Connect with us

News

Rivers Chief Judge Defies Assembly’s Request of Probe Against Fubara, Citing Court Injunction

Published

on

 

By Yusuf Danjuma Yunusa

 

The Chief Judge of Rivers State, Hon. Justice Simeon C. Amadi, has stated that he is legally restrained from constituting a seven-member panel to investigate allegations of gross misconduct against Governor Sir Siminalayi Fubara and Deputy Governor Prof. Ngozi Nma Odu.

The statement is contained in a letter addressed to the Speaker of the Rivers State House of Assembly, Rt. Hon. Martin Chike Amaewhule, dated January 20, 2026.

In the letter, Justice Amadi referred to two letters from the House of Assembly, both dated January 16, 2026, which requested him “to appoint seven (7) persons to investigate the allegations of gross misconduct against His Excellency, Sir Siminalayi Fubara, GSSRS, the Governor of Rivers State, pursuant to Section 188(5) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended).”

The requests were based on resolutions of the House pursuant to Section 188(4) of the Constitution.

A similar request was made regarding the Deputy Governor, Prof. Ngozi Nma Odu, in the same language and effect, according to the Chief Judge.

Justice Amadi revealed that his office had also received two separate court orders of interim injunction on January 16, 2026 in two suits:

Suit No.: OYHC/6/CS/2026 – Her Excellency, Prof. (Ms.) Ngozi Nma Odu, DSSRS Vs. The Rt. Hon. Martin Amaewhule, DSSRS (Speaker, Rivers State House of Assembly) & 32 Ors and Suit No.: OYHC/7/CS/2026 – His Excellency, Sir Siminalayi Fubara, GSSRS Vs. The Rt. Hon. Martin Chike Amaewhule, DSSRS (Speaker, Rivers State House of Assembly) & 32 Ors.

The Chief Judge is listed as the 32nd Defendant/Respondent in both suits, and the interim orders were served on his office on January 16.

Advert

Justice Amadi cited paragraph 1 of the orders, which reads: “That an interim injunction is hereby made, restraining the 32nd Defendant, i.e., The Hon. Chief Judge of Rivers State from receiving, forwarding, considering and or howsoever acting on any request, resolution, articles of impeachment or other documents or communication from the 1st-27th and 31st Defendants for the purpose of constituting a panel to investigate the purported allegations of misconduct of the Claimant/Applicant for seven days.”

Attached to his letter were certified true copies of the court orders. Justice Amadi emphasized the importance of constitutionalism and the rule of law, noting that “all persons and authorities are expected to obey subsisting orders of court of competent jurisdiction, irrespective of perception of its regularity or otherwise.”

The Chief Judge also referenced case law in support of his position, citing Hon. Dele Abiodun vs. The Hon. Chief Judge of Kwara State & 3 Ors. (2007) 18 NWLR, 109-169, in which the Court of Appeal condemned a Chief Judge for constituting a panel to investigate allegations against an appellant despite a subsisting restraining order.

The court warned, “I liken the scenario created by the Chief Judge to the position of a chief priest and custodian of an oracle turning round to desecrate the oracle. The Chief Judge of the State who is the custodian and head of the judicial arm of the State, ought to abide by the Laws of the State, nay the land…”

Justice Amadi added that the Speaker of the House has already filed an appeal against the interim orders at the Court of Appeal, Port Harcourt Division, with notices served on 19th and 20th January. He explained that under the doctrine of lis pendens, “parties and the court have to await the outcome of the appeal.”

He concluded that, due to the subsisting interim orders and pending appeal, his “hand is fettered” and he is “legally disabled at this point from exercising my duties under Section 188(5) of the Constitution in the instant.”

Justice Amadi urged the Rivers State House of Assembly to “be magnanimous enough to appreciate the legal position of the matter.”

The Assembly had sought the establishment of a seven-member panel to probe Governor Fubara and his deputy, Ngozi Odu, regarding allegations of gross misconduct.

The allegations include the demolition of the Assembly complex, extra-budgetary spending, withholding of funds meant for the Assembly Service Commission, and alleged refusal to comply with a Supreme Court ruling on the financial autonomy of the legislature.

The House commenced the impeachment proceedings days after the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike, accused the governor of reneging on a peace agreement brokered by President Bola Tinubu in 2025.

Consequently, the impeachment proceedings have been halted by the judiciary, creating a tense political deadlock in the state. The path forward now depends on either a resolution of the pending court case or a new legal strategy by the State Assembly.

News

At 89, Obasanjo Reflects: “Leadership’s Burden and Blessing Are Often the Same

Published

on

By Yusuf Danjuma Yunusa

Former President Olusegun Obasanjo marked his 89th birthday not with quiet celebration, but with a characteristically frank discourse on the nature of power, using his own dramatic life story—from military commander to imprisoned dissident to democratically elected president—as the central case study.

Delivering a keynote address at an international colloquium in Abeokuta, the Ogun State capital, Obasanjo described leadership as a double-edged sword: a profound burden that is also a deep privilege. The event, titled “Burden and Blessing of Leadership: Reflections from Global Africa to the World,” saw the elder statesman argue that the quality of a nation’s leaders is the primary determinant of its fate.

Obasanjo opened with a stark personal testament, recalling his imprisonment by the late military ruler Sani Abacha. He framed the experience not just as personal suffering, but as evidence of a core principle.

“My imprisonment proves the price of a principled stand,” he told the audience. “Leadership without principle is mere management. True leadership demands that you say no when yes would be more convenient — and that comes at a cost.”

