Connect with us

News

Twitter Ban:FG Infringes On The Right Of Millions -CITAD

Published

on

Malam YZ Yau

 

The center f or information technology and development CITAD says the twitter ban by the federal government is an ill-advised and unacceptable action by the federal government.

The executive director of the centre Malam Y Z Ya’u made the statement during a press conference held in Kano.

 

According to Malam Y Z Yau the Federal Government, through its Minister of Information, Mr. Lai Mohammed announced the suspension of the operations of Twitter in Nigeria. This suspension followed the action of Twitter in deleting a tweet by President Mohammed Buhari which the platform concluded had violated its community standards.

He pointed out that CITADexpresses shock with such an ill-advised action by the Government.

The Head further said they are surprised that the president could allowed himself to be wrongly advised. The quality of advice that he received shows an extremely level of ignorance of the working of Over the top (OTTs) in the world.

“First, Twitter does not need to be in Nigeria for its business to strive. By suspending its operation in the country the government is not hurting the interests of Twitter but rather jeopardising the jobs of the Nigerian staff of Twitter and more fundamentally, derogating the right of Nigerians to freedom of expression which is guaranteed in both our constitution and in the Africa Peoples and Human Rights which Nigeria is a signatory to, among other covenants of human rights.

Twitter Ban: FG Orders Prosecution of Offenders

The platforms of OTTs are important component of the internet, access to which the UN has decided as constituting a fourth generation of rights that all citizens should enjoy.

By shutting down access to Twitter for the millions of Nigerians, the government has totally curtailed the rights of Nigerians to this service.

Second, it shows the lack of understanding of the state of technology in the world. Many countries have unsuccessfully tried to block social media access for their citizens, but the increasing number of by-pass technologies means that such an action is fruitless and rather a drain on useful resource that could be used to support educating citizens on how to use the internet.

Third, when government argues that Twitter was selective in punishing misuse of its platform, it betrays a lack of understanding of the issues at hand. Twitter like, any other OTTs, has its community standards. Violating any of these standards elicits punishment which ranges from deletion to suspension and to even outright ban on the platform. One of the standards is that no message that is threatening violence against other people should be allowed on the platform. ”

YZ Yau said the Presidents message was a threat to violence. It does not matter that he was responding to a violent situation. That other people had in the past made similar messages and were not so punished is not an argument for two wrongs do not make a right.

Advert

The statement further said the ban illustrates the fourth nativity of the government. When the Government or the President noticed that some people were spreading messages inciting or inviting violence, what they ought to do was to flag this off with Twitter. Once a message is flagged the relevant OTT (in this case Twitter) is duty bound to respond to it by taking action. When it is dissatisfied with the action taken, it can appeal the case and in the case of Facebook, it has a global Independent Board of Oversight which deals with controversial appeals and whose decisions or rulings are binding on the OTT.”

The other aspect of the naivety of the government response is that it does not understand the nature of hate speech for which it has over a long period been pushing for a legislation. One of the key attributes of hate speech for it to catalyse into violence is that it should have a powerful speaker. That powerful speaker can earn his or her status on the basis of statutory power (such as a President) or love such as celebrity or cultural assets such respected community leaders or even religious capital in the case of religious leaders. What a powerful speaker does is that he makes the audience to commit the call to action embedded in his or her message. They could act the call to action either because they fear the speaker or love her or him or has institution of violence that could do his or her bidding. In the Nigerian context, clearly President Buhari is a powerful speaker who earned his status because of the office he occupies but also, additionally, because he has political and probably, ethnic followers. His message has a clear call to action which is to incite violence against his target. It is clear that his message, given his position as President has the potential to catalyse violence. It is entirely different from a riffraff ranting on twitter.

However, all these are by the way, the substantive issue for us is that we see in the act of the president a vicious intolerance of dissenting views. What Twitter had done was a mild criticism of the President but the president responded with an over kill. Clearly if President Buhari where the President of USA when twitter banned President Trump, he probably could have ordered the army to take over the company and dragged its management and owners to prison.

This intolerance of dissenting views is dangerous to democracy and unacceptable. It also is unnecessary and uncalled for given the situation that Nigeria is in, a situation that requires building bridges through effective communication rather than one of responding in kind.

We also fear that this act is preamble to the long ambition of the government to control access to the social media in the country.

Over the last six years, it has tried to do this through legislation unsuccessfully and now it wants use the response by Twitter to start a piece meal effort.

This is acceptable, undemocratic and unconstitutional.
We call on the government to withdraw its suspension and allow Twitter to carry out its legitimate business unhindered.

