Connect with us

Opinion

Nigerians, We Must Stop Amplifying The Terrorist Agenda

Published

on

 

 

By Abduljalil Hassan Muhammad

The defining objective of terrorism is the destabilisation of the state. Terrorists accomplish this by attacking citizens, sowing fear, and creating a pervasive sense of insecurity. Their calculated strategy seeks to make the populace question the government’s ability to protect them. When this doubt deepens, it weakens the social contract, nurtures lawlessness, and pushes the nation toward failure, the ultimate goal of terrorist groups everywhere. Their motivations may differ, from extremist ideologies to separatist ambitions, but their core method is the same: violence, intimidation, and psychological warfare.

Nigeria’s experience is a classic illustration of this phenomenon. Since the early 2000s and with a dangerous escalation from 2009 onward, the country has confronted multiple insurgencies. The most devastating has been Boko Haram and its offshoots, primarily in the Northeast. At their peak between 2011 and 2014, these groups killed, maimed, and abducted at unprecedented levels. Estimates by the Council on Foreign Relations put the death toll above 350,000, with millions displaced. Entire communities in Borno, Yobe, and Adamawa were wiped out, many of which remain deserted today.

This crisis has since mutated. In the Northwest and segments of the Northcentral, “bandits”, many evolving from cattle‐rustling networks, have entrenched terror through mass kidnappings, including the infamous abductions in Kankara (over 300 boys) and Kuriga (over 280 pupils). These groups impose illegal levies on villages and hold entire populations hostage. Meanwhile, in the Southeast, the Eastern Security Network (ESN), the militant wing of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), has enforced a violent Monday sit-at-home order, crippling economic activity and resurrecting a war-era siege mentality.

The Nigerian state has responded by deploying the military across multiple fronts. Major operations include Operation Hadin Kai in the Northeast, confronting Boko Haram and ISWAP; Operation Hadarin Daji in the Northwest, tackling banditry; and Operation Whirl Stroke in the Northcentral, countering militia and farmer-herder crises. In the South South, Operation Delta Safe protects vital oil infrastructure, while Operation Udo Ka addresses separatist violence in the Southeast. Beyond its borders, Nigeria also works with regional partners through the Multi-National Joint Task Force (MNJTF) to combat terrorism in the Lake Chad Basin.

Yet despite these substantial efforts, the threat persists. And in some regions, it worsens. A major but often overlooked factor is our own complicity as citizens in amplifying the terrorists’ message. Whether out of ignorance, partisanship, or naive sentiment, many Nigerians inadvertently aid the very forces that seek to destroy our country.

How We Unwittingly Amplify Terrorism

Sensationalist Media Practices

Advert

While mainstream media have generally avoided graphic content, their reporting often prioritises sensationalism over national responsibility. Coverage of attacks such as the 17 November 2025 ambush that killed Brigadier General M. Uba, frequently highlights the “success” of terrorists while underreporting the military’s response or the heroism of fallen officers. The race to break news sometimes overrides verification, resulting in unconfirmed claims reaching the public, as seen in false reports of military base takeovers in Borno, later debunked by defence authorities.

Reckless “Investigations” by Blogs and Social Media

Local blogs and social platforms, desperate for attention, have become loudspeakers for terrorist propaganda. Outlets like Peoples Gazette and Sahara Reporters often skirt ethical boundaries by publishing detailed accounts that serve the terrorists’ psychological strategy. Worse, ordinary social media users actively share execution videos and propaganda clips, unwittingly becoming unpaid agents of terror. This behaviour traumatises citizens, demoralises troops, and strengthens the terrorists’ psychological grip.

Dangerous Rhetoric from Influencers and Leaders

Some influential voices, from religious figures to social media personalities, provide moral justification for terrorism. Clerics like Sheikh Ahmad Gumi have repeatedly framed banditry as a “cry of the oppressed,” advocating amnesty for violent criminals. Certain commentators describe military operations in the Southeast as “genocide,” while minimising the brutal enforcement of sit-at-home orders by IPOB/ESN. Such rhetoric creates false equivalence between violent non-state actors and the legitimate security forces tasked with protecting citizens.

Indiscriminate Sharing by Citizens

A heartbreaking example is the circulating video of Brigadier General M. Uba’s killing. Despite the clear psychological intent behind ISWAP’s release of the footage, many Nigerians shared it widely on WhatsApp, Facebook, and X (formerly Twitter). Motivated by curiosity or a misguided sense of “awareness,” these citizens unintentionally became amplifiers of terrorism. By sharing such content, they terrorise the public, dishonour the fallen, and hand terrorists the publicity they crave.

