Connect with us

Opinion

Nigerians, We Must Stop Amplifying The Terrorist Agenda

Published

on

 

 

By Abduljalil Hassan Muhammad

The defining objective of terrorism is the destabilisation of the state. Terrorists accomplish this by attacking citizens, sowing fear, and creating a pervasive sense of insecurity. Their calculated strategy seeks to make the populace question the government’s ability to protect them. When this doubt deepens, it weakens the social contract, nurtures lawlessness, and pushes the nation toward failure, the ultimate goal of terrorist groups everywhere. Their motivations may differ, from extremist ideologies to separatist ambitions, but their core method is the same: violence, intimidation, and psychological warfare.

Nigeria’s experience is a classic illustration of this phenomenon. Since the early 2000s and with a dangerous escalation from 2009 onward, the country has confronted multiple insurgencies. The most devastating has been Boko Haram and its offshoots, primarily in the Northeast. At their peak between 2011 and 2014, these groups killed, maimed, and abducted at unprecedented levels. Estimates by the Council on Foreign Relations put the death toll above 350,000, with millions displaced. Entire communities in Borno, Yobe, and Adamawa were wiped out, many of which remain deserted today.

This crisis has since mutated. In the Northwest and segments of the Northcentral, “bandits”, many evolving from cattle‐rustling networks, have entrenched terror through mass kidnappings, including the infamous abductions in Kankara (over 300 boys) and Kuriga (over 280 pupils). These groups impose illegal levies on villages and hold entire populations hostage. Meanwhile, in the Southeast, the Eastern Security Network (ESN), the militant wing of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), has enforced a violent Monday sit-at-home order, crippling economic activity and resurrecting a war-era siege mentality.

The Nigerian state has responded by deploying the military across multiple fronts. Major operations include Operation Hadin Kai in the Northeast, confronting Boko Haram and ISWAP; Operation Hadarin Daji in the Northwest, tackling banditry; and Operation Whirl Stroke in the Northcentral, countering militia and farmer-herder crises. In the South South, Operation Delta Safe protects vital oil infrastructure, while Operation Udo Ka addresses separatist violence in the Southeast. Beyond its borders, Nigeria also works with regional partners through the Multi-National Joint Task Force (MNJTF) to combat terrorism in the Lake Chad Basin.

Yet despite these substantial efforts, the threat persists. And in some regions, it worsens. A major but often overlooked factor is our own complicity as citizens in amplifying the terrorists’ message. Whether out of ignorance, partisanship, or naive sentiment, many Nigerians inadvertently aid the very forces that seek to destroy our country.

How We Unwittingly Amplify Terrorism

Sensationalist Media Practices

Advert

While mainstream media have generally avoided graphic content, their reporting often prioritises sensationalism over national responsibility. Coverage of attacks such as the 17 November 2025 ambush that killed Brigadier General M. Uba, frequently highlights the “success” of terrorists while underreporting the military’s response or the heroism of fallen officers. The race to break news sometimes overrides verification, resulting in unconfirmed claims reaching the public, as seen in false reports of military base takeovers in Borno, later debunked by defence authorities.

Reckless “Investigations” by Blogs and Social Media

Local blogs and social platforms, desperate for attention, have become loudspeakers for terrorist propaganda. Outlets like Peoples Gazette and Sahara Reporters often skirt ethical boundaries by publishing detailed accounts that serve the terrorists’ psychological strategy. Worse, ordinary social media users actively share execution videos and propaganda clips, unwittingly becoming unpaid agents of terror. This behaviour traumatises citizens, demoralises troops, and strengthens the terrorists’ psychological grip.

Dangerous Rhetoric from Influencers and Leaders

Some influential voices, from religious figures to social media personalities, provide moral justification for terrorism. Clerics like Sheikh Ahmad Gumi have repeatedly framed banditry as a “cry of the oppressed,” advocating amnesty for violent criminals. Certain commentators describe military operations in the Southeast as “genocide,” while minimising the brutal enforcement of sit-at-home orders by IPOB/ESN. Such rhetoric creates false equivalence between violent non-state actors and the legitimate security forces tasked with protecting citizens.

Indiscriminate Sharing by Citizens

A heartbreaking example is the circulating video of Brigadier General M. Uba’s killing. Despite the clear psychological intent behind ISWAP’s release of the footage, many Nigerians shared it widely on WhatsApp, Facebook, and X (formerly Twitter). Motivated by curiosity or a misguided sense of “awareness,” these citizens unintentionally became amplifiers of terrorism. By sharing such content, they terrorise the public, dishonour the fallen, and hand terrorists the publicity they crave.

