Connect with us

News

Cover Story: Natasha’s Recall Process—Is It Realizable or Political Vendetta?

Published

on

 

Following the issue of recall that surfaced recently in Kogi Central regarding Senator Natasha, NIGERIAN TRACKER’s Yusuf Danjuma Yunusa takes a look at the scenario and files this story for Nigerian Tracker this weekend.

By Yusuf Danjuma Yunusa

On the 20th of February, 2025, an altercation occurred between Senator Natasha and the President of the Chamber, Senator Akpabio. What birthed the altercation was the directive from the President of the Senate, Senator Godswill Akpabio, which demanded that Senator Natasha relocate to a newly allocated seat given to her due to a circumstance of the house.

The circumstance, which the Chief Whip of the house, Senator Muhammed Tahir Munguno of Borno State, in the midst of the rancor, stood up and read the rules guiding the conduct of the house in respect to the directive of the Senate President. According to the rules of the house as read by the Chief Whip, it is at the discretion of the President of the Senate to allocate seats to each senator. Also, according to the rules, a senator must only speak from the seat allocated to them. These are contained in Order 6, Rule 2 of their constitution.

Furthermore, the Chief Whip, in the course of reading out the rules of the house, gave a reason why the senator from Kogi Central, Senator Natasha, was instructed to change her seat. He revealed that two senators from the opposition parties—Senator Ned Nwokwo and Senator Francis Ezenwa—both from the Peoples Democratic Party and Labour Party, respectively, defected to the ruling All Progressive Congress. Hence, the need for a change of seats according to the arrangements of the members of the Senate.

It was after the refusal of Senator Natasha to heed the spelled-out rules that the President of the Senate ordered her dismissal from the house. Even with the order, the embattled senator insisted that she must make a contribution to the debate of an issue that was ongoing in the house at the moment, but the President persisted that she must make her contributions from the new seat allocated to her, else she would not be recognized. The two parties did not reconcile, and this led to Senator Natasha being led out of the house by the Sergeant-at-Arms.

Additionally, on the 28th of that same month, February 2025, Senator Natasha granted an interview on the Arise TV channel where she alleged that the President of the Senate was persecuting her because she refused him sex. The allegation sparked lots of debates as to the authenticity of her claim because, while the accused Senate President had been censured for this same act by one Joy Nunieh—the former NDDC Boss—in 2020 when the former was the Minister for Niger Delta Affairs, Senator Natasha had also made such allegations against different personalities in the country which were proven false—notably that of Reno Omokri.

In response to the above allegation, the wife of the Senate President, Ekaette Akpabio, during a press address at their residence, dismissed the allegation, citing that her responsible husband is incapable of making such sexual advances. The Senate President himself, through his aide, denied the allegation.

Moreover, on the 5th of March, 2025, Senator Natasha submitted a petition to the Ethics Committee of the Red Chamber of the National Assembly, notifying the committee officially of the sexual harassment, abuse of office, and other crimes committed against her by the President of the Senate. The petition was received but, however, rejected and dismissed after due consideration of the processes of the petition. The Ethics Committee learned that the petition lacked the due processes of the rules of the chamber.

Consequent to the above action of hers, the Senate decided and ruled that she should be suspended for a period of six months and also withdrew her security details for the stipulated period. Later after this development, her recall process was initiated.

It was alleged that some political establishments in the state, Kogi, who are unhappy about her show of doggedness which has caused the President of the Senate grave embarrassment, orchestrated the move to recall her from the Senate. This allegation, again, was made by the embattled senator herself. She emphatically stated that the President of the Senate had a conversation with the governor of her state, Usman Ododo, on the 12th of March, 2025, to initiate her recall process and fund the expenses.

While the recall process was initiated, it was, however, on the 4th of April, 2025, ruled by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) that the recall process fell short of the requirements of Section 69(a) of the constitution. Hence, it failed, and as such, no further action should be taken in that regard.

