A claim currently circulating on social media that the “University of Paris” has ranked Kano State Government as the highest spending state across West Africa has been found to be unsubstantiated.

Recent investigations have shown that there is no verifiable record to support the viral claim that the “University of Paris” ranked Kano State as the highest spender on education in West Africa.

Checks of official websites and publications of Sorbonne University, Université Paris Cité, and other institutions under the University of Paris system show no such ranking, report, or statement.

According to investigation, there is no academic paper or press release from any Paris-based university mentions Kano State in relation to government expenditure across West Africa.

A review of the latest 2026 rankings shows that mentions of Nigeria focus on universities such as Bayero University Kano, which was ranked 4th in West Africa, and not on state government spending.

An educationist Hassan Usman has said that global comparative data on government spending across nations are usually issued by international bodies such as UNESCO, the World Bank, or the IMF through their education, finance, and governance reports.

According to him, University rankings released by French and international academic bodies are typically limited to academic performance, research output, and institutional reputation.

Usman urged members of the public, especially journalists, to always verify information from credible sources before sharing to avoid the spread of misinformation and fake news.

However, a check of recent UNESCO publications, including the Global Education Monitoring Report and Institute for Statistics database, showed that no such ranking placing Kano State or any Nigerian state as the highest spender in West Africa has been released.

By Yusuf Danjuma Yunusa

The House of Representatives Special Committee on Crude Oil Theft has called for the establishment of a special court to fast-track the prosecution of crude oil thieves and other economic saboteurs, saying weak laws and delays in the judicial process have continued to undermine efforts to curb oil theft in Nigeria.

The proposal was made at a stakeholders’ meeting in Abuja on Thursday, where lawmakers, security agencies and officials from the Office of the National Security Adviser reviewed the country’s legal framework for tackling crude oil theft, pipeline vandalism and related offences.

The meeting forms part of the committee’s ongoing consultations on legislative and institutional measures to address crude oil theft, which has continued to reduce government revenue, cut oil production, discourage investment and threaten Nigeria’s energy security despite years of security operations.

Chairman of the committee, Alhassan Doguwa, said participants agreed on the need to review existing laws, arguing that many of the statutes governing the sector date back to the military era and no longer provide adequate deterrence against increasingly sophisticated criminal networks.

“We have also recommended in previous bills before the House the possibility of establishing a special court for these kinds of crimes because the crimes themselves are special.

“If we allow these criminal cases to go through the conventional court system, considering the delays involved, many of them will remain unresolved while the criminals escape appropriate punishment,” he said.

He said the committee and stakeholders had agreed to work together to address legal and institutional bottlenecks hampering the fight against crude oil theft.

“The global oil and gas economy is now in an advanced stage. Virtually all oil-producing countries are making progress because they have provided effective legal instruments to address their challenges. For this reason, we believe Nigeria should also review some of its laws,” he added.

Doguwa noted that courts are still relying on outdated legislation enacted during military rule to prosecute offences in the oil and gas sector.

“Unless we provide new measures, new laws and a new legal framework, the courts will continue to rely on this obsolete legislation in handling serious criminality within Nigeria’s oil and gas sector.

“I want to assure Nigerians that the National Assembly, especially the House of Representatives through this committee, will partner with the Office of the National Security Adviser to effectively combat crude oil theft and every other criminal activity within the oil and gas environment,” he added.

The lawmaker said Nigeria’s crude oil production remains below budget projections because of persistent theft and pipeline vandalism, stressing that reversing the trend is essential to improving government revenue and restoring investor confidence.

He noted that representatives of the Nigerian Army, Nigerian Navy, Nigerian Air Force, Nigeria Police Force and the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps attended the meeting, describing inter-agency collaboration as critical to addressing the challenge.

Doguwa, however, criticised the absence of the Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission from the meeting, describing it as disappointing.

“It was rather unfortunate that some of the critical regulatory agencies in the oil and gas sector, particularly the NUPRC, neither attended nor sent representatives.

“We frown at that action and have directed the Clerk of the Committee to write to them, requiring them to appear before the committee because they are key stakeholders in the fight against this serious problem bedevilling our country,” he added.

A member of the committee, Cyril Hart, said the committee’s mandate extends beyond tackling crude oil theft to ensuring Nigeria’s oil assets are fully developed for national benefit.

He said operators that fail to develop oil blocks within stipulated timelines should also be held accountable.

Representing the National Security Adviser, the Director of Energy Security in the Office of the National Security Adviser, Goodluck Ilajufi, said stronger legislation had become necessary because existing penalties were no longer serving as effective deterrents.

By Yusuf Danjuma Yunusa

Presidential candidate of the African Democratic Congress ADC, Atiku Abubakar, has given President Bola Tinubu a seven-day ultimatum to order a transparent, comprehensive and independent investigation into the scandal rocking the Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council PFIPC, warning that failure to do so would deepen public suspicion that powerful interests in government benefited from the alleged fraud.

Speaking through his Senior Special Assistant on Public Communication, Phrank Shaibu, the former vice president said the controversy had moved beyond ordinary forgery allegations into a full-blown crisis of institutional credibility, and that many Nigerians seeking public sector appointments may have been duped through a racket that enjoyed official protection.

Atiku said the explanation offered by the Presidency through Bayo Onanuga did not add up and had left more questions than answers, questioning how one man could allegedly create an office for himself, secure office space within a government facility, meet with foreign embassy delegations, pay courtesy visits to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission EFCC, and process staff salaries through official channels without the knowledge of anyone in government.

“If the government wants Nigerians to believe that one man single-handedly created an office for himself, secured office space within a government facility, held meetings with foreign embassy delegations, paid courtesy visits to the EFCC, processed staff salaries through official channels, allegedly operated institutional accounts, and carried on all these activities without the knowledge, approval, negligence or collaboration of anyone within government, then that narrative raises even more troubling questions than it answers,” he said.

He said that while Adeniyi Adeyemi, the man at the centre of the scandal, must face the law if he committed fraud, the more pressing question was what kind of government system allowed such an elaborate operation to pass through budgetary, administrative, security and institutional channels undetected. “Haba. Nigerians cannot be asked to swallow such a story whole,” he said.

Atiku argued that the accused’s antecedents could not explain away the institutional processes he reportedly navigated, asking whether it was his character that secured budgetary allocations for a supposedly fictitious office, or his antecedents that got him office space within a government facility, or his dubious nature that enabled him to hold meetings with foreign delegations, legislators and public officials. “At some point, we must separate an individual’s alleged conduct from the institutional systems that either enabled it or failed to detect it,” he said.

He noted that public records had reportedly shown the PFIPC captured in the 2026 Appropriation Act with a budgetary allocation running into billions of naira, and that fresh reports indicating the Office of the Head of the Civil Service had allegedly approved the recruitment of over 300 personnel into the agency had changed the nature of the scandal.

According to him, budget preparation and civil service recruitment were structured processes involving multiple institutions and could not happen by accident.

Quoting the novelist Chinua Achebe, Atiku said a man asked to carry a basket of eggs does not break them all and then blame the road, insisting the Presidency could not continue blaming one man while declining to account for the official systems that gave life to the scandal.

He said the intervention of Prince Adeyemi, who has denied the allegations and claimed powerful figures are attempting to silence him, made an independent inquiry more urgent, adding that only a full investigation — not press statements — could establish the truth.

“Nigeria deserves the truth. Quietly investigating the matter and addressing the lapses would have been better than publicly presenting a story that collapses under its own contradictions. The President must order a comprehensive, independent investigation immediately. Anything short of that will amount to complicity by silence,” he said.