The government should allow Nigerians unhindered access to the platform. What the Government ought to do is to begin to educate and enlighten citizens on how to use the social media and not how to prevent them from using it.

We join millions of other well-meaning and patriotic Nigerians in demanding an immediate restoration of access to Twitter and a proactive safeguard against similar action to other OTTs.

We call on the National Assembly to declare the act of the president as illegal and unconstitutional and proceed to provide a legal clarify by enacting a law that prohibits presidents or any other authority from blocking any internet platform.

As an organization dedicated to the use of information technology to promote development and good governance, we are prepared to help in the campaign for better use of the internet but even more, we are ready to help Nigerians reclaim their right to access to twitter, among other OTT platforms by building their capacity on by bypass technologies.”

News

Twenty-Five Organisations Petition Kano Health Commissioner Over Engagement of Anti Government CSO in GAVI-Funded Polio Programme

Published

on

 

 

 

A coalition of twenty-five concerned citizens’ organisations and patriotic groups in Kano State has formally petitioned the Commissioner for Health, Dr. Labaran Yusuf, and the Executive Secretary of the Kano State Primary Health Care Management Board, for engaging Maryam Garba Usman, of the Centre for Gender and Social Inclusion, CAGSI, under the Solina GAVI Grant Polio Programme currently being implemented in the state, an organization the petitioners described as Anti Government and a leading critic of the Government programmes and activities in Kano State.

 

The petition, dated May 12, 2026, and addressed to the Hon. Commissioner, Ministry of Health with copies transmitted to the Executive Governor, Alhaji Abba Kabir Yusuf, the Secretary to the State Government, Alhaji Farouk Umar Ibrahim, the Commissioner for Information and Internal Affairs, Comrade Ibrahim Abdullahi Waiya and the Kano State Public Complaint and Anti-Corruption Commission. The petotion raises concerns about the integrity, transparency, and non-partisan character of the organization engaged in the donor-supported health intervention programmes in the State.

The petition, signed on behalf of the coalition of concerned organisations, states that the engagement of the named individual has generated questions among stakeholders about the impartiality and professional neutrality required of all organizations and individuals involved in government-supported and donor-funded health programmes. The petitioners maintain that the GAVI-funded polio programme, like all internationally supported public health interventions, must be implemented strictly in accordance with the professional, ethical, and governance standards that donor organisations and the Nigerian public expect, and that the selection of programme personnel must be guided exclusively by professional neutrality and independent of partisan politics, sabotage against Government, competence, institutional credibility, and a demonstrable commitment to the public interest rather than any consideration that could compromise the programme’s neutrality or public trust.

The concerns raised in the petition go to the heart of a governance challenge that is not unique to Kano State but that carries particular significance in the context of northern Nigeria’s polio eradication history. The success of polio vaccination and health intervention programmes in communities across the north has always depended, to a substantial degree, on the public confidence that those programmes command, and that confidence is inseparable from the perceived integrity and impartiality of the organisations and individuals responsible for implementing them.

Advert

When questions arise about whether programme personnel are truly neutral, truly professional, and truly committed to the public health objectives of the intervention rather than to any other agenda, those questions have the potential to erode the community’s trust upon which effective health programme delivery depends. It is precisely to prevent that erosion that the petitioning organisations have brought their concerns to the attention of the appropriate authorities.

 

The coalition specifically called on the Ministry of Health and the Kano State Primary Health Care Management Board to conduct a thorough review of the engagement process for all personnel involved in the Solina GAVI Grant Programme, to ensure that all procedures, standards, and guidelines governing the programme are strictly followed, and to ensure that only organisations and individuals that are genuinely neutral and demonstrably committed to the programme’s public health objectives are engaged in its implementation. The petitioners further urged the relevant authorities to take all necessary steps to uphold transparency, accountability, and fairness in the administration of the programme, noting that the integrity of donor-funded health interventions is a matter of public interest that extends well beyond the boundaries of any single engagement decision

The timing and the target of this petition carry a significance that deserves to be understood in its proper governance context. The Solina GAVI Grant Polio Programme represents a significant international investment in Kano State’s public health infrastructure, and the organisations and individuals who implement it carry the responsibility not merely of delivering a health programme but of maintaining the trust, the cooperation, and the confidence of the communities they serve.

