele for winning the 2025 version and hailing its award to a practicing Muslim. Obviously, the crown now carries political significance that stretches well beyond the pitch.

Since its inception in 1956, the Ballon dOr has been regarded as footballs most prestigious individual award. Founded by France Football (conceived by sports writers Gabriel Hanot and Jacques Ferran), the award was initially designed to honour the best European player annually, with Stanley Matthews of Blackpool becoming the pioneer winner. Later, it evolved into a global prize, celebrating many other icons. Many have rightly questioned the credibility of the award but mostly on myopic grounds centred around player and club sentiments. However, as a long time football observer, I believe there are much broader issues regarding the credibility of the award that are worth discussing.
Let us start with the politics. During the Cold War (1947-1991), Eastern European players (more aligned to the Soviet Union) often struggled to receive equal recognition despite dazzling performances, while Western European stars (more aligned to the United States and friends) enjoyed more favourable media attention. Although Russian goalkeeper Lev Yashin won the award in 1963, many argue that his case was only the exception that proved the unwritten rule of ‘politics, geography and media exposure consistently play decisive roles’. Today, the award continues to reflect broader inequalities in football. European clubs dominate global coverage, which inflates the recognition of their stars. Players performing in less visible leagues whether in South America, Africa, or Asia rarely receive consideration, even if their contributions are extraordinary.

Another concern is the awards inconsistent eligibility rules over time. Until 1995, only European players competing in European clubs were considered, excluding legendary figures like Pelé and Diego Maradona from getting even a nomination. It was only after a rule change that non-Europeans in European leagues became eligible, allowing George Weah to win in 1995. Yet, by then, the award had already excluded decades of worthy non-European and non-European based winners. Mild allegations of racism also cast a dark shadow over the award.

Many believe players like Didier Drogba, Samuel Etoo, Yaya Touré, Sadio Mané and Mohammed Salah were routinely ranked below their pedigree. In 2021, French pundit Emmanuel Petit openly questioned whether African players were judged by double standards.

The selection of voters itself raises concerns. Initially restricted to journalists, it later expanded between 2010 and 2015 after a merger with FIFAs World Player of the Year, adding coaches and captains to the electorate whose votes often reflected tribal, national or club loyalties rather than merit. The 2016 reversion to journalist-only voting is perhaps a tacit admission of voting flaws thereby creating difficulties in comparisons across eras. For example, Lionel Messis consecutive wins (2009-2013) under a global, mixed electorate cannot be objectively compared to Michel Platinis (1983-1985) under a European-only jury. The current co-organization with UEFA, which began in 2024, signifies another attempt to lend the award more institutional weight. However, the constant changes in its format and governing alliances suggest an award in search of a stable identity, struggling to balance its commercial ambitions with its original purpose.

Advert

Bias towards attacking players has been an emerging hallmark of Ballon dOr selections. Legendary defenders like Paolo Maldini, Alessandro Nesta, Sergio Ramos and Roberto Carlos, who defined an era of defensive excellence, always fell short. The exception of Fabio Cannavaro in 2006 along with few others in the past, after a World Cup-winning campaign with Italy, serves as a testament to the rarity of a defender being recognized. More recently, Virgil van Dijks 2019 narrow runner-up finish sparked debate about whether non-attacking players could ever realistically win in a sport increasingly obsessed with goals and flair. The award relies heavily on football journalists who often prioritize goal highlight reels, statistics and global recognition over tactical nuance and defensive brilliance. Strikers and playmakers dominate the headlines that directly feeds into voting behaviour.

To combat positional bias, a more revolutionary approach could be implemented; nomination by quota. Why not have separate shortlists and voting panels for goalkeepers, defenders, midfielders and forwards? The top three or five of these categories could then be considered for the overall voting and eventual award. This would ensure that the unique skills of each position are evaluated by those who best understand them, guaranteeing that players are judged on their specializations rather than against others with contrasting roles.

