Connect with us

News

El-rufai Files N1Billion Suit Against ICPC for Unlawful Invasion of Residence

Published

on

 

By Yusuf Danjuma Yunusa

Former Gov. Nasir El-Rufai of Kaduna State has filed a N1 billion fundamental rights enforcement suit against the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Enforcement Commission (ICPC) over alleged unlawful invasion of his Abuja residence.

El-Rufai, through his team of lawyers led by Oluwole Iyamu, SAN, prayed the court to declare that the search warrant issued on Feb. 4 by the Chief Magistrate, Magistrate’s Court of the FCT (2nd respondent), authorising the search and seizure at his residence was invalid, null and void.

He urged the court to declare that the search warrant was “null and void for lack of particularity, material drafting errors, ambiguity in execution parameters, overbreadth, and absence of probable cause thereby constituting an unlawful and unreasonable search in violation of Section 37 of the Constitution.”

The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the former governor had, in the originating motion on notice marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/345/2026, sued ICPC as 1st respondent.

El-Rufai named the Chief Magistrate, Magistrate’s Court of the FCT, Abuja Magisterial District; I-G and Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) as 2nd to 4th respondents respectively.

In the suit dated and filed Feb. 20 by Iyamu, the detained ex-governor sought seven reliefs.

He prayed the court to declare that the invasion and search of his residence at House 12, Mambilla Street, Aso Drive, Abuja, on Feb. 19 at about 2pm and executed by agents of ICPC and I-G, “under the aforesaid invalid warrant, amounts to a gross violation of the applicant’s fundamental rights to dignity of the human person, personal liberty, fair hearing, and privacy under Sections 34, 35, 36, and 37 of the Constitution.”

He urged the court to declare that “any evidence obtained pursuant to the aforesaid invalid warrant and unlawful search is inadmissible in any proceedings against the applicant, as it was procured in breach of constitutional safeguards.”

El-Rufai, therefore, sought an order of injunction restraining the respondents and their agents from further relying on, using, or tendering any evidence or items seized during the unlawful search in any investigation, prosecution, or proceedings involving him.

“An order directing the Ist and 3rd respondents (ICPC and I-G) to forthwith retum all items seized from the applicant’s premises during the unlawful search, together with a detailed inventory thereof.

“An order awarding the sum of N1,000,000,000.00 (One Billion Naira) as general, exemplary, and aggravated damages against the respondents jointly and severally for the violations of the applicant’s fundamental rights, including trespass, unlawful seizure, and the resultant psychological trauma, humiliation, distress, infringement of privacy, and reputational harm.”

El-Rufai did the breakdown of the N1 billion in damages to include “a N300 million as compensatory damages for psychological trauma, emotional distress, and loss of personal security;

A N400 million as exemplary damages to deter future misconduct by law enforcement agencies and vindicate the applicant’s rights.

Advert

A N300 million as aggravated damages for the malicious, high-handed and oppressive nature of the respondents’ actions, including the use of a patently defective warrant procured through misleading representations.”

He equally sought a N100 million as cost of filing the suit, including legal fees and associated expenses.

In his grounds of argument, the senior lawyer argued that the search warrant was fundamentally defective, lacking specificity in the description of items to be seized, containing material typographical errors, ambiguous execution terms, overbroad directives, and no verifiable probable cause.

He said this was in contravention of Sections 143-148 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA), 2015; Section 36 of the Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences (ICPC) Act, 2000, and constitutional protections against arbitrary intrusions.

Specifically, Iyamu argued that Section 143 of the ACJA requires that an application for a search warrant be supported by information in writing and on oath, setting forth reasonable grounds for suspicion, which was absent here as evidenced by the incomplete initiating clause;

He said Section 144 mandates particular descriptions of the place to be searched and the items sought, to prevent general warrants.

He, however, argued that the instant warrant vaguely referred to “the thing aforesaid” without any detail.

“Section 146 stipulates that the warrant must be in the prescribed form, free from defects that could mislead, but the document is riddled with errors in the address, date, and district designation;

“Section 147 allows direction to specified persons, but the warrant’s indiscriminate addressing to “all officers is overbroad and unaccountable.

“Section 148 permits execution at reasonable times, but the contradictory language creates ambiguity, undermining procedural clarity,” he submitted.