Counterproductive Government Actions

Some government decisions also strengthen the terrorists’ hand. In attempts to secure temporary peace, several state governments have negotiated with or paid ransoms to terrorists. Former Zamfara Governor Bello Matawalle admitted to paying bandits, while former Kaduna Governor Nasir El Rufai disclosed that another Northwest governor paid millions to criminal groups. These actions finance the acquisition of deadlier weapons and embolden terrorists.
At the federal level, the De-radicalisation, Rehabilitation, and Reintegration programme for “repentant” terrorists faces public scepticism. When victims still grieve and displaced communities remain unrepaired, reintegrating former Boko Haram fighters under “Operation Safe Corridor” can appear unjust, feeding public frustration and weakening trust.

In Conclusion, the fight against terrorism is not only a battle of guns but a battle of narratives. Every unverified rumour we spread, every propaganda video we forward, every attempt to justify terrorist brutality, and every careless comment that undermines our military strengthens the enemy. We become unwilling accomplices in the erosion of our own national security.

Nigeria’s survival requires a shift from passive consumption of information to active, patriotic vigilance. We must demand responsible journalism, hold public figures accountable for reckless rhetoric, and criticise policies that empower violent groups. Our collective resilience is the most effective weapon against terror. By refusing to amplify fear and division, we deprive terrorists of their most potent tool.

The bravery of our soldiers on the frontlines must be matched by the wisdom and discipline of citizens at home. The defence of Nigeria is a shared responsibility, and the war against terror will be won not only by bullets, but by the choices we make every day.

Opinion

NELFUND: Lifeline or Test of Sustainability?

Published

on

 

By Ibrahim Maryam Queen

For many Nigerian students, securing admission into a tertiary institution is only the beginning of another struggle—finding the money to stay in school. Rising tuition fees, accommodation costs and the increasing cost of living have made higher education difficult to afford for many families. In response to these challenges, the Federal Government introduced the Nigerian Education Loan Fund (NELFUND), a scheme intended to ensure that financial hardship does not prevent qualified students from completing their education.
The response has been remarkable. According to official NELFUND reports, more than one million students have applied for the loan, while hundreds of tertiary institutions have been onboarded onto the platform. These figures reflect not only the popularity of the programme but also the growing financial pressure faced by students across the country.
For one University of Abuja student, who requested anonymity, the loan meant the difference between remaining in school and dropping out.

“My father lost his job and my family could no longer afford my fees. I had already missed lectures, and I feared my education would end. The loan gave me another chance,” she said.

Her story illustrates the reality faced by many students. With household incomes under pressure and youth unemployment still a concern, financing higher education has become increasingly difficult. For many families, student loans provide immediate relief from a burden that might otherwise end a student’s academic journey.

However, the growing number of applications also raises important questions. If demand continues to increase, can the programme remain financially sustainable? While the scheme has attracted widespread interest, Nigeria has millions of students enrolled in tertiary institutions, suggesting that many eligible students may still not have access because of limited awareness, documentation challenges or difficulties with the application process.

Advert

Another concern is repayment. Although the loans are designed to ease financial barriers to education, their long-term success depends on graduates’ ability to secure stable employment. Where unemployment or underemployment persists, repayment may become difficult, potentially affecting the sustainability of the scheme. This suggests that student loans cannot be viewed in isolation from broader economic realities.

Experiences from other countries provide useful lessons. A 2017 study by Nicholas Barr, Bruce Chapman, Lorraine Dearden and Susan Dynarski of the Centre for Global Higher Education, University of Oxford, found that poorly designed repayment systems can place heavy financial burdens on graduates. Examining the United States student loan system, the researchers observed that decades of accumulated debt and repayment challenges underscored the importance of creating fair and sustainable loan policies. While Nigeria’s scheme differs from the American model, the study highlights the need for careful implementation and continuous review.

Transparency and public confidence will also determine whether the programme succeeds. Regular publication of data on applications, disbursements, beneficiaries and repayment performance will help strengthen accountability. At the same time, expanding awareness campaigns, particularly in underserved communities, could ensure that eligible students are not excluded simply because they lack information about the scheme.

NELFUND has already provided hope to many students who might otherwise have abandoned their education. Yet its long-term impact will depend not only on the number of loans disbursed but also on sound management, transparent administration and an economy capable of creating opportunities for graduates. Without these, even the most ambitious education financing programme may struggle to achieve its objectives.