Counterproductive Government Actions

Some government decisions also strengthen the terrorists’ hand. In attempts to secure temporary peace, several state governments have negotiated with or paid ransoms to terrorists. Former Zamfara Governor Bello Matawalle admitted to paying bandits, while former Kaduna Governor Nasir El Rufai disclosed that another Northwest governor paid millions to criminal groups. These actions finance the acquisition of deadlier weapons and embolden terrorists.
At the federal level, the De-radicalisation, Rehabilitation, and Reintegration programme for “repentant” terrorists faces public scepticism. When victims still grieve and displaced communities remain unrepaired, reintegrating former Boko Haram fighters under “Operation Safe Corridor” can appear unjust, feeding public frustration and weakening trust.

In Conclusion, the fight against terrorism is not only a battle of guns but a battle of narratives. Every unverified rumour we spread, every propaganda video we forward, every attempt to justify terrorist brutality, and every careless comment that undermines our military strengthens the enemy. We become unwilling accomplices in the erosion of our own national security.

Nigeria’s survival requires a shift from passive consumption of information to active, patriotic vigilance. We must demand responsible journalism, hold public figures accountable for reckless rhetoric, and criticise policies that empower violent groups. Our collective resilience is the most effective weapon against terror. By refusing to amplify fear and division, we deprive terrorists of their most potent tool.

The bravery of our soldiers on the frontlines must be matched by the wisdom and discipline of citizens at home. The defence of Nigeria is a shared responsibility, and the war against terror will be won not only by bullets, but by the choices we make every day.

Opinion

Bauchi at Fifty: A State That Learned to Become

Published

on

 

By: Lamara Garba Azare

Bauchi was not born in silence. On the third day of February 1976, it arrived with the quiet dignity of history unfolding, carved out of the old North Eastern State, not merely as a political entity but as a promise. A promise that people mattered. A promise that governance could be closer to the heartbeat of the land. A promise that a place shaped by savannah winds, ancient footsteps, and resilient souls deserved its own name and destiny.

In those earliest days, the founding leaders stood before an unformed canvas. There were no clear roads, only directions. No settled institutions, only intentions. Men like Mohammed Bello Kaliel and the first set of military administrators did not inherit comfort. They inherited responsibility. With discipline and restraint, they laid the skeletal frame of a state yet to find its voice. Ministries were formed, public service took its first breath, and order was introduced where uncertainty once loomed. Their service was not loud, but it was consequential. They held Bauchi together when it was most fragile, and history must remember them not for what was absent, but for what they preserved.

Then came the gentle dawn of civilian rule and with it the reassuring presence of Abubakar Tatari Ali. His leadership spoke directly to the soul of the people. Roads stretched outward as symbols of connection, farms rose as declarations of self belief, industries emerged as statements of confidence, and Bauchi began to imagine itself beyond survival. He governed with faith in possibility and left behind a lesson that development is not only measured in concrete and steel, but in hope restored and dignity affirmed.

The years that followed were long and demanding. Military administrators came and went, each carrying the weight of stewardship in difficult times. Mohammed Sani Sami, Chris Abutu Garuba, Joshua Madaki, Abu Ali, Wing Commander James Yana Kalau, Rasheed Adisa Raji, Theophilus Bamigboye and Abdul Adamu Mshelia each, in their own seasons, kept the machinery of governance alive. These were years of holding the centre, of completing water projects so thirst would not rule, of strengthening hospitals so life could be preserved, of nurturing sports and social cohesion so the human spirit would not be crushed. Bauchi learned patience in those years. It learned that progress does not always arrive with celebration, but often with quiet persistence.

Advert

The brief return of democracy in the early nineties under Dahiru Mohammed rekindled hope, only for it to be interrupted again. Yet the idea of civilian choice never died. It waited patiently in the consciousness of the people. And when it returned in 1999, it returned with purpose.

Ahmadu Adamu Muazu’s era marked a turning point that still echoes across the state. Schools multiplied, classrooms filled, enrolment soared, and Bauchi found itself counted among Nigeria’s strongest performers in education. Roads stitched communities together, water flowed where scarcity once reigned, electricity reached villages long forgotten by the grid, and healthcare gained renewed attention. His leadership proved that when people are placed at the centre of policy, development responds naturally. Many families still live inside the outcomes of those years, sometimes without knowing the names of the policies that made them possible.

Isa Yuguda and Mohammed Abdullahi Abubakar governed in times shaped by complexity. Economic pressure, national uncertainty, and rising security concerns tested the limits of leadership. Yet governance continued. Roads were maintained, institutions sustained, and the state was kept standing when the ground beneath Nigeria often felt unsteady. Their stewardship reminded the people that leadership is not always about expansion, but about preservation, about ensuring that the house does not collapse while waiting for renovation.