Iyamu stated that the execution of the invalid warrant on Feb. 19 resulted in an unlawful invasion of his client’s premises, constituting violations of the rights to dignity (Section 34), personal liberty (Section 35), fair hearing (Section 36), and privacy (Section 37) of the Constitution.

He further argued that the search was conducted without legal justification and in a manner that inflicted humiliation and distress.

“Evidence obtained without a valid warrant is unlawful and inadmissible, as established in judicial precedents such as C.O.P. v. Omoh (1969) NCLR 137, where the court ruled that evidence procured through improper means contravenes fundamental rights and must be excluded,” he said.

The lawyer, who also cited the case of Fawehinmi v. IGP (2000) 7 NWLR (Pt. 665) 481, said the court condemned vague warrants as affording unbridled discretion and leading to abuse.

He equally gave a plethora of cases to back his argument.

In the affidavit in support of the application, Mohammed Shaba, a Principal Secretary to the former governor, averred that on Feb. 19 at about 2p.m., officers from the ICPC and Nigeria Police Force invaded the residence under a purported search warrant issued on or about Feb. 4.

According to him, the said warrant is invalid due to its lack of specificity, errors, and other defects as outlined in the grounds of this application.

He said the “search warrant did not specify the properties or items being searched for.”

Shaba stated that the officers failed to submit themselves for search as provided by the law before proceeding with the search.

“That the Magistrate did not specify the magisterial district wherein he sits.

“That during the invasion, the officers searched the applicant’s premises without lawful authority, seized personal items including documents and electronic devices, and caused the applicant undue humiliation, psychological trauma, and distress.

“Now shown to me and marked as ‘EXHIBIT B’ Is the list of the items carted away.

“That no items seized have been returned, and the respondents continue to rely on the unlawful evidence.

“That the applicant suffered violations of his constitutional rights as a result, and this application is brought in good faith to enforce same,” Shaba said.

News

Subsidy Gone, Hardship Remains: Economist Blames Policy Missteps, Debt Burden for Nigeria’s Deepening Crisis Amid Tinubu’s Borrowing

Published

on

 

By Yusuf Danjuma Yunusa

Amidst growing public discontent over persistent economic hardship and the Federal Government’s continued reliance on borrowing, former Central Bank Governor and current Emir of Kano, Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, recently questioned the logic behind President Bola Tinubu’s borrowing spree despite the removal of the long-criticised fuel subsidy.

In an exclusive interview with our correspondent, a prominent economist and financial analyst at a reputable establishment, AbdulWahab Olalekan, dissected the paradox, arguing that the administration’s promises to “stop the hemorrhaging” have yet to materialise because the wound has only been relocated.

When asked whether this economic dislocation is driven by global forces or local mismanagement, Olalekan did not mince words. He attributed the severity of the current hardship primarily to “local structural deficiencies and poor policy sequencing”—specifically the twin shocks of subsidy removal and foreign exchange (FX) liberalisation.

“The relocation of this hardship is primarily the result of local structural deficiencies and policy sequencing (FX liberalisation shock following subsidy removal), though it has been heavily compounded by global economic headwinds,” Olalekan said.

Advert

He stressed that most economists agree the removal of the subsidy was a long-overdue necessity. However, the problem, he explained, lies in the “blunt execution of the transition.” He pointed to two critical domestic failures: the absence of effective social safety net programmes to cushion the blow for ordinary Nigerians, and the country’s “huge debt servicing blackhole” which has swallowed much of the revenue that should have trickled down to the populace.

“The severity of the current hardship is less about the removal of the subsidy itself… and more about the underlying fragility of the Nigerian economy and the blunt execution of the transition. Notably, failure to provide effective social safety net programmes to cushion impact and the fact that the country’s huge debt servicing blackhole sucked some of the subsidy revenue that should typically have trickled down to the average Nigerian,” he explained.

But while local dynamics set the stage, the economist acknowledged that global macroeconomic forces have acted as a devastating multiplier. He noted that the current high global interest rate environment has forced emerging markets like Nigeria to borrow at an expensive premium, further worsening the fiscal picture. Additionally, sticky global inflation has directly fed into Nigeria’s import-dependent economy, accelerating imported inflation.

“The high global interest rate environment meant that countries in the emerging and frontier markets like Nigeria had to borrow at an expensive premium further exacerbating our fiscal picture while the stickiness of global inflation meant increased imported inflation since we are largely an import-dependent nation,” Olalekan stated.