The criteria for judgment also lack clarity and consistency. Officially, the award considers individual performance, team achievements, talent, fair play and career consistency. In practice, however, voters often seem swayed by a single outstanding tournament or by sentimental narratives. Luka Modrić’s 2018 victory after Croatia’s World Cup run exemplified this. While Modrić was superb, critics argued that other players had stronger year-round performances, but the emotional weight of Croatia’s fairy tale run tilted the scales. But how comes, this same emotion did not sway voters to select any player from Leicester Citys 2016 Premier League incredible winning team? A pervasive, though often unstated, criterion for many voters is team success. To win the Champions League or a major international tournament has become almost a prerequisite for contention. This creates an inherent unfairness, elevating players in dominant teams while punishing extraordinary individuals in less successful sides. This inconsistency reveals a fundamental confusion: is the award for the “best player”, most popular player or the “most successful player”?
The timing and calendar controversies is another issue. International tournaments occur every two years, creating periods where national team success heavily influences voting. World Cup years traditionally favour tournament winners, regardless of club form. The recent calendar change to August-July aimed to address this imbalance but created new problems, with voters now contending with assessing performances from overlapping seasons and tournaments. This temporal confusion affects not just voting patterns but public understanding of what the award actually represents; is it recognition for calendar year performance, season achievement or tournament success? The 2013 Ballon d’Or win by Cristiano Ronaldo was critiqued following timing inconsistencies from odd deadline extensions. The current system, which can see a player win a major tournament in the summer and have their performance rewarded a year later, creates a disjointed narrative.

The question of authority is another big one. FIFA represents 211 national associations, UEFA oversees European football’s institutional framework, yet it is a private French publication that bestow football’s most prestigious individual honour. The comparison with FIFAs The Best awards and UEFAs Player of the Year exposes this imbalance. This raises the paradox: why should a magazine possess such outsized influence in determining footballs most prestigious individual accolade, overshadowing awards backed by governing institutions? While there is nothing fundamentally wrong with this, it only emphasizes the need for France Football to show more responsibility by sanitizing and standardizing its award.
I am not in a position to coach France Football on how to reform its awards to minimize the credibility dilemma, they have much better experts who can do that. My concern is to see young football followers and analysts become more informed and equipped for deeper debates that are beyond sentiments. My other concern which has little to do with the Ballon dOr is to see football giving a little back to its estimated 3.5 billion fans that have made it powerful. While fans give it a lot, the sport appears to be giving almost nothing significant in return. It is sad to see football remaining silent, bias and indifferent in the face of global oppression and injustice. While it took FIFA and UEFA just four days to suspend Russia after its invasion of Ukraine in 2022, both bodies have remained criminally silent over two years since Israel launched its genocide on the football supporting people of Palestine.

24-09-2025

Opinion

Clerics Call, Citizens Cheer: Kano Rallies Behind Muhuyi’s Anti-Drug Task Force

Published

on

 

By Abba Anwar

Politics apart, if there is anything non-political that can open corridor of victory for the Governor of Kano State, Eng Abba Kabir Yusuf to secure second term in office, that thing, could automatically be his fight against drug abuse and other related crimes strategy. Not only the fight, the political will and the commitment are but best options for better result.

The leadership of the State Multi-Agency Task Force on Drug Abuse and other Related Crimes, under Barrister Muhiyi Magaji Rimingado and his able team, gives much hope and periscopes brighter future for Kano. Once a leading state in drug peddling and substance abuse. But in recent Kano political history, Governor Yusuf excels in the area of suffocating drug abuse and other related crimes, with the bringing on board of the Task Force.

No wonder from the Minbars (pulpits) of Kano’s Mosques to the timelines of Facebook, X and WhatsApp, a single refrain is ringing out across the state: Stand with the Task Force! The war against drug abuse and illicit trafficking has taken a decisive turn, as the State Task Force pushes deeper into the Local Government Areas with arrests, raids, sensitization and community engagement.

The result is unprecedented. When Islamic clerics are urging congregations to pray for and protect the officers, civil society groups are applauding the boldness, fearless operations and thousands of citizens online are flooding comment sections with commendations and prayers. In a moment that feels like renewed hope. Result? Kano is uniting from Pulpits to pixels, behind the fight to reclaim its streets and secure the future of its youth.