When contacted to shed more light on the issue of recall and its political implications, a political scientist based in Abuja, Dr. Muttaqa Yushau Abdulrauf, said:

“A recall is a process where members of a particular constituency can stage a process to recall their elected representative, and this is quite stipulated in Section 69 of the Nigerian constitution as part of their democratic right; either due to their discontent or the inability of their elected representative to represent that particular constituency. So, it’s a constitutionally provided right of the constituents.

Advert

However, if one examines all the recall attempts in our Fourth Republic, he would find out that they are orchestrated by a lot of vendetta and as well by the discontent expressed from the top (not from the bottom). What that means is that most of the recall processes are as a result of a particular member not aligning with the political elites at the top (be it the presidency or the ruling party). If one checks the case of the representative of Birnin Kudu, in Jigawa State, Honorable Faruk Adamu, it’s the same thing.

It was an orchestrated attempt because she was a staunch opposition of the then ruling party. The orchestration was tensed to the extent that all the opposition leaders had to gather in Birnin Kudu to protest. The recall didn’t materialize. Another similar case of orchestrated recall process but which doesn’t have a similar root cause is that of Senator Natasha.

It’s obvious from all indications that it’s an orchestrated attempt from the political elites who are not happy with the way and manner she engaged the Senate President. A matter that was supposed to be dealt with by the Senate Committee on Ethics or other laid-down procedures of the National Assembly instead warrants lots of inducements for the constituents to reject and recall their elected representative.

The two attempts highlighted above show that there are clearly initiatives of the elites which didn’t emanate from the discontent of the constituents. So, the clarion call to the custodians of democracy is that the laid-down procedures should be allowed to flourish. Because, in a democratic environment, it’s allowed for dissenting voices to be recognized. That is the essence of the democratic journey. But because of the culture of impunity, favoritism, and not hearing from the contending voices together before passing verdict, democracy is shrinking,” said Dr. Muttaqa.

Conversely, the sexual harassment case which was filed by Senator Natasha was, on the 26th of March, 2025, supported by a mere affidavit. This also sparked lots of debates on the social media space. To the dismay of some of those defending Senator Natasha, an affidavit, instead of ocular proof, was what she presented as support for her petition against the Senate President.

While Nigerians are waiting patiently for the outcome of the petition, Senator Natasha again alleged that the President of the Senate, in collaboration with the former governor of Kogi State and his protégé, Governor Usman Ododo, are planning to have her assassinated. This was revealed during her visit to the state which was tagged “Natasha’s Homecoming,” where she addressed the mammoth crowd that welcomed her.

At this very moment, on the 5th of April, 2025, the court has, on the 4th of April, 2025, barred both parties—Senators Akpabio and Natasha—from granting any interviews henceforth.

According to a renown Political Scientist Dr Kabir Sufi Said said ‘Well, there are several grounds which a legislature can be recalled. One is, when there’s poor representation or when the electorates are not satisfied with the quality of the representation or when there are so many other issues with which there are dissatisfaction on the side of the electorates towards their legislature–which in this case could be a member of the Senate or House of the Representative or a member of the State House of Assembly as provided by the constitution.

He said The section 69 and 110 of the Nigerian constitution are where the recall processes are contained. The process comprises of three things mainly: first of them which is a submission of petition by the constituents, notifying the electoral body that they want to recall their representative(i.e a Senator, House of the Representative member or the State House of Assembly member). Secondly, the petition must be signed by fifty percent of the registered voters in the constituency and as soon as that request is submitted to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), a referendum, which is the last thing, is expected to be conducted within the period of three months(90 days) for the recall of the concerned legislature as explained by the section 110 of the constitution.

The process is a tedious one as it concerns the collection of signatures, and the verification of those signatures by the Independent National Electoral Commission(INEC). So many other issues are explained in the electoral acts(Section 2 and Section 113 of the electoral acts). These sections further explained the process through which INEC would verify the signatures and then conduct the referendum. The process of recall could be said that it’s synonymous with that of impeachment of the President, Vice president, Governors, Deputy Gorvernors and Chairmen. This denotes that, if the various executives mentioned can be checked through impeachments, then the legislatures must, in one way or the other, be checked through the recall processes.

