Connect with us

News

El-rufai Files N1Billion Suit Against ICPC for Unlawful Invasion of Residence

Published

on

 

By Yusuf Danjuma Yunusa

Former Gov. Nasir El-Rufai of Kaduna State has filed a N1 billion fundamental rights enforcement suit against the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Enforcement Commission (ICPC) over alleged unlawful invasion of his Abuja residence.

El-Rufai, through his team of lawyers led by Oluwole Iyamu, SAN, prayed the court to declare that the search warrant issued on Feb. 4 by the Chief Magistrate, Magistrate’s Court of the FCT (2nd respondent), authorising the search and seizure at his residence was invalid, null and void.

He urged the court to declare that the search warrant was “null and void for lack of particularity, material drafting errors, ambiguity in execution parameters, overbreadth, and absence of probable cause thereby constituting an unlawful and unreasonable search in violation of Section 37 of the Constitution.”

The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the former governor had, in the originating motion on notice marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/345/2026, sued ICPC as 1st respondent.

El-Rufai named the Chief Magistrate, Magistrate’s Court of the FCT, Abuja Magisterial District; I-G and Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) as 2nd to 4th respondents respectively.

In the suit dated and filed Feb. 20 by Iyamu, the detained ex-governor sought seven reliefs.

He prayed the court to declare that the invasion and search of his residence at House 12, Mambilla Street, Aso Drive, Abuja, on Feb. 19 at about 2pm and executed by agents of ICPC and I-G, “under the aforesaid invalid warrant, amounts to a gross violation of the applicant’s fundamental rights to dignity of the human person, personal liberty, fair hearing, and privacy under Sections 34, 35, 36, and 37 of the Constitution.”

He urged the court to declare that “any evidence obtained pursuant to the aforesaid invalid warrant and unlawful search is inadmissible in any proceedings against the applicant, as it was procured in breach of constitutional safeguards.”

El-Rufai, therefore, sought an order of injunction restraining the respondents and their agents from further relying on, using, or tendering any evidence or items seized during the unlawful search in any investigation, prosecution, or proceedings involving him.

“An order directing the Ist and 3rd respondents (ICPC and I-G) to forthwith retum all items seized from the applicant’s premises during the unlawful search, together with a detailed inventory thereof.

“An order awarding the sum of N1,000,000,000.00 (One Billion Naira) as general, exemplary, and aggravated damages against the respondents jointly and severally for the violations of the applicant’s fundamental rights, including trespass, unlawful seizure, and the resultant psychological trauma, humiliation, distress, infringement of privacy, and reputational harm.”

El-Rufai did the breakdown of the N1 billion in damages to include “a N300 million as compensatory damages for psychological trauma, emotional distress, and loss of personal security;

A N400 million as exemplary damages to deter future misconduct by law enforcement agencies and vindicate the applicant’s rights.

Advert

A N300 million as aggravated damages for the malicious, high-handed and oppressive nature of the respondents’ actions, including the use of a patently defective warrant procured through misleading representations.”

He equally sought a N100 million as cost of filing the suit, including legal fees and associated expenses.

In his grounds of argument, the senior lawyer argued that the search warrant was fundamentally defective, lacking specificity in the description of items to be seized, containing material typographical errors, ambiguous execution terms, overbroad directives, and no verifiable probable cause.

He said this was in contravention of Sections 143-148 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA), 2015; Section 36 of the Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences (ICPC) Act, 2000, and constitutional protections against arbitrary intrusions.

Specifically, Iyamu argued that Section 143 of the ACJA requires that an application for a search warrant be supported by information in writing and on oath, setting forth reasonable grounds for suspicion, which was absent here as evidenced by the incomplete initiating clause;

He said Section 144 mandates particular descriptions of the place to be searched and the items sought, to prevent general warrants.

He, however, argued that the instant warrant vaguely referred to “the thing aforesaid” without any detail.

“Section 146 stipulates that the warrant must be in the prescribed form, free from defects that could mislead, but the document is riddled with errors in the address, date, and district designation;

“Section 147 allows direction to specified persons, but the warrant’s indiscriminate addressing to “all officers is overbroad and unaccountable.

“Section 148 permits execution at reasonable times, but the contradictory language creates ambiguity, undermining procedural clarity,” he submitted.