The Chairman of the Council of Ulama of Nigeria, Kano State Branch, Shaykh Ibrahim Khalil, though a gubernatorial candidate of the opposition party, calls on the people of Kano state and beyond to support the work of the Task Force and secure the future of our younger ones. This he does without any recourse to political party differences. A Shaykh like no other.

In a widely circulated video clip, Shaykh Khalil made a courageous call as he said, “I am calling on my brothers the people of Kano state and beyond to stand up, cooperate and support the Task Force led by Barrister Muhiyi Magaji Rimingado in the fight against drug abuse and other related crimes. Because the thing is really harming us as a people. It is also retrogressive to our youth.

I also call on the government to please create a platform where people will be selected to engage these young people, our future, the youth, and counsel them. So that government will come to know their problems and frustrations. With the view to proffering lasting solution.”

Reiterating his commitment and support for the Task Force’s tasking responsibility, Shaykh Khalil emphasized that, “We are absolutely hopeful that, this Committee will help much in this area of drug abuse and other related crimes.

“We are also calling on all people to rise up and help Muhuyi Magaji in this struggle with prayers. It is absolutely necessary for government to listen to these suspected criminals and know their real worries,” fatherly advice by Chairman Council of Ulama, Kano Branch.

The Commander General of the agency saddled with the responsibility of ‘Al-Amr Bil Ma’ aruf Wannahayi Anil Munkar’ (enjoying good deed and forbidden evil), Kano State Hisbah Board, Shaykh Aminu Ibrahim Daurawa, in another widely circulated video clip encouraged that, “On behalf of our Hisbah, with twenty thousand (20,000) personnel, we are sending our good wishes and commendation for the establishment of Barrister Muhiyi Magaji Rimingado’s Task Force on the fight against drug abuse, phone snatching and even the killing of innocent people.

We should all thank His Excellency, the Governor for this great work. We are calling on people to commend the Task Force. This is a very important committee for all of us to encourage and support. Imams should preach against drug abuse on Minbars. So also journalists and social media users, among many others.”

This Task Force, according to Shaykh Daurawa, “… is not for Barrister Muhiyi Magaji alone. We call on all those who support those miscreants to please desist from that. Doing that is counter-productive and bad for all of us.”

Before saying anything concerning praises Barrister Rimingado enjoys in the social media, let me begin with commending social media handlers of the Task Force. Clips of many operations are viral in the social media. So also in the conventional media platforms, especially our radio stations and other national dailies.

I personally searched many videos shared/posted on the Task Force’s Facebook handle, monitoring operations, raids and arrests. My major concern for this, is knowing how Kano people react to Barrister Rimingado’s operations and other activities under the Task Force.

While over 90 percent of the reviewed comments are praises, commendations, encouragement and prayers directed at Barrister Rimingado and his team, like 5 percent or so condemned the mode of operations and 5 percent or so condemned the work of the Task Force in its entirety. The tiny percentage that totally condemned the Task Force is mainly because of political differences. Or because they work and judge with hearsay.

Let me share some of the comments here. I visited some postings and monitored their comment sections. I also monitored shares and likes.

A fraction of my findings is briefly presented below:

1- In posting “A” there are 4.8k and 225 comments. Some of the comments are that of Sagir Aminu who said, “Our people should not politicize this problem. It affects all. May Allah see us through.” Mannir Sale Muhammad critically observed that, “Masha Allah. All what Muhiyi Magaji said is true in its purest form. I saw a boy in railway who is always intoxicated from drug abuse.” Imam Bichi commented, “We wish you the best always.”

Advert

Bashir Nasidi Muhammad encouraged that, “We are solidly behind you in the fight against drug abuse. But you should make sure that there is a need for good investigation always. We are wishing you well.”

Jameel Yareema commended that, “I really enjoy your commitment. May Allah help you and guide you always. And whoever breaks the law should be punished.” Aminuddeen Abdullahi commended and encouraged that, “Wallahi Wallahi Wallahi we are with you always. Ours is to say may Allah protect you and make you successful Barrister Muhiyi Magaji Rimingado.”

2. In posting “B” there are 7.6k Likes, 282 Comments and 220 Shares. Under this one Sulaiman Sani said, “Truthfully this is the most important and crucial job that Abba’s administration created since their assumption.” Yusuf Muhammad commented that, “Oga this is Fashion Parade because you can’t fight drugs with (sic) telling them you are coming to them by (sic) siren.”

