Connect with us

News

News Analysis: Answers To Some Pertinent Questions Regarding The Recent Move By The IPOB Leader To Defend Self In Court

Published

on

 

By Yusuf Danjuma Yunusa

Detained leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra a movement regarded by the federal government as terrorist organization , Nnamdi Kanu, is set to open his defence in his ongoing decade-old terrorism trial, listing several top political figures and retired military chiefs as witnesses he intends to call.

In a fresh motion, marked FHC/ABJ/CR/383/2015, dated October 20, the IPOB leader listed the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike; Lagos State Governor, Babajide Sanwo-Olu; and former Chief of Army Staff, Lt. Gen. Tukur Buratai (retd.), among his witnesses.

In the defence notice personally signed him, Kanu informed the court of his intention to call 23 witnesses, divided into two categories — “ordinary but material witnesses” and “vital and compellable witnesses.”

Among the “vital and compellable witnesses” are Wike, Sanwo-Olu, Buratai, alongside s former Minister of Defence, Gen. Theophilus Danjuma (retd.); the governors of Lagos and Imo states, Babajide Sanwo-Olu and Hope Uzodinma, respectively.

Others listed include the Minister of Works, David Umahi; a former Abia State Governor, Okezie Ikpeazu; and the immediate past Attorney-General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami (SAN).

Also named are the former Director-General of the Department of State Services, Yusuf Bichi; the immediate past Director-General of the National Intelligence Agency, Ahmed Abubakar; and several other unnamed individuals

According to the motion, Kanu intends to rely on Section 232 of the Evidence Act, 2011 to compel the appearance of those he considers “vital and compellable” witnesses.

He also asked the court to grant a 90-day window to enable him to conclude his defence, pledging to testify personally and provide sworn statements from voluntary witnesses to support his case.

“I will testify on my own behalf, providing a sworn account of the facts, denying the allegations, and explaining the political context of my statements and actions,” Kanu told the court.

“It will interest the honourable court and the general public that justice is not only done but is manifestly seen to have been done.”

Consequently, the IPOB leader asked his legal team to step aside. Based on his position, all the senior advocates in the team led by Kanu Agabi (SAN), announced their decision to withdraw their continuous participation in the case.

Agabi announced that the team of Senior Advocates of Nigeria in the matter, comprising Onyechi Ikpeazu, Paul Erokoro, Joseph Akubo and Emeka Etiaba, explained that the reason for their withdrawal “is because the defendant has taken this case back from us and we respect that.”
The Questions:

Advert

We often hear officers uttering the statement below to culprits whenever they come for an arrest:

“You have the right to remain silent.

Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law.

You have the right to an attorney.

If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you.”

Based on the above statements which officers usually utter, many have been posing the questions below to know the actual context of the law, and the Nigerian Tracker News desk have answers provided to them:

1.Is Nnamdi Kanu a Lawyer?

No, Nnamdi Kanu is not a lawyer.
He did not study or practice law. Nnamdi Kanu studied Geography at the University of Nigeria, Nsukka (UNN), although the specific years of his attendance are not widely publicized. Nnamdi Kanu is primarily known as a political activist and the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB). His background is in media and activism, not law.

2. Why Did He Seek to Defend Himself?

Nnamdi Kanu’s decision to defend himself in court is a strategic and principled choice, rooted in several factors including:

Fundamental Right: As detailed below, the right to self-representation is a foundational legal right in many jurisdictions, including Nigeria. He is simply exercising this right.

Political Statement and Platform: For Kanu, the courtroom is not just a legal arena but a political one. By representing himself, he can directly address the court, the media, and his supporters, framing his defense as a political struggle against the Nigerian state. He can use the opportunity to articulate his ideology and challenge the legitimacy of the charges and the court itself.

Lack of Faith in the Process: Kanu and his supporters have repeatedly expressed a lack of confidence in the fairness of the Nigerian judicial process regarding his case.

3. Is There a Provision in the Constitution for a Non-Lawyer to Defend Themselves?

Yes, absolutely. This is a crucial and universally recognized legal right.

The provision is explicitly stated in the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended).