Iyamu stated that the execution of the invalid warrant on Feb. 19 resulted in an unlawful invasion of his client’s premises, constituting violations of the rights to dignity (Section 34), personal liberty (Section 35), fair hearing (Section 36), and privacy (Section 37) of the Constitution.

He further argued that the search was conducted without legal justification and in a manner that inflicted humiliation and distress.

“Evidence obtained without a valid warrant is unlawful and inadmissible, as established in judicial precedents such as C.O.P. v. Omoh (1969) NCLR 137, where the court ruled that evidence procured through improper means contravenes fundamental rights and must be excluded,” he said.

The lawyer, who also cited the case of Fawehinmi v. IGP (2000) 7 NWLR (Pt. 665) 481, said the court condemned vague warrants as affording unbridled discretion and leading to abuse.

He equally gave a plethora of cases to back his argument.

In the affidavit in support of the application, Mohammed Shaba, a Principal Secretary to the former governor, averred that on Feb. 19 at about 2p.m., officers from the ICPC and Nigeria Police Force invaded the residence under a purported search warrant issued on or about Feb. 4.

According to him, the said warrant is invalid due to its lack of specificity, errors, and other defects as outlined in the grounds of this application.

He said the “search warrant did not specify the properties or items being searched for.”

Shaba stated that the officers failed to submit themselves for search as provided by the law before proceeding with the search.

“That the Magistrate did not specify the magisterial district wherein he sits.

“That during the invasion, the officers searched the applicant’s premises without lawful authority, seized personal items including documents and electronic devices, and caused the applicant undue humiliation, psychological trauma, and distress.

“Now shown to me and marked as ‘EXHIBIT B’ Is the list of the items carted away.

“That no items seized have been returned, and the respondents continue to rely on the unlawful evidence.

“That the applicant suffered violations of his constitutional rights as a result, and this application is brought in good faith to enforce same,” Shaba said.

News

Ambassadorial Posting: Omokri Faces Rejection as Diaspora Group Calls for a Recall

Published

on

 

By Yusuf Danjuma Yunusa

The Global Coalition for Security and Democracy in Nigeria (GCSDN), a diaspora advocacy organization, has formally called on Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum to reject the designation of Mr. Reno Omokri as Nigeria’s next ambassador to Mexico.

In an official letter addressed to President Sheinbaum, the GCSDN outlined its strong opposition to the appointment, citing concerns over the nominee’s character, the controversial process behind his selection, and potential risks to bilateral relations. The letter was signed by the organization’s Global Coordinator, Comrade Frederick Odorige.

A central point of the GCSDN’s protest is the process by which Mr. Omokri’s nomination was confirmed in Nigeria. The group alleges that the appointment circumvented standard legislative protocol.

“Mr. Omokri was not subjected to the required screening by Nigeria’s National Assembly,” Comrade Odorige stated in the letter. “The process was expedited, allowing him to merely ‘take a bow and leave’—a practice that effectively bypassed substantive debate and a thorough vetting of his qualifications. This has led to widespread public condemnation of the appointment within Nigeria.”

The GCSDN further described Mr. Omokri as a divisive figure lacking the integrity and moral authority befitting a diplomatic post. The letter alleges a pattern of inflammatory rhetoric and opportunism.

Advert

“He is a self-seeking individual known for flippant and provocative public statements, which have frequently led to divisive altercations,” Odorige wrote. “To appoint such a personality as a diplomatic representative raises serious questions about the message it sends to the international community.”

The letter highlights a significant shift in Mr. Omokri’s political stance, suggesting his appointment is a political reward. The group referenced Mr. Omokri’s previous harsh criticism of President Bola Tinubu, including a televised interview on ARISE TV where he referred to the President as a “known drug lord,” claiming to possess documentary evidence from the United States.

“It is a matter of public record that Mr. Omokri has levelled grave accusations against President Tinubu,” the letter continued. “Given that he originates from the same ethnic background as the First Lady, Senator Oluremi Tinubu, it is our belief that he has been politically co-opted. This appointment serves as compensation for abandoning his previous opposition and ceasing his public campaigns, including his advocacy for the release of abducted schoolgirl Leah Sharibu.”

The GCSDN alleges that the ambassadorial posting is designed to grant Mr. Omokri diplomatic immunity, thereby shielding him from accountability for what the group describes as his “despicable activities.”

