Connect with us

Opinion

The Story Of The Nigerian Academic And The ASUU

Published

on

Abdelgafar Amoka

 

By Abdelgafar Amoka

 

Some colleagues at home and in the diaspora that can’t stand ASUU have decided to pick up a new job to portray ASUU as the bad guy and the major problems of public universities rather than a solution.

 

 

They ascribed the mischievous and unfortunate activities of few academics in the universities to ASUU and claimed that these elements that should ordinarily have no business being in academics are shielded by ASUU.

 

 

 

They are also of the opinion that there are no quality thoughts and research in our universities. Meanwhile, they are divided in the quality of teaching in public universities. While some of them are of the opinion that the quality of undergraduate teaching is still good as our graduates are still able to cope during their postgraduate studies abroad, some insisted that Nigerian lecturers are bad from head to toe.

 

I will always use my nearly 16 years of experience in Academia to tell our story. There are quality thoughts in the form of good proposals on issues affecting our immediate society.

 

 

A researcher is expected to find solutions to problems in his immediate society first. But a good proposal is just a good idea on paper if there is no fund to execute them. As an Academic, I am not expected to use my salary that is barely enough to feed us for research. I am actually supposed to be made very comfortable to get the job done and funds are supposed to be available to assess on a fairground for research purposes, but that is sometimes not the case.

 

The government is supposed to engage their intellectuals and place policy-driven demands on them. But the government only puts money where some individuals have personal interest without any much expectations on output. Can you imagine that there is a budget for research for ministries but not for universities.

 

 

What research are they into at the ministries? I keep mentioning “cause and effect”. We seems to have place much emphasis on “effect” without much reference to the “cause”. Not much of impactful research is going on in our universities as expected because the relevant stakeholder has not created that structure.

 

 

No adequate provision for funds for that purpose. The drivers of our government agenda and policies prefer to buy a solution from abroad no matter the cost instead of engaging their intellectuals. That complex that anything from oyinbo land (abroad) is superior is still very much there.

 

The question is this; are the lecturers responsible to fund structures for research or the owner and the financier of the university? What makes a laboratory is not the space but the facilities in it. No organization will give you money to fill the space you call a lab to do research work for them. It is the facilities that you already have that will convince them that you have the capacity to do their research.

 

While I was in the UK, we use to have industrialists and potential collaborators visit our lab to see what we had to drive collaboration. When I got a scholarship for my PhD and I needed a university in the UK for it, I just googled “High Voltage Laboratories in the UK” and5 universities with that facilities pop up. I took the scholarship money to one of the universities. That is one of the issues ASUU is fighting for. Revitalization of public universities to put in place those facilities that will make it possible to effectively carry out research and teaching. Such facilities will also serve as a source of foreign exchange.

 

I still remember the university congregation that took place in 2008 where a member of the congregation asked of the budget for research. And I think the response then was that no budget for research but that he has set aside 10 million naira for research. I was a PhD student at the university then. The 10m naira if given to only me was not enough to acquire the facilities for my PhD research before luck came my way with the scholarship that took me out. No provision for research in the university budget and the VC possibly set aside that 10 million from the internally generated fund. That is the level the policymakers have placed the universities. Just a teaching institution but they still blame the university for not doing research.

Advert

 

When I got back from the UK, I prepared a proposal that was sent to the VC. Thinking the university will be able to source for funds to execute the project. The next day, i got a call for an invitation from the VC to make a presentation of the proposal to the university management.

 

 

He was very impressed after the presentation and made motivating comments. At the end of the meeting, he asked me to put in some things and return the proposal to him. The proposal died a natural death after leaving his office. I sent the same proposal to NASENI, a government agency. The email response was that they will see what they can do and nothing till today. After discussion with some friends, contact was made to Sam Amadi, the then Head of NERC. He requested I send the proposal. I emailed it to him and never got a response till today. All these happened in 2013.

 

Then I left for a postdoc in Norway in September 2013. I continued the quest for a grant on my return in September 2015 and that same proposal eventually won the 2019 TETFund NRF research grant and we are working on it presently. Meanwhile, before the grant, I started crowdfunding among family and friends in 2018. I was able to raise about 1.4 million naira to buy a few stuff for my lab. Is that how to create a research environment? How many people are ready to go this extra to raise money from his family and friends for a university lab just to have facilities to work with?

Breaking:ASUU Suspends Strike

To the best of my knowledge, the financier is supposed to put up the structure and you use the structure to get grants to sustain the research activities and even make money for the university and foreign exchange from international students. Where is the infrastructure to challenge us? our universities have lecturers trained in the UK, US, Europe, China, Russia, etc. Rather than engaging us, they hire consultants abroad, a case study of the Malaysian economic consultants in 2017, to solve our local problem and pay them in USD.