Section 36(6)(c) of the Constitution guarantees every person charged with a criminal offense the right “to defend himself in person or by legal practitioners of his own choice.”

This means the law is clear: an accused person has two options:

1.To be represented by a lawyer of their choosing (which is the most common and often the most prudent course of action).

2. To represent themselves (a concept known as “pro se” representation in many legal systems).

Important Nuances and the Judge’s Role

While the right to self-representation is fundamental, it is not absolute and comes with important caveats that the judge must manage:

Knowing and Intelligent Waiver: The court must ensure that the accused person is making this choice knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently. The judge will typically question the defendant (in this case, Kanu) to ensure they understand the severe risks of forgoing professional legal counsel.

Standby Counsel: Even when a defendant chooses self-representation, the judge often appoints a lawyer as “standby counsel.” This lawyer remains in the background to provide legal advice if the defendant asks for it and to step in if the proceedings become too disruptive or if the defendant’s self-representation threatens the integrity of the trial.

The embattled activist was first arrested in Lagos in 2015 for treasonable felony. On 28 of April, 2017, Kanu was released from prison on bail. However, in June 2021, he was re-arrested through a collaboration between the Kenyan Interpol and that of Nigeria. Since then, he has been in the custody of the Department of State Security (DSS).

News

Subsidy Gone, Hardship Remains: Economist Blames Policy Missteps, Debt Burden for Nigeria’s Deepening Crisis Amid Tinubu’s Borrowing

Published

on

 

By Yusuf Danjuma Yunusa

Amidst growing public discontent over persistent economic hardship and the Federal Government’s continued reliance on borrowing, former Central Bank Governor and current Emir of Kano, Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, recently questioned the logic behind President Bola Tinubu’s borrowing spree despite the removal of the long-criticised fuel subsidy.

In an exclusive interview with our correspondent, a prominent economist and financial analyst at a reputable establishment, AbdulWahab Olalekan, dissected the paradox, arguing that the administration’s promises to “stop the hemorrhaging” have yet to materialise because the wound has only been relocated.

When asked whether this economic dislocation is driven by global forces or local mismanagement, Olalekan did not mince words. He attributed the severity of the current hardship primarily to “local structural deficiencies and poor policy sequencing”—specifically the twin shocks of subsidy removal and foreign exchange (FX) liberalisation.

“The relocation of this hardship is primarily the result of local structural deficiencies and policy sequencing (FX liberalisation shock following subsidy removal), though it has been heavily compounded by global economic headwinds,” Olalekan said.

Advert

He stressed that most economists agree the removal of the subsidy was a long-overdue necessity. However, the problem, he explained, lies in the “blunt execution of the transition.” He pointed to two critical domestic failures: the absence of effective social safety net programmes to cushion the blow for ordinary Nigerians, and the country’s “huge debt servicing blackhole” which has swallowed much of the revenue that should have trickled down to the populace.

“The severity of the current hardship is less about the removal of the subsidy itself… and more about the underlying fragility of the Nigerian economy and the blunt execution of the transition. Notably, failure to provide effective social safety net programmes to cushion impact and the fact that the country’s huge debt servicing blackhole sucked some of the subsidy revenue that should typically have trickled down to the average Nigerian,” he explained.

But while local dynamics set the stage, the economist acknowledged that global macroeconomic forces have acted as a devastating multiplier. He noted that the current high global interest rate environment has forced emerging markets like Nigeria to borrow at an expensive premium, further worsening the fiscal picture. Additionally, sticky global inflation has directly fed into Nigeria’s import-dependent economy, accelerating imported inflation.

“The high global interest rate environment meant that countries in the emerging and frontier markets like Nigeria had to borrow at an expensive premium further exacerbating our fiscal picture while the stickiness of global inflation meant increased imported inflation since we are largely an import-dependent nation,” Olalekan stated.

He, however, offered a sliver of relief, observing that the inflation trajectory would have been even worse were it not for the operationalisation of the Dangote Refinery and certain reforms introduced by the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN).

“Thanks to the Dangote Refinery and some of the CBN reforms, the inflation situation could have been worse,” he concluded.