Student loans are more than financial assistance; they are an investment in human capital and national development. Whether NELFUND ultimately becomes a lasting lifeline for Nigerian students or a test of sustainable higher education financing will depend on the choices made today by policymakers, institutions and all stakeholders responsible for its implementation.

Sources
Nigerian Education Loan Fund (NELFUND), Official Reports.
National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), Labour Force Survey.
Student Loans (Access to Higher Education) Act, 2024.
Barr, N., Chapman, B., Dearden, L., & Dynarski, S. (2017). Student Loan Design. Centre for Global Higher Education, University of Oxford.
Vanguard Newspaper.
Punch Newspaper.
Interview with an anonymous University of Abuja student (June 2026).

Ibrahim maryam queen
200level student of the department of Development and strategic communication university of Abuja.

Continue Reading

Opinion

AI Delusion Among Students: When Smart Tools Start Replacing Real Connections, The Truth About AI And Student Life

Published

on

 

 

BY: NDUBUISI MICHAEL SOMTOCHUKWU

In recent years, Artificial intelligence in Nigeria has rapidly shifted from the digital technologies concept talked about in the past to an everyday companion for students. AI has evolved past just helping students with their assignments and now is seen as capable of giving emotional support when needed. With AI tools such as chat GPT and Claude being able to interact with students, it has now become deeply integrated into their lives. While this shift is seen as an undeniable, beneficial way to help students, it also introduces an emerging concern often described as the term known as AI Delusion, the tendency to over rely on AI systems sometimes mistaking their human like understanding, empathy or authority. From a students perspective, this phenomenon is quietly changing relationships, mentorship and counseling in ways that are both empowering and potentially risky.

AI in academic fields has made communication faster and easier. Nigerian Students now use AI to draft messages, generate conversation ideas, and even simulate companionship through chatbots. For many, especially those who feel isolated or socially anxious, AI can feel like a safe space and non-judgmental, always available, and responsive. However, this convenience comes with a trade-off. Human relationships are built on emotional nuance, shared experiences, and mutual vulnerabilities, qualities AI cannot truly replicate. When students begin to substitute real interactions with AI conversations, they may unintentionally weaken their social skills and reduce meaningful human connections.

From a student’s point of view, the danger lies not in using AI, but in preferring it over people. This is where AI delusion begins: when a student starts believing that AI “understands” them better than their peers or family.

Advert

Traditionally, mentorship involves guidance from experienced individuals such as teachers, seniors, or professionals, who provide not just knowledge, but wisdom shaped by real life experiences. In Today’s society, AI tools are used to acquire quick answers, career advice, and academic support, making students prefer these tools over human experience, The speed and accessibility of AI tools is what students appreciate and for most students, it reduces the need to schedule appointments and prevents the fear and judgement students might face when making real connections, they delude themselves saying “it really gets me”.

Mentorship is more than information. A human mentor challenges assumptions, shares personal failures, and adapts guidance based on deep understanding of a student’s personality and context. AI, on the other hand, generates responses based on patterns, not lived experience.

AI in Nigeria offers privacy, immediacy, and a sense of safety. Students may feel more comfortable opening up to a machine than to a person, especially when dealing with stigma or fear of judgment. However, AI lacks true empathy and cannot fully understand complex emotional or psychological conditions. It also cannot replace trained professionals in handling serious mental health issues. From a student’s perspective, AI can feel “good enough,” especially in moments of distress. But relying solely on AI for emotional support can create a false sense of being understood—another form of AI delusion. It may delay seeking real help when it is truly needed

A practical example is being a student in Abuja or Lagos chats with AI every night about stress, school, or relationships. He or she soon Stops opening up to friends and Feels more “heard” by AI than by real people, Believing AI genuinely understands emotions better than humans.

AI is not entirely to blame as misuse and over-dependence when it t comes from the students, From the student’s perspective, the goal should be balance, not avoidance. There are practical ways to minimize delusion of AI,these ways consist of things like allowing it to assist learning and not replace critical thinking, prioritizing real conversations with friends, teachers, and family, combining AI insights with guidance from experienced individuals, and knowing when to seek health for serious emotional or mental health concerns, in summary consult professionals.

