Connect with us

Opinion

Abacha’s Property: Where Federal Government Got it Wrong

Published

on

Late General Sani Abacha ,Former Head Of State

The media is awash with the news of how the Federal Government under the administration of President Olusegun Obasanjo revoked a landed property in the Maitama District of Abuja belonging to the family of Late Head-of-State, General Sani Abacha.

While the revocation occurred in February 2006 during the time of Mallam Nasir El-Rufai as the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), the approval was given in 1993 – while General Sani Abacha was still the country’s leader.

It was exclusively gathered that El-Rufai’s action was targeted at irking the Abacha family, which spite him, in any way under the directives of former President Olusegun Obasanjo.

The former President ordered the revocation for the purpose of harming the Abacha family. It was obvious that the revocation was not in the public interest.

To further worsen the matter, Senator Bala Abdulkadir Mohammed, on May 25, 2011, as then Minister of FCT, issued a Certificate of Occupancy (C-of-O) in favour of a company, Salamed Ventures despite the fact that the case was before a court of law.

Salamed Ventures Limited was said to have acquired the property at the cost of $1.3 million dollars, while the matter was pending at the court of appeal. Since then, the family and the authorities concerned have locked horns in a fierce legal battle.

It is clear that from the revocation letter, revocation is not in contravention of any law of the Federal Capital Territory or the Land Use Act neither was it done in public interest nor carried out in contravention of the rules and regulations.

Findings by this paper shown that there was no semblance of legal justification in the action of this revocation.

The Abacha family has been fighting tooth and nail to keep their property, which was lawfully acquired. Mohammed Abacha and Dr. Maryam Abacha who are acting as administrators of the estate in the suit, approached a High Court in February 2006 under Justice I.M Bukar.

Recalled earlier that, on June 30, 2009, the Justice I.M Bukar delivered his judgement by striking the suit. He held that the court doesn’t have jurisdiction to entertain the matter and the appropriate court to try the case is the Federal High Court of Nigeria.

The plaintiffs in the case, Mohammed Sani Abacha and Dr. Maryam Sani Abacha, then appealed to the Court of Appeal in Abuja on the same matter, citing an infringement on their right.

Subsequently, the Appeal Court, on May 18, 2015, affirmed the Judgement of the trial court, by striking out the suit.

The Plantiffs/ Appelants thereafter instituted this present action on the 25th of May 2015 in accordance the judgement of the Court of Appeal.

Mohammed Abacha informed this paper that the property was fully developed before the death of late General Sani Abacha.

Fast forward to this year, the lingering case was argued before Justice Peter Lifu of the Federal High Court and on the 19th of July 2024, he delivered his judgement dismissing the claims of Mohammed Abacha and Dr. Maryam Sani Abacha.

Advert

Justice Lifu ruled that the Abacha family lacked the locus standi to file the suit challenging the revocation of its property at Maitama District and demanding the sum of N500 million in compensation.

However, the family has since filed an appeal against the judgment. The counsel to the family, Reuben Atabo SAN said that the trial court erred on 11 grounds in the dismissal of their suit.

Atabo informed this paper that they will be filing additional grounds to appeal the case.

The appeal joined President Bola Tinubu, Minister of the FCT, the Federal Capital Development Authority (FCDA), and Salamed Ventures Ltd.

The demand is for the appellate court to set aside the sale and transfer of the title to Plot 3119, Maitama, Abuja measuring 3 hectares of land to Salamed Ventures Ltd on February 25, 2011.

In the lawsuit, the Abacha family is also praying the court to set aside the judgment of Justice Lifu of the Federal High Court, Abuja, which on July 19, 2024 dismissed their suit on the property.

The family are also praying the Appellate Court to invoke Section 15 of the Court of Appeal Act to take over their legal battle as a court of first instance and do justice to the matter.

But, according to an Abuja-based lawyer, Barrister Abdulsalam Nasiru, the plaintiffs have the opportunity to present their case at the Federal High Court as ordered by the Court of Appeal.