As the Tinubu administration continues to defend its borrowing plan in the face of mounting scrutiny, Olalekan’s diagnosis suggests that without fixing domestic structural flaws and providing tangible relief, removing the subsidy alone will remain a repositioning of pain rather than a cure.

Continue Reading

News

Obi Meets Jonathan, Consults Former President Ahead of 2027

Published

on

 

 

By Yusuf Danjuma Yunusa

Peter Obi, the 2023 presidential candidate of the Labour Party, and other South-East leaders on Monday held a closed-door meeting with former President Goodluck Jonathan in Abuja ahead of the 2027 general election.

The meeting, held at Mr Jonathan’s residence, was attended by several South-East leaders.

Present at the meeting were former Enugu State Governor, Okwesilieze Nwodo; former Imo State Governor, Achike Udenwa; former Managing Director of the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC), Onyema Ugochukwu and Senator Victor Umeh, among others.

Advert

Mr Obi, who spoke to journalists shortly after the meeting, said they consulted with the former president over the 2027 general elections.

He said Mr Jonathan wished Nigeria well and hoped for free, fair and credible elections in 2027, adding that the country must not become a one-party state.

“He wished that we have free, fair, credible election. That would be his wish. There can’t be one party system. He cannot support such a thing. Nobody can claim to be more of a democrat in this country. In terms of those who have led this country without putting him (Jonathan) as number one,” he said.

He said Mr Jonathan served the country faithfully and is a committed democrat.

On endorsement, he said, “We are not talking about endorsement yet. When I become a candidate, I will come for it. He wishes the country well, and we are here to consult with him.”

“We, some notable South-East leaders have come in consultation to our respected former President Goodluck Jonathan, That’s basically what it is. It is on 2027 elections and it is all about Nigeria.

“We are now seeing him (Jonathan) in the categories we have come to see former President Olusegun Obasanjo, former president Ibrahim Babangida and others, so that is the category we are seeing now.

“They are fathers now. They are not defecting. They are not involved. But we need to consult them, because especially someone like him (Jonathan) who served the country very faithfully, focused, and did what is expected in a democracy in this declining situation,” Mr Obi said.

Continue Reading

News

How AA Zaura escaped mob attack by miscreant at Farm centre

Published

on

 

 

 

A chieftain of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Abdulsalam Abdulkarim Zaura, on Monday recounted how he narrowly escaped a mob attack unleashed by suspected thugs along farm center in Kano metropolis.

Zaura, who recently declared his intention to contest the Kano Central Senatorial seat in the 2027 general elections, under the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC), escaped with several of this vehicles damaged and supporters injured.

The ugly incident ensured while the Businessman along side hundreds of his supporters were on their way to Meena event center for the declaration of his senatorial ambition.

Advert

Speaking through his media aide, Dahiru Maiwuddadu, Zaura said the a group of suspected hoodlums suddenly unleashed attacked on his convey and vandalised several of his vehicles in the process.

According to him, Zaura escaped unhurt, but the attack left a trail of damage and heightened fear among traders and residents.

He asserted that the same set of thugs subsequently went on rampage to invade the GSM market along farm center creating panic on residents.

While commiserating with the victims of the unfortunate attack on the market, the APC Chieftain applauded the quick intervention of the security agencies for bring the situation under control.

He expressed concern over what he described as rising youth-related violence, stressing the need for urgent action to address the root causes and safeguard lives and property.

Zaura called on security agencies to investigate the incident and bring the perpetrators to justice, warning that such acts could undermine peace and economic activities in the state.

He also urged youths to shun violence and embrace peaceful coexistence, dialogue and lawful means of engagement.

The APC stalwart reaffirmed his commitment to supporting policies and initiatives that promote security and economic stability in Kano Central, noting that traders and small businesses must operate in a safe environment to thrive.

He further assured affected traders of his solidarity, describing them as vital contributors to the state’s economy and calling for collective efforts to prevent future occurrences.

The incident has raised fresh concerns over security around major commercial centres in Kano, especially as political activities intensify ahead of the 2027 general elections.

Continue Reading

Trending