Connect with us

News

News Analysis: Independence Day Cancellation Sparks Political Tensions and Public Reflection”

Published

on

 

 

By Yusuf Danjuma Yunusa, Nigerian Tracker Correspondent

As expected, the Federal Government of Nigeria was to facilitate the parade procession at Eagles Square every morning of October 1, celebrating the country’s independence. But it took most Nigerians aback when the President, through his Secretary, George Akume, disclosed that the Independence Day celebration was not going to hold. The announcement was contained in a press statement released by the Secretary to the Government of the Federation:

“The Federal Government wishes to announce the cancellation of the Independence Anniversary parade, previously scheduled to mark the 65th independence on Wednesday, 1st October. The cancellation is in no way a diminishment of the significance of this milestone anniversary,” the statement, as read, was signed by the Director of Information and Public Relations, Segun Imohiosen.

The announcement took most Nigerians by surprise because no single reason was mentioned as to why the celebration was cancelled—unlike other cases in which the reason, even though not given, made itself glaring why the celebration couldn’t hold.

Such moments were, first in 1966–1967 during the civil war, which brought chaos into the country. Second was in 1992 when Ibrahim Babangida made such a cancellation announcement in honor of the victims of the Nigerian Air Force Lockheed C-130 Hercules plane crash in Ejigbo, Lagos, in which 159 persons, mainly military officers, lost their lives. Third was in 2010 when the celebration was marred by explosions from two cars parked near Eagles Square, which took the lives of many and injured a few others. Due to the incident, the celebration for the following years did not hold until 2014. Fourth was during the COVID-19 pandemic. The outbreak didn’t allow the celebration to flow as it should have, hence the low-key procession by the late President Buhari at the Villa.

Obviously, the years in which the Independence Anniversary celebration didn’t hold presented themselves with reasons, and those reasons were genuine. So, why did the incumbent President Tinubu cancel the celebration without a reason?

In another development, the Commissioner of Police in Kano State, Ibrahim Adamu Bakori, was accused by the State Governor, Abba Kabir Yusuf, of boycotting the Independence Anniversary celebration in the state by withdrawing police personnel who should have taken part in the procession at the Sani Abacha Stadium, despite his unambiguous instructions to make provision for security for the event.

Out of displeasure, the Governor then called on the President, Bola Ahmad Tinubu, to immediately redeploy the State Police Commissioner for his “unethical” behavior:

Advert

“The Commissioner of Police has embarrassed us by his conduct,” Yusuf said. “His action is unprofessional, unethical, and contrary to what is expected of a security chief on such a historic day for the people of Kano and indeed for Nigeria as a whole.”

He continued, “On behalf of myself as the Chief Security Officer of the state, and the good people of Kano, I call on President Bola Ahmad Tinubu to remove CP Ibrahim Adamu Bakori, today.”

Since 1960, when the first ceremony was held at the Race Course, now Tafawa Balewa Square in Lagos, the military parade has become a significant aspect of the Independence Day celebration, with heads of government at various tiers taking the salute as the armed forces, paramilitary outfits, and school children march past. Independence Day was given more relevance by the actions of past leaders, such as when Olusegun Obasanjo, during his military regime, decided to hand over power to civil administration on the 1st of October 1979.

Similarly, the then Head of State, General Sani Abacha, added to the relevance of the day when he announced the creation of six new states—Bayelsa, Ebonyi, Ekiti, Gombe, Nasarawa, and Zamfara—on October 1, 1996, a pronouncement that brought the number of states in Nigeria to the current 36. These six states have since then celebrated the day as the anniversary of their creation.

Did States Follow Suit in the Cancellation?

The South-East region presented a unique case. Following the federal directive, all five states (Abia, Anambra, Ebonyi, Enugu, and Imo) officially canceled government-sponsored celebrations. This was largely due to the prevailing socio-political climate in the region, where October 1st is often viewed with ambivalence. The federal cancellation provided a convenient reason to forego an event that typically has low public enthusiasm there.

Cross River State organized a tree-planting exercise to mark the day, framing it as an “investment in Nigeria’s future.” Delta State held a “solemn symposium” on national unity with civil society groups instead of a parade.

In Rivers State, Governor Siminalayi Fubara presided over a brief flag-raising ceremony at the Government House, attended only by top government functionaries, with no public fanfare. A statement emphasized “the symbolic importance of the day without extravagant spending.”

Bayelsa State government cited the need to redirect resources to flood preparedness and mitigation efforts. Edo State announced a low-key workday and suspended official festivities. Ekiti and Ondo States canceled celebrations and encouraged citizens to engage in community service.