Today, under Bala Mohammed, Bauchi speaks again in the language of renewal. Roads are being rebuilt not just as infrastructure but as arteries of opportunity. Schools are being restored, health facilities revived, urban spaces reimagined, and economic empowerment extended to women and youths who for too long stood at the margins. Investment summits invite the world to see Bauchi differently, not as an afterthought, but as a land of promise. His leadership reflects a belief that governance must listen, that peace must be cultivated, and that development must feel human.

As Bauchi marks fifty years, this is not merely a roll call of leaders. It is a collective tribute. To those who laid foundations when there was little applause. To those who governed in difficult seasons without surrender. To those who expanded opportunity and those who protected stability. To civil servants who kept institutions alive, teachers who shaped minds in overcrowded classrooms, farmers who planted hope in stubborn soil, and communities who believed that this state belonged to them.

As Bauchi steps into the future, it does so with memory in its hands and hope in its eyes. The past has spoken through sacrifice, the present breathes through responsibility, and the future waits for courage. What remains certain is this: Bauchi has never been defined by the ease of its journey, but by the strength of its will. From those who laid the first stones to those who now carry the torch, the story continues not as an echo of yesterday, but as a call to tomorrow. And as long as its people believe in the dignity of service, the power of unity, and the promise of becoming better than before, Bauchi will not merely endure. It will rise, again and again.

Lamara Garba Azare, a veteran journalist, writes from Kano

Continue Reading

Opinion

Who Will Speak for Young Nigerians Dying for Russia?

Published

on

 

By, Alhassan Bala

The silence is deafening. While South Africa and Kenya agitate loudly for the return of their citizens deceived into fighting Russia’s war in Ukraine, Nigeria remains conspicuously quiet about its own sons being used as cannon fodder on foreign battlefields.

In January 2026, Kenyan social media platforms were flooded with images of young Kenyans killed while fighting for Russia.

In South Africa, the issue turned to politics as an elite was accused of sending young South Africans to Russia to join the army and fight in Ukraine.

However, the stories of the victims from Nigeria paint a horrific image, especially as among those faces was one that haunts the most: Anas Adam from Kano State, Nigeria. His story is not unique, but it demands to be told.

On November 10, 2025, Anas boarded an Egypt Air flight from Lagos, telling friends he was traveling to Russia for business. Within days, the cheerful entrepreneur’s voice had changed to one of desperation. In a WhatsApp voice note, he pleaded with friends to pray for him that “things have changed,” he said cryptically. Soon after, his photograph appeared online, wearing a Russian army uniform.

Two months after, precisely on January 10, 2026, his family received news of his death not from Nigerian authorities, not from the Russian government, but from a Kenyan he had met in Russia.

He was not alone. Two others: Abubakar and a man named Tunde left Nigeria the same day. Another young man from Kano had already died on the frontlines. Records have shown that more are presently processing visas to Russia, some fully aware of what awaits them: the plan to join the army, while others have been hoodwinked with promises of scholarships or employment.

The Deception Machine

During a visit to Ukraine in June, 2024, I met prisoners of war from Ghana, Egypt, Somalia, and Togo; young Africans were lured to Russia through various schemes. Their testimonies revealed a pattern of systematic deception and exploitation.

Advert

A Somali prisoner told me he was promised a Russian passport and received an advance of $20,000 deposited in a new Russian bank account. An Egyptian was given a choice: fight in Ukraine or complete his prison sentence in Russia. A Ghanaian who had applied for a scholarship found no academic program waiting but only a contract he signed without fully understanding, binding him to military service.

During that time there was no Nigerian captured or reported killed while fighting for Russia which made me think there were no Nigerians lured to join the Russian army but I was wrong as few weeks after some Nigerians were announced as prisoners of war, captured by Ukrainian forces.

This brazen deceit continues even in death. The agency that processed Anas’s trip operates from Kaduna State. Despite promises to visit his bereaved family, they have offered only excuses. There will be no compensation, no official acknowledgment, no dignity in his death.

Where Is Nigeria’s Voice?

Ghana has initiated discussions with Ukrainian authorities for the return of its citizens currently serving as prisoners of War. Authorities in Kenya and the media have raised alarm about their young people being exploited as mercenaries. South Africa and Kenya are demanding answers. Action is certainly coming.

Despite these efforts by theese African countries, there is still nothing coming out from Nigeria or its agencies like Nigerians in Diaspora Commission (NiDCom).

