Connect with us

Opinion

4 Big Mistakes of the Buhari Administration Tinubu Should Avoid-Getso 

Published

on

Umma Getso

 

By Umma Getso

Leadership carries with it the weight of responsibility, shaping the trajectory of a nation and its people. As political figures emerge on the horizon, it becomes imperative to reflect upon the successes and failures of past administrations, seeking to build upon the former while avoiding the latter. In Nigeria, the presidency of Muhammadu Buhari marked a significant chapter in the country’s history, characterized by moments of progress and setbacks.

As President Asiwaju Bola Tinubu (BAT) assumed the mantle of leadership, it is vital to examine and learn from the four major mistakes made by the Buhari administration. By recognizing these pitfalls and charting a different course, Tinubu can steer the nation towards a future that embraces sound governance, effective policies, and sustainable development.

Here are the 4 big mistakes of the Buhari Administration that Tinubu should avoid.

1) Late Inauguration of Cabinet Members
President Muhammadu Buhari was sworn in as the president of Nigeria on May 29, 2015. However, he did not appoint his cabinet members until November 16, 2015. This six-month gap was widely criticized as a sign of indecisiveness and a lack of planning. This essay will argue that Buhari’s late inauguration of cabinet was a major mistake that damaged his reputation and hindered his governance.

One possible reason for Buhari’s delay in appointing his cabinet was that he wanted to find the best people for the job. He claimed that he was looking for people with integrity and competence who could help him fight corruption and insecurity. However, this reason did not convince many Nigerians who expected him to act faster and more decisively. According to a survey by NOI Polls, 67% of Nigerians were dissatisfied with Buhari’s delay in appointing his cabinet.

Another possible reason for Buhari’s delay in appointing his cabinet was that he was trying to balance the interests of his party, the All Progressives Congress (APC). The APC was a coalition of different political parties and factions that came together to defeat the incumbent president, Goodluck Jonathan. Buhari had to deal with the demands and expectations of his party members who wanted to be rewarded with ministerial positions. However, this reason also did not justify the delay, as it showed that Buhari was more concerned with appeasing his party than serving the nation.

The late inauguration of Buhari’s cabinet had a negative impact on his reputation and governance. It created a perception that Buhari was not prepared to lead the country. It also made it harder for Buhari to implement his policies and programs. For example, Buhari’s flagship policy, the Economic Recovery and Growth Plan (ERGP), was launched in April 2017, almost two years after he took office. The late inauguration of Buhari’s cabinet also affected his relations with foreign leaders and partners. For example, Buhari could not attend the United Nations General Assembly in September 2015, because he did not have a foreign minister.

In conclusion, Buhari’s late inauguration of cabinet was a serious mistake that undermined his credibility and effectiveness. It showed that Buhari was not ready to lead the country. It also delayed the implementation of his policies and programs.
This is a big mistake President Bola Ahmed Tinubu must avoid.

2) Ineffective Monitoring of Presidential Directives
President Muhammadu Buhari has been widely criticized for his failure to monitor and enforce his directives on security matters. One of the most glaring examples of this failure was the case of the Inspector General of Police (IGP), Ibrahim Idris, who disobeyed Buhari’s order to relocate to Benue state and remain there until the herdsmen-farmers crisis was resolved.

Buhari gave the order to the IGP on January 9, 2018, after he met with Benue leaders over the killing of over 70 people by suspected herdsmen on New Year’s Day. Buhari said he had instructed the IGP to “get into (Benue) and take care” of the situation. However, it was later revealed that the IGP only spent one day in Benue and then moved to Nasarawa state, where he reportedly attended a birthday party. The IGP also failed to visit the affected communities or meet with the governor and other stakeholders in Benue.

What were the implications of Buhari’s failure to monitor his directive to the IGP? There were several negative consequences of this failure. One was that it exposed Buhari’s weakness and incompetence as a leader and commander-in-chief. It showed that he was not in charge of his administration and that he could not enforce his authority or ensure compliance with his orders. It also showed that he was not in touch with the reality and needs of the people.