Hafizu Akilu said, “Whenever you see someone condemning this work of Muhuyi’s Committee he is not loving Kano. Or such a person is not from Kano. Because I observed there are a few individuals who hates Kano and they are condemning the effort.”

Hamza Musa compared Muhuyi and Wike in his comment. He said, “Wike and Muhuyi are like twin brothers. Even if you don’t like them, but you can’t deny that they are working. Though I don’t like Muhuyi because of a reason I reserve for myself, I think he deserves federal appointment.”

Musa Yunusa commented that, “Wallahi Wallahi Wallahi I’m extremely happy with what Muhuyi’s Committee did concerning those children around Nassarawa Specialists Hospital, (now called Abdullahi Wase Hospital). You always see them abusing drugs.” Abdullahi Ismail Muhammed KT, who sees the Task Force work as a mere content creation said, “This is a good content.”

3- In posting “C” there are 7.6k Likes, 282 Comments and 220 Shares. Under this Ibrahim Y. Said commented that, “If the Kano State government is really serious about this, marketers of such illicit drug should be arrested. And all routes used by them in trafficking the drugs should also be blocked.” Usman T Abdullahi, who saw the operation as a film or drama, queried that,” Name of the Scene.” To me you may not blame him. Probably he witnessed similar efforts in the past, that derailed. So it is up to the Task Force to take the challenge and prove to Usman and like-minded individuals that it is no longer as usual.

Bukhari Ashafa, who volunteered to be part of this great effort, urged that, “Please give us the phone number for giving you intel.” Saleh Nuhu commented, “Show of force. This is our collective fight.” And Usman Tijjani Abdulqadir said “Well done.”

4- In posting “D” there are 4.9k Likes, 107 Comments and 79 Shares. One Musa Ahmed encouraged that, “Wallahi whenever an educated man is assigned with responsibility he will deliver. In less that one Month Muhuyi terrified drug abusers and marketers.” Nasir Sani Dansaja who looked at the medical side of the operations advised that, “Please you should be using hand gloves next time, for safety.”

Malam Usman Fantami encouraged and appreciated the personality of Barrister Muhuyi, he said, “Whichever appointment is given to Muhuyi I believe without any doubt that, the result will be fruitful.”

5- In posting “E” there are 14k likes, 694 comments, 705 shares and 379 saved. This is a posting from BBC Hausa Service, in an interview with Muhuyi. In the comment section, one Bashir Mukhtar said, “I urge respectfully the Governor of Kano State to please encourage Barrister Muhiyi with everything and resources. So that he can work well continuously. I also urge His Excellency to please reopen Reformatory Institute Kiru and to establish another one in Kano Central and Kano North. So that the Centres can cater very well for the children involved in this menace of drug abuse. May Allah continue to protect our families and cater for those coming much later.”

Umar Usman Danlarabawa in his comment observed something critically important. He said, “Malam Muhiyi Magaji my observation concerning parents’ undertaking whose children are involved in this problem. Most of those young people engaging in this drug abuse cannot be controlled by their parents. Their hearts are that hard that they don’t even listen to their parents.

When a father is taken away by the Task Force who then will cater for the remaining children back home? When a father confessed that he can’t correct his ward, so the burden is on government to know what to do with the bad egg. But for a father who comes forward to bail his child or children, then such a father should write undertaking. I do hope that Muhuyi will see this advice and work with it.”

Abdulmutallib Muhammad Sani, in his comment adviced that, “If and only if government and Judges will support Muhiyi Magaji the effort will be successful. Because I know him as someone who keeps faith in whatever responsibility assigned to him. He is an achiever. Though I differ with him in politics, but I support him hundred percent in this struggle. There is nothing more harmful for us in Kano than drug abuse and related crimes.”

Muhammad G. Muhammad warned in his comment that, “People are taking this problem for granted. Unknown to them that this is a very serious problem. That we must all wake up an fight collectively. We just have to aid our able security agencies win this war.”