As soon as the petition is received and the aforementioned requirements are met, then the electoral body which is the INEC would make a declaration as to whether the recall process is successful or not.

That being said, the challenges in the recall process as to the initiation of the request to recall a representative and as well the collection and verification of the signatures are another tedious sides of the process. It has been alleged that the said challenges are deliberate efforts from the legislatures who took part in the amendment of the laws since 2010. Because, in reality, it’s difficult to get the fifty percent registered voters to sign the petition where, most elections in this country are won by barely 25 to 27 percent participation. Also, it’s very rare to see a Nigerian that’s consistent with a signature since the verification process warrants that a comparison between the signatures on the voters’ cards and on the petition must be the same. With this analysis, it’s obvious that a recall process is almost impossible to materialize in Nigeria.

According to Dr Sufi ,’However, in a situation whereby the process is successful, the development would be communicated to the affected legislature and a by-election would be conducted in order to have a new representative for the constituents. It’s on this note we are calling for a check into the recall processes and even the impeachment process as well. There’s need for a more realizable processes for these two exercises to be feasible.”

News

Kwankwaso Threatens N10bn Lawsuit Against Primate Ayodele

Published

on

 

By Yusuf Danjuma Yunusa

Former Kano State Governor and Vice-Presidential Candidate of the Nigeria Democratic Congress, NDC, Dr. Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso, has threatened legal action against Primate Babatunde Elijah Ayodele over alleged defamatory statements made against him.

Mr Kwankwaso, through his legal representatives, Magaji Mato Ibrahim SAN & Co., issued a formal demand letter to the cleric, accusing him of publishing false, malicious and damaging allegations capable of tarnishing his reputation and political standing.

In the letter dated June 11, 2026, and signed by Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Magaji Mato Ibrahim, the former governor demanded an immediate retraction and public apology within 24 hours or face a lawsuit seeking N10 billion in damages.

According to the lawyers, the controversial remarks were made by Primate Ayodele during a church service that was recorded and broadcast live to a large audience before being circulated widely across social media platforms and news outlets.

The legal team alleged that the cleric falsely claimed that Mr Kwankwaso was insincere in his relationship with the presidential candidate of the NDC, Peter Obi, and would eventually betray him.

The letter specifically cited statements allegedly made by Ayodele, including claims that “Kwankwaso is fake to Obi,” that “Kwankwaso will betray Obi,” and that “Kwankwaso has been paid to be Vice President to Obi.”

Advert

Mr Kwankwaso’s lawyers described the statements as “false, malicious, deliberate and premeditated,” arguing that they were intended to portray their client as dishonest, deceitful and politically untrustworthy.

They maintained that the comments directly attacked Mr Kwankwaso’s credibility, sincerity and integrity as the running mate to Mr Obi in the forthcoming elections.

“Our client’s attention has been drawn to your viral publication which is trending on all social media platforms and in international and local news outlets, wherein you published malicious and defamatory contents against him geared toward tarnishing his long-earned reputation in Nigeria and beyond,” the letter stated.

The legal practitioners further argued that the alleged publication was designed to damage Kwankwaso’s reputation and create division within the NDC and among its supporters.

According to the lawyers, Mr Kwankwaso has built a distinguished political career spanning several decades, serving as Governor of Kano State, Minister of Defence, Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives, Senator and presidential candidate.

They contended that the cleric’s comments were capable of undermining public confidence in the former governor and causing significant reputational harm.

Consequently, the legal team demanded that Mr Ayodele publish a “full, direct and unequivocal retraction and apology” on all platforms where the alleged defamatory remarks were circulated.

The lawyers also requested a written undertaking from the cleric, committing him to refrain from making or republishing any further defamatory statements against Kwankwaso.

The letter warned that failure to comply with the demands within the stipulated 24-hour period would leave their client with no option but to initiate legal proceedings.

