Connect with us

Opinion

Abacha’s Property: Where Federal Government Got it Wrong

Published

on

Late General Sani Abacha ,Former Head Of State

The media is awash with the news of how the Federal Government under the administration of President Olusegun Obasanjo revoked a landed property in the Maitama District of Abuja belonging to the family of Late Head-of-State, General Sani Abacha.

While the revocation occurred in February 2006 during the time of Mallam Nasir El-Rufai as the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), the approval was given in 1993 – while General Sani Abacha was still the country’s leader.

It was exclusively gathered that El-Rufai’s action was targeted at irking the Abacha family, which spite him, in any way under the directives of former President Olusegun Obasanjo.

The former President ordered the revocation for the purpose of harming the Abacha family. It was obvious that the revocation was not in the public interest.

To further worsen the matter, Senator Bala Abdulkadir Mohammed, on May 25, 2011, as then Minister of FCT, issued a Certificate of Occupancy (C-of-O) in favour of a company, Salamed Ventures despite the fact that the case was before a court of law.

#

Salamed Ventures Limited was said to have acquired the property at the cost of $1.3 million dollars, while the matter was pending at the court of appeal. Since then, the family and the authorities concerned have locked horns in a fierce legal battle.

It is clear that from the revocation letter, revocation is not in contravention of any law of the Federal Capital Territory or the Land Use Act neither was it done in public interest nor carried out in contravention of the rules and regulations.

Findings by this paper shown that there was no semblance of legal justification in the action of this revocation.

The Abacha family has been fighting tooth and nail to keep their property, which was lawfully acquired. Mohammed Abacha and Dr. Maryam Abacha who are acting as administrators of the estate in the suit, approached a High Court in February 2006 under Justice I.M Bukar.

Recalled earlier that, on June 30, 2009, the Justice I.M Bukar delivered his judgement by striking the suit. He held that the court doesn’t have jurisdiction to entertain the matter and the appropriate court to try the case is the Federal High Court of Nigeria.

The plaintiffs in the case, Mohammed Sani Abacha and Dr. Maryam Sani Abacha, then appealed to the Court of Appeal in Abuja on the same matter, citing an infringement on their right.

Subsequently, the Appeal Court, on May 18, 2015, affirmed the Judgement of the trial court, by striking out the suit.

The Plantiffs/ Appelants thereafter instituted this present action on the 25th of May 2015 in accordance the judgement of the Court of Appeal.

Mohammed Abacha informed this paper that the property was fully developed before the death of late General Sani Abacha.

Fast forward to this year, the lingering case was argued before Justice Peter Lifu of the Federal High Court and on the 19th of July 2024, he delivered his judgement dismissing the claims of Mohammed Abacha and Dr. Maryam Sani Abacha.

Justice Lifu ruled that the Abacha family lacked the locus standi to file the suit challenging the revocation of its property at Maitama District and demanding the sum of N500 million in compensation.

However, the family has since filed an appeal against the judgment. The counsel to the family, Reuben Atabo SAN said that the trial court erred on 11 grounds in the dismissal of their suit.

Atabo informed this paper that they will be filing additional grounds to appeal the case.

The appeal joined President Bola Tinubu, Minister of the FCT, the Federal Capital Development Authority (FCDA), and Salamed Ventures Ltd.

The demand is for the appellate court to set aside the sale and transfer of the title to Plot 3119, Maitama, Abuja measuring 3 hectares of land to Salamed Ventures Ltd on February 25, 2011.

In the lawsuit, the Abacha family is also praying the court to set aside the judgment of Justice Lifu of the Federal High Court, Abuja, which on July 19, 2024 dismissed their suit on the property.

The family are also praying the Appellate Court to invoke Section 15 of the Court of Appeal Act to take over their legal battle as a court of first instance and do justice to the matter.

But, according to an Abuja-based lawyer, Barrister Abdulsalam Nasiru, the plaintiffs have the opportunity to present their case at the Federal High Court as ordered by the Court of Appeal.

Barrister Nasiru, said it was wrong for the government to sell the land, while the matter is pending in the court. “This decision is a lack of respect to the rule of law. Whatever made the former governor of Kaduna State, while as FCT Minister, to set this precedence would surely not augur well for Nigeria.

“On one side of the argument, the action is sowing the seeds of humiliating the former presidents’ family, now that their patriarch is no more. And on the other hand, the action showed blatant disrespect to The Land Use Act which the family followed to acquire the landed property.