Hafizu Akilu another commentator queried with annoyance that, “In the entire world setting who gives birth to a boy and pushes him to the society for life direction, if not a Hausa man? His (Hausa man) is only interested in making love and producing babies without any recourse to how to train them in their upbringing.”

Above are some of the comments I came across with while examining how Kano people react to the work of the Task Force.

One greater thing I observed is, even the security agents going round with Barrister Rimingado for operations, are ready for the work. You will see courage, will and belief that the leader of the team, Rimingado, is courageous, unapologetic and honest in discharging his responsibility. The moral support is there, being promoted by the Chairman.

My final call is to the Governor, Sir this Task Force alone if handled well, can give you second tenure comfortably. And beyond that, it can pave your way to the Jannatul-Fiddaus.

Anwar writes from Kano
Friday, 11th September, 2026

Continue Reading

Opinion

Per Ishaq Samaila: “Waziri” for Strategy. “Mai Jama’a” for Service. One Man. One Mission. Ibrahim Kabir Masari

Published

on

 

By Abba Anwar

I read with great admiration and clear endorsement the piece by Ishaq Samaila titled “Why President Tinubu Calls Ibrahim Kabir Masari ‘Waziri’ and the First Lady Senator Oluremi Tinubu calls him ‘Mai Jama’a.” It is not only an envelope of precision, it is also the kind of political writing we need more of under the current political atmosphere; thoughtful, measured, and rooted in substance rather than fallacy.

Ishaq Samaila deserves commendation for capturing what many in Abuja understand but few can articulate so clearly. As he rightly noted, “President Bola Ahmed Tinubu describes Alhaji Ibrahim Kabir Masari as his ‘Waziri’ — a traditional title associated with counsel, responsibility, political strategy and service close to leadership. And First Lady Senator Oluremi Tinubu has referred to him as ‘Mai Jama’a’ a Hausa expression meaning “man of the people.”

These are not casual and loosed nicknames. In Samaila’s analysis, they represent “… two defining sides of Masari’s political identity.” I could not agree more. And it is on this premise that I offer this addendum, not to debate, but to amplify and showcase how Masari, the man, embodies every word in that excellent article.

Being “Waziri” in tensed and difficult political atmosphere isn’t a joke. The man, Masari, is an embodiment of Presidential trust, vision for the nation and unwavering loyalty from the former. While the latter maintains a very long standing relationship. He (Masari) is entrusted with the weight of the nation’s political stability. It is to be the calm in the storm, the ear that listens as it sounds musical to it, before decisions are made, and the hand that builds bridges where others see walls and castles in the air.

That is Masari. As Special Adviser to the President on Political and Other Matters, he has operated with a rare combination of discretion, ingenuity, efficiency and effectiveness. At a time when governance requires managing 36 states, 360 federal constituencies, and thousands of political interests, Masari has been the President’s henchman and trusted anchor.

He does not grandstand. He does not seek credit. His work is in the consultations that prevent crises, in the engagements that align stakeholders with the Renewed Hope Agenda, and in the political intelligence that allows leadership to stay ahead of challenges. Also in political sophistication that strengthens presidential ambition through utilization of all options.

This is the modern definition of a Waziri: a man who serves power by serving the country first. President Tinubu, a master political strategist himself, recognized this quality in Masari and brought him closer in strategy and execution. It was not by accident. It was designed long before now. A relationship built over decades and rooted in trust.

Advert

If “Waziri” explains Masari in the Villa, “Mai Jama’a” explains Masari in the villages, in our communities. And this is where his political genius truly shines. This is where he speaks wisdom, freedom and breaks chain of hardship, to stardom, to build a kingdom of service. He is a great leader and mentor who never left ground, grassroot. Hence, he is well grounded and firmer.

The title “Man of the People” is the hardest to earn in Nigerian politics because the people themselves must give it to you. You cannot buy it. You cannot lobby for it. You can only work for it. The title is more or less, achievable and non-replaceable. Masari toiled for it and achieved it.

First Lady’s description speaks to something deeper than politics. It speaks to character and characteristics. To accessibility and creativity. To a man who, despite holding one of the most sensitive political offices in the country, still believes in his people, still attends community events, and still understands the language of the ordinary Nigerian. Hence the initiation of many interventions. To help people become economically independent, culturally creative and politically reliable.

