Connect with us

News

The Altercation Between Officer Yerima And The FCT Minister Wike: Nigerians Express Divergent Views

Published

on

 

By Yusuf Danjuma Yunusa

Yesterday afternoon, at about 3pm, a Naval officer with the name A. M Yerima was involved in a face-off with the serving minister of the federal capital territory, Nyesome Wike, over land issue.

The altercation led to Wike addressing the officer as a ‘fool’ severally despite Yerima being polite in his responses. With all the verbal abuses to the officer of the law from the minister, the viral video showed that the Yerima stood his ground and refused to allow Wike assess the land; while letting him know that he was acting based on an order from his superior.

With a roudy scene as shown in the video, Wike later put a call directly to the Chief of Defense Staff, Oluyede Olufemi, who, according to the video, was believed to had made him leave the scene.

What is Really The Story Behind The Altercation?

According to a video made by a practicing human rights lawyer, Deji Adeyanju, the said piece of land located at Gaduwa, in Abuja, belongs to a Chief Naval Officer. He acquired the land for his wife and started developing on it already when Wike’s men came threatening the builders to leave or they would be dealt with mercilessly. The development was reported to the Chief Naval Officer, and he ordered his boys to go to the location and make sure they were not harmed in any form.

Wike’s men having known that military officers had arrived, positioning themselves strategically on the piece of land, went to inform their superior who came and started verbal abuses.

Who Is Wrong?

With that exchange between the young, polite, and vibrant officer Yerima and Wike, some people are of the opinion that the officer was wrong to have come to the scene, as it’s not right for a military personnel to meddle in civilian cases like land dispute; citing the Land Acts section of law that prohibits such.

Conversely, others insist the officer wasn’t wrong, that it’s Wike–for addressing an officer of the law as a fool; noting that the said piece of land belongs to a 3–star General who acquired it for his wife. They further argued that Wike should have immediately reach out to the said 3–star General to find out the legality of his acquisition of the land instead of involving himself in an exchange with the officer to the extent he had to abuse in order to make a point.

What Does The Law Say?

According to another practicing lawyer, Osita Chidoka–the founder of Athena Centre For Policy And Leadership, he made two points known in his piece which he entitled: “Minister Wike: Power, Process, And The Rule of Law”:

One of the points was that the FCT Minister was wrong to have abused the officer verbally:

“Any law enforcement officer, in uniform or plain clothes, represents the President and the sovereignty of the Nigerian state. To abuse such an officer is to diminish the authority of the Republic itself,” he posted.

The second point was the process that Wike took the matter through. Osita explained that he would have taken the matter through the appropriate channels instead of trying to enforce an order himself while making verbal abuses.

Advert

“Executive authority must be exercised or adjudicated through the courts, ministries, and lawful instruments of state, never through confrontation. No matter how justified a grievance, a minister cannot become an enforcer; that violates the very idea of ordered government.

In a democracy, ministers act through process, not presence. A formal communication to the Minister of Defence, whose office oversees the Armed Forces, would have sufficed. If the officers were on illegal duty, the established disciplinary systems would have addressed it.”

Chidoka concluded by noting that the FCT Minister has dent the image of the office he holds by his uncouth behavior at the site:

“This episode is a cautionary tale: This episode demeans the dignity of the office of the Minister and undermines the image of disciplined governance.”

However, section 5 of the Land Use Act gives the Governor, or the FCT Minister in Abuja, wide powers to manage all land within their jurisdiction. In simple terms, this means the Governor can legally grant anyone the right to occupy and use land for any purpose—whether for housing, business, farming, or public use. The Governor can also authorise someone to use part of another person’s land for specific purposes, charge rent for land that has been allocated, and review or change that rent from time to time, as stated in the land documents or whenever necessary.

But that does not warrant him insulting an officer who, by extension, represents the president of the federal republic of Nigeria as the C-in-C of the armed forces.

Another lawyer, Muhammad Bello Buhari, stated that the laws vested on the FCT Minister, authorizing him to wield certain powers do not exonerate him from the uncouth behavior that he exhibited at the Gaduwa land scene.

 

 

“From the reports that have emerged, the land in question was acquired by the 23rd CNS, Vice Admiral AZ Gambo (Rtd), duly documented, and lawfully owned. Yet, under the present administration, it was suddenly revoked without justification, without notice, without compensation, and the minister personally led a team of police and bulldozers to enforce that revocation. How can a revocation of title be valid when it violates the due process prescribed by the same Land Use Act that confers power on the minister? Even under that law, revocation must be founded on overriding public interest, not personal vendetta or political motivation. And where revocation is done, the law requires notice and compensation. When none of these exist, what we have is not law, it is brute power,” Mr. Bello posted.

