Connect with us

News

Rule of Law on Trial in Apo Resettlement Market Dispute as Investors Face Growing Risk

Published

on

 

What began as a commercial disagreement over the Apo Resettlement Scheme Market in Abuja is fast becoming a defining moment for the enforcement of judicial authority and the protection of property investors in Nigeria.

At the center of the controversy is the alleged refusal by Manillah Integrated Partners Ltd and AMAC Investment Development Company to comply with a subsisting court order halting construction on the disputed project – an action that raises urgent questions about respect for the rule of law and the safety of public investment.

The dispute traces back to a suit before the FCT High Court, where Justice Yusuf Halilu granted an interlocutory injunction on April 15, 2025, directing all parties involved in the project to cease further work pending the determination of the substantive matter.

The order was not only issued but duly served and visibly enforced at the site, with court bailiffs pasting the directive and marking the premises with a “Stop Work” notice on 28th April 2025. For many observers, that should have marked a pause in all activities and a deference to the judicial process.

Yet, developments on the ground appear to tell a different story. Reports indicate that construction activities have continued despite the court’s directive, with claims that the posted injunction notices were removed and the “Stop Work” inscription erased.

When a team of journalists, in the company of some security personnel, visited the site on 12th May, 2025, it was noticed that not only the construction works on the multi-million naira market project is still ongoing, the documents of the Interlocutory Injunction which were pasted on the administrative wall of the project by the court bailiff have been removed and the “stop work” order written on the walls cleansed.

On 3rd May 2025, a party in the matter, Dr Shuaibu Musari, visited the site to see the level of compliance to the Court Order, but was attacked by the site workers with shovels and other dangerous materials.

If accurate, such actions go beyond mere oversight; they point to a deliberate defiance of judicial authority.

In a country where the courts are constitutionally empowered to interpret and enforce the law, such conduct is not only provocative but also potentially punishable.

Under Nigerian law, disobedience of a court order constitutes contempt of court, an offence that strikes at the heart of the justice system.

The implications for a party found guilty can be severe, ranging from fines to imprisonment, and in some cases, legal setbacks that could influence the outcome of the substantive case itself.

The courts have consistently maintained that their authority must not be undermined, and any proven act of defiance is often met with firm sanctions intended to preserve institutional integrity.

Beyond the courtroom, however, lies a more immediate and human concern – the risk faced by unsuspecting Nigerians who may be investing in the project.

Despite the ongoing litigation and the court’s directive, there are claims that shops within the Apo market are being marketed and sold. This places potential buyers in a precarious position, as any transaction conducted while the property is under judicial dispute may ultimately prove invalid or unenforceable.

Should the court rule against the party undertaking the sales, those who have paid for shops could find themselves entangled in protracted legal battles or, worse, stripped of their investments entirely.

Advert

This uncertainty is compounded by the legal doctrine that discourages transactions on properties under litigation, effectively placing a cloud over any such deals. In practical terms, it means that buyers are not just purchasing physical spaces but also inheriting the legal risks attached to them. In a volatile property market, that is a gamble few can afford.
The situation has also taken a troubling turn with reports of violence at the construction site. An alleged attack on representatives of the opposing developer underscores the tension surrounding the project and raises concerns about public safety.

When disputes of this nature escalate beyond legal arguments into physical confrontations, it signals a breakdown in orderly conflict resolution and heightens the urgency for intervention.
For regulators and enforcement agencies, the unfolding events present a critical test. The apparent continuation of work in defiance of a court order suggests gaps not only in compliance but also in enforcement.

It raises the question of whether existing mechanisms are sufficient to ensure that judicial decisions are respected on the ground. The responsibility extends beyond the courts to include administrative authorities and law enforcement bodies tasked with maintaining order and protecting citizens.

Ultimately, the Apo market dispute is shaping up to be more than a disagreement between two developers. It is a reflection of broader systemic issues – how effectively court orders are enforced, how well investors are protected from high-risk ventures, and how seriously the rule of law is taken in practice.

The outcome of this case, and the actions taken in response to the alleged defiance by Manillah Integrated Partners Ltd and AMAC Investment Development Company will likely send a strong signal to both the real estate sector and the wider public.

For now, caution remains the most prudent course for prospective buyers. Until the court reaches a final determination, the project remains legally uncertain, and any financial commitment carries inherent risk. As the judiciary weighs its next steps, the expectation is clear: that the authority of the court will be upheld and that no individual or entity will be allowed to operate above the law.

However, at the resumed hearing, on Thursday April 23, 2026, at the Maitama High Court, Justice Yusuf Halilu, adjourned further hearing of the matter to May 7, 2026, to enable the second claimant AMAC Investment Development Company, serve the defendant, Dr Shuaibu Musari a subpoena.