From Katsina to Kano, from party meetings to condolence visits, Masari has maintained what Samaila correctly called “… grassroots orientation and his ability to maintain contact with communities, political supporters and ordinary citizens.” What a reliable political figure. Reliability in its purest form.

He is proof that you can be in the room where national strategy is decided in the morning, and still be on the ground listening to market women and youth leaders in the evening. A balanced political figure, who believes strategy keeps political opponents continuously busy from a position of weakness. That balance is rare. That balance is leadership. That balance is resistance against a non-welfare state.

As Samaila concluded so powerfully, “Tinubu’s ‘Waziri’ is also the First Lady’s ‘Mai Jama’a.’ One description highlights his role around political leadership; the other highlights his connection with the people.”

In today’s Nigeria we need leaders who understand high-level politics but are not imprisoned by it. A clear explanation of President Tinubu’s symbol, a broken chain of slavery. Where poverty of rationality remains in limbo. We need advisers who can navigate complex stakeholder dynamics without losing touch with the pain and aspirations of the people. We need a Waziri who is also Mai Jama’a.

It is absolutely true that Masari depicts this with all that is said in Samaila’s article. He depicts loyalty without sycophancy. He depicts strategy without arrogance. He depicts accessibility without losing authority. The same way he depicts engagement without scarcity.

He is a bridge-builder in an age of division, where weaker opponents misrepresent facts with fictions, vision with illusion, and hope with hype. A stabilizer in an age of noise, who clearly differentiates empty noise from real choices. A public servant who understands that titles are not for decoration, they are for duty. They are for selfless service to humanity.

While I concur with the author in all his submission, let me also join him in celebrating this well-thought and timely piece. It reminds us that in the midst of our national challenges, we still have men and women in government who embody service, humility, and competence.

Alhaji Masari, by all standard, is one of them. The President saw the Waziri in him. The First Lady saw the Mai Jama’a in him. The people are beginning to see both. His interventions to his people is invaluable. His faith in this administration is absolute. His hope is renewed. His effort in renewing people’s hope is rewarding and visibly engaging.

Samaila Bravo for explaining in a more clearer terms, Waziri and Mai Jama’a in Masari. A golden coin of two inseparable sides.

Anwar writes from Kano
Thursday, 10th September, 2026

Continue Reading

Opinion

Fifty Years, Four Terms. A Life Of Enterprise, Scholarship And Public Service-By Abbas Tajuddin

Published

on

 

 

Today, I celebrate my colleague and friend, Hon. Abdulmumin Jibrin Kofa, as he attains the golden milestone of 50.

Turning 50 is more than a birthday; it is a moment to pause, reflect and appreciate a journey already rich in accomplishment, service and impact.

Over four terms in the House of Representatives, Abdulmumin has brought to our legislative enterprise a rare combination of intellectual depth, business experience, courage and an unmistakable independence of mind. From his leadership of key committees, including Finance, Appropriations, Land Transport, Foreign Affairs, and Housing and Habitat, his contributions have reflected a strong grasp of public finance and a broad understanding of national affairs.

Advert

He is, without doubt, one of the sharpest minds in our Parliament. His academic accomplishments, including two PhDs and an MBA, his experience in business and academia, his executive education at leading institutions, and his service at the Federal Housing Authority have all contributed to the distinctive perspective he brings to public service.

But beyond the degrees, positions and accomplishments is a man who has never been afraid to speak his mind.

Abdulmumin is forthright. He is courageous. He is independent-minded. And he is never one to hide his convictions.

In a Parliament, such voices matter. A healthy legislature must have room for principled disagreement, robust debate and legislators willing to speak for what they believe is right and in the interest of their constituents.

As you celebrate 50, dear Abdulmumin, I celebrate not only the milestones behind you but also the possibilities ahead.

On behalf of the leadership and the entire membership of the House of Representatives, I wish you good health, renewed strength, greater accomplishments and many more years of impactful service to your constituents and our dear nation.

May the next chapter be even greater than the first five decades.

Happy 50th Birthday, Hon. Abdulmumin Jibrin Kofa.

Continue Reading

Trending