Connect with us

News

IGP, Lagos CP Slammed With ₦500million Lawsuit By Sowore

Published

on

 

By Yusuf Danjuma Yunusa

Human rights activist and former presidential candidate of the African Action Congress (AAC), Omoyele Sowore, has filed a lawsuit seeking ₦500 million in damages against the Nigeria Police Force, the Inspector-General of Police, Kayode Egbetokun, and the Lagos State Commissioner of Police, Moshood Jimoh. The legal action alleges a violation of his fundamental human rights.

In the suit, which was lodged at the Federal High Court in Lagos, Sowore is petitioning for the enforcement of his fundamental rights to human dignity, personal liberty, and freedom of movement. He bases his claim on the provisions of Sections 34, 35, 39, 40, 41, and 46 of the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria (as amended), in addition to Articles 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, and 12 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights.

The lawsuit, filed by a team of human rights lawyers including Tope Temokun, Marshal Abubakar, Inibehe Effiong, A.E. Adegoroye, Moshood Shittu, Deji Adeyanju, O.D. Olatunde, and I.E. Osunyikanmi, follows a public declaration by the Lagos State Commissioner of Police on November 3, 2025, naming Sowore as a “wanted person.”

In an affidavit of urgency personally deposed to by Sowore, he stated that on November 3, 2025, the Commissioner of Police, Lagos State, publicly declared him “wanted” through the media, despite no prior invitation, warrant, or charge being issued against him.

The motion, brought pursuant to Order of the Fundamental Rights (Enforcement Procedure) Rules 2009, seeks several urgent reliefs, including: “AN ORDER granting LEAVE to the Applicant to serve the originating processes in this suit and the hearing notices for the court sittings, on the 2nd and 3rd Respondents, by substituted means, to wit; By serving the 2nd and 3rd Respondents, through the 3rd Respondent’s state command i.e. the office of the 1st Respondent, the commissioner of police of Lagos State, lagos State Police Command. Ikeja, by delivering to the said state command i.c. .the office of the 1st Respondent, each copy of the originating processes and/or hearing notices meant for each of the gnd and 3rd Respondents.

Advert

“An order of interim injunction restraining the Respondents, , particularly the 1 Respondent, the Commissioner of Police, Lagos State, whether by themsclves, their servants, agents, officers, or privies, from harassing and/or intimidating and/or threatening with arrest and/or arresting and/or further declaring, representing, or in any manner portraying the Applicant as a “wanted person” or fugitive, pending the hearing and determination of the Motion on Notice.

“An order of interim stay of operation and action on the effect of the public declaration made by the 1st Respondent, the Commissioner of Police, Lagos State, describing or declaring the Applicant, Mr. Omoyele Sowore, as a “wanted person”, pending the hearing and determination of the Motion on Notice.

“AND FOR SUCH FURTHER ORDER OR ORDERS as this Honourable Court may deem fit to make in the circumstance.”

Sowore deposed that he had not been served with any formal police invitation or warrant of arrest, adding that his constitutional rights to dignity, liberty, and free movement had been severely impaired by the actions of the police.

The activist, who described himself as a law-abiding citizen, emphasised that if he had been invited for any lawful investigation, he would have honoured such invitation.

He argued that the declaration by the Lagos Police Commissioner unlawfully tainted his reputation as a respected journalist and former presidential candidate, noting that it was intended to stifle his freedom and silence his activism.

Sowore urged the court to restrain the police and their agents from further harassing, intimidating, or arresting him, and to set aside the public declaration labeling him as a wanted person.

The Affidavit Of Urgency reads, “That unless restrained urgently by this Honourable Court, the Respondents will continue to threaten and harass me everywhere I go.

“That I am not also aware of any offences committed by me and neither have I been extended any prior invitation before the 1st Respondent’s declaration on the 3rd day of November, 2025.

“That I am a law abiding citizen and if extended invitation by the 1st Respondent for a crime known to law, I would have honoured such invitation.

“That I am a person of high repute, being a human right activist, journalist, pro-democracy campaigner, and former presidential candidate in this country and the declaration of the 1st Respondent declaring me as a “wanted” criminal unlawfully taints my reputation and dignity contrary to my social status and that if unchecked or unrestrained now, the 1st Respondent and the 2nd and 3rd Respondents will give effect to a declaration I am still challenging here and stifle my freedom of movement and my right to personal liberty will be taken away,

“That since service is fundamental to the jurisdiction of the court, and difficulty in service of processes and hcaring notices might delay this case, it has become necessary to depose to the urgency of this matter as I scek leave of this Honourable Court to grant me leave to the applicant to serve the originating processes on the 2nd and 3rd respondents through the mode sought on the motion paper.

“That it is in the interest of justice to grant this application.

“That I depose to this affidavit in good faith, contentiously believing same to be true and in accordance with the Oaths Act.”

News

BREAKING: President Tinubu Removes IGP Egbetokun

Published

on

 

 

By Yusuf Danjuma Yunusa

President Bola Tinubu has officially sacked Kayode Egbetokun from his position as Inspector General of Police. The announcement was confirmed by senior police officials and sources within the Police Service Commission

Tunji Disu, currently the Assistant Inspector General in charge of the Force Criminal Investigation Department (FCID) Annex in Alagbon, Lagos, has been named as Egbetokun’s successor.

A source revealed, “Egbetokun was at the Presidential Villa yesterday and was instructed to prepare his handover notes. He has likely done so already and will hand over to Tunji Disu.” The source further described Egbetokun as “incompetent and power-drunk,” with many scandals marking his tenure. The President reportedly advised him to step down and focus on treatment for kidney-related health issues.

