Connect with us

Opinion

Re-No Research in Nigerian Universities: A Rejoinder to Professor Maqari

Published

on

Babayo Sule

 

By Babayo Sule (PhD)

To start with, I respect Professor Ibrahim Maqari much and if u are keenly following his submissions he is being considered fair and honest in most of his engagements. Besides, he has the constitutional power to express his views and narrate his experience of his academic journey. We all know that no Nigerian system is working properly as it should. But to his this particular view, I have a contrary one with some fundamental issues raised as follows.

If research is not undertaken in Nigerian universities, does he agree that he became a Professor without doing any meaningful research?

Research is carried out in Nigerian universities now more than any period in Nigerian history. The emergence of TETfund scholarship training to young academics provides the opportunity for Nigerian scholars to attend world class universities, exposed to rigours of modern scientific research and advanced research techniques which they are now applying at home. The quality of journals and publishers that the Nigerian scholars are now penetrating is unprecedented. To confirm this, just make a simple Google search on subject of interest and see wonders.

Nigerian scholars are now accessing international grants more than ever and these grants are research driven and research oriented. In just Gombe State here between FUK and GSU, I can list more than 50 scholars with international grants running in thousands of dollars for research. What if u exapand and search all Nigerian tertiary institutions? Amazing!

Young Nigerian scholars are now publishing in Q1 journals and other Clavarite Analytics ISI/Scopus indexed journals which are universally testified to publish only ground breaking research and not any copy and paste or literature review or theoretical postulations. In some universities like UNN, u will never become a Professor until you published in this class of journals and publishers.

He may be talking of himself, his likes and his experiences and this regard, he is right. Then, u may ask him how he became a Professor. Surprisingly, I checked his profile in the internet but I was utterly shocked and confused to discover his total absence in all global academia forum or any SINGLE visible academic contribution. He is not present in Google Scholar, Research gate, Academia.edu, Semantic Scholar, Mendeley, talk less of Scopus ID and ORCID. Only his Facebook page and tafsirs are visible as a Professor. In contemporary academic world even in the neighbourhood of African countries, he will never ever be a Professor forever without a presence in these global academic forum. In essence, countries like Malaysia, Taiwan, India and even South Africa will never promote an academic that is not publishing in Scopus and other Clavarite Analytics ISI indexed journals and articles.

Advert

Additionally, how can he expect a genuine research from the Nigerian academics who are not catered adequately. Just in 2021, the US Government awarded Harvard University a grant of $500 million, a university now privately run to undertake research. In Nigeria, what is the government providing for research? A TETfund IBR research grant of N800000 for academics to carry a ground breaking research. Laughable! Isn’t it? Even decent salaries to the academics is now a taboo. Yet, with this condition, check world first class reputable journals and publishers such as Springer, Sage, Palgrave Macmillan, Routledge, Zed Books, Rowman and Littlefield, etc etc and see how Nigerian academics are publishing there frequently. Are all these not evidence of research? Do these publishers published a joke or low quality research?

Besides, all of us, i repeat, all are products of Nigerian universities and academics, we are working in various fields of human endeavour and you can testify to the role of academics in training our younger ones in research. Graduates of Nigerian universities despite the poor condition of learning and instructions always excel in world class universities in the US, Europe and Asia why?

Perhaps, Prof was regurgitating his past experience during his analog days in Nigerian universities that he had not been frequenting during his working days. No one, may be, cares to enlighten the Prof that we are now in digital age where various softwares introduced such as Turnitin, ithenticate and other amti-plagiariam softwares compelled Nigerian universities’ academics to embark on research with originality, contribution and practical policy implications. This is confirmed in Nigeria’s recent Scimago ranking where Nigerian academics emerged 3rd after South Africa and Egypt in Africa amidst a wretched and miserable working conditions. In other words, Prof is obsolete to know that the era of copy/cut and paste is now a history for aspiring academics globally.

More reasonably, Prof might have been understood if he limits his unguarded utterances and advertisement of out-of-touch reality to himself and his likes. Of course, I agree with him, some Nigerian academics are truant, unproductive, inconsequential and can only work if they are closely supervised and compelled with threats of dismissal to work. Otherwise, they may easily bastardise the so-called academic freedom, stationed themselves stationary in places like Abuja and operate from there. These few deviants should not be considered as the yardstick of measuring the productivity of the Nigerian academics.

In essence, what is bemusing with the submission by Prof is what exactly is he trying to achieve? Blackmail his colleagues? Denigrate them? Diminish the sympathy they enjoy from the public for their father’s land sacrifice? Buy sympathy and support to the government that prove to be notorious in reneging against all promises or what? Nigerian academics, for Prof’s consent, are highly respected globally.

The likes of Maqari could not even mentor the younger ones academically since he believed they don’t know research. Well, he is a missing gap in what the Nigerian academic community wasted for unproductive venture. This is my little take.