 

But then, even with the limited funds, the universities are still making frantic efforts to put in place research facilities. ABU for example, has Multiuser science laboratories, NLNG multiuser laboratory in Engineering, the Biotech Centre, the African Centre of Excellence for Neglected Tropical Diseases, the recently established high voltage materials laboratory in the physics department, etc. With all these constraints, we have Professors and middle career academics in ABU with research grants, 20 to over a hundred articles in index journals, and a Scopus h-index from 7 to 20. There are quite a number of them in ABU. Our efforts despite the harsh environment should be commended.

 

You can’t keep telling me the country doesn’t have the money to make provision for research funds for universities in our budget. The international community believes that we have the money. That was the reason why they took Nigeria off the list of “education least developed countries” and researchers in Nigeria are not qualified for the 15,000 USD TWAS research grant for basic sciences. I got the grant in 2013 and while trying to reapply in 2016, I discovered that applicants from Nigeria are no longer qualified.

 

I sent an email in January 2018 to a senior colleague (British) at National Grid UK that I want to establish a high voltage lab in my university in Nigeria. And his response was that; “Abdel, it’s like you like to take on tough challenges. Starting a high voltage lab from nothing is a tough one”. I take on the tough challenge with my colleagues with personal efforts, personal funds, and begging. The photo is one of the facilities in our lab.

 

Of course, not everyone can go that extra mile and you can’t fault them. You are employed and supposed to be given what you need to work. You are not supposed to go that extra and even turn to a beggar just to get what you need to perform some of your responsibilities as an Academic. This is our story!

 

So, who do we blame? The FG (the financier) who is the “cause” and still establishing more universities without a funding plan, or the ASUU’s struggle for the survival of public universities which is the “effect”? What we’ve got is surely not good enough and we need to do more. So, if you can’t come to join us to rebuild the system, don’t condemn us but encourage us and offer the necessary support.

 

Meanwhile, if you know any Lecturer that is into sexual harassment, sex-for-mark, money-for-mark, extortion of students, admission racketeering, etc, in any university, report him to the management of that university and copy ASUU local branch and even the ASUU National president and watch if he is shielded.

 

If you refused to make such reports or take the necessary actions to stop such ills in our universities and decided to go to Facebook to blame ASUU like the “Professor” from Benue State University, Markudi, then you are part of the problem.

 

 

Opinion

Kaduna State: A Phoenix Rising from the Ashes of Insecurity and Politics” By Zubair Abdurrauf Idris

Published

on

 

Despite the maelstrom of criticism and political backlash that has engulfed Kaduna state’s governance under Governor Uba Sani, the latest indices of easing business by the Nigerian Presidential Council PEBEC have catapulted the state to the pole position, nipping at the heels of Lagos state. This stunning revelation has sent shockwaves across the nation, with many wondering how Kaduna state managed to turn the corner and emerge as a beacon of hope in the region.

The “Ease of Doing Business” report has ranked Kaduna state a respectable second, with an impressive score of 65.1%, trailing only Lagos state, which boasts an enviable 85.6%. The other contenders, Oyo State, Federal Capital Territory (FCT), and Ogun State, have been relegated to third, fourth, and fifth positions, with scores of 62.7%, 61.0%, and 59.9%, respectively. This remarkable turnaround is a testament to the state’s resilience and determination to rise above the challenges that have held it back for so long.

This remarkable turnaround is a blessing in disguise, considering the dark days of insecurity that once shrouded Kaduna state like a pall. The state was previously ravaged by armed banditry and kidnappings, which had sent investors packing and crippled economic activity. However, thanks to the recent community-based peace deal, the frontline local government areas have been able to breathe a sigh of relief, and the state’s economic prospects are looking brighter than ever.

Advert

Kaduna state’s journey to this point has not been without its challenges. The state has been mired in political logjam and accusations, with the former administration casting a long shadow over the current government’s efforts. However, the “Ease of Doing Business” report is a vindication of Governor Uba Sani’s tireless efforts to woo foreign investors and create a conducive business environment. The governor’s recent trip to Kuwait, which resulted in a grant of $63 million for out-of-school children, teacher training, and rehabilitation of classrooms, is a case in point.

While some critics have dismissed the governor’s foreign trips as globe-trotting, the positive results are beginning to trickle in, and they are a testament to the governor’s unwavering commitment to improving the lives of Kaduna state residents. The improved security, coupled with the government’s focus on industrialization, economic development, and infrastructure, is expected to have a multiplier effect on the state’s economy, creating jobs, stimulating growth, and enhancing the overall quality of life for citizens.