“Take notice that if you neglect, fail or refuse to accede to our reasonable demands within the stipulated time frame, we have our client’s unflinching instruction to take out appropriate legal proceedings against you without further recourse to you,” the lawyers stated.

They added that the proposed lawsuit would seek damages amounting to N10 billion as well as the full cost of litigation and other reliefs the court may deem appropriate.

As of the time of filing this report, Primate Ayodele had not publicly responded to the allegations or the legal threat issued by Kwankwaso’s lawyers.

Daily Nigerian

Continue Reading

News

Senate Passes State Police Bill, Empowers Govs to Appoint Commissioners

Published

on

 

By Yusuf Danjuma Yunusa

The Senate on Wednesday passed the landmark Constitution Alteration Bill seeking to establish state police across the federation, marking a major step in Nigeria’s decades-long debate over decentralising the country’s policing structure to address worsening insecurity.

The passage followed a rigorous clause-by-clause consideration of the bill and came after more than two-thirds of senators voted in support through a manual voting process conducted on the floor of the chamber.

Senate President, Godswill Akpabio, announced the passage of the legislation after lawmakers overwhelmingly backed the proposal during plenary.

The upper chamber approved the bill after considering the report of the Senate Committee on the Review of the Constitution, presented by Deputy Senate President and committee chairman, Barau Jibrin.

The bill’s provisions were first considered at the Committee of the Whole before lawmakers adopted them and proceeded to a final vote.

Debate on the legislation was led by Senate Leader, Opeyemi Bamidele, who urged senators to support what many lawmakers described as a critical reform aimed at strengthening internal security and improving response to local threats.

The legislation seeks to establish a state policing framework that would operate concurrently with the existing federal police system, effectively ending the exclusive control of policing by the Federal Government.

A key provision of the bill “empowers state governors to appoint Commissioners of Police for their respective states, subject to confirmation by the state Houses of Assembly.”

Advert

Under Clause 17 of the proposed constitutional amendment, “while the Federal Police Service will continue to be headed by the Inspector-General of Police, each State Police Service shall be headed by a Commissioner of Police appointed by the governor and confirmed by the legislature of the state.”

The bill further outlines the operational relationship between governors and state police commands.

Section 17(6) provides that “a governor may issue lawful written directives of a general policy nature to the Commissioner of Police on matters relating to the maintenance of public safety and public order within the state.”

To address concerns over potential abuse of the new policing structure by state governments, lawmakers included safeguards aimed at protecting political freedoms and civil liberties.

Section 17(7) specifically states that “a state Commissioner of Police shall not arrest, detain, investigate or deploy force against any person, political party or group merely for criticising the government except in accordance with the law.”

The provision is intended to prevent state police formations from being weaponised against political opponents, activists, journalists or dissenting voices and ensures that any action taken must comply with due process and existing legal provisions.

The passage of the bill came barely an hour after the Senate abandoned plans to deploy an electronic voting system for the consideration of the State Police Bill and other constitutional amendment proposals.

Lawmakers instead adopted a manual voting process following concerns that technical glitches affecting some voting devices could disenfranchise senators and undermine the integrity of the exercise.

The decision followed a motion made by Bamidele, who argued that every senator should be given an equal opportunity to participate in the historic vote.

Akpabio backed the proposal, insisting that an open voting system would not only guarantee full participation but also promote transparency by allowing Nigerians to know where their representatives stood on critical constitutional issues.

Several senior government officials, including the Governor of Kaduna State, Senator Uba Sani; Governor of Ogun State, Prince Dapo Abiodun; Governor of Ondo State, Lucky Aiyedatiwa; and the Chief of Staff to President Bola Tinubu, Femi Gbajabiamila, witnessed the Senate’s decision on the floor of the Senate.

Following the adoption of the motion, senators were called individually to publicly declare their votes during the consideration of the constitutional amendment bills.

The successful passage of the State Police Bill represents one of the most consequential constitutional reforms undertaken by the 10th National Assembly and is expected to reshape Nigeria’s security architecture.

