Connect with us

Opinion

Abacha’s Property: Where Federal Government Got it Wrong

Published

on

Late General Sani Abacha ,Former Head Of State

The media is awash with the news of how the Federal Government under the administration of President Olusegun Obasanjo revoked a landed property in the Maitama District of Abuja belonging to the family of Late Head-of-State, General Sani Abacha.

While the revocation occurred in February 2006 during the time of Mallam Nasir El-Rufai as the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), the approval was given in 1993 – while General Sani Abacha was still the country’s leader.

It was exclusively gathered that El-Rufai’s action was targeted at irking the Abacha family, which spite him, in any way under the directives of former President Olusegun Obasanjo.

The former President ordered the revocation for the purpose of harming the Abacha family. It was obvious that the revocation was not in the public interest.

To further worsen the matter, Senator Bala Abdulkadir Mohammed, on May 25, 2011, as then Minister of FCT, issued a Certificate of Occupancy (C-of-O) in favour of a company, Salamed Ventures despite the fact that the case was before a court of law.

Salamed Ventures Limited was said to have acquired the property at the cost of $1.3 million dollars, while the matter was pending at the court of appeal. Since then, the family and the authorities concerned have locked horns in a fierce legal battle.

It is clear that from the revocation letter, revocation is not in contravention of any law of the Federal Capital Territory or the Land Use Act neither was it done in public interest nor carried out in contravention of the rules and regulations.

Findings by this paper shown that there was no semblance of legal justification in the action of this revocation.

The Abacha family has been fighting tooth and nail to keep their property, which was lawfully acquired. Mohammed Abacha and Dr. Maryam Abacha who are acting as administrators of the estate in the suit, approached a High Court in February 2006 under Justice I.M Bukar.

Recalled earlier that, on June 30, 2009, the Justice I.M Bukar delivered his judgement by striking the suit. He held that the court doesn’t have jurisdiction to entertain the matter and the appropriate court to try the case is the Federal High Court of Nigeria.

The plaintiffs in the case, Mohammed Sani Abacha and Dr. Maryam Sani Abacha, then appealed to the Court of Appeal in Abuja on the same matter, citing an infringement on their right.

Subsequently, the Appeal Court, on May 18, 2015, affirmed the Judgement of the trial court, by striking out the suit.

The Plantiffs/ Appelants thereafter instituted this present action on the 25th of May 2015 in accordance the judgement of the Court of Appeal.

Mohammed Abacha informed this paper that the property was fully developed before the death of late General Sani Abacha.

Fast forward to this year, the lingering case was argued before Justice Peter Lifu of the Federal High Court and on the 19th of July 2024, he delivered his judgement dismissing the claims of Mohammed Abacha and Dr. Maryam Sani Abacha.

Advert

Justice Lifu ruled that the Abacha family lacked the locus standi to file the suit challenging the revocation of its property at Maitama District and demanding the sum of N500 million in compensation.

However, the family has since filed an appeal against the judgment. The counsel to the family, Reuben Atabo SAN said that the trial court erred on 11 grounds in the dismissal of their suit.

Atabo informed this paper that they will be filing additional grounds to appeal the case.

The appeal joined President Bola Tinubu, Minister of the FCT, the Federal Capital Development Authority (FCDA), and Salamed Ventures Ltd.

The demand is for the appellate court to set aside the sale and transfer of the title to Plot 3119, Maitama, Abuja measuring 3 hectares of land to Salamed Ventures Ltd on February 25, 2011.

In the lawsuit, the Abacha family is also praying the court to set aside the judgment of Justice Lifu of the Federal High Court, Abuja, which on July 19, 2024 dismissed their suit on the property.

The family are also praying the Appellate Court to invoke Section 15 of the Court of Appeal Act to take over their legal battle as a court of first instance and do justice to the matter.

But, according to an Abuja-based lawyer, Barrister Abdulsalam Nasiru, the plaintiffs have the opportunity to present their case at the Federal High Court as ordered by the Court of Appeal.

Barrister Nasiru, said it was wrong for the government to sell the land, while the matter is pending in the court. “This decision is a lack of respect to the rule of law. Whatever made the former governor of Kaduna State, while as FCT Minister, to set this precedence would surely not augur well for Nigeria.

“On one side of the argument, the action is sowing the seeds of humiliating the former presidents’ family, now that their patriarch is no more. And on the other hand, the action showed blatant disrespect to The Land Use Act which the family followed to acquire the landed property.

“There is no doubt that the landed property in question was applied for allocation in the early 90’s by the Late Head of State. The application was approved on Plot No 3199, Maitama, Abuja and was allocated by the then Minister of the Federal Capital Territory.

It was after obtaining necessary approval for setting up architectural, mechanical, structural and electrical designs, the Late General developed the property, prior to his death on 8th June 1998,” he said.

Why the Federal Government Got it wrong?