Advert

The decision to remove Egbetokun has reportedly been met with widespread approval among police officers. “Police officers jubilated when the news broke on Monday. Although the First Lady, Remi Tinubu, reportedly wanted him to remain, the President was resolute on the matter,” a source added.

Egbetokun’s time as IGP was marred by controversy, including his extended stay beyond the mandatory retirement age and years of service, sparking debates over violations of police service regulations. Allegations of nepotism and favoritism also dogged his tenure, with investigations highlighting rapid and questionable promotions within his close circle, particularly involving Bukola Yemisi Kuti, his Principal Staff Officer, who critics claim had a personal relationship with him.

Further controversy arose from reports linking ₦100 million from Anambra State’s security vote to Victor, Egbetokun’s son. Critics raised alarms about the possible diversion of state funds for private benefit, allegations that were met with aggressive legal actions by police authorities against journalists and activists who reported on these issues.

Continue Reading

News

APC Governors Cry Foul After the Removal of Indirect Primaries

Published

on

 

By Yusuf Danjuma Yunusa

 

Just over a week after President Bola Tinubu assented to the 2026 Electoral Act, signs of discord have emerged within the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC). According to reports from leadership, a number of APC governors are deeply unhappy with the removal of the indirect primary election mode from the newly signed legislation.

According to party insiders, the governors feel they were outmaneuvered by federal lawmakers, who they claim drove the amendment process with unusual speed, culminating in the President’s prompt assent.

“We feel frustrated and ambushed,” a governor from the South-East region was quoted as telling an aide to President Tinubu during a meeting in Abuja on Sunday. The source added that the South-East governor was accompanied by a colleague from the South-West to voice their collective concerns. Their primary grievance, it was gathered, is that the new law significantly curtails their influence over the candidate selection process within the party.

At the heart of the dispute is the removal of the indirect primaries option. The previous Electoral Act of 2022, in Section 84(2), allowed political parties to nominate candidates through direct, indirect, or consensus primaries. The new 2026 Act, however, prescribes only direct and consensus primaries in Section 84.

The indirect system, often referred to as the delegate system, has historically been a powerful tool for state governors, who typically wield significant control over the selection of delegates. The new direct primary mode, which mandates voting by all registered party members, is seen by the governors as a move that dilutes their control over who flies the party’s flag, particularly for National Assembly seats.

Advert

A credible source within the party elaborated on the governors’ perspective, stating that they felt sidelined during the legislative process. “All the governors elected on the APC platform are committed to complementing the efforts of our leader and President, Bola Ahmed Tinubu,” the source said. “But the events of the last few days have felt like an ambush. There is a growing frustration that the President may be prioritising the counsel of some lawmakers over that of the governors.”

The source clarified that the governors’ opposition is not to the entire bill but to specific provisions. “It’s not that they have many issues with the entire Bill, but they had tabled specific reservations with Mr. President, particularly regarding the selection of National Assembly candidates for the 2027 elections. He had given his consent on those points. The governors believe they have a better grasp of the grassroots and who is electable.

Their plan was to complement Mr. President by ensuring the nomination of strong candidates. Now, they feel ambushed and frustrated that they may be sidelined from nominating candidates for the National Assembly elections.”

Responding to the reports, the Chairman of the APC Governors’ Forum and Governor of Imo State, Senator Hope Uzodimma, moved to quell the narrative of a rift, stating that governors were not outwitted and remain loyal to the party and national interest.

In a statement released through his Chief Press Secretary and Special Adviser on Media, Hon. Oguwike Nwachuku, Governor Uzodimma described the amendment process as a purely legislative affair. He stressed that the lawmakers acted in the national interest and that the resulting framework is for the overall good of the populace.

“The legislators deliberated on it and arrived at a compromise, which the president assented to,” Governor Uzodimma was quoted as saying. He emphasised that as responsible and responsive members of the party, “they are loyal to every decision of the party.”

He further submitted that the governors have “no reason to feel outwitted,” as the actions were taken “for the well-being and overall good and benefit of the populace.”

President Tinubu signed the Electoral Act Amendment Bill 2026 into law last Wednesday. The signing proceeded despite public debate over another contentious clause that makes the electronic transmission of election results optional. The final version of the Bill notably deleted the indirect primary option, retaining only the direct and consensus modes.

Continue Reading

News

BREAKING: El-Rufai Suffers Nose Bleeding in EFCC Custody, Family Denied Access

Published

on

 

By Yusuf Danjuma Yunusa

Former Kaduna State Governor, Mallam Nasir Ahmad El-Rufai, is currently in custody following his voluntary appearance for questioning at the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

El-Rufai arrived at the EFCC headquarters in Abuja on Monday, February 16, 2026, after returning from Egypt on February 12. According to his media team, he has been detained since his arrival, with no official reports of interrogations been carried out.

A statement released via El-Rufai’s official social media account by his media adviser, Muyiwa Adekeye, raised concerns over the conditions of his detention. Mr. Adekeye alleged that the former governor experienced a nosebleed during the night following his detention.

Advert

The statement further claimed that family members and legal representatives have faced significant difficulties in gaining access to him.

“Ubong Akpan also complained that lawyers and family were having difficulties in securing access to him in detention,” the statement read. “One of his wives was not allowed to deliver his meal directly to him in the evening of 17th February but was asked to pass it to him through one of the commission’s personnel. His lawyers have reported that he suffered an overnight episode of bleeding from his nose.”

It has been confirmed that El-Rufai has been transferred from EFCC custody to the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC). He is scheduled to appear in court on Wednesday, February 25, 2026, in connection with charges related to cybercrime.

As of the time of this report, neither the EFCC nor the ICPC has issued a statement regarding the alleged health incident or the conditions of his detention.

Continue Reading

Trending