Connect with us

Opinion

Re: Re: Kano 2027 Projection: APC Chances, Intrigues and Realistic Reality

Published

on

 

By Abba Anwar

All praises be to The Almighty Allah, that my write – up on the above subject matter ignited discussions, displeasure, sensible and below sensible observations.

My friend Adamu Mukhtar Unguwar Gini, the author of the rejoinder, who chooses to behave as a gentleman, has raised some issues, that I cherish from the bottom of my heart.

My friend I am sorry if some of my answers do not recognize your position as one of the Protocol officers of the National Chairman of APC, Dr Abdullahi Umar Ganduje, CON, and as Chairman Coalition of APC Youth Movement.

Or alleged self-assigned position of Protocol officer of the former Governor, Dr Nasiru Yusuf Gawuna or an alleged self-assigned Protocol Officer of Hon Nasir Bala Ja’o’ji. But all my submission I assure you will definitely be centered around issues you raised.

While assuring that you wouldn’t want join issues with me, you opined that, “The intention here is just to point at some salient issues skipped by the writer and underscores (sic) the need for establishing the imperative for peace and unity in our great party, the All Progressives Congress (APC).”

You said, “To me what the APC needs most now is peace and unity of purpose in order to wrestle power from the ruling New Nigeria People’s Party (NNPP) in Kano. Of course, every political party may have its peculiar internal wrangling, but I insist unity is the only option we have to get what we want.” I absolutely concur!

Let me jump down to the central point you raised, where you said and I quote, ” The three potential candidates mentioned by Anwar from Kano North are forces to (sic) reckon with. But the writer shrewdly skipped one very influential politician of national repute from the zone in person of Hon. Abubakar Kabir Bichi, member representing Bichi Federal Constituency at the National Assembly… who has demonstrably shown that he is a leader who had long chosen to be different from others.”

What you fail to understand here is, JUST LOOK AT THE CONTEXT OF MY WRITE – UP. Hon Bichi does not belong to this context at all. If you really understand the contextual explanation. I did not mean his contributions in the party are ignorable or dumpable.

No where in my piece where I mentioned that, only those I made reference to, were the only people who could make difference in the scheme of things. You need to get this clearly.

In one of my recent write-ups titled “Kano APC Youth Coalition, Nasir Ja’o’ji and Party Survival,” go and Google the caption it is there online, I said, “Stars like Deputy Senate President, Barau Jibrin, former Deputy Governor and Gubernatorial Candidate for 2023 election, HE Nasiru Yusuf Gawuna, former Commissioner for Local Governments and Chieftaincy Affairs and former Deputy Gubernatorial Candidate for 2023 election, HE Murtala Sule Garo, HON ABUBAKAR KABIR BICHI, among others.”

The way I put Hon Bichi and didn’t include some of the names of those I included now, didn’t mean they were not important or relevant. Only that, they do not belong to the context of my piece. So it is the same thing here. Bichi is not within the purview of my context now.

In another recent write-up titled “DSP Barau : A Resilient Senator With Advanced Mind,” I wrote it when Barau sponsored 70 students abroad to study Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Robotic Science. After commending Barau for that and calling on other leaders to copy from him, I said in one of the paragraphs”… Senator Kawu Sumaila of Kano South and HON ABUBAKAR BICHI, representative of Bichi Federal Constituency, in the House of Representatives, HAVE ALREADY GONE FAR IN THIS DIRECTION. KUDOS TO THEM!”

He is reflected therein because the context allowed for that. Why didn’t you or your backers protested that I did not include other Honorable members? So I begin to wonder the sudden protest started and midwifed from somewhere and birthed through you.

Where were you all, when I gave Kudos to Hon Bichi? I think you people are doing bad public relations for Hon Bichi. What you are doing is not good for his image. You are only painting him in a corrosive manner.

Still under “Kano APC Youth Coalition, Nasir Ja’o’ji and Party Survival,” I included many names of party loyalists who are committed to the survival of the party. Simply because the context allowed that.

This is where I said, “People like Musaddique Wada Waziri, Malam Abdussalam Ishaq (Kumbotso), Umar Maiwayo Rimingado, my younger brother Inyass Habibu, Ibrahim Danyaro, Jijitar, Abubakar Indabawa, former Vice Chairman, Warawa, Dini Manchester Kankarofi, Abubakar Aminu, Hon Barwa, Sani Gilashi, Danfillo, Idris Zango, among many others, are playing very critical role in strengthening the grip of the party across the state and the nation at large.”

Why didn’t you protest that, I did not include so and so person or Honourable? Because they do not belong here. But still that does not mean only those mentioned are the best in terms of party survival.