Opinion

Dr Bello Matwallle: Why Dialogue Still Matters in the Fight Against Insecurity

Published

on

 

By Musa Iliyasu Kwankwaso

In the history of leadership, force may be loud, but wisdom delivers results. This is why security experts agree that while military action can suppress violence temporarily, dialogue is what permanently closes the door to conflict. It is a lesson the world has learned through blood, loss, and painful experience.

When Dr. Bello Matawalle, as Governor of Zamfara State, chose dialogue and reconciliation, it was not a sign of weakness. It was a different kind of courage one that placed the lives of ordinary citizens above political applause. A wise leader measures success not by bullets fired, but by lives saved.

Across conflict zones, history has consistently shown that force alone does not end insecurity. Guns may damage bodies, but they do not eliminate the roots of violence. This understanding forms the basis of what experts call the non-kinetic approach conflict resolution through dialogue, reconciliation, justice, and social reform.

When Matawalle assumed office, Zamfara was deeply troubled. Roads were closed, markets shut down, farmers and herders operated in fear, and citizens lived under constant threat. Faced with this reality, only two options existed: rely solely on military force or combine security operations with dialogue. Matawalle chose the path widely accepted across the world security reinforced by dialogue not out of sympathy for criminals, but to protect innocent lives.

Advert

This approach was not unique to Zamfara. In Katsina State, Governor Aminu Bello Masari led peace engagements with armed groups. In Maiduguri granted amnesty to repentant offenders of Boko Haram, In Sokoto, dialogue was also pursued to reduce bloodshed. These precedents raise a simple question: if dialogue is acceptable elsewhere, why is Matawalle singled out?

At the federal level, the same logic applies. Through Operation Safe Corridor, the Federal Government received Boko Haram members who surrendered, offered rehabilitation and reintegration, and continued military action against those who refused to lay down arms. This balance
rehabilitation for those who repent and force against those who persist is the core of the non-kinetic approach.

Security experts globally affirm that military force contributes only 20 to 30 percent of sustainable solutions to insurgency. The remaining 70 to 80 percent lies in dialogue, justice, economic reform, and addressing poverty and unemployment. Even the United Nations states clearly: “You cannot kill your way out of an insurgency.”

During Matawalle’s tenure, several roads reopened, cattle markets revived, and daily life began to normalize. If insecurity later resurfaced, the question is not whether dialogue was wrong, but whether broader coordination failed.

Today, critics attempt to recast past security strategies as crimes. Yet history is not blind, and truth does not disappear. Matawalle’s actions were rooted in expert advice, national precedent, and global best practice.

The position of Sheikh Ahmad Gumi, who publicly affirmed that Matawalle’s approach was appropriate and that military force accounts for only about 25 percent of counterinsurgency success, further reinforces this reality. Such views cannot be purchased or manufactured; they reflect established security thinking.

In the end, dialogue is not a betrayal of justice it is often its foundation. And no amount of political noise can overturn decisions grounded in evidence, experience, and the priority of human life.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Matawalle: The Northern Anchor of Loyalty in Tinubu’s Administration

Published

on

 

By Adebayor Adetunji, PhD

In the broad and competitive terrain of Nigerian politics, loyalty is often spoken of, yet rarely sustained with consistency, courage and visible action. But within the administration of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, one Northern appointee has demonstrated this quality not as a slogan, but as a lifestyle, as a political principle and as a national duty — Hon. (Dr.) Bello Muhammad Matawalle, Minister of State for Defence.

Since his appointment, Matawalle has stood out as one of the most loyal, outspoken and dependable pillars of support for the Tinubu administration in the North. He has never hesitated, not for a moment, to stand firmly behind the President. At every turn of controversy, in moments of public misunderstanding, and at times when political alliances waver, Matawalle has continued to speak boldly in defence of the government he serves. For him, loyalty is not an occasional gesture — it is a commitment evidenced through voice, alignment, and sacrifice.

Observers within and outside the ruling party recall numerous occasions where the former Zamfara State Governor took the front line in defending the government’s policies, actions and direction, even when others chose neutrality or silence. His interventions, always direct and clear, reflect not just loyalty to a leader, but faith in the future the President is building, a future anchored on economic reform, security revival, institutional strengthening and renewed national unity.

Advert

But Matawalle’s value to the administration does not stop at loyalty. In performance, visibility and active delivery of duty, he stands among the most engaged ministers currently serving in the federal cabinet. His portfolio, centred on defence and security, one of the most sensitive sectors in the country, demands expertise, availability and unbroken presence. Matawalle has not only embraced this responsibility, he has carried it with remarkable energy.

From high-level security meetings within Nigeria to strategic engagements across foreign capitals, Matawalle has represented the nation with clarity and confidence. His participation in defence summits, international cooperation talks, and regional security collaborations has positioned Nigeria as a voice of influence in global security discourse once again. At home, his involvement in military policy evaluation, counter-terrorism discussions and national defence restructuring reflects a minister who understands the urgency of Nigeria’s security needs, and shows up to work daily to address them.