Nigeria is experiencing rapid AI adoption, with over 90% of users relying on it for complex tasks and extensive use of chatbots. This high engagement, without adequate local ethical frameworks or mental health support, increases the risk of negative psychological impact. Experts in Nigeria have raised alarms about students experiencing hallucinations, paranoia, and a distorted sense of reality after prolonged, immersive interactions with AI a phenomenon sometimes termed “AI psychosis”.

Other critics however, argue that calling it “AI delusion” exaggerates the issue. Students are not necessarily “deluded”; many are fully aware that AI is not human. Instead, they are simply adapting to a more efficient tool. According to some critics, It may be more accurate to describe the trend as behavioral dependence, not psychological confusion. Historically, similar fears were raised about calculators, the Internet, and smartphones—yet society adapted.

NDUBUISI MICHAEL SOMTOCHUKWU wrote from Department of strategic communications University of Abuja and can be reached at ndubuisimichael292@gmail.com

Continue Reading

Opinion

Open letter to Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf on the Need To Include PCN, NAFDAC In Special Task Force On Drug Abuse And Illicit Trafficking

Published

on

 

By Saidu Lawal Burji

I wish to commend Your Excellency for the timely establishment of the Special Task Force on Drug Abuse and Illicit Trafficking in Kano State. This initiative demonstrates your administration’s commitment to protecting the health, security, and future of the citizens of Kano State, particularly the youth who are disproportionately affected by substance abuse and illicit drug trafficking.

The composition of the Task Force reflects a commendable multi-sectoral approach involving security agencies, health institutions, traditional and religious stakeholders, and civil society representatives. However, considering the critical role of pharmaceutical regulation in combating drug abuse and illicit drug circulation, I respectfully wish to advocate for the inclusion of representatives from the National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC) and the Pharmacy Council of Nigeria (PCN) as members of the Task Force.

The inclusion of these two statutory regulatory agencies would significantly strengthen the operational capacity and effectiveness of the Task Force for the following reasons:

Expertise in Drug Regulation and Control

NAFDAC is the foremost federal agency charged with regulating and controlling the manufacture, importation, distribution, sale, and use of medicines and other regulated products in Nigeria. The agency possesses extensive intelligence, technical expertise, and enforcement experience relating to counterfeit, substandard, unregistered, and controlled substances that often fuel drug abuse.

Regulation of Pharmaceutical Premises and Medicine Distribution Channels

Advert

The Pharmacy Council of Nigeria is the statutory body responsible for regulating pharmacy practice, pharmaceutical premises, patent and proprietary medicine vendors, and medicine distribution systems. PCN’s knowledge of legitimate medicine supply chains and pharmaceutical establishments would be invaluable in identifying sources of diversion, illegal medicine sales, and unauthorized drug outlets.

Support for Intelligence Gathering and Enforcement Operations

Both agencies maintain valuable databases and field intelligence relating to pharmaceutical products, distribution networks, and regulatory violations. Their participation would enhance the Task Force’s ability to identify illicit drug distribution points and support evidence-based enforcement actions.

Strengthening Investigations and Prosecution

Effective prosecution of drug-related offences requires technical evidence concerning drug authenticity, regulatory status, licensing requirements, and pharmaceutical standards. NAFDAC and PCN can provide expert witnesses, forensic support, and regulatory documentation necessary for successful prosecution of offenders.

Public Education and Demand Reduction

Both agencies have extensive experience in public enlightenment campaigns on rational medicine use, dangers of substance abuse, and safe medicine practices. Their participation would strengthen the advocacy and preventive components of the Task Force’s mandate.

Promotion of a Comprehensive Public Health Approach

Drug abuse is not only a security challenge but also a significant public health issue. The inclusion of NAFDAC and PCN would ensure that regulatory, preventive, and public health perspectives are adequately integrated into the Task Force’s activities.

Your Excellency, the inclusion of these agencies will complement the efforts of the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA) and other security institutions while ensuring a more comprehensive and sustainable response to the challenge of drug abuse and illicit trafficking in Kano State.

I therefore respectfully appeal to Your Excellency to consider expanding the membership of the Special Task Force to include one representative each from NAFDAC and the Pharmacy Council of Nigeria.

I am confident that such inclusion will further strengthen the capacity of the Task Force to achieve its noble objectives and contribute meaningfully to the realization of a healthier, safer, and drug-free Kano State.

Please accept the assurances of my highest esteem and regards.

Yours faithfully,

Saidu Lawal Burji Bpharm, MHE, Msc GHaP(in view)
Chief Pharmacist
Pharmacy Council of Nigeria
Kano State Office
burji1120@gmail.com

Continue Reading

Trending