As Kaduna state continues to navigate the complex web of challenges and opportunities, it is imperative that the government remains focused on consolidating the gains made so far. The state must continue to implore all its arsenal to maintain the fragile peace, ensure free movement, and create an enabling environment for businesses to thrive. If the current trajectory is anything to go by, Kaduna state is poised to become the next big thing in Nigeria’s economic landscape, a shining example of what can be achieved with vision, determination, and a commitment to progress.

 

(Zubair Abdurrauf Idris is a public affairs analyst, wrote from Birnin-Gwari)

Continue Reading

Opinion

Re:Replace Ribadu With Ex- military Officer As NSA,Senator Urges Tinubu

Published

on

 

Henry Bassey

As a concerned citizen of Nigeria and someone who desire a stable structure in tune with the modern dynamics which will invariably bring about security of lives and property, my attention was drawn to a statement credited to Senator representing Osun East, Distinguished Senator Francis Fadahunsi issued through his Special Adviser on Media, Sam Segun – Progress on Tuesday 2 December 2025 at Osogbo and published in Punch online and other social media platforms including Facebook, Instagram and X (formally Twitter) to mention a few.

In the statement, the lawmaker was urging President Tinubu “to further reorganize the nation’s security management team by appointing a retired military officer as the National Security Adviser. He also advised the President to “redeploy the current NSA Malam Nuhu Ribadu to another area of national service where his competence would be better utilised.”

The call by Senator Fadahunsi for President Bola Ahmed Tinubu to replace Mallam Nuhu Ribadu with a retired military officer as National Security Adviser reflects a narrow view of national security leadership, a dangerous direction of thought inconsistent with global best practices and Nigeria’s security needs, and a comment that should not go unanswered. Rather than distracting the nation with unnecessary politicization of security appointments, leaders should support efforts already succeeding to strengthen intelligence gathering, improve operational synergy, and pursue lasting peace across the country. What Nigeria needs is results, not recycled arguments rooted in outdated assumptions.

For a proper understanding, it should be noted that the broad dimensions of national security include physical, political, economic, social, food, energy and environmental aspects, which have expanded beyond traditional military concerns to encompass the gamut of modern threats. These dimensions are interconnected and involve protecting a nation’s citizens, infrastructure, and institutions from internal and external threats, such as cyberattacks, economic shocks, pandemics, and climate change, external aggression, etc. Military means is therefore one among many contributing factors to national security, not its essence. This understanding is fundamental to having the right national security strategy and architecture.

Advert

Senator Fadahunsi’s suggestion that the President should replace the NSA with a retired military officer exposes a shallow and outdated understanding of modern national security leadership. The policymakers and security specialists of the United States and other climes, whose style of democracy we practice, have always leveraged this for preserving their national security. Among the many who have held that office in the US in recent times is a civilian lawyer, Jake Sullivan, and his predecessor too was a political scientist-turned-lawyer. Regardless of the difference in context, the fact is that the role has successively been held across the globe by civilians with intellectual understanding of the complex realities that undermine national security. Even here on the African continent, in countries like Egypt, the appointment of non-military security insiders and analysts is a proven practice. Few Nigerians are aware that policemen had been in control of ONSA in the past, serving under both military regimes and civilian administrations. Both Gambo Jimeta, a former Inspector-General of Police, and Aliyu Isma’ila Gwarzo, a retired Assistant Inspector-General of Police (AIG) have served as NSA, and their performance was outstanding because of their recognition of the diverse range of challenges that undermined national security, and their understanding of the relationship between the civilian and military spheres.

What lies at the core of Nigeria’s complex and multifactorial security challenge? Nigerians are bedeviled by internal security collapses that require much more than tanks and other military hardware to combat, without diminishing the need for that. The nation desperately needs ideas and brains to identify the root causes of the conflicts and proffer solutions, hence the need for an NSA who possesses a combination of expertise in statecraft and public policy, mastery of engagement with civilian and military structures, dedication to the nation, as well as experience in internal security and law enforcement, to change the negative security narrative of the country – something that Mallam Ribadu has brought to the table.

Ribadu’s leadership is anchored in deep experience in intelligence, anti-corruption enforcement, inter-agency collaboration and counter-terrorism policy. The NSA is not a combatant position, the unique value they provide is the ability to analyze available information and intelligence to predict the state of security in the nation, hence the critical need for one with an understanding of the socio-cultural and political determinants of conflicts in a country like Nigeria undermined by internal security largely. Today’s security environment demands intelligence, intellectual capacity, integrity and strategic coordination of civilian and military structures, with unwavering patriotism, qualities which Mallam Nuhu Ribadu has demonstrated for decades. He is a square peg in a square hole as the NSA. The idea that only a soldier can manage national security is obsolete.