Barrister Nasiru, said it was wrong for the government to sell the land, while the matter is pending in the court. “This decision is a lack of respect to the rule of law. Whatever made the former governor of Kaduna State, while as FCT Minister, to set this precedence would surely not augur well for Nigeria.

“On one side of the argument, the action is sowing the seeds of humiliating the former presidents’ family, now that their patriarch is no more. And on the other hand, the action showed blatant disrespect to The Land Use Act which the family followed to acquire the landed property.

“There is no doubt that the landed property in question was applied for allocation in the early 90’s by the Late Head of State. The application was approved on Plot No 3199, Maitama, Abuja and was allocated by the then Minister of the Federal Capital Territory.

It was after obtaining necessary approval for setting up architectural, mechanical, structural and electrical designs, the Late General developed the property, prior to his death on 8th June 1998,” he said.

Why the Federal Government Got it wrong?

As for Said Akintade Shittu, a public affairs analyst: “There may be some indications that former FCT Ministers, Nasir El-rufai and Bala Mohammed have an axe to grind with the family of General Sani Abacha. This notwithstanding, the government has absolutely got it wrong.

First, one can blame Sani Abacha for some misdoing as all the other past presidents, but there is no denying the fact that he was a former president of this country. And there is legality in the way the land in dispute was acquired.

Second, whoever advised El-rufai and Bala Mohammed to sell the landed property after its revocation even though the landed property is being disputed before a court of law is wrong, too.

“While El-rufai is an ex-governor, Bala Mohammed is the serving governor of Bauchi State. Nobody will wish the same fate on their family.

There is no need to rush the action. Until court processes are exhausted, any action taken on the disputed landed property may look personal, which I believe many Nigerians are observing the trend and feeling some urge to judge.

“Also, the Federal Government has a duty not only to investigate the matter thoroughly but also come clean of the issue. Happenings in Nigeria have shown that President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has an enormous respect for the rule of Law.

Therefore, it is advisable that the president set a committee to look into the land dispute involving the Abacha family and the two past ministers of the FCT and allow justice to take its course. Only this can save him from blame”.

Opinion

Dr Bello Matwallle: Why Dialogue Still Matters in the Fight Against Insecurity

Published

on

 

By Musa Iliyasu Kwankwaso

In the history of leadership, force may be loud, but wisdom delivers results. This is why security experts agree that while military action can suppress violence temporarily, dialogue is what permanently closes the door to conflict. It is a lesson the world has learned through blood, loss, and painful experience.

When Dr. Bello Matawalle, as Governor of Zamfara State, chose dialogue and reconciliation, it was not a sign of weakness. It was a different kind of courage one that placed the lives of ordinary citizens above political applause. A wise leader measures success not by bullets fired, but by lives saved.

Across conflict zones, history has consistently shown that force alone does not end insecurity. Guns may damage bodies, but they do not eliminate the roots of violence. This understanding forms the basis of what experts call the non-kinetic approach conflict resolution through dialogue, reconciliation, justice, and social reform.

When Matawalle assumed office, Zamfara was deeply troubled. Roads were closed, markets shut down, farmers and herders operated in fear, and citizens lived under constant threat. Faced with this reality, only two options existed: rely solely on military force or combine security operations with dialogue. Matawalle chose the path widely accepted across the world security reinforced by dialogue not out of sympathy for criminals, but to protect innocent lives.

Advert

This approach was not unique to Zamfara. In Katsina State, Governor Aminu Bello Masari led peace engagements with armed groups. In Maiduguri granted amnesty to repentant offenders of Boko Haram, In Sokoto, dialogue was also pursued to reduce bloodshed. These precedents raise a simple question: if dialogue is acceptable elsewhere, why is Matawalle singled out?

At the federal level, the same logic applies. Through Operation Safe Corridor, the Federal Government received Boko Haram members who surrendered, offered rehabilitation and reintegration, and continued military action against those who refused to lay down arms. This balance
rehabilitation for those who repent and force against those who persist is the core of the non-kinetic approach.

