Connect with us

News

Ambition or Betrayal? Senator Barau Jibrin’s Role in Tax Reform Bill

Published

on

 

Garba Ubale

The Senate’s passage of the controversial tax reform bill past its second reading has sparked widespread discontent, particularly regarding Senator Barau Jibrin’s role in the process. Many view his actions as a betrayal, raising concerns about his commitment to the interests of Northern Nigeria and the masses at large. The events at the Senate plenary on Wednesday and Thursday laid bare the deep divisions between senators prioritizing public welfare and those seemingly driven by personal ambitions.

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, a known master strategist, has a reputation for using political surrogates to achieve his goals. In this case, Senator Barau played the role of Tinubu’s stooge, pushing the contentious tax reform bill forward despite vocal opposition from Senator Ali Ndume, who stood firm in defense of the people’s interests. Barau’s actions raise the specter of manipulation, where loyalty to political benefactors outweighs allegiance to the electorate.

Senator Ali Ndume’s lone battle on behalf of the masses highlighted the glaring contrast between the two senators. Ndume epitomized principled leadership, rejecting policies that would exacerbate the plight of Nigerians. Meanwhile, Barau aligned himself with an agenda many view as anti-people. The question looms: Is Barau willing to sacrifice the North’s interests for personal political gain?

Barau’s actions bring to mind the infamous third-term agenda during President Olusegun Obasanjo’s administration. Then, influential Northern senators like Nasiru Ibrahim Mantu, Omar Abubakar Hambagda, and Jonathan Zwingina were instrumental in pushing the agenda, only to face public disgrace when the ploy failed. Barau risks treading the same path, where short-term gains lead to long-term repercussions. History teaches us that betraying one’s people for political expediency often ends in disgrace and irrelevance.

Speculation abounds that Barau’s support for the tax reform bill is tied to his ambitions to run for governor in Kano State. By aligning with Tinubu’s administration, Barau appears to be securing favor and resources for his future campaign. However, such political maneuvering comes at a high cost. The tax reform bill, widely regarded as an anti-masses policy, threatens to deepen the financial burdens on Nigerians already struggling with economic hardships. Barau’s willingness to prioritize his ambitions over the welfare of his constituents is a troubling indication of his political ethos.

This episode underscores a recurring theme in Nigerian politics: the North often sabotages its own interests. Barau’s actions are a stark reminder of this reality. By championing policies that undermine the economic well-being of the region, he has joined the ranks of Northern leaders who prioritize personal gain over collective progress. His betrayal is likened to selling the North for a “pot of porridge”—a short-sighted decision that will have lasting consequences for his people.

If it were Senate President Godswill Akpabio leading the charge for this tax reform bill, the narrative would likely have been different. Akpabio’s Southern roots and the optics of his leadership would have been scrutinized in ways Barau seems to have escaped. This double standard reveals an uncomfortable truth: the North’s political elite often fail to hold their own accountable, paving the way for continued exploitation and marginalization.

Senator Barau Jibrin’s actions in advancing the tax reform bill highlight a disturbing trend in Nigerian politics, where personal ambition supersedes public service. His role as a willing tool for Tinubu’s agenda casts doubt on his loyalty to his constituents and raises questions about his suitability for higher office. As Northern Nigeria grapples with poverty, insecurity, and underdevelopment, leaders like Barau must be held accountable for their actions. The people deserve representatives who will stand firm against policies that harm the masses, not those who sell out their region for political expediency.

Garba Ubale Kankarofi wrote this piece from Kano – Nigeria

#

News

Court Halts Federal Government’s Kano-Niger Railway Project Over Land Dispute

Published

on

 

The Kano State High Court has issued a restraining order against the Federal Government, halting the continuation of the ongoing railway project from Kano to Daura and onward to the Niger Republic, on land belonging to residents of the Kuyan Ta Inna community.

The court, presided over by Justice Usman Na Abba, ruled that any such construction must follow due legal process, including consultation with landowners and the provision of adequate compensation

Nigerian Tracker reports that the injunction came in response to a suit filed by the Kano Property Agent Development Association (KAFADA), which represents affected landowners in the area.

The suit names the Federal Ministry of Works, the Federal Ministry of Transport, and the compensation consultant as defendants, accusing them of attempting to issue what it describes as “incommensurable” compensation to property owners.