Continue Reading

News

Alkalanci holds fact-checking, media and information literacy workshop for Northern Islamic clerics in Abuja

Published

on

 

Islamic clerics and scholars drawn across Northern states and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) have been urged to play a more active role in combatting misinformation and promoting responsible information sharing as Nigeria approaches the 2027 general elections.

The call was made at a two-day capacity-building workshop on “Building Resilient Communities through Fact-Checking and Media and Information Literacy,” organised by Alkalanci in Abuja.
The workshop brought together 40 Islamic clerics and scholars from across Northern Nigeria to strengthen their capacity to identify, verify and counter false information within their communities. The programme was supported by the MacArthur Foundation and implemented in partnership with the Centre for Democracy and Development (CDD).
In his welcome remarks, Alkalanci Editor, Alhassan Bala, described the workshop as both timely and necessary, particularly in light of preparations for Nigeria’s 2027 general elections and the growing threat posed by artificial intelligence-generated misinformation.
He warned that misinformation and disinformation often increase during election periods, while foreign information manipulation and interference (FIMI) have become an emerging concern globally.
“We are also in a time where AI-generated pictures, videos and audio, popularly known as deepfakes, are becoming increasingly sophisticated. This is another important reason for community leaders to understand the information environment and learn practical ways to protect themselves and their communities from falsehood,” Bala said.
According to him, Islamic clerics remain among the most trusted voices in society, making them critical partners in promoting information integrity.
“The sermons you deliver, the lessons you teach, and the words you speak carry enormous influence. For millions of people, your voices are voices of guidance and authority. With such trust comes a profound responsibility to ensure that the information shared with communities is true, verified and beneficial,” he said.
Bala noted that Alkalanci has previously organised similar workshops for Islamic clerics and religious leaders in Sokoto, Kano, Gombe and Maradi in the Republic of Niger. The organisation also conducted a dedicated workshop for female Islamic scholars, teachers and religious leaders in Kaduna State as part of efforts to strengthen community resilience against misinformation.
Speaking to journalists, Alkalanci Programme Manager, Victoria Bamas, said engaging religious leaders is critical because of their influence and credibility within communities.
“Religious leaders remain among the most trusted voices in our communities. By equipping them with media and information literacy skills, we are strengthening their ability to guide their congregations and communities towards accurate information and away from harmful misinformation,” she said.
Bamas added that the rapid evolution of the information ecosystem requires citizens to develop the skills needed to critically assess and verify information before sharing it.
“We are in a time where the means of distributing information is no longer in the hands of a few. Anyone with a mobile phone and internet connection can create and share content with large audiences. This makes media and information literacy more important than ever, as people need the skills to navigate the information space and identify credible and accurate information,” she said.
Speaking at the opening ceremony on behalf of the Secretary-General of the Nigerian Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs (NSCIA), Professor Is-haq Olanrewaju Oloyede, the NSCIA Public Affairs Officer, Abbas Jimoh, said misinformation, disinformation and other forms of information disorder have contributed to misunderstanding among communities, heightened religious and ethnic tensions, undermined public trust and, in some instances, fuelled insecurity and violence.
“We live in an era where information travels faster than ever before. Through social media platforms, messaging applications, blogs and online news outlets, information reaches millions of people within seconds. While these technologies have created tremendous opportunities for communication and education, they have also enabled the rapid spread of falsehoods, rumours, manipulated content and divisive propaganda,” he said.
He noted that Islamic teachings emphasise the importance of verifying information before acting upon it.
“Religious leaders must become champions of truth, peace and informed citizenship. They must encourage communities to pause before sharing information, verify before believing, and seek evidence before making judgments,” he added.
Participants received practical training on understanding misinformation, disinformation and fake news; recognising biased and manipulative content; fact-checking techniques and verification tools; artificial intelligence and information integrity; and the role of faith leaders in promoting responsible communication.

Advert

The workshop also featured discussions on how mosques and religious institutions can serve as trusted centres of information and guidance, helping communities respond more effectively to false narratives and harmful rumours.

Continue Reading

Trending