Another consequence was that it worsened the security situation and the humanitarian crisis in Benue. It emboldened the herdsmen to continue their attacks and killings, as they perceived that the government was not serious or sincere about protecting the lives and properties of the people. It also increased the distrust and resentment of the people towards the government and the police, as they felt abandoned and betrayed by their leaders.

Advert

In conclusion, Buhari’s failure to monitor his directive to the IGP was a serious blunder that had grave implications for his leadership and governance.

If President BAT must outdo PMB, he should establish robust monitoring frameworks to track progress, identify bottlenecks, and make necessary adjustments. This will enhance accountability, transparency, and overall governance effectiveness, ensuring that policies translate into tangible results for the Nigerian population.

3) Lopsided Appointment
One of the major criticisms that President Muhammadu Buhari faced during his first six years in office was his alleged lopsided appointment of key officials in his administration. Many Nigerians accused him of violating the federal character principle and favouring his northern region and his party members over other parts of the country and other qualified candidates.

According to a report by Premium Times, as of August 2015, Buhari had appointed 29 key officials, out of which 75 per cent were from the north and 43 per cent were from his North West geopolitical zone. The South East had no appointee at all. The report also showed that Buhari had not appointed any female official, unlike his predecessor, Goodluck Jonathan, who had women in all major segments of government.

Why did Buhari make such lopsided appointments? One possible reason is that Buhari was influenced by his personal preferences and biases. He may have chosen people he knew and trusted, or people who shared his ethnic, religious, or political affiliation. He may have also been loyal to those who supported him during his election campaigns or who contributed to his party’s success.

True or false, whatever the reason was; it is pertinent to remember that public appointments should not be rewards for personal favour.

In the case of PMB, the alleged lopsided appointments created a perception that he was biased and partial. It also increased the distrust and resentment of some regions and groups towards the government and the security agencies, as they felt marginalized and oppressed.

As Nigeria enters a new era under President Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu, he should learn from Buhari’s mistake and avoid making lopsided appointments in his administration.

One of the blessings of a large population is the abundance of human resources. Every region and every state has competent people to fill in different areas. He should prioritize meritocracy, selecting individuals who are capable, experienced, and committed to serving the nation’s interests. He should appoint known and practising professionals to the appropriate ministries and not appoint an accountant to head the education ministry. By appointing qualified professionals, Tinubu can build a team capable of delivering tangible results and gaining the trust of the Nigerian people.

4) Poor Administration and Management of Changes in Policies
One of the most significant mistakes of the Buhari administration has been its poor administration and management of major changes in economic policies.

Although these policies may not be bad in themselves, the government’s failure to provide a cushion to interface between the existing and new policies presented a lot of challenges for the people.

The administration has been unable to effectively implement its policies, and it has often made changes without considering the impact on the people.

Border Closure

This has been evident in the administration’s handling of key economic policies, such as the closing of the border with the Benin Republic and the redesign of the naira notes.

The border closure, which was implemented in August 2019, was intended to curb smuggling and boost local production. However, it has had a devastating impact on the economy, particularly on the informal sector, which employs the majority of Nigerians. The closure has led to a shortage of goods, increased prices, and job losses. It has also disrupted cross-border trade, which is an important source of income for many Nigerians.

The government has defended the border closure, arguing that it is necessary to protect the country’s economy. However, critics argue that the policy has been poorly implemented and that it has caused more harm than good.

They point out that the government did not provide any support to businesses or workers who were affected by the closure. This forced many people to close their businesses or move to other parts of the country in search of work.

The border closure is just one example of the Buhari administration’s poor administration and management of changes in key policies.

Fuel Subsidy

In 2016, the government implemented a fuel subsidy removal, which led to a sharp increase in the price of petrol. This policy also had a devastating impact on the economy, particularly on the poor.

The Buhari administration’s failure to provide a cushion for Nigerians prior to the implementation of these policies has made it difficult for people to cope with the negative consequences of these policies. This has led to widespread discontent and has contributed to the rise of insecurity in the country.