These young men are not statistics. They are sons, brothers, friends and are people with dreams who believed they were pursuing opportunities, not marching toward unmarked graves in a foreign war. They deserve better than to die unacknowledged, their families left without answers, compensation, or even the return of their remains.

During my time in Lviv and Kyiv, I experienced firsthand the terror of air raid sirens announcing imminent drones and missile attacks. I saw the reality of the war these young Africans are being fed into often without proper training, documentation, or legal protections regarding insurance and other rights. When I returned to Nigeria, I carried the trauma of those sirens with me. How much worse for those who never make it home?

A Call to Action

. The Nigerian government must break its silence. Our Ministry of Foreign Affairs should immediately:

. Investigate how many Nigerian citizens have been recruited into the Russian military?

. Demand accountability from recruitment agencies operating within our borders

. Engage with Ukrainian authorities to secure the return of any Nigerian prisoners of war

. Warn young Nigerians about these deceptive recruitment schemes

It does not stop there as civil society organisations, the media, and concerned citizens must amplify these stories. We cannot allow our young people to become invisible casualties in someone else’s war.

Anas Adam’s friends posted his pictures in Russian army uniform as a memorial. But memorials are not enough. His death, and the deaths of others like him, demand investigation, accountability, and action.

Who will speak for young Nigerians dying for Russia? If we do not raise our voices now, the answer may be: no one. And that silence will cost more young lives.

Alhassan Bala, OSINT specialist, Researcher writes this from Abuja

Continue Reading

Opinion

When The Sun Newspaper Shines DSP Barau in Lagos

Published

on

 

By Abba Anwar

The patriotic commitment for his role in national cohesion, integration and overall national development, Deputy Senate President, His Excellency (Dr) Barau I Jibrin, CFR, is practically recognized along the breadth and length of the country. Such recognition is spotted across ethnic groups, different geographical locations and status.

As The Sun Newspaper believes, after some diligent scrutiny and due process, finds the Senator worthy of the Sun’s Humanitarian Service Icon Award. Respected media professionals of global repute, like the former Governor of Ogun state, an elder statesman, Chief Olusegun Osoba, corroborated with the Sun’s decision for the Award, in favour of DSP.

It took the newspaper months beaming its searchlight on all categories of patriotic and disciplined Nigerians, on who the cap fits, in accordance with their set standards and impartial acknowledgement of high standard. Purposely on Nigerian project.

Which covers many areas of human endeavor. Including humanitarian interventions, commitment to education, promotion of peaceful Nigeria, bridge building role across all sections of the country and faith in national development.

The correct choice of His Excellency, Jibrin, after rigorous and scientific process speaks volumes of his commitment in making Nigeria great again. No wonder he is listed among the best elected leaders in Nigeria, who are frontliners in spearheading President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s Renewed Hope Agenda Initiative.

Advert

Chief Osoba, presented the Award to the DSP, on behalf of the founder of the newspaper, Chief Orji Uzo Kalu. During the presentation, Osoba hailed that, “This is my son, in whom I am very, very pleased to present this Award on behalf of the Sun’s founder, Chairman and management. He is making us proud. I’m proud of him.”

The event took place at the Expo Convention Centre, Eko Hotels and Suites, Victoria Island, Lagos. Osoba’s complimentary remarks on Senator Jibrin, explains greater reflection of the Senator’s role in national politics, unwavering commitment to nation building, uninterrupted faith in the Nigerian project and high sense of patriotism, among many others.

To further encourage others and boost their morale, to take a leaf from him, His Excellency, Jibrin acknowledges that, “Sun’s Newspapers selected me for the Award in recognition of my tireless efforts to promote human dignity and community development nationwide.”

He takes the Award as a challenge to further his good work in the country. He believes that, “I’m delighted. And let me say that this Award is a way to propel me to do more in my humanitarian activities for people in need. The award is a propeller to propel me to do more.”

Many of those who made remarks at the occasion, believe that, DSP Jibrin is a bridge builder, philanthropist par excellence, a hard working legislator, who promotes synergy and good working relationship, between National Assembly and the Executive arm of government and one of the few political messiah we have in the country.

It has already been established since the return of democracy, in 1999, that the Deputy Senate President, is identified as one of the pillars of democracy in the country. While he is busy with his legislative responsibilities, that does not divert his attention from discharging his primary responsibility, for his constituency and other parts of the political entity.

With people like DSP on the ground, whose grip on the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) is firm, back home in his constituency, Kano North Senatorial District, Kano state, and the North West region, including the North as a whole, President Tinubu could be on solid footing.

Anwar writes from Kano
Sunday, 1st February, 2026

Continue Reading

Trending