The notion that only government officials with military backgrounds could command the necessary respect within the armed forces is a dangerous idea to be promoted by anyone in a democracy, and is far from what modern military training delivers to the officers and men of the various services. The proper democratic structure which the military stands ready to uphold and defend, including proper regard for the command of any official appointed by the President and Commander-In-Chief, needs to be reinforced, not weakened as this suggestion by Senator Fadahunsi inadvertently achieves. The role of the NSA will remain suboptimized unless the nation moves away from excessive militarization of the office, particularly for a country where the military is overburdened with taking on responsibilities under the Nigeria Police Force and other internal security agencies.

National security is not all hinged upon and cannot be left to military power and coercion alone, it must enlist the other strengths of our nation to holistically address our challenges, and persuasively engage the world. As a nation we must strengthen the civilian security capabilities we have left to waste for so long. President Bola Ahmed is on track with the appointment of Mallam Nuhu Ribadu and the results that have been delivered so far, this needs only to be sustained for more results in the interest of all Nigerians, and not disrupted by a myopic few.

Henry Bassey,
Former Lagos State Chairman, Police Campaign Against Cultism and Other Vices.
Currently Head Community Engagement, Police Campaign Against Cultism and Other Vices, South West
Email: bassey.henry373@gmail.com

Continue Reading

Opinion

DSP Barau Jibril: A True Model of Progressive Politics

Published

on

 

By Dr Usman Sarki Madobi

In an era when public trust in political leadership often fluctuates, the example set by Deputy Senate President Barau Jibril stands out as a refreshing demonstration of what progressive politics entails. His approach to governance and representation reflects a blend of humility, inclusiveness, and unwavering dedication to the public good showcasing the qualities that have earned him admiration across party lines and among citizens who yearn for purposeful representation. Today, DSP Barau Jibril became a treasure in the political arena of Kano state and the country at large. His politics, representation and leadership style has made him a distinguished politian worth of supporting for every elective position both at state and national levels.

At the heart of Senator Barau Jibril’s political philosophy is selfless service. His actions consistently demonstrate a commitment to the welfare of his constituents and the nation above personal or political gain. This people-first mindset is a cornerstone of progressive leadership, where decisions are guided by the desire to improve lives, uplift communities, and strengthen democratic institutions. His reputation for placing public interest before personal ambition has made him a dependable figure in the political landscape of Kano and Nigeria as a whole.

Another hallmark of his leadership is his refusal to discriminate between party members and the opposition. In an environment where political divides sometimes hinder national development, Senator Barau Jibril proves that collaboration is possible and paramount. His inclusive style ensures that all voices, regardless of political alignment are respected and considered in the pursuit of common goals. This rare quality fosters unity, reduces partisanship, and encourages a healthier democratic process that facilitate human and Societal development.

Advert

DSP Barau Jibril also exemplifies a dignified brand of politics that rejects violence, intimidation, and thuggery. He further promotes peaceful engagement and issue-based politics that helps in strengthening Nigeria’s democratic culture. His stance sends a clear message stressing that political success should be achieved through ideas, integrity, and service to the people not coercion or unrest. This commitment to civility contributes to a safer and more respectful political environment.

As a member of the Senate, his dedication to purposeful representation is evident in the seriousness with which he approaches legislative responsibilities. His purposeful representation made him to understand the needs of his constituents and work relentlessly to address them through meaningful legislative action. He also champion the formulation of policies that support national growth, equity, and stability. DSP Barau Jibril’s commitment in this regard underscores his credibility and effectiveness as a true representative that can transform Kano within a limited time if given the chance.

Perhaps one of the most profound aspects of his political character is his consistent respect for his party leadership, fellow members, and for humanity as a whole. True progressiveness is grounded in humility and empathy, and Senator Barau Jibril embodies these values through his conduct. His respect for others fosters cooperation, reduces conflict, and reinforces moral leadership qualities essential for building strong political institutions.

In conclusion, DSP Barau Jibril stands today as a true model of progressive politics, not only because of the offices he holds but because of the values he upholds. His selfless service, inclusive leadership, insistence on peaceful politics, commitment to meaningful representation, and deep respect for people form a powerful blueprint for the kind of leadership Nigeria needs. In him, many see a compelling example of how politics can indeed be a noble instrument for societal transformation.

Dr. Usman Sarki Madobi

Continue Reading

Trending