Redesign of New Notes

The redesign of the naira notes is another example of the Buhari administration’s poor change management and administration. The new notes were introduced in 2020, and they were intended to make it more difficult to counterfeit the naira, encourage the digital economy, curb criminal activities and encourage ease of doing business.

However, the new notes policy presented serious difficulty for businesses and the people. This led to the eventual redirection of the policy.

To ensure a successful tenure, the Tinubu administration must recognize the importance of effective policy implementation alongside the formulation of new policies. It should prioritize both short-term and long-term impacts, understanding that intermittent progress is key to achieving lasting change.

The BAT administration should adopt a mindful approach to policy implementation, considering the potential hardships that may arise and strive to minimize them. By striking a balance between policy objectives and the well-being of the people, the administration can pave the way for productive and transformative governance.

Opinion

Kaduna State: A Phoenix Rising from the Ashes of Insecurity and Politics” By Zubair Abdurrauf Idris

Published

on

 

Despite the maelstrom of criticism and political backlash that has engulfed Kaduna state’s governance under Governor Uba Sani, the latest indices of easing business by the Nigerian Presidential Council PEBEC have catapulted the state to the pole position, nipping at the heels of Lagos state. This stunning revelation has sent shockwaves across the nation, with many wondering how Kaduna state managed to turn the corner and emerge as a beacon of hope in the region.

The “Ease of Doing Business” report has ranked Kaduna state a respectable second, with an impressive score of 65.1%, trailing only Lagos state, which boasts an enviable 85.6%. The other contenders, Oyo State, Federal Capital Territory (FCT), and Ogun State, have been relegated to third, fourth, and fifth positions, with scores of 62.7%, 61.0%, and 59.9%, respectively. This remarkable turnaround is a testament to the state’s resilience and determination to rise above the challenges that have held it back for so long.

This remarkable turnaround is a blessing in disguise, considering the dark days of insecurity that once shrouded Kaduna state like a pall. The state was previously ravaged by armed banditry and kidnappings, which had sent investors packing and crippled economic activity. However, thanks to the recent community-based peace deal, the frontline local government areas have been able to breathe a sigh of relief, and the state’s economic prospects are looking brighter than ever.

Advert

Kaduna state’s journey to this point has not been without its challenges. The state has been mired in political logjam and accusations, with the former administration casting a long shadow over the current government’s efforts. However, the “Ease of Doing Business” report is a vindication of Governor Uba Sani’s tireless efforts to woo foreign investors and create a conducive business environment. The governor’s recent trip to Kuwait, which resulted in a grant of $63 million for out-of-school children, teacher training, and rehabilitation of classrooms, is a case in point.

While some critics have dismissed the governor’s foreign trips as globe-trotting, the positive results are beginning to trickle in, and they are a testament to the governor’s unwavering commitment to improving the lives of Kaduna state residents. The improved security, coupled with the government’s focus on industrialization, economic development, and infrastructure, is expected to have a multiplier effect on the state’s economy, creating jobs, stimulating growth, and enhancing the overall quality of life for citizens.

As Kaduna state continues to navigate the complex web of challenges and opportunities, it is imperative that the government remains focused on consolidating the gains made so far. The state must continue to implore all its arsenal to maintain the fragile peace, ensure free movement, and create an enabling environment for businesses to thrive. If the current trajectory is anything to go by, Kaduna state is poised to become the next big thing in Nigeria’s economic landscape, a shining example of what can be achieved with vision, determination, and a commitment to progress.

 

(Zubair Abdurrauf Idris is a public affairs analyst, wrote from Birnin-Gwari)

Continue Reading

Opinion

Re:Replace Ribadu With Ex- military Officer As NSA,Senator Urges Tinubu

Published

on

 

Henry Bassey

As a concerned citizen of Nigeria and someone who desire a stable structure in tune with the modern dynamics which will invariably bring about security of lives and property, my attention was drawn to a statement credited to Senator representing Osun East, Distinguished Senator Francis Fadahunsi issued through his Special Adviser on Media, Sam Segun – Progress on Tuesday 2 December 2025 at Osogbo and published in Punch online and other social media platforms including Facebook, Instagram and X (formally Twitter) to mention a few.