Counsel to the second claimant Idris Abubakar SAN, has earlier presented a witness, Hassan Ahmed Omale, a legal practitioner, who allegedly prepared a Joint Venture Agreement between Dr Shuaibu Musari and Manillah Integrated Partners Ltd, who is also a third claimant in the case.

Also, Counsel to the first claimant, Dr Shuaibu Musari, Realwan Okpanachi, who was represented by Barr. Godwin, sought the approval of the court to serve an order of contempt – Form 48 and 49, to the second and third claimants (Manillah Integrated Partners Ltd and AMAC Investment Development Company), through substituted means (WhatsApp etc), adding that he has been unable to serve them.

While the presiding Judge, Justice Yusuf Halilu, approved that they be served through substituted service, the Counsel to the second claimant, Idris Abubakar, SAN, however received the form 48 and 49 on behalf of the second and third claimants.

What this implies is that Dr Shuaibu Musari has initiated a contempt of court proceedings against Manillah Integrated Partners Ltd and AMAC Investment Development Company for disobeying court order.

Forms 48 and 49 are legal documents used in Nigerian civil procedure to initiate contempt of court proceedings, specifically when a party disobeys a court order. The penalty for disobeying court orders can lead to imprisonment of the contemnor.

Manillah Integrated Partners Ltd was noticeably absent at the resumed hearing.

The first claimant, Dr Shuaibu Musari is seeking a service of an order mandating the second and third claimants to pay N850 million fine for allegedly disregarding the April 2025, interlocutory injunction issued by the court, pending the final determination of the substantive matter.

Will Manillah Integrated Partners Ltd and AMAC Investment Development Company gets away with this contemptuous disregard for the court order? This is up to Justice Yusuf Halilu and the Nigeria Judiciary to determine.

News

Kano Task Force Intensifies PVC Registration Campaign at Yan Lemo Market

Published

on

 

The Kano State Task Force Committee on Voter Registration Mobilisation has intensified its campaign to encourage eligible residents to obtain their Permanent Voter Cards (PVCs) with an advocacy visit to Yan Lemo Market in Na’ibawa, the largest fruit market in Kano State. The outreach was carried out by the Sub-Committee on Engagement with the Business Community as part of efforts to ensure that no eligible voter is left out of the ongoing voter registration exercise.

Speaking during the visit, Chairman of Yan Lemo Market, Alhaji Muhammadu, welcomed the delegation and commended the committee for identifying the market as a strategic partner in the voter registration campaign. He expressed appreciation for the initiative and appealed to the Kano State Government to make voter registration more accessible to traders and business owners, noting that the nature of their commercial activities often makes it difficult for them to leave their businesses to register.

Addressing the traders, the Chairman of the Sub-Committee on Engagement with the Business Community, Alhaji Tijjani Abdullahi Sarki, described the possession of a Permanent Voter Card as both a constitutional right and a civic responsibility. He urged eligible residents to take advantage of the ongoing registration exercise to secure their PVCs and participate in future elections.

According to Alhaji Sarki, the registration exercise is open to first-time registrants, Nigerians who have attained the age of 18 since the last voter registration exercise, individuals seeking to transfer their voting location following a change of residence, those requesting corrections to their personal information, as well as citizens whose voter cards have been lost or damaged.

Advert

He further assured the traders of the Kano State Government’s commitment to promoting wider voter participation across the state. He said the concerns and requests presented by the market leadership, particularly the need for easier access to registration centres for traders, would be forwarded to the main Task Force Committee for appropriate consideration and necessary action.

Also speaking during the engagement, the Secretary of the Sub-Committee, Alhaji Hassan Kofar Mata, thanked the market executives and traders for their warm reception and active participation throughout the sensitisation programme. He commended their interest in the exercise and encouraged them to mobilise other eligible members of the business community to register.

Responding to questions from traders, Alhaji Hassan explained the procedures for transferring voter registration from one Local Government Area to another, correcting personal records, replacing lost or damaged Permanent Voter Cards, and other voter registration-related processes. He urged residents to take advantage of the ongoing exercise to regularise their voter information and ensure they are eligible to participate in future elections.

The advocacy visit forms part of the Kano State Task Force Committee’s broader campaign to increase voter registration and strengthen citizens’ participation in the democratic process through sustained engagement with critical stakeholders, including business communities across the state.

Continue Reading

News

ADC Dissolves Kano State Executives, Constitutes Caretaker Committee

Published

on

 

The African Democratic Congress (ADC) has dissolved its Kano State executive committee and constituted a caretaker committee to oversee the affairs of the party pending the conduct of future congresses. The announcement was made on Monday in Kano by the party’s Deputy National Chairman (North West), Hajiya Najaatu Muhammad, during a press briefing at the Kano Press Centre.