The GCSDN warned that sending such a controversial figure could have detrimental effects on the diplomatic relationship between Mexico and Nigeria. The group cautioned that Mr. Omokri’s conduct might lead to actions that undermine the Mexican government and damage its international relations.

“We believe his presence in Mexico will be counterproductive. His history suggests a propensity for conflict that could lead him to organize secret protests or work against the interests of your government, thereby destabilizing the diplomatic harmony between our two nations,” the letter warned.

In its appeal, the GCSDN urged President Sheinbaum’s administration to exercise its sovereign right to refuse the acceptance of Mr. Omokri’s credentials, citing “diplomatic sensitivities, security concerns, and political considerations.” The organization concluded its plea with the proverb, “A stitch in time saves nine,” urging swift action to prevent future discord.

Copies of the correspondence were also forwarded to the Mexican Secretary of Foreign Affairs, the President of the Mexican Senate, and the Mexican Embassy in Nigeria for their awareness and consideration.

The Global Coalition for Security and Democracy in Nigeria is a diaspora-led organization focused on promoting good governance, security, and democratic principles in Nigeria.

Continue Reading

News

Breaking:Kano Government dissolves Ministry of Higher Education

Published

on

 

 

The Kano state governor Alhaji Abba Kabir Yusuf has approved the merger of the Ministry of Higher Education with the Ministry of Education in a decisive step to strengthen coordination and accelerate reforms in Kano State’s education sector.

This was contained in a statement signed by the governor’s spokesperson, Sunusi Bature Dawakin Tofa, on Sunday.

Following the restructuring, the new entity will operate as the Ministry of Education, with a specialized Directorate of Higher Education established within the ministry to oversee tertiary education activities.

The directorate will be headed by a Permanent Secretary and supported by the necessary personnel to ensure effective management of higher education institutions in the state.

Advert

“Under this restructuring, all agencies under the defunct Higher Education Ministry such as Scholarship Board will return to the Ministry of Education while state owned universities and other Highter Education Institute will also be supervised by the new Directorate under the merged ministry” the statement added.

The move is part of the state government’s ongoing State of Education sector reform, aimed at repositioning the sector, eliminating duplication of responsibilities, improving policy coordination across all levels of education and reducing cost of governance.

Governor Yusuf stated that the reform is designed to reduce the cost of governance while enhancing efficiency, accountability, and the overall quality of education administration in Kano State.

He reiterated that his administration remains fully committed to implementing far-reaching reforms that will revive the education sector and secure a brighter future for the younger generation.

Consequently, the Office of the Secretary to the State Government and the Office of the Head of Service have been directed to ensure the immediate and seamless realignment of the affected ministries and their respective departments.

 

Continue Reading

News

Executive Council: Kano Deputy Governor Absent Amidst Calls for Resignation”

Published

on

 

 

The Deputy Governor of Kano State, Comr. Aminu Abdussalam Gwarzo, was absent from the 38th State Executive Council meeting held on March 12, a development that has fueled discussions about the ongoing political uncertainties within the state’s administrative machinery.

The meeting, presided over by Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf, was attended by members of the state executive council. However, the deputy governor’s seat remained vacant throughout, despite the official notice of the meeting.

His absence from this critical engagement is believed to stem from lingering political disagreements following Governor Yusuf’s decision, along with several allies, to defect to the All Progressives Congress (APC).

Advert

While some commissioners who did not follow the governor resigned voluntarily in the face of the political realignment, the deputy governor refused to step down, despite holding two key positions: Deputy Governor and Commissioner for Higher Education.

The situation has triggered strong reactions both within and outside government circles, with some officials openly suggesting that a deputy governor who does not share the same political platform as the governor should consider resigning in the interest of the state.

This development has also reignited discussions around the impeachment proceedings initiated against the deputy governor by the Kano State House of Assembly.

Political commentators argue that his continued stay in office, despite the realignment, has created an administrative vacuum within the state’s governance structure. They question whether his actions prioritize the interests of the Kano people or serve personal ambitions, warning that such a stance could stagnate governance and undermine stability.

According to some Kano residents, the deputy governor should at least resign his position as Commissioner for Higher Education to allow the ministry to function smoothly in the interest of the state and its people.

As of the time of this report, neither the deputy governor’s office nor the state government had issued an official statement regarding his absence from the March 12 Executive Council meeting.

 

Continue Reading

Trending