Security experts globally affirm that military force contributes only 20 to 30 percent of sustainable solutions to insurgency. The remaining 70 to 80 percent lies in dialogue, justice, economic reform, and addressing poverty and unemployment. Even the United Nations states clearly: “You cannot kill your way out of an insurgency.”

During Matawalle’s tenure, several roads reopened, cattle markets revived, and daily life began to normalize. If insecurity later resurfaced, the question is not whether dialogue was wrong, but whether broader coordination failed.

Today, critics attempt to recast past security strategies as crimes. Yet history is not blind, and truth does not disappear. Matawalle’s actions were rooted in expert advice, national precedent, and global best practice.

The position of Sheikh Ahmad Gumi, who publicly affirmed that Matawalle’s approach was appropriate and that military force accounts for only about 25 percent of counterinsurgency success, further reinforces this reality. Such views cannot be purchased or manufactured; they reflect established security thinking.

In the end, dialogue is not a betrayal of justice it is often its foundation. And no amount of political noise can overturn decisions grounded in evidence, experience, and the priority of human life.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Matawalle: The Northern Anchor of Loyalty in Tinubu’s Administration

Published

on

 

By Adebayor Adetunji, PhD

In the broad and competitive terrain of Nigerian politics, loyalty is often spoken of, yet rarely sustained with consistency, courage and visible action. But within the administration of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, one Northern appointee has demonstrated this quality not as a slogan, but as a lifestyle, as a political principle and as a national duty — Hon. (Dr.) Bello Muhammad Matawalle, Minister of State for Defence.

Since his appointment, Matawalle has stood out as one of the most loyal, outspoken and dependable pillars of support for the Tinubu administration in the North. He has never hesitated, not for a moment, to stand firmly behind the President. At every turn of controversy, in moments of public misunderstanding, and at times when political alliances waver, Matawalle has continued to speak boldly in defence of the government he serves. For him, loyalty is not an occasional gesture — it is a commitment evidenced through voice, alignment, and sacrifice.

Observers within and outside the ruling party recall numerous occasions where the former Zamfara State Governor took the front line in defending the government’s policies, actions and direction, even when others chose neutrality or silence. His interventions, always direct and clear, reflect not just loyalty to a leader, but faith in the future the President is building, a future anchored on economic reform, security revival, institutional strengthening and renewed national unity.

Advert

But Matawalle’s value to the administration does not stop at loyalty. In performance, visibility and active delivery of duty, he stands among the most engaged ministers currently serving in the federal cabinet. His portfolio, centred on defence and security, one of the most sensitive sectors in the country, demands expertise, availability and unbroken presence. Matawalle has not only embraced this responsibility, he has carried it with remarkable energy.

From high-level security meetings within Nigeria to strategic engagements across foreign capitals, Matawalle has represented the nation with clarity and confidence. His participation in defence summits, international cooperation talks, and regional security collaborations has positioned Nigeria as a voice of influence in global security discourse once again. At home, his involvement in military policy evaluation, counter-terrorism discussions and national defence restructuring reflects a minister who understands the urgency of Nigeria’s security needs, and shows up to work daily to address them.

Away from partisan battles, Matawalle has proven to be a bridge — between North and South, civilian leadership and military institutions, Nigeria and the wider world. His presence in government offers a mix of loyalty, performance and deep grounding in national interest, the type of partnership every President needs in turbulent times.

This is why calls, campaigns and whisperings aimed at undermining or isolating him must be resisted. Nigeria cannot afford to discourage its best-performing public servants, nor tighten the atmosphere for those who stand firmly for unity and national progress. The nation must learn to applaud where there is performance, support where there is loyalty, and encourage where there is commitment.

Hon. Bello Matawalle deserves commendation, not suspicion. Support — not sabotage. Encouragement, not exclusion from political strategy or power alignment due to narrow interests.

History does not forget those who stood when it mattered. Matawalle stands today for President Tinubu, for security, for loyalty, for national service. And in that place, he has earned a space not only in the present political equation, but in the future judgment of posterity.