 

The Kano State Government, under the leadership of Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf, has consistently demonstrated its commitment to transparency, accountability, and professional standards in the management of public programmes and donor-funded interventions. The administration’s broader governance record, reflected in the historic N1.477 trillion budget for 2026, its first-place ranking in the 2025 NECO results, and its extensive investments in healthcare infrastructure, community health services, and grassroots empowerment across all 44 local government areas of the state, speaks to a government that takes its responsibilities to the people of Kano seriously and that expects the same seriousness of purpose from all those who operate under its umbrella or within its programmes. The petition submitted by the coalition of twenty-five organisations is consistent with the governance philosophy, reflecting the conviction that public programmes, particularly those funded by international donors and designed to protect the health of the most vulnerable members of the community, must be insulated from every form of compromise, however it presents itself and whoever it involves.

The petitioners expressed confidence that the Commissioner for Health and the Executive Secretary of the Kano State Primary Health Care Management Board will give the matter the urgent and serious attention it deserves, noting that the integrity of the GAVI-funded polio programme and the public trust it depends upon are too important to be compromised by questions that proper and timely institutional action can resolve. They further expressed their confidence in the Kano State Government’s commitment to due process, fairness, and good governance, and their expectation that the relevant authorities will act with the transparency and the decisiveness that the situation demands and that the people of Kano State deserve.

 

As of the time of going to press, neither the Ministry of Health nor the Kano State Primary Health Care Management Board had issued a public response to the petition.

 

The petitioners while contacted, asserted that, the Centre for Gender and Social Inclusion, CAGSI, had been involved in many activities that, publicly condemned and criticized Governor Abba Kabiru Yusuf administration programmes, activities and initiative alongside other anti Government organizations operating in Kano

Continue Reading

News

No Zaura, no vote,’ women group holds 1m march in Kano

Published

on

 

 

Hundreds of women supporters of a chieftain of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Abdulsalam Abdulkarim Zaura, popularly known as AA Zaura, on Wednesday staged a solidarity march in Kano, insisting that the party must give him a fair political opportunity ahead of the 2027 elections.

The women, under the banner of AA Zaura Women Mobilisation Forum led by Binta Rabiu Zaura, marched through major streets in Kano metropolis chanting “No Zaura, no vote,” while carrying placards with inscriptions such as “Justice for AA Zaura,” “Reward loyalty,” and “Kano women stand with Zaura.”

The rally comes amid growing political tension within the Kano APC over the Kano Central Senatorial ticket following the emergence of former governor Ibrahim Shekarau as consensus candidate after a reconciliation meeting involving party stakeholders.

Advert

Addressing journalists during the procession, the coordinator of the group, Binta Rabiu Zaura, said the women were demanding fairness and recognition for Zaura’s contributions to the party and the people of Kano.

“We are here to tell the leadership of the APC that AA Zaura has sacrificed so much for this party and for the people. He deserves justice and fair treatment,” she said.

According to her, Zaura has empowered thousands of youths and women across the state through humanitarian and business support initiatives.

“He has touched many lives, especially among women and young people. We cannot sit quietly and watch him being sidelined,” she added.

The protesters also appealed to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and APC national leaders to intervene in the political situation in Kano and ensure what they described as a transparent and inclusive process.

One of the protesters, Amina Musa, said many grassroots supporters were unhappy with recent developments surrounding the Kano Central senatorial ticket.

“We are loyal party members, but loyalty should be rewarded. If there is no justice for AA Zaura, many people may lose interest in participating,” she said.

Daily Trust reports that AA Zaura recently claimed that his ambition to contest for the Kano Central Senatorial seat was “taken away” from him against his wish.

The businessman and politician also said he was not invited to the reconciliation meeting where several aspirants stepped down for Shekarau.

Continue Reading

News

JUST IN: Mustapha Abdullahi, DG of Nigeria Energy Commission, Arrested by EFCC

Published

on

 

 

 

By Yusuf Danjuma Yunusa

 

 

Operatives of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission have arrested the Director-General of the Energy Commission of Nigeria, Mustapha Abdullahi, over alleged money laundering offences.

Advert

 

A source within the anti-graft agency, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorised to speak on the matter, disclosed on Wednesday that Abdullahi was arrested in Abuja and is currently in the custody of the commission.

 

According to the source, the alleged fraud involves funds estimated at N500bn.

 

“We have arrested the Director-General of the Energy Commission of Nigeria, Dr Mustapha Abdullahi, for money laundering offences. He was arrested and is currently in our custody. The money is to the tune of N500bn,” the official said.

 

Efforts to get confirmation from the EFCC spokesperson, Dele Oyewale, were unsuccessful as he could not be reached as of the time of filing this report.

 

President Bola Tinubu had on October 24, 2023 appointed Abdullahi as Director-General of the Energy Commission of Nigeria.

Continue Reading

Trending