“There is no doubt that the landed property in question was applied for allocation in the early 90’s by the Late Head of State. The application was approved on Plot No 3199, Maitama, Abuja and was allocated by the then Minister of the Federal Capital Territory.

It was after obtaining necessary approval for setting up architectural, mechanical, structural and electrical designs, the Late General developed the property, prior to his death on 8th June 1998,” he said.

Why the Federal Government Got it wrong?

As for Said Akintade Shittu, a public affairs analyst: “There may be some indications that former FCT Ministers, Nasir El-rufai and Bala Mohammed have an axe to grind with the family of General Sani Abacha. This notwithstanding, the government has absolutely got it wrong.

First, one can blame Sani Abacha for some misdoing as all the other past presidents, but there is no denying the fact that he was a former president of this country. And there is legality in the way the land in dispute was acquired.

Second, whoever advised El-rufai and Bala Mohammed to sell the landed property after its revocation even though the landed property is being disputed before a court of law is wrong, too.

“While El-rufai is an ex-governor, Bala Mohammed is the serving governor of Bauchi State. Nobody will wish the same fate on their family.

There is no need to rush the action. Until court processes are exhausted, any action taken on the disputed landed property may look personal, which I believe many Nigerians are observing the trend and feeling some urge to judge.

“Also, the Federal Government has a duty not only to investigate the matter thoroughly but also come clean of the issue. Happenings in Nigeria have shown that President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has an enormous respect for the rule of Law.

Therefore, it is advisable that the president set a committee to look into the land dispute involving the Abacha family and the two past ministers of the FCT and allow justice to take its course. Only this can save him from blame”.

Opinion

Uromi Killings, Barau’s Intervention and Responsible Representation

Published

on

 

By Abba Anwar

Before any note on the barbaric Uromi mob action, let me begin with prayer for The Almighty Allah to Bless and Forgive the gentle soul of Galadiman Kano, Alhaji Abbas Sanusi, the son of the late Emir of Kano and Grand Khalifa of Tijjaniyya, Sir Muhammadu Sanusi and the father of the Kano State Chairman of All Progressives Congress (APC), Abdullahi Abbas.

Whenever I sighted the late Galadiman Kano, my mind naturally recollects the face of his respected and revered father, our Tijjaniyya guide, beacon of hope, an epitome of greatness and scholarship, Sir Sanusi, whom I was privilege to visit in both Azare and Wudil, with my parents, when I was much younger, but not toddling.

We had a tradition back in the family, that the younger ones were included in such visits turn by turn. So I was included in two visits to Azare and two visits to Wudil. Where the blessed hands of Sir Sanusi were on my head full with prayers. Alhamdulillah.

ALLAH YA JIKAN GALADIMAN KANO, ALHAJI ABBAS SANUSI

#

Coming down to the barbaric incident that affected legitimate hunters, in Uromi, Esan North East of Edo state, where 16 hunters were burned to death, an incident that went viral in both the traditional and the new media, the action was condemned across the nation.

Political leaders, governments and other humane elements were up and doing dismissing the anti-human development as condemnable and animalistic.

While I acknowledge and appreciate the concerns of many, I was personally moved by extra efforts put by the Deputy Senate President, Barau I. Jibrin, for moving extra miles and strategizing ways for redress. Responsive and responsible leadership at work.

He immediately condemned the mob action dastardly exhibited when it happened. Then followed by many other well meaning Nigerians. Kudos to all in this direction.

When the Governor of Edo state, H. E. Monday Okpebholo paid a condolence visit to Barau in Abuja, the Deputy Senate President said,
“We cannot undo what has been done. But we all want – all Nigerians, what they are looking forward to, is to make sure that these people are arrested and brought to justice. And you are doing well in that direction. And I’m also glad you’ve spoken about the fact that your government is ready to assist the families of those affected.”

To tell you how concerned Barau is he further stated that, ” I want you to continue to pursue the case so that all those who were involved in these barbaric actions are brought to justice. It’s a barbaric action, to say the facts.

If they are brought to justice, it would serve as a deterrent to those who might want to do this in future. I know that people from other parts of the country have been staying with your people in Edo for centuries in a very conducive atmosphere. And this barbaric act has never happened. I’m sure, under your watch, this will not happen again.”

The Deputy Senate President didn’t stop at that, he called the attention of the President and other well meaning Nigerians, including the security agencies, lamenting over the sad development.

Edo state Governor, started with Senator Barau and from there, based on his fruitful discussion with the Deputy Senate President, he was convinced that his coming to Kano, could douse tension and portray him (Edo Governor) as right thinking leader. Of which he attested to that.