Very committed and hard working individuals like Aminu Dahiru and Barista Baburi, were not mentioned. Why? Because the context did not allow that. But the way I see it both Aminu and Baburi are far better than some of the people I mentioned. But I can’t include them because of contextual concord.

When I did the write – up on APC Youth Coalition, to my surprise, you as the Chairman of the Coalition, did not even call my attention to at least correct me if there was anywhere in the write-up I perceived wrongly. But I continued relating with you happily. Being a friend for that matter.

That was why I am still insinuating that your rejoinder was not merely for the sake of rejoinder, it must have been orchestrated from invisible backers, who do not see reason and wisdom in all that I said in my piece. Why? Because some people were praised beyond any reasonable doubt. Which they do not like. So is this the kind of unity you are talking about?

As you said, “No doubt, loyalty is a pride in political parlance. And Ganduje is an embodiment of loyalty. Rather than to ask his opponent, (sic) the question we should ask ourselves is (sic) how loyal are we to our leader and mentor, Dr. Ganduje? Do we all agree to his decisions in the event he made them?”

I am still grappling to know which part of my piece corresponds with this statement.

As you posit, ” While the APC in Kano may have an array of contenders to the office of the governor, the decision to adopt one remains with the party. We should not be bringing out issues that never existed or even if they do, in order to dent the image of others and promote those we support.”

Though you argued that none of the people cited in my piece, either officially or unofficially declared his intention to run for gubernatorial seat, why then are you acknowledging that, APC may have an array of contenders to the office of the governor? Do you really understand what you are saying here Malam Gini?

The rejoinder continues, “From what I understand, Anwar is saying his mind on where his interest tilted to. Neither the gubernatorial and deputy gubernatorial candidate of the APC in the 2023 election nor the current Deputy Senate President have clearly made any official or unofficial pronouncement on their intention to vie for the governor’s ticket.”

Hello hello hello Unguwar Gini are you sleeping? Please wake up from slumber. Are you aware of the political implications of this statement for your political ambition? Let me ask for the second time, do you really understand what you are saying here? Hmmm.

The best way I understand this portion of your submission is, you could be one of those APC people who have the opinion that none of the three would-be-contestants is suitable for the seat. It is indeed being economical with the truth to talk in this way.

With all the praise singing accorded to Bichi in your write – up, no where before now when you did any similar write – up or something deeper in showcasing Bichi. Such behavior to me, is shortsightness in public relations. If you really believe in what you are saying concerning Bichi what other efforts did you make in the past to show to Nigerians how worth is Bichi? A challenge! Just go beyond posting his pictures in Ganduje Online or Gawuna Online, in such a primitive way and manner.

To cap it all, nobody is contesting how productive is Bichi and how progressive are all his interventions.

The rejoinder added, “The writer, while making a suggestion on the consolidation of the party’s strength, spread and unrelenting tempo be left with some hardworking individuals, he, to my understanding, inadvertently forgotten, is the likes of Comrade Muhammad Garba, Chief of Staff to the national chairman of the APC,”

This really shows you are totally out of touch with the context of my piece. People like Mohammed Garba do not belong here. We are talking of full fledged politicians. Not only that, even if one is a politician, he has to fit in to this context. Not all politicians we have in APC that fit in here. Talkless of professionals like Mohammed Garba. Please understand my contextual approach.

As a matter of fact, I think I should be in the better position to tell you, within the circle of professionalism, who Mohammed Garba is.

I laughed profusely when you said, “Another dimension to Anwar’s analysis which I would want to respond to is likening the APC’s victory or lack of it to the lingering Kano Emirate tussle. As somebody who has written widely on the subject matter, I do not think the writer truly believes the APC or its elements are banking on the crisis to settle political scores.”

Another misconception from the writer’s part is this issue of Emirate Tussle. No where in my piece I said so so group of people are banking on the crisis to settle political scores. I was just highlighting a possible feeling that, whoever thinks the issue can do miracle in party’s victory in 2027, such a person is deceiving himself. Simple!

Furthermore, as somebody who wrote in the past about this tussle, I think I should understand the crisis more clearly than Unguwar Gini. Who possibly didn’t write as short as two or three paragraphs in the past about it.

I hope this part is said with all sincerity of purpose and responsibility, “It is my firm belief that all the people mentioned by the writer have contributed to the success of the APC in the past and are ready to continue to lend their support to its success in the 2027 election year.”

Anwar, was Chief Press Secretary to the former Governor of Kano State, Dr Abdullahi Umar Ganduje CON and can be reached at fatimanbaba1@gmail.com

#

Opinion

Clarification On Recent Events During The Eid-El-Fitr Celebration In Kano: A Response To The GiGG’s Malicious Statement

Published

on

Clarification On Recent Events During The Eid-El-Fitr Celebration In Kano: A Response To The GiGG’s Malicious Statement

In light of the recent malicious statement issued by the Global Initiatives for Good Governance (GIGG), which disrespects constituted authority and has the potential to cause uncertainty and security breaches regarding the events during the Eid-el-Fitr celebrations in Kano, it is important to provide clarification regarding the actions of both the Emir of Kano, Mallam Muhammadu Sanusi II, and Governor HE. Abba Kabir Yusuf.