As for Said Akintade Shittu, a public affairs analyst: “There may be some indications that former FCT Ministers, Nasir El-rufai and Bala Mohammed have an axe to grind with the family of General Sani Abacha. This notwithstanding, the government has absolutely got it wrong.

First, one can blame Sani Abacha for some misdoing as all the other past presidents, but there is no denying the fact that he was a former president of this country. And there is legality in the way the land in dispute was acquired.

Second, whoever advised El-rufai and Bala Mohammed to sell the landed property after its revocation even though the landed property is being disputed before a court of law is wrong, too.

“While El-rufai is an ex-governor, Bala Mohammed is the serving governor of Bauchi State. Nobody will wish the same fate on their family.

There is no need to rush the action. Until court processes are exhausted, any action taken on the disputed landed property may look personal, which I believe many Nigerians are observing the trend and feeling some urge to judge.

“Also, the Federal Government has a duty not only to investigate the matter thoroughly but also come clean of the issue. Happenings in Nigeria have shown that President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has an enormous respect for the rule of Law.

Therefore, it is advisable that the president set a committee to look into the land dispute involving the Abacha family and the two past ministers of the FCT and allow justice to take its course. Only this can save him from blame”.

Opinion

Alhaji Tijjani Rabiu Spikin: A Neighbour, Philanthropist, and Friend of Children

Published

on

 

BY
MUDASSIR ALIYU YUNUSA (MSNB)
mudassiray@gmail.com

Alhaji Tijjani Rabiu Spikin, popularly known as ‘Tijjani Spikin,’ is one of the most respected elders of the Kofar Nassarawa and Sabuwar Kofa communities. A successful businessman with an outstanding reputation, he is admired not only for his business accomplishments but also for his kindness, humility, and generosity toward those around him, especially children.

He is widely regarded as a man of peace who values harmonious relationships. He believes that good neighbourliness is built on mutual respect, compassion, and the willingness to uphold the rights of others. His home has always been a place where people feel welcome, particularly children, and he has earned the trust and admiration of both the young and the old through his exemplary character.

What distinguishes Alhaji Tijjani most is his genuine love for children. He has always shown special affection to every child living in his neighbourhood, regardless of family background. It has long been his habit to brighten their day by giving them small gifts, including cash, biscuits, sweets, and other treats. To many children, these gestures were not merely gifts but expressions of love and encouragement that made them feel valued and appreciated.

Advert

Those who grew up in the area could bear me witness. I can vividly remember the excitement whenever Alhaji Tijjani came out in the morning or afternoon on his way to his daily routine. Children would eagerly and joyously gather around him, knowing that he would never send them away empty-handed. Because of this remarkable generosity to the children, they affectionately gave him the nickname “Mai Raba Kwandala Kwandala,” meaning “the man who shared coins.” It was a title born out of admiration for his habit of distributing small denominations of the Nigerian naira to every boy or girl he met.

Today, Alhaji Tijjani Rabiu (Spikin) remains a shining example of how kindness, generosity, and good neighbourliness can leave a lasting impact on a community, especially in the minds of the children who have now become youths and stakeholders in society. His legacy is reflected not only in the lives he has touched but also in the fond memories cherished by generations of children who experienced his compassion firsthand.

May Almighty Allah (SWT) continue to bless Alhaji Tijjani Rabiu and his entire family abundantly. May He increase him in wealth, grant him sound health, strengthen him in Iman (faith), protect him from all harm, and reward his kindness with His endless mercy in this world and in the Hereafter. Ameen.

Mudassir can be reached via:
mudassiray@gmail.com

Continue Reading

Opinion

Arewa Media Summit:Big Promises, Little Substance-Tijjani Sarki 

Published

on

 

Tijjani Sarki

I was genuinely amazed that the inaugural Arewa Media Summit ended with a communique. For an event presented as a defining conversation on media, governance and accountability in Northern Nigeria, the silence was difficult to understand. It was only after analysts and observers questioned the omission that a comprehensive communiqué eventually emerged.

I have read the document carefully. It is professionally written, politically appealing and rich in democratic vocabulary. Unfortunately, it is also painfully short on substance.

Beyond the impressive language, there is no implementation framework, no timelines, no measurable targets and no independent mechanism to ensure that its resolutions become reality. That is not how transformational policy conversations are measured. It is how public relations documents are often written.

Advert

Even more disappointing is what the communiqué failed to confront. The media space in Arewa is under siege, not only from misinformation but from increasing political manipulation. Today, media platforms are too often deployed to inflame unnecessary controversies, deepen divisions, promote personality cults, settle political scores and manufacture enemies instead of advancing public enlightenment and good governance. This dangerous trend deserved to be the centrepiece of the summit, yet it received only passing attention.

If the gathering truly sought to reshape the future of media in Northern Nigeria, it should have produced practical strategies to strengthen investigative journalism, protect editorial independence, support indigenous media institutions and insulate the media from political capture.