He, however, offered a sliver of relief, observing that the inflation trajectory would have been even worse were it not for the operationalisation of the Dangote Refinery and certain reforms introduced by the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN).

“Thanks to the Dangote Refinery and some of the CBN reforms, the inflation situation could have been worse,” he concluded.

As the Tinubu administration continues to defend its borrowing plan in the face of mounting scrutiny, Olalekan’s diagnosis suggests that without fixing domestic structural flaws and providing tangible relief, removing the subsidy alone will remain a repositioning of pain rather than a cure.

Continue Reading

News

Obi Meets Jonathan, Consults Former President Ahead of 2027

Published

on

 

 

By Yusuf Danjuma Yunusa

Peter Obi, the 2023 presidential candidate of the Labour Party, and other South-East leaders on Monday held a closed-door meeting with former President Goodluck Jonathan in Abuja ahead of the 2027 general election.

The meeting, held at Mr Jonathan’s residence, was attended by several South-East leaders.

Present at the meeting were former Enugu State Governor, Okwesilieze Nwodo; former Imo State Governor, Achike Udenwa; former Managing Director of the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC), Onyema Ugochukwu and Senator Victor Umeh, among others.

Advert

Mr Obi, who spoke to journalists shortly after the meeting, said they consulted with the former president over the 2027 general elections.

He said Mr Jonathan wished Nigeria well and hoped for free, fair and credible elections in 2027, adding that the country must not become a one-party state.

“He wished that we have free, fair, credible election. That would be his wish. There can’t be one party system. He cannot support such a thing. Nobody can claim to be more of a democrat in this country. In terms of those who have led this country without putting him (Jonathan) as number one,” he said.

He said Mr Jonathan served the country faithfully and is a committed democrat.

On endorsement, he said, “We are not talking about endorsement yet. When I become a candidate, I will come for it. He wishes the country well, and we are here to consult with him.”

“We, some notable South-East leaders have come in consultation to our respected former President Goodluck Jonathan, That’s basically what it is. It is on 2027 elections and it is all about Nigeria.

“We are now seeing him (Jonathan) in the categories we have come to see former President Olusegun Obasanjo, former president Ibrahim Babangida and others, so that is the category we are seeing now.

“They are fathers now. They are not defecting. They are not involved. But we need to consult them, because especially someone like him (Jonathan) who served the country very faithfully, focused, and did what is expected in a democracy in this declining situation,” Mr Obi said.

Continue Reading

News

How AA Zaura escaped mob attack by miscreant at Farm centre

Published

on

 

 

 

A chieftain of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Abdulsalam Abdulkarim Zaura, on Monday recounted how he narrowly escaped a mob attack unleashed by suspected thugs along farm center in Kano metropolis.

Zaura, who recently declared his intention to contest the Kano Central Senatorial seat in the 2027 general elections, under the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC), escaped with several of this vehicles damaged and supporters injured.

The ugly incident ensured while the Businessman along side hundreds of his supporters were on their way to Meena event center for the declaration of his senatorial ambition.

Advert

Speaking through his media aide, Dahiru Maiwuddadu, Zaura said the a group of suspected hoodlums suddenly unleashed attacked on his convey and vandalised several of his vehicles in the process.

According to him, Zaura escaped unhurt, but the attack left a trail of damage and heightened fear among traders and residents.

He asserted that the same set of thugs subsequently went on rampage to invade the GSM market along farm center creating panic on residents.

While commiserating with the victims of the unfortunate attack on the market, the APC Chieftain applauded the quick intervention of the security agencies for bring the situation under control.

He expressed concern over what he described as rising youth-related violence, stressing the need for urgent action to address the root causes and safeguard lives and property.

Zaura called on security agencies to investigate the incident and bring the perpetrators to justice, warning that such acts could undermine peace and economic activities in the state.

He also urged youths to shun violence and embrace peaceful coexistence, dialogue and lawful means of engagement.

The APC stalwart reaffirmed his commitment to supporting policies and initiatives that promote security and economic stability in Kano Central, noting that traders and small businesses must operate in a safe environment to thrive.

He further assured affected traders of his solidarity, describing them as vital contributors to the state’s economy and calling for collective efforts to prevent future occurrences.

The incident has raised fresh concerns over security around major commercial centres in Kano, especially as political activities intensify ahead of the 2027 general elections.

Continue Reading

Trending