Addressing journalists, Hajiya Najaatu Muhammad said the newly constituted caretaker committee would be chaired by Alhaji Umar Bala. She explained that the decision was taken by the national leadership of the party in line with its constitutional responsibility to preserve the unity, continuity and constitutional integrity of the ADC in Kano State.

According to her, the dissolution of the state executives and the inauguration of the caretaker committee should not be interpreted as a victory for one faction over another but as a constitutional response to an administrative situation within the party. She stressed that the move was aimed at restoring stability and ensuring the uninterrupted administration of the party in Kano State.

Hajiya Najaatu stated that the national leadership acted in accordance with the provisions of the party’s constitution, the Electoral Act and its responsibility to safeguard the future of the ADC. She maintained that when circumstances create a leadership vacuum within a political party, it becomes the duty of the national leadership to take appropriate constitutional measures to maintain order, discipline and continuity.

Advert

She further emphasized that the constitution of the caretaker committee was not a judgment on the loyalty or commitment of party members across Kano State. According to her, thousands of members had sacrificed their time, resources and reputation to build the party at the grassroots and had remained committed even during difficult political periods, adding that their contributions remained appreciated by the national leadership.

Speaking on the mandate of the committee, Hajiya Najaatu said its primary responsibility was to heal divisions within the party rather than deepen them. She noted that the committee was expected to rebuild confidence in the party’s structures, strengthen its institutions, prepare for future congresses and ensure that every genuine member of the ADC had a place within the party.

She urged members of the caretaker committee to lead with fairness, humility, transparency and impartiality, saying their success would be measured not by the number of decisions they make but by their ability to reunite members under one platform. She advised the committee to consult widely, exercise patience and always regard leadership as a trust rather than a privilege.

The ADC Deputy National Chairman also appealed to party members across the 44 local government areas of Kano State to support the transitional arrangement in good faith. She assured members that the doors of the party remained open to everyone and called on stakeholders to embrace reconciliation, dialogue and unity in the overall interest of the party.

Hajiya Najaatu said the political environment ahead would require greater unity and discipline, warning that internal disagreements should not distract the party from presenting itself as a credible alternative to Nigerians. She urged members to channel their energy toward strengthening the party, mobilising supporters, expanding membership and engaging communities instead of focusing on internal divisions.

She expressed confidence that the future of the ADC in Kano State would be stronger if members remained faithful to the party’s constitution and democratic ideals. She called on members to replace division with dialogue, suspicion with trust and personal interests with the collective interest of the party, while praying for God’s guidance for the caretaker committee, Kano State and Nigeria.

Continue Reading

News

NANS Gives South African Businesses Four-day Ultimatum to Leave Nigeria

Published

on

 

By Yusuf Danjuma Yunusa

The National Association of Nigerian Students (NANS) has issued a four-day ultimatum to South African businesses in Nigeria to leave the country.

This is contained in a statement on Monday in Enugu, by Bestman Okereafor, NANS national executive director, corporate and private sectors engagement.

Mr Okereafor stated that after the expiration of the ultimatum, South African business interests would face the wrath of the more than 43.1 million Nigerian students across the country.

“The attention of the apex students governing body, NANS, has been drawn to continuous attacks, intimidation and subsequent chase of law-abiding, peaceful and hardworking Nigerians and other Africans from South Africa.

Advert

“As the biggest student body in Africa, we are giving South African business interests four days to evacuate our beloved country, Nigeria.

“The reason for this action is simple: South Africans cannot continue to oppress and chase our people from their country and expect their businesses to thrive on our soil,” he said.

He also stated that immediately after the expiration of the ultimatum, the student body would consider picketing South African businesses, while further actions follow.

He called on the federal government and the African Union to take more decisive actions against South Africa for its “inimical” acts towards other Africans.

“It is on record that Nigeria played a major role in support of South Africa during the apartheid struggle and should never be paid with disloyalty, disrespect and global embarrassment,” he added.

It will be recalled that xenophobic attacks by South Africans on other Africans for some months had led to Nigerians being physically assaulted, embarrassed, intimidated, injured and some allegedly gruesomely murdered.

Several businesses and premises owned by Nigerians in South Africa were either completely burnt down or destroyed by rampaging South Africans during the xenophobic attack.

The perpetrators of these crimes had earlier given Nigerians and other Africans an ultimatum of June 30 to leave South Africa.

The federal government, through the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, had in recent weeks airlifted hundreds of Nigerians from South Africa back to Nigeria.

Continue Reading

Trending