He continued, “Let us even assume, for argument’s sake, that the land was properly revoked. Should that justify the minister’s physical presence, berating and demeaning a presidential commissioned military officer on lawful duty, acting under the orders of a three-star general? The same law that vests authority in the minister also imposes boundaries on how that authority should be exercised. Power must always be subject to restraint, and leadership without discipline is the most dangerous form of lawlessness.”

Reacting to the development, the former Chief of Army Staff, Lieutenaant General Tukur Buratai(rtd), posted on his social media handle that Wike’s action undermines the security consciousness of the country:

“The events of November 11, 2025, involving the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Barrister Nyesom Wike, demand an immediate and serious response. His public disparagement of a uniformed officer of the Nigerian Armed Forces transcends mere misconduct; it represents a palpable threat to national security and institutional integrity,” he posted.
General Buratai concluded by urging the FCT Minister to tender an apology for the verbal abuses toward the officer:

“Consequently, Barrister Nyesom Wike must tender an immediate and unequivocal public apology to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu as Commander-in-Chief, the entire Armed Forces of Nigeria, and the specific officer whose honour was violated.

Our nation’s security must come first. It is time for decisive action, not politics of military bashing. The integrity of our Armed Forces demands nothing less.”

News

Emir of Gumel, Ahmad Muhammad Sani, Dies After 45 Years on the Throne

Published

on

 

 

The Emir of Gumel, His Royal Highness Alhaji Ahmad Muhammad Sani II, has died after more than four decades on the throne, bringing to an end the reign of one of Northern Nigeria’s longest-serving traditional rulers.

Ahmad Muhammad Sani II, who became the 16th Emir of Gumel, ascended the throne in 1980 following the death of his father, the late Emir Maina Muhammad Sani II. He subsequently received his staff of office from the then Governor of Kano State, the late Alhaji Abubakar Rimi, in 1981.

His death marks the end of a historic reign that spanned more than 45 years and covered some of the most significant political, social and administrative changes in the old Kano State and, later, Jigawa State.

Before ascending the traditional throne, the late Emir was actively involved in public service and politics. He served as Commissioner for Information, Internal Affairs and Culture in the Kano State Government during the administration of Governor Abubakar Rimi between 1979 and 1980.

His transition from political office to the traditional institution came after the death of his father in December 1980. Historical records indicate that Ahmad Muhammad Sani was selected to succeed his father on December 16, 1980, while his formal presentation with the staff of office followed on May 29, 1981.

As Commissioner for Information, he was associated with important developments in the media sector of the then Kano State. Records indicate that during his tenure, he played a role in the establishment of Triumph newspaper and CTV67 television station, now associated with the state’s television broadcasting history, while also overseeing the expansion of Radio Kano.

Advert

His educational background was also notable. He attended Gumel Primary School and Hadejia Middle School before graduating from Kano High School at Rumfa College in 1961. He later obtained qualifications in Public Administration from the Institute of Administration in Zaria, now part of Ahmadu Bello University, and pursued further studies in Political Science and International Relations at Ohio University in the United States.

Before entering politics, Ahmad Muhammad Sani had worked with the Gumel Native Authority and later joined the Immigration Department, where he was posted to Ngamboru Ngala in present-day Borno State. He subsequently served as a senior government official in the Kazaure Divisional Office before moving into politics in 1978.

His long reign as Emir of Gumel made him one of the most experienced traditional rulers in Northern Nigeria. The Jigawa State Government describes him as the 16th Emir of Gumel and records that he had remained on the throne since 1981.

Over the years, the Emir became associated with efforts to promote peace, education, community development and the preservation of traditional values. His palace also played a role in mobilising communities around government programmes, including public health initiatives.

The World Health Organisation, for instance, previously identified the Emir of Gumel as one of the traditional rulers who played an active role in promoting immunisation activities in his emirate. The organisation reported that he publicly vaccinated his own children as part of efforts to reassure communities about the safety of polio vaccination.

Even in the later years of his reign, the Emir continued to participate in peace-building and community affairs. In 2025, he was represented at a farmers-herders peace meeting in Jigawa, where his message emphasised dialogue and mutual understanding as essential to achieving lasting peace.

In December 2025, the Emirate marked his 45th anniversary on the throne, with prominent national and traditional figures, including Vice President Kashim Shettima and the Sultan of Sokoto, participating in activities associated with the anniversary.

His death therefore comes after a reign that began in the final years of the Second Republic and continued through successive military governments, the return to democratic rule in 1999, the creation of Jigawa State and several generations of political leadership.

The Emir of Gumel’s reign also represented a unique bridge between political administration and traditional leadership. Having served as a senior political office holder before becoming a monarch, he brought extensive experience of government and public administration to the traditional institution.