Even before he left Senator Barau in Abuja for Kano, the Governor was made to understand the importance of paying condolence visit to the hometown of the slained victims. Which he also complied. A good of him indeed.

So he came to Kano, visited the Governor of Kano State, His Excellency Abba Kabir Yusuf. From there he proceeded to the see the families of the victims.

What I am trying to portray here is, how the DSP put all the strategies in place for bringing the culprits to book, to douse tension and see ways of giving helping hand to the families of the deceased and to those who sustained injuries.

Governor Okpebholo’s first disclosure about his effort in dealing with the situation was first known during his visit to the Deputy Senate President, when he explained that, “It’s unfortunate that it happened in our state. We are here to say, to let you and other people know that we are not happy.

The President is doing something drastic about this. He is not happy also. The IG has swung into action. The DIG CID is in charge. So far, they have arrested 14 suspects.

So they are bringing them to Abuja for interrogation. We have also set up a Committee to see that we take care of the families of the deceased.”

Distinguished Senator Barau did not stop at that, he visited families of the victims who were gathered at At-Taqwa Mosque, Sabon Fegi, Bunkure local government, as all victims came from Bunkure, Rano and Kibiya local governments, Kano state.

To cushion the effect of trauma in those families he gave the sum of One Million Naira (N1m) to each of families of the 16 deceased ones. Making it a total of N16m in all.

During his visit he was quoted to have said, “I was worried when the incident happened. I had to call the Governor, security agencies and all stakeholders involved.

They swung into action. So far apart from the 14 people who have been arrested, two more suspects have been nabbed. The state governor, who visited my house in Abuja, has assured me that the state government will support you.

We will not take it lightly. We will ensure that the culprits are brought to book and face the wrath of the law.”

Examining and appreciating Barau’s leadership qualities since the occurrence of the ugly incident, the entire families of the deceased commended him through the Chief Imam of the area, Sheikh Zainul Abidina Auwal.

They unequivocally thanked the Senator for his unwavering efforts in ensuring justice, adding that, “Rankai dade Senator you prove to be an excellent representative of your people. You are the leader we so much cherish. Your style of leadership is direly needed for the country’s development.”

To compliment his effort with legislative action, DSP Barau assured that when Senate resumes after Sallah holiday, he would sponsor a Bill to look into the activities of Vigilant groups and their modus operandi.

This will go a long way in checkmating their legitimate activities and other nefarious activities allegedly attach to their operations across the country.

His understanding of the situation and his great concern for Nigerians regardless of where they come from, prompts his moves from multi – faceted approach to make sure that Nigeria is safe and developed.

Anwar was Chief Press Secretary to the former Governor of Kano State, Dr Abdullahi Umar Ganduje CON and can be reached at fatimanbaba1@gmail.com

Continue Reading

Opinion

Clarification On Recent Events During The Eid-El-Fitr Celebration In Kano: A Response To The GiGG’s Malicious Statement

Published

on

Clarification On Recent Events During The Eid-El-Fitr Celebration In Kano: A Response To The GiGG’s Malicious Statement

In light of the recent malicious statement issued by the Global Initiatives for Good Governance (GIGG), which disrespects constituted authority and has the potential to cause uncertainty and security breaches regarding the events during the Eid-el-Fitr celebrations in Kano, it is important to provide clarification regarding the actions of both the Emir of Kano, Mallam Muhammadu Sanusi II, and Governor HE. Abba Kabir Yusuf.

First and foremost, it is essential to clarify that there was no Durbar held during this Eid celebration. Rather, what took place was the Emir’s procession to and from the Eid prayer at Kofar Mata, located outside the eastern city wall. This procession is a long-standing Islamic tradition (Sunnah), which involves taking a different route from the one followed to the prayer ground when returning. The Emir’s procession, limited to his guards and close officials, followed this practice in accordance with Islamic traditions. Unlike the Durbar, which is a formal parade involving district heads and traditional horse riders symbolizing allegiance to the Emir and the Emirate, this procession was conducted with full attention to both tradition and public safety.

#

Durbar celebrations, as historically practiced, have not been held regularly in recent years, mainly due to concerns from security forces. The recent event was no exception. Both the Emir and the Governor acted with the intention of striking a balance between preserving cultural practices and ensuring the safety and security of the public. They did not disregard the law or public safety, rather, their actions were aimed at preventing the potential exploitation of the occasion by individuals seeking to disrupt peace and stability.