Nigeria needs more leaders like him. And Nigeria must say so openly.

Adebayor Adetunji, PhD
A communication strategist and public commentator
Write from Akure, Ondo State, Nigeria

Continue Reading

Opinion

Drug Abuse Among People With Disabilities: The Hidden Crisis Nigeria Is Yet to Address

Published

on

 

By Abdulaziz Ibrahim

Statistically Invisible, Persons with Disabilities feel shut out of Nigeria’s drug abuse war as a report from Adamawa reveals lacks data and tailored support needed, forcing a vulnerable group to battle addiction alone.

In Adamawa State, the fight against drug abuse is gaining attention, but for many people living with disabilities (PWDs), their struggles remain largely unseen. A new report has uncovered deep gaps in support, treatment, and data tracking for PWDs battling addiction despite official claims of equal access.

For nearly three decades, Mallam Aliyu Hammawa, a visually impaired resident of Yola, navigated a world increasingly shrouded by drug dependency. He first encountered psychoactive substances through friends, and what began as casual use quickly escalated into long-term addiction.

“I used cannabis, tramadol, tablets, shooters everything I could get my hands on,” he recalled. “These drugs affected my behaviour and my relationship with the people close to me.”

Family members say his addiction changed him entirely. His friend, Hussaini Usman, described feeling “sad and worried” when he realized Aliyu had fallen into drug use.

Aliyu eventually made the decision to quit. It was marriage and the fear of hurting his wife that finally forced him to seek a new path. “Whenever I took the drugs, I felt normal. But my wife was confused about my behaviour,” he said. “I decided I had to stop before she discovered the full truth of what I was taking.”

A National Problem With Missing Data

Advert

Nigeria has one of the highest drug-use rates in West Africa, according to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). Over 14 million Nigerians between the ages of 15 and 64 use psychoactive substances. Yet, within that massive user base, PWDs are statistically invisible.

There is almost no national data on drug abuse among persons with disabilitiesa critical gap that experts warn makes it impossible to design effective, inclusive rehabilitation programmes.

Ibrahim Idris Kochifa, the Secretary of the Adamawa State Association of Persons with Physical Disability, told this reporter that PWDs face unique, systemic pressures that intensify their vulnerability to drug abuse, specifically citing poverty, unemployment, isolation, and social discrimination.

“Whenever a person with disability is caught with drugs, the common decision is to seize the drugs and let him go,” Kochifa said, speaking on behalf of the disabled community leadership. “But if they consult us, we have advice to offer on how they can be treated and rehabilitated. Without involving us, no programme will fully benefit people with disabilities.”

NDLEA Responds

At the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA) Command in Adamawa, officials insist their services are open to everyone without discrimination.

Mrs. Ibraham Nachafia, the Head of Media and Advocacy for the NDLEA Adamawa State Command, said during an interview, “Our rehabilitation centre is open to all. There is no discrimination. Anyone including persons with disabilities can access treatment.”

While the official position suggests inclusiveness, disability advocates call it “tokenistic.” They argue that equal access on paper does not translate to tailored support in practice. True rehabilitation for PWDs requires specialized counselling that understands their unique traumas, physically accessible facilities, and significantly stronger community engagement to prevent relapse.

A Call for More Inclusive Action

Advocates are now urging the Nigerian government and drug-control agencies to build a response framework that recognizes PWDs as a vulnerable group in need of targeted support.

The advocate Goodness Fedrick warns that until rehabilitation and prevention programmes reflect the realities faced by people with disabilities, Nigeria’s battle against drug abuse will remain incomplete.

For people like Aliyu Hammawa, who managed to recover without structured support, the message is clear: many others may not be as fortunate.

This story highlights the urgent need for inclusive, data-driven, and community-supported approaches in Nigeria’s fight against drug addiction. Until the nation sees and serves this ‘hidden crisis,’ its overall battle against addiction will continue to be fought with one hand tied behind its back.

Continue Reading

Trending