In the statement, the lawmaker was urging President Tinubu “to further reorganize the nation’s security management team by appointing a retired military officer as the National Security Adviser. He also advised the President to “redeploy the current NSA Malam Nuhu Ribadu to another area of national service where his competence would be better utilised.”

The call by Senator Fadahunsi for President Bola Ahmed Tinubu to replace Mallam Nuhu Ribadu with a retired military officer as National Security Adviser reflects a narrow view of national security leadership, a dangerous direction of thought inconsistent with global best practices and Nigeria’s security needs, and a comment that should not go unanswered. Rather than distracting the nation with unnecessary politicization of security appointments, leaders should support efforts already succeeding to strengthen intelligence gathering, improve operational synergy, and pursue lasting peace across the country. What Nigeria needs is results, not recycled arguments rooted in outdated assumptions.

For a proper understanding, it should be noted that the broad dimensions of national security include physical, political, economic, social, food, energy and environmental aspects, which have expanded beyond traditional military concerns to encompass the gamut of modern threats. These dimensions are interconnected and involve protecting a nation’s citizens, infrastructure, and institutions from internal and external threats, such as cyberattacks, economic shocks, pandemics, and climate change, external aggression, etc. Military means is therefore one among many contributing factors to national security, not its essence. This understanding is fundamental to having the right national security strategy and architecture.

Advert

Senator Fadahunsi’s suggestion that the President should replace the NSA with a retired military officer exposes a shallow and outdated understanding of modern national security leadership. The policymakers and security specialists of the United States and other climes, whose style of democracy we practice, have always leveraged this for preserving their national security. Among the many who have held that office in the US in recent times is a civilian lawyer, Jake Sullivan, and his predecessor too was a political scientist-turned-lawyer. Regardless of the difference in context, the fact is that the role has successively been held across the globe by civilians with intellectual understanding of the complex realities that undermine national security. Even here on the African continent, in countries like Egypt, the appointment of non-military security insiders and analysts is a proven practice. Few Nigerians are aware that policemen had been in control of ONSA in the past, serving under both military regimes and civilian administrations. Both Gambo Jimeta, a former Inspector-General of Police, and Aliyu Isma’ila Gwarzo, a retired Assistant Inspector-General of Police (AIG) have served as NSA, and their performance was outstanding because of their recognition of the diverse range of challenges that undermined national security, and their understanding of the relationship between the civilian and military spheres.

What lies at the core of Nigeria’s complex and multifactorial security challenge? Nigerians are bedeviled by internal security collapses that require much more than tanks and other military hardware to combat, without diminishing the need for that. The nation desperately needs ideas and brains to identify the root causes of the conflicts and proffer solutions, hence the need for an NSA who possesses a combination of expertise in statecraft and public policy, mastery of engagement with civilian and military structures, dedication to the nation, as well as experience in internal security and law enforcement, to change the negative security narrative of the country – something that Mallam Ribadu has brought to the table.

Ribadu’s leadership is anchored in deep experience in intelligence, anti-corruption enforcement, inter-agency collaboration and counter-terrorism policy. The NSA is not a combatant position, the unique value they provide is the ability to analyze available information and intelligence to predict the state of security in the nation, hence the critical need for one with an understanding of the socio-cultural and political determinants of conflicts in a country like Nigeria undermined by internal security largely. Today’s security environment demands intelligence, intellectual capacity, integrity and strategic coordination of civilian and military structures, with unwavering patriotism, qualities which Mallam Nuhu Ribadu has demonstrated for decades. He is a square peg in a square hole as the NSA. The idea that only a soldier can manage national security is obsolete.

The notion that only government officials with military backgrounds could command the necessary respect within the armed forces is a dangerous idea to be promoted by anyone in a democracy, and is far from what modern military training delivers to the officers and men of the various services. The proper democratic structure which the military stands ready to uphold and defend, including proper regard for the command of any official appointed by the President and Commander-In-Chief, needs to be reinforced, not weakened as this suggestion by Senator Fadahunsi inadvertently achieves. The role of the NSA will remain suboptimized unless the nation moves away from excessive militarization of the office, particularly for a country where the military is overburdened with taking on responsibilities under the Nigeria Police Force and other internal security agencies.