With his passing, the Gumel Emirate loses a monarch whose tenure lasted more than four decades and whose public career had already begun before his accession to the throne.

Details concerning his burial arrangements, the circumstances surrounding his death and the process for selecting his successor are expected to be announced by the Gumel Emirate Council and the Jigawa State Government

Continue Reading

News

Uber Shutdowns Operations in Nigeria

Published

on

 

By Yusuf Danjuma Yunusa

Ride-hailing company, Uber, has shut down its operations in Nigeria.

In a statement, the company, which came into Nigeria in 2014, said its exit is effective from September 2, 2026.

“We are writing to share some difficult news. After a thorough review of our business, we have made the tough decision to wind down our operations in Nigeria, effective 2 September 2026.

“Since we first launched in Lagos in 2014, it has been an absolute privilege to be a part of your daily life connecting you with independent transportation providers.

“Whether it was a morning commute, a ride to see loved ones, or exploring the city, thank you for trusting the platform to connect you to a driver to get you there safely. We know this may cause disruption to your routine, and we sincerely apologize for the inconvenience.”

In a memo on Wednesday, the ride-hailing company also announced elimination of roughly 3,300 positions.

The job cuts focused on management and coordination roles, according to its CEO, Dara Khosrowshahi.

Advert

“Today, we’re making a number of significant organizational changes across Uber. We are removing layers, simplifying team structures, refining our global location strategy, and focusing our people and investments against the biggest opportunities ahead of us.”

“As a result, we will be reducing the size of our team by about 10%. Everyone whose role has been affected has already been notified, except in countries where we will follow the required local process.

“This wasn’t a decision we made lightly, because it will have a real impact on our teammates and friends who have worked hard for Uber. It’s important to say that these changes are about how we’re organized and what we’re prioritizing, not about anyone’s contributions to Uber, which we will always value.

“I’m sure you’re asking, ‘Why, and why now?’ particularly since our business is performing so well. Over the last 5+ years, Uber has grown by orders of magnitude, with our top line nearly tripling. We’ve built new products, expanded into new businesses, reached more consumers and supported more earners, and become a much larger and stronger company. But that growth has also brought complexity: more layers, more coordination, more fragmented ownership, and in some cases structures that made sense when businesses were smaller but no longer serve us well at our current scale.

“Our opportunity from here is enormous: we have the chance to bring Uber to hundreds of millions more people; to invest even more in drivers, couriers and merchants; and to innovate across our core businesses and build the autonomous future.

“The changes we’re making today are designed to do two things: make Uber simpler and faster, and create more capacity to invest in our future. A leaner organization will mean clearer ownership, faster decisions, and more time spent building rather than coordinating. It will also generate savings that we intend to reinvest in growth, innovation, and the capabilities that will matter most over the coming years.

“It’s our job as leaders to make these difficult calls, and to give you transparency into our thinking and our decision-making process.”

The layoffs are the latest round of job cuts for Uber, which eliminated roles in customer service and HR earlier this year.

Continue Reading

News

Author of ‘Rich Dad Poor Dad’ Languishes in Billion Dollar Debt

Published

on

 

By Yusuf Danjuma Yunusa

Robert Kiyosaki, the author of the bestselling ’Rich Dad Poor Dad’ book, has accumulated an estimated $1.2 billion debt connected to his aggressive real estate investment.

According to reports, the debt is the estimated amount the 79-year-old author and his business partners borrowed to acquire approximately 1,500 property units as Mr Kiyosaki continues to expand his real estate holdings.

Despite the significant debt, Mr Kiyosaki does not appear apprehensive about the liabilities, maintaining that borrowing money to acquire income-generating assets is a strategy commonly used by wealthy individuals.

Advert

“So, I’m a billion two in debt,” the author said on the ‘Get Rich Education’ podcast recently, adding that people “should not do what I do, right? But I studied it since 1974… If you’re going to learn to use debt, you’d better take some education.”

In a recent interview with Vanity Fair, Mr Kiyosaki’s ex-wife and business partner, Kim Kiyosaki, revealed that the debt did not reflect the amount her ex-husband personally owes.

She stressed that it is connected to the real estate properties owned by them and their business partners, adding that Mr Kiyosaki’s personal share of the liabilities is small.

Vanity Fair estimated Mr Kiyosaki’s share of the debt at around $30 million to $60 million.

“We have a lot of apartment houses with our partners. So technically, yes, we have all this debt,” the ex-wife told Vanity Fair.

Speaking to the magazine, Mr Kiyosaki stated, “If it all comes to hell, you can talk to my attorney. Firewalls—that’s the way the rich play the game.”

Continue Reading

Trending