He argued that many who seek power are seduced by its perks, underestimating the immense personal sacrifices required. Drawing on his experience commanding the Third Marine Commando Division during the Nigerian Civil War, he painted a vivid picture of leadership’s isolating core.

“There is the loneliness of the final decision,” Obasanjo explained. “When all the briefings have been received and all arguments made, you alone must decide. That weight does not distribute itself.” He recalled the final days of the war in January 1970, when he chose restraint to protect civilians. “No textbook told me what to do. The decision was mine alone,” he stated, underscoring the immense moral weight that leaders must carry.

Advert

Despite the hardships—including more than three years in detention—Obasanjo insisted he would choose the same path again. He spoke of the profound fulfilment found in service, describing Nigeria’s first peaceful transition from military to civilian rule in 1979, when he handed over power to Shehu Shagari, as one of the most rewarding moments of his career.

“There is the blessing of having been given the opportunity to matter—to serve at the hinge of history,” he reflected. “It was the relief of having been tested and not found wanting. The greatest burden a man can carry is his country on his shoulders. The greatest blessing he can also receive is that country’s gratitude. At 89, I now understand that the burden and the blessing are often the same.”

Shifting his focus from the personal to the continental, Obasanjo offered a sharp diagnosis of Africa’s struggles, arguing that the root cause is not a lack of resources but a failure of governance.

“Africa is richly endowed—with mineral wealth, vast arable land and the world’s youngest population. By every measure, we should be prosperous and stable,” he noted. “Instead, too much of our continent remains trapped in preventable suffering.”

He placed the blame squarely on poor leadership, weak institutions, and systemic corruption, warning of the fragility inherent in personality-driven governance. “When a country’s trajectory depends solely on the character of one person, that country is permanently fragile,” he cautioned.

Looking forward, Obasanjo called for a fundamental rethinking of the continent’s political and economic models. He urged leaders to adapt democratic systems to local realities without sacrificing the core principles of accountability, transparency, and inclusiveness.

He advocated for a massive investment in leadership development and institutional strengthening, emphasizing that sustainable progress requires systems that outlast any single individual. He also identified the global African diaspora as a critical, underutilized asset and urged governments to create conditions that encourage their engagement and investment.

On the economic front, Obasanjo pointed to the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) as a transformative opportunity that, if fully implemented, could reshape the continent’s global standing.

He concluded with a message of hope and a charge to the next generation, framing leadership as the key to unlocking the continent’s vast potential.

“Africa is not a problem to be managed,” Obasanjo declared. “Africa is a promise to be fulfilled — and leadership is how that promise gets kept.”

Continue Reading

News

Walida Was 16, Not 20’ — Father Fires Back at Women Minister, Demands Justice

Published

on

 

A fresh controversy has emerged in the ongoing case of Walida Abdulhadi, the young woman whose alleged abduction by a Department of State Services (DSS) operative, Ifeanyi Onyewuenyi, has sparked national outrage, as conflicting accounts of her age continue to dominate public discourse.

Walida’s father, Malam Abdulhadi, has strongly rejected a claim by the Minister of Women Affairs, Hajiya Imaan Sulaiman-Ibrahim, that his daughter was about 20 years old at the time of the alleged abduction. He described the minister’s statement as “baseless hearsay,” insisting that family records clearly show that Walida was a minor when she was taken.

Malam Abdulhadi questioned how a government official who is not a member of the family could determine the birth date of his daughter.

“The minister was not the one who gave birth to her,” he said. “I married her mother in 2007, and I can tell you that she was abducted when she was 16 years old. She only recently turned 18.”

Advert

He further dismissed references to what he described as a “strange indigene certificate” allegedly used to support claims about Walida’s age, arguing that the timeline of his marriage and family history provides a clearer basis for verification.

“Is the minister in a position to tell me the age of my daughter when she does not know when I got married to her mother?” he asked. “She should come out publicly and say what she said was not true. It is simply propaganda.”

Adding weight to the family’s position, Walida’s maternal uncle, Malam Yunusa Kani, also challenged the minister’s statement, insisting that the family’s records contradict the official narrative.

According to him, Walida’s mother was married in Anku in 2007 and gave birth to Walida the following year.

“We were witnesses to the marriage ceremony in 2007,” Kani said. “After about a year, the family was blessed with Walida’s birth in 2008. That is the fact. We do not know where the minister got her information.”

He urged the government to handle the matter with fairness and sensitivity, noting that the family had already endured significant emotional distress since the alleged abduction.

“She must remember that public officials will be held accountable for what they say. We plead with the government to take pity on us and ensure justice is done,” he added.

Walida’s younger sister, Fatima Abdulhadi, also spoke during the programme, offering further details about the family timeline.

“I am 14 years old, and my brother who was born after Walida is 16 years old,” she said. “Walida was abducted two years ago.”

Source: Veteran Journalist and a PR Guru Yushau Shuaibu

Continue Reading

News

Former Kano Finance Commissioner Prof. Dandago Is Dead 

Published

on

 

A former Kano State Commissioner for Finance, Professor Kabiru Isa Dandago, is dead.

The renowned accounting and taxation scholar passed away on Wednesday evening at the Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital after a brief illness.

Advert

Until his death, Prof. Dandago was a respected professor of Accounting and Taxation at Bayero University Kano, where he made significant contributions to academic research and financial studies.

His funeral prayers will take place at his residence in Rijiyar Zaki Kano by 9: AM

Continue Reading

Trending