National security is not all hinged upon and cannot be left to military power and coercion alone, it must enlist the other strengths of our nation to holistically address our challenges, and persuasively engage the world. As a nation we must strengthen the civilian security capabilities we have left to waste for so long. President Bola Ahmed is on track with the appointment of Mallam Nuhu Ribadu and the results that have been delivered so far, this needs only to be sustained for more results in the interest of all Nigerians, and not disrupted by a myopic few.

Henry Bassey,
Former Lagos State Chairman, Police Campaign Against Cultism and Other Vices.
Currently Head Community Engagement, Police Campaign Against Cultism and Other Vices, South West
Email: bassey.henry373@gmail.com

Continue Reading

Opinion

DSP Barau Jibril: A True Model of Progressive Politics

Published

on

 

By Dr Usman Sarki Madobi

In an era when public trust in political leadership often fluctuates, the example set by Deputy Senate President Barau Jibril stands out as a refreshing demonstration of what progressive politics entails. His approach to governance and representation reflects a blend of humility, inclusiveness, and unwavering dedication to the public good showcasing the qualities that have earned him admiration across party lines and among citizens who yearn for purposeful representation. Today, DSP Barau Jibril became a treasure in the political arena of Kano state and the country at large. His politics, representation and leadership style has made him a distinguished politian worth of supporting for every elective position both at state and national levels.

At the heart of Senator Barau Jibril’s political philosophy is selfless service. His actions consistently demonstrate a commitment to the welfare of his constituents and the nation above personal or political gain. This people-first mindset is a cornerstone of progressive leadership, where decisions are guided by the desire to improve lives, uplift communities, and strengthen democratic institutions. His reputation for placing public interest before personal ambition has made him a dependable figure in the political landscape of Kano and Nigeria as a whole.

Another hallmark of his leadership is his refusal to discriminate between party members and the opposition. In an environment where political divides sometimes hinder national development, Senator Barau Jibril proves that collaboration is possible and paramount. His inclusive style ensures that all voices, regardless of political alignment are respected and considered in the pursuit of common goals. This rare quality fosters unity, reduces partisanship, and encourages a healthier democratic process that facilitate human and Societal development.

Advert

DSP Barau Jibril also exemplifies a dignified brand of politics that rejects violence, intimidation, and thuggery. He further promotes peaceful engagement and issue-based politics that helps in strengthening Nigeria’s democratic culture. His stance sends a clear message stressing that political success should be achieved through ideas, integrity, and service to the people not coercion or unrest. This commitment to civility contributes to a safer and more respectful political environment.

As a member of the Senate, his dedication to purposeful representation is evident in the seriousness with which he approaches legislative responsibilities. His purposeful representation made him to understand the needs of his constituents and work relentlessly to address them through meaningful legislative action. He also champion the formulation of policies that support national growth, equity, and stability. DSP Barau Jibril’s commitment in this regard underscores his credibility and effectiveness as a true representative that can transform Kano within a limited time if given the chance.

Perhaps one of the most profound aspects of his political character is his consistent respect for his party leadership, fellow members, and for humanity as a whole. True progressiveness is grounded in humility and empathy, and Senator Barau Jibril embodies these values through his conduct. His respect for others fosters cooperation, reduces conflict, and reinforces moral leadership qualities essential for building strong political institutions.

In conclusion, DSP Barau Jibril stands today as a true model of progressive politics, not only because of the offices he holds but because of the values he upholds. His selfless service, inclusive leadership, insistence on peaceful politics, commitment to meaningful representation, and deep respect for people form a powerful blueprint for the kind of leadership Nigeria needs. In him, many see a compelling example of how politics can indeed be a noble instrument for societal transformation.

Dr. Usman Sarki Madobi

Continue Reading

Trending