First and foremost, it is essential to clarify that there was no Durbar held during this Eid celebration. Rather, what took place was the Emir’s procession to and from the Eid prayer at Kofar Mata, located outside the eastern city wall. This procession is a long-standing Islamic tradition (Sunnah), which involves taking a different route from the one followed to the prayer ground when returning. The Emir’s procession, limited to his guards and close officials, followed this practice in accordance with Islamic traditions. Unlike the Durbar, which is a formal parade involving district heads and traditional horse riders symbolizing allegiance to the Emir and the Emirate, this procession was conducted with full attention to both tradition and public safety.

Durbar celebrations, as historically practiced, have not been held regularly in recent years, mainly due to concerns from security forces. The recent event was no exception. Both the Emir and the Governor acted with the intention of striking a balance between preserving cultural practices and ensuring the safety and security of the public. They did not disregard the law or public safety, rather, their actions were aimed at preventing the potential exploitation of the occasion by individuals seeking to disrupt peace and stability.

The breakdown of law and order that occurred was due to the actions of alleged, sponsored criminal elements who hijacked the occasion to create chaos. These individuals sought to tarnish the reputations of both the Emir and the Governor, possibly even attempting to blackmail them and state. We commend the Nigeria Police Force for their swift action in making arrests, which is an important step toward uncovering the full extent of the individuals and networks behind these destructive activities.

It is also essential to address the concerns raised by the faceless NGO. While the police do not have the constitutional authority to outrightly ban traditional programs such as this, they are within their rights to call for a suspension or cancellation based on actionable intelligence aimed at maintaining public safety. Any formal ban, however, would require adherence to due legal process.

The nation is now closely watching the Nigeria Police Force, and we are hopeful that justice will be served swiftly. We trust that ongoing investigations will identify all those responsible for these disruptive actions and ensure accountability.

A.T. Abdullahi
A Concerned Kano Indigene
31st March 2025

#
Continue Reading

Opinion

Periscoping Waiya’s Alleged Assault on Free Press Viz the Preponderance of Mob Reasoning

Published

on

 

By Al Amin Ubandoma

The recent controversy surrounding Kano State Commissioner for Information, Ambassador Ibrahim Waiya, has sparked heated debates about free press and mob reasoning. The controversy began with an opinionated article written by one Auwalu Ismail, which criticized Waiya that was widely circulated online.

The article contained allegedly malicious and defamatory statements about Ambassador Ibrahim Waiya. As a public figure, Waiya has the right to defend himself against such attacks, and his decision to report the matter to the police was a legitimate exercise of this right.

However, the response from journalists and Amnesty International was swift and merciless. Without recourse to the violation of Waiya’s rights, they condemned his actions as an assault on free press and a threat to democracy.

This mob-like response is a classic example of mob reasoning, where emotions and sensationalism override rational thinking and fairness.

#

The implications of this response are far-reaching. If public figures like Ambassador Ibrahim Waiya are not allowed to defend themselves against malicious attacks, it could create a culture of impunity where anyone can make false and defamatory statements without consequence.

Furthermore, the response from journalists and Amnesty International undermines the principles of fairness and justice as enshrined in journalistic ethics.

By failing to consider Waiya’s side of the story and his right to defend himself, Amnesty international, and its co-travellers perpetuated a one-sided narrative that ignored the complexities of the issue at stake.

The controversy surrounding Waiya highlights the need for fairness and balance in public discourse. While free press is essential to democracy, it is equally important to protect the rights and privileges of public figures like Ambassador Waiya.

By prioritizing fairness and justice, we can create a more equitable and just society for all. This requires a commitment to considering multiple perspectives and upholding the rights and privileges of all individuals, including public figures.

The mob-like response from journalists and Amnesty International is a reminder that even in the pursuit of press freedom, we must not trample on the rights of others.

Indeed, Ambassador Waiya’s experience serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of mob reasoning and the importance of upholding fairness and justice in public discourse.

As we move forward, it is essential that we learn from Waiya’s experience and prioritize fairness and balance in public discourse. This requires a commitment to considering multiple perspectives and upholding the rights and privileges of all individuals.

The protection of human rights is essential to creating a just and equitable society. By upholding the rights and privileges of all individuals, including public figures like Waiya, we can create a more just and equitable society for all.

In conclusion, Ambassador Waiya’s experience serves as a powerful reminder of the importance of protecting the rights and privileges of all individuals, including public figures.