The breakdown of law and order that occurred was due to the actions of alleged, sponsored criminal elements who hijacked the occasion to create chaos. These individuals sought to tarnish the reputations of both the Emir and the Governor, possibly even attempting to blackmail them and state. We commend the Nigeria Police Force for their swift action in making arrests, which is an important step toward uncovering the full extent of the individuals and networks behind these destructive activities.

It is also essential to address the concerns raised by the faceless NGO. While the police do not have the constitutional authority to outrightly ban traditional programs such as this, they are within their rights to call for a suspension or cancellation based on actionable intelligence aimed at maintaining public safety. Any formal ban, however, would require adherence to due legal process.

The nation is now closely watching the Nigeria Police Force, and we are hopeful that justice will be served swiftly. We trust that ongoing investigations will identify all those responsible for these disruptive actions and ensure accountability.

A.T. Abdullahi
A Concerned Kano Indigene
31st March 2025

Continue Reading

Opinion

Periscoping Waiya’s Alleged Assault on Free Press Viz the Preponderance of Mob Reasoning

Published

on

 

By Al Amin Ubandoma

The recent controversy surrounding Kano State Commissioner for Information, Ambassador Ibrahim Waiya, has sparked heated debates about free press and mob reasoning. The controversy began with an opinionated article written by one Auwalu Ismail, which criticized Waiya that was widely circulated online.

The article contained allegedly malicious and defamatory statements about Ambassador Ibrahim Waiya. As a public figure, Waiya has the right to defend himself against such attacks, and his decision to report the matter to the police was a legitimate exercise of this right.

However, the response from journalists and Amnesty International was swift and merciless. Without recourse to the violation of Waiya’s rights, they condemned his actions as an assault on free press and a threat to democracy.

This mob-like response is a classic example of mob reasoning, where emotions and sensationalism override rational thinking and fairness.

#

The implications of this response are far-reaching. If public figures like Ambassador Ibrahim Waiya are not allowed to defend themselves against malicious attacks, it could create a culture of impunity where anyone can make false and defamatory statements without consequence.

Furthermore, the response from journalists and Amnesty International undermines the principles of fairness and justice as enshrined in journalistic ethics.

By failing to consider Waiya’s side of the story and his right to defend himself, Amnesty international, and its co-travellers perpetuated a one-sided narrative that ignored the complexities of the issue at stake.

The controversy surrounding Waiya highlights the need for fairness and balance in public discourse. While free press is essential to democracy, it is equally important to protect the rights and privileges of public figures like Ambassador Waiya.

By prioritizing fairness and justice, we can create a more equitable and just society for all. This requires a commitment to considering multiple perspectives and upholding the rights and privileges of all individuals, including public figures.

The mob-like response from journalists and Amnesty International is a reminder that even in the pursuit of press freedom, we must not trample on the rights of others.

Indeed, Ambassador Waiya’s experience serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of mob reasoning and the importance of upholding fairness and justice in public discourse.

As we move forward, it is essential that we learn from Waiya’s experience and prioritize fairness and balance in public discourse. This requires a commitment to considering multiple perspectives and upholding the rights and privileges of all individuals.

The protection of human rights is essential to creating a just and equitable society. By upholding the rights and privileges of all individuals, including public figures like Waiya, we can create a more just and equitable society for all.

In conclusion, Ambassador Waiya’s experience serves as a powerful reminder of the importance of protecting the rights and privileges of all individuals, including public figures.

The debate surrounding Waiya’s actions is a reminder that the pursuit of press freedom is complex and multifaceted. While it is essential to protect the rights of journalists and writers, it is equally important to uphold the rights and privileges of public figures.

Ultimately, the controversy surrounding Waiya and the opinionated article highlights the need for a more nuanced and balanced approach to public discourse.

By prioritizing fairness and justice, we can create a more equitable and just society for all. This requires a commitment to considering multiple perspectives and upholding the rights and privileges of all individuals.

As we move forward, it is essential that we prioritize fairness and balance in public discourse. This requires a commitment to considering multiple perspectives and upholding the rights and privileges of all individuals.

The importance of protecting the rights and privileges of public figures like Ambassador Waiya cannot be overstated.

By upholding the rights and privileges of all individuals, including public figures, we can create a more just and equitable society for all.

In the end, Ambassador Waiya’s experience serves as a powerful reminder of the importance of prioritizing fairness and balance in public discourse, and it has indeed brought to fore how not to deployed mob reasoning on issues of human rights

Al Amin Ubandoma, a Public Affairs Analyst writes from Lagos.

Continue Reading

Trending