Away from partisan battles, Matawalle has proven to be a bridge — between North and South, civilian leadership and military institutions, Nigeria and the wider world. His presence in government offers a mix of loyalty, performance and deep grounding in national interest, the type of partnership every President needs in turbulent times.

This is why calls, campaigns and whisperings aimed at undermining or isolating him must be resisted. Nigeria cannot afford to discourage its best-performing public servants, nor tighten the atmosphere for those who stand firmly for unity and national progress. The nation must learn to applaud where there is performance, support where there is loyalty, and encourage where there is commitment.

Hon. Bello Matawalle deserves commendation, not suspicion. Support — not sabotage. Encouragement, not exclusion from political strategy or power alignment due to narrow interests.

History does not forget those who stood when it mattered. Matawalle stands today for President Tinubu, for security, for loyalty, for national service. And in that place, he has earned a space not only in the present political equation, but in the future judgment of posterity.

Nigeria needs more leaders like him. And Nigeria must say so openly.

Adebayor Adetunji, PhD
A communication strategist and public commentator
Write from Akure, Ondo State, Nigeria

Continue Reading

Opinion

Drug Abuse Among People With Disabilities: The Hidden Crisis Nigeria Is Yet to Address

Published

on

 

By Abdulaziz Ibrahim

Statistically Invisible, Persons with Disabilities feel shut out of Nigeria’s drug abuse war as a report from Adamawa reveals lacks data and tailored support needed, forcing a vulnerable group to battle addiction alone.

In Adamawa State, the fight against drug abuse is gaining attention, but for many people living with disabilities (PWDs), their struggles remain largely unseen. A new report has uncovered deep gaps in support, treatment, and data tracking for PWDs battling addiction despite official claims of equal access.

For nearly three decades, Mallam Aliyu Hammawa, a visually impaired resident of Yola, navigated a world increasingly shrouded by drug dependency. He first encountered psychoactive substances through friends, and what began as casual use quickly escalated into long-term addiction.

“I used cannabis, tramadol, tablets, shooters everything I could get my hands on,” he recalled. “These drugs affected my behaviour and my relationship with the people close to me.”

Family members say his addiction changed him entirely. His friend, Hussaini Usman, described feeling “sad and worried” when he realized Aliyu had fallen into drug use.

Aliyu eventually made the decision to quit. It was marriage and the fear of hurting his wife that finally forced him to seek a new path. “Whenever I took the drugs, I felt normal. But my wife was confused about my behaviour,” he said. “I decided I had to stop before she discovered the full truth of what I was taking.”

A National Problem With Missing Data

Advert

Nigeria has one of the highest drug-use rates in West Africa, according to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). Over 14 million Nigerians between the ages of 15 and 64 use psychoactive substances. Yet, within that massive user base, PWDs are statistically invisible.

There is almost no national data on drug abuse among persons with disabilitiesa critical gap that experts warn makes it impossible to design effective, inclusive rehabilitation programmes.

Ibrahim Idris Kochifa, the Secretary of the Adamawa State Association of Persons with Physical Disability, told this reporter that PWDs face unique, systemic pressures that intensify their vulnerability to drug abuse, specifically citing poverty, unemployment, isolation, and social discrimination.

“Whenever a person with disability is caught with drugs, the common decision is to seize the drugs and let him go,” Kochifa said, speaking on behalf of the disabled community leadership. “But if they consult us, we have advice to offer on how they can be treated and rehabilitated. Without involving us, no programme will fully benefit people with disabilities.”

NDLEA Responds

At the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA) Command in Adamawa, officials insist their services are open to everyone without discrimination.

Mrs. Ibraham Nachafia, the Head of Media and Advocacy for the NDLEA Adamawa State Command, said during an interview, “Our rehabilitation centre is open to all. There is no discrimination. Anyone including persons with disabilities can access treatment.”

While the official position suggests inclusiveness, disability advocates call it “tokenistic.” They argue that equal access on paper does not translate to tailored support in practice. True rehabilitation for PWDs requires specialized counselling that understands their unique traumas, physically accessible facilities, and significantly stronger community engagement to prevent relapse.

A Call for More Inclusive Action

Advocates are now urging the Nigerian government and drug-control agencies to build a response framework that recognizes PWDs as a vulnerable group in need of targeted support.

The advocate Goodness Fedrick warns that until rehabilitation and prevention programmes reflect the realities faced by people with disabilities, Nigeria’s battle against drug abuse will remain incomplete.

For people like Aliyu Hammawa, who managed to recover without structured support, the message is clear: many others may not be as fortunate.

This story highlights the urgent need for inclusive, data-driven, and community-supported approaches in Nigeria’s fight against drug addiction. Until the nation sees and serves this ‘hidden crisis,’ its overall battle against addiction will continue to be fought with one hand tied behind its back.

Continue Reading

Trending