Arewa does not need another annual media jamboree with polished speeches and elegant communiqués. It needs a platform that speaks truth to power, promotes professional journalism, unites rather than divides our people, and produces measurable reforms. Until then, many will continue to question whether this summit advanced the public interest or merely refined the language of political communication.

Tijjani Sarki
Good Governance Advocate and Public Policy Analyst

Continue Reading

Opinion

IDP Is More Than A Humanitarian Case-Ekanem Joan

Published

on

 

 

By
EKANEM JOAN

When discussions about Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) arise, attention often turns to numbers and relief packages. Yet behind every statistic is a family that has lost a home, a child whose education has been disrupted, and a community torn apart by conflict. While compensation may replace damaged structures, it cannot restore the memories, dignity, and sense of belonging that displacement takes away.

Recompensation does not make it fine; How do you compensate a child staring at the fire and iron as it takes their lands, while uniforms hang up in a room? How do you price the memory of a mother who once called these lands home. She cuddled her children and the savoury flavour of meals each smiles on her family’s faces, or, the men who spent decades building a life, a family, a shelter, only to watch unconventional disasters take it away. The youths! With their lives sketched on a rough map, all gone – indefinitely. IDPs are just victims of a conflict or a humanitarian crisis waiting to be part of a scheme but humans with lives.

Nigeria is transitioning into durable solutions and we must remind the policy makers that a house is not merely a structure to be replaced but a sanctuary that has been entirely erased, some are memories. These compensations do not weigh the emotional fabric of what has been torn away. At first, it was a crisis to put an end to but then the plan changed, by the end of year 2023, statistics recorded by United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees to about 1.1 million IDPs (approximately 1,134,828 persons) with 50.3% below 18 years old and 49.7% above 18 years old. The same year saw 81.2% Boko Haram insurgency, 1.6% banditry and 16.2% herder clashes. This crisis was most prominent in the North-West region. The issue was worsening, leading to a humanitarian disaster and as the years grew the IDP numbers rose to 3.5 million persons.

Advert

This rise in persons is alarming. An increase of 2.4 million estimated is not fine. Compensation is not enough! as the number of internally displaced persons increased the government shifted its focus from protection and curbing the disaster to putting infrastructure in place. These infrastructures included the 2025 financial injection and the African Union Convention for Protection and Assistance of IDPs into law to provide food and shelter (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees). The policy makers have decided to place these infrastructures but numbers alone cannot capture the true weight of internal displacement. Statistics do not feel hunger, do not grieve the sudden loss of an ancestral home, and do not carry the psychological weight of an uncertain tomorrow.

The last IDP count done in 2026 by United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees shows total displaced persons as over 3.7 million. The causes still remain armed insurgency, farmer-herder conflicts, banditry and climate change across the affected regions including the North-East, Middle Belt and North-West (Borno, Zamfara, Sokoto and Benue).
87% of the IDPs live below the international poverty line and 60% face high levels of food insecurity, close to decades of displacement leads to limited access to healthcare and schooling. How do we fight a problem without digging out its roots. Across Nigeria millions of Nigerians have lost their land, homes and monuments of memories because of armed conflicts, terrorism, communal clashes, flooding and other disasters.
This does not end in loss of structures but lives too. Imagine a mother who carried a child for 9 months – nurtured and bred, that child wasted! or a father who struggled to give a child all that is needed to watch his own flesh and blood lay on the floor, lifeless.

Displacement hits the most vulnerable demographics hardest. Children are exposed to interrupted education and emotional distress or what about gender-based violence? The uncertainty and emotional weight of being displaced in your own country, your own land.

The Government must address the security gap. There must be increased, professionalized, and transparent security presence in vulnerable regions to prevent the “unconventional disasters” that turn citizens into refugees in their own country. Banditry and herder-farmer clashes are often hyper-local. Success requires empowering local traditional leaders, civil society, and grassroots peace committees to mediate disputes before they escalate into armed conflict.

As the policy makes provision for emergency food, clean water and canvas tents. Yet we know that the deepest wounds of displacement are ones that don’t bleed. Displacement is not just a change of address; it is a sudden, violent fracturing of life, identity and dignity. It is the theft of a person’s yesterday and the total blinding of their tomorrow. The approach is shifting from short term “crisis management” to long term poverty reduction and healing but our main focus should be the roots – reduce or eradicate banditry, set infrastructure to settle communal crisis and provide resources for all citizens, it is not just about moving the CSR to invest in vocational rehabilitation but removing the cause for a better Nigeria.
Fight for IDP and fight for a better Nigeria! It could be you and it could be I. Together we fix this humanitarian crisis.

EKANEM JOAN
200LVL STUDENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND STRATEGIC COMMUNICATION, UNIVERSITY OF ABUJA.
1ST JULY, 2026.

Continue Reading

Trending