The debate surrounding Waiya’s actions is a reminder that the pursuit of press freedom is complex and multifaceted. While it is essential to protect the rights of journalists and writers, it is equally important to uphold the rights and privileges of public figures.

Ultimately, the controversy surrounding Waiya and the opinionated article highlights the need for a more nuanced and balanced approach to public discourse.

By prioritizing fairness and justice, we can create a more equitable and just society for all. This requires a commitment to considering multiple perspectives and upholding the rights and privileges of all individuals.

As we move forward, it is essential that we prioritize fairness and balance in public discourse. This requires a commitment to considering multiple perspectives and upholding the rights and privileges of all individuals.

The importance of protecting the rights and privileges of public figures like Ambassador Waiya cannot be overstated.

By upholding the rights and privileges of all individuals, including public figures, we can create a more just and equitable society for all.

In the end, Ambassador Waiya’s experience serves as a powerful reminder of the importance of prioritizing fairness and balance in public discourse, and it has indeed brought to fore how not to deployed mob reasoning on issues of human rights

Al Amin Ubandoma, a Public Affairs Analyst writes from Lagos.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Journalists: The Unseen Heroes of Development, Kano Desires Collaboration Not Confrontation

Published

on

 

BY AMINU BALA

By convention and practice, media houses and journalists have the right to express their opinions under guided principles, ethical compliance, and the rule of law.

The recent allegations surrounding the arrest and detention of two journalists in Kano State have sparked intense debate. However, it’s essential to set the record straight: the duo were only invited for questioning, not arrested or detained, for allegedly attacking the personality of Comrade Ibrahim Abdullahi Waiya, Kano State Commissioner for Information and Internal Affairs in one online media platform, Kano Times titled “Dear Governor Abba Kabir, .Beware of Waiya”.

Some critics argue that the police’s invitation for questioning was improper. Amnesty International, in particular as a reputable organization, appears to have jumped to conclusions without proper due diligence by condemning the police invitation, describing it as a threat to free press.

It’s crucial to verify facts before making conclusions, and Amnesty should ensure they present accurate information to maintain their credibility. It was clear that Amnesty didn’t balance findings as one of the guided principles of journalism. According to Amnesty, it heard the tidings break from the grapevine.

To this extent, Amnesty, as a reputable organization, failed to verify information through official channels, thereby perpetuating misinformation and undermining its reputation. This lack of due diligence raises questions about Amnesty International’s commitment to accuracy and fairness. It’s crucial to verify facts before making conclusions, and Amnesty should ensure they present accurate information to maintain their credibility.

In this case, Amnesty International’s hasty condemnation of the police invitation of the two suspects was premature and unwarranted. By failing to engage with an official source, as it appears, its impromptu action spurs unnecessary tension.

It is common knowledge that the Kano State Government has no issues with media houses or journalists. Instead, it recognises the critical role journalists play in promoting development and accountability as encapsulated in the 1999 Constitution as amended, which guarantees Press Freedom in Section 39 (1) and (2).Additionally, Section 22 guarantees the freedom of the press.

Against the odd, Amnesty must take steps to address its methodology and credibility concerns. This includes engaging with official sources, verifying information through multiple channels, and avoiding hasty conclusions and condemnation. Only by so doing can the organization regain its credibility as impartial human rights advocate.

The State government, in particular, acknowledges journalists as major stakeholders, bedrocks, and pillars of democracy and is committed to transparency and accountability. Collaboration, not confrontation, is the way forward. By working together, the government and journalists can provide essential information to the public, addressing the “oils and waters” of development challenges.

Naturally, every human on the surface of the earth might have or develop some glaring err, so Waiya is not an exception. It’s only God the Supreme that doesn’t err, As a vibrant human rights advocate, activist, and media acquaintance, Waiya possesses the enigmatic leadership skills to transform the journalism profession With his exceptional stamina, he is poised to re-energize and revitalize the industry and take it to new heights. As a seasoned media acquaintance and advocate, Waiya brings a unique blend of expertise, passion, and commitment to bear on his job. His leadership is a beacon of hope for a more robust, responsible, and respected journalism profession in Kano State.

As Waiya navigates the complexities of his new role, he should remain steadfast in his dedication to the principles of journalism, human rights, and democracy. His unwavering commitment to the truth, coupled with his exceptional leadership skills, makes him an exemplary figure in the journalism profession. With Waiya at the helm, the future of journalism in Kano State looks brighter than ever.

In conclusion, to cut the story short, the K
It is instructive to note that the Kano State Government values the role of journalists in promoting development and accountability. With guided principles and a commitment to transparency, the government is eager to collaborate with media houses and journalists to drive progress in Kano State.

Aminu writes from Kano

#

Continue Reading

Trending