Counsel to the plaintiffs, Barrister Usman Baito, stated that the court’s ruling affirms that moving forward with the railway project on community land without following appropriate legal procedures would constitute a breach of the Nigerian Constitution.

#

Baito added that the court emphasized the necessity of thorough consultation, transparency, and equitable compensation before any land can be lawfully acquired for such a major project.

“The judgment reinforces the rights of the Kuyan Ta Inna residents,” Baito said. “Any attempt to sidestep these procedures is not only unlawful but a direct violation of the constitutional rights of the people.”

The Chairman of KAFADA, Isa Jibrin Isa, acknowledged the community’s willingness to cooperate with the government.

He noted that the property owners are not opposed to the railway development but are insisting that all actions must be carried out within the bounds of the law.

“We are open to dialogue and ready to sign a compensation agreement,” Isa said, “but only if it is based on fair valuation and in line with legal provisions. Our people deserve justice, not exploitation.”

Efforts to reach representatives of the Federal Government or the project contractor were unsuccessful at the time of filing this report.

 

 

 

Continue Reading

News

Kano Durbar: Lawyers accuse FG Of moves To discredit Emir Sanusi

Published

on

 

 

A group of Kano-based human rights lawyers has alleged that Federal Government political plot against Emir of Kano, Muhammadu Sanusi II necessitated the cancellation of Sallah durbar festivities across Kano emirates.

In a strongly worded petition submitted to Kano State Commissioner of Police, the National Forum of Kano Indigene Lawyers also alleged that security alert raised as justification for imposing the ban lacked merit and may be a veiled move to curtail the influence of the reinstated Emir of Kano.

The police prohibited the UNESCO certified Kano cultural status as intangible heritage of humanity, after sensing security breach even when the 15th emir Aminu Ado Bayero cancelled his planned paralleled Durbar.

Addressing journalists shortly after submitting their letter to the police commissioner, leader of the lawyers, Barrister Usman Imam Tudun Wazirchi insisted the ban was unnecessary.

Tudun Wazirchi said the so-called security threat has no substantial basis, claiming that “If Durbars were allowed to hold in high-risk states like Borno, Katsina, and Zamfara, why not Kano?

“Even during Boko Haram’s peak, such total bans were not implemented,” the lawyers emphasized.

The lawyers accused “unpatriotic citizens” and political actors of instigating fears in the minds of peaceful residents simply to prevent the cultural pageantry associated with Emir Sanusi’s return to palace. They argued that the ban not only infringes on cultural rights but also represents a broader attack on constitutional freedoms.

Referring to the recent Court of Appeal judgment that upheld Sanusi’s position, the letter warned against using law enforcement to carry out political persecution.

The lawyers also addressed their concerns to international bodies, including the UN, EU, and African Union, signaling a desire to draw global attention to what they called “an orchestrated attack on Kano’s heritage and legitimate royal leadership.”

#

Continue Reading

News

Former MD of Sokoto State-Owned Newspaper, Na’ayi, Passes Away

Published

on

 

The media fraternity in Nigeria has been thrown into mourning following the passing of veteran journalist and former Managing Director of Sokoto State-owned The Path Newspaper, Alhaji Ibrahim Na’ayi Salisu.

Popularly known as Na’ayi, the seasoned editor breathed his last on the night of Monday, April 7, 2025, at the Federal Medical Center in Gusau, Zamfara State. His death marks the end of an era for many who admired his dedication and contributions to journalism in northern Nigeria.

Before his tenure at *The Path Newspaper*, Na’ayi was also the Managing Director of *Legacy Newspaper*, a Zamfara State-owned publication. Over the years, he played a pivotal role in shaping the discourse in the region, mentoring young journalists and ensuring that factual, investigative reporting remained at the heart of local journalism.

His funeral prayer is scheduled to take place today, Tuesday, at 10 a.m., as family, friends, and members of the media industry gather to bid their final farewell.

Condolences have started pouring in from colleagues, media professionals, and political figures who recognize Na’ayi’s enduring legacy in journalism. Many have described him as an icon of truth, integrity, and professionalism.

May his gentle soul rest in perfect peace. Aamin.

#

Continue Reading

Trending