In a nutshell, the federal directive resulted in a largely compliant but politically fractured response. The overwhelming compliance from APC states was anticipated. However, the bold defiance from Kano State—a major political and commercial hub—and the subsequent constitutional crisis over control of the police has become the defining story of the 2025 Independence Day. It demonstrates the potent role of sub-national politics in challenging federal authority and sets a tense precedent for future interactions between the NNPP-led Kano State and the APC-led Federal Government.

The Potent Questions Remain:

1. Was the defiance by the Kano State Governor merely about preserving the relevance of the Independence Day anniversary, or is it a reflection of differences in their political ideologies that might serve as a proxy for larger political battles?
2. Was the President wrong for canceling the celebration without a reason?

On the non participation of Kano police command during the independence parade the force Headquarters is yet to issue a statememt.

News

BREAKING: President Tinubu Removes IGP Egbetokun

Published

on

 

 

By Yusuf Danjuma Yunusa

President Bola Tinubu has officially sacked Kayode Egbetokun from his position as Inspector General of Police. The announcement was confirmed by senior police officials and sources within the Police Service Commission

Tunji Disu, currently the Assistant Inspector General in charge of the Force Criminal Investigation Department (FCID) Annex in Alagbon, Lagos, has been named as Egbetokun’s successor.

A source revealed, “Egbetokun was at the Presidential Villa yesterday and was instructed to prepare his handover notes. He has likely done so already and will hand over to Tunji Disu.” The source further described Egbetokun as “incompetent and power-drunk,” with many scandals marking his tenure. The President reportedly advised him to step down and focus on treatment for kidney-related health issues.

Advert

The decision to remove Egbetokun has reportedly been met with widespread approval among police officers. “Police officers jubilated when the news broke on Monday. Although the First Lady, Remi Tinubu, reportedly wanted him to remain, the President was resolute on the matter,” a source added.

Egbetokun’s time as IGP was marred by controversy, including his extended stay beyond the mandatory retirement age and years of service, sparking debates over violations of police service regulations. Allegations of nepotism and favoritism also dogged his tenure, with investigations highlighting rapid and questionable promotions within his close circle, particularly involving Bukola Yemisi Kuti, his Principal Staff Officer, who critics claim had a personal relationship with him.

Further controversy arose from reports linking ₦100 million from Anambra State’s security vote to Victor, Egbetokun’s son. Critics raised alarms about the possible diversion of state funds for private benefit, allegations that were met with aggressive legal actions by police authorities against journalists and activists who reported on these issues.

Continue Reading

News

APC Governors Cry Foul After the Removal of Indirect Primaries

Published

on

 

By Yusuf Danjuma Yunusa

 

Just over a week after President Bola Tinubu assented to the 2026 Electoral Act, signs of discord have emerged within the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC). According to reports from leadership, a number of APC governors are deeply unhappy with the removal of the indirect primary election mode from the newly signed legislation.

According to party insiders, the governors feel they were outmaneuvered by federal lawmakers, who they claim drove the amendment process with unusual speed, culminating in the President’s prompt assent.

“We feel frustrated and ambushed,” a governor from the South-East region was quoted as telling an aide to President Tinubu during a meeting in Abuja on Sunday. The source added that the South-East governor was accompanied by a colleague from the South-West to voice their collective concerns. Their primary grievance, it was gathered, is that the new law significantly curtails their influence over the candidate selection process within the party.

At the heart of the dispute is the removal of the indirect primaries option. The previous Electoral Act of 2022, in Section 84(2), allowed political parties to nominate candidates through direct, indirect, or consensus primaries. The new 2026 Act, however, prescribes only direct and consensus primaries in Section 84.

The indirect system, often referred to as the delegate system, has historically been a powerful tool for state governors, who typically wield significant control over the selection of delegates. The new direct primary mode, which mandates voting by all registered party members, is seen by the governors as a move that dilutes their control over who flies the party’s flag, particularly for National Assembly seats.

Advert

A credible source within the party elaborated on the governors’ perspective, stating that they felt sidelined during the legislative process. “All the governors elected on the APC platform are committed to complementing the efforts of our leader and President, Bola Ahmed Tinubu,” the source said. “But the events of the last few days have felt like an ambush. There is a growing frustration that the President may be prioritising the counsel of some lawmakers over that of the governors.”

The source clarified that the governors’ opposition is not to the entire bill but to specific provisions. “It’s not that they have many issues with the entire Bill, but they had tabled specific reservations with Mr. President, particularly regarding the selection of National Assembly candidates for the 2027 elections. He had given his consent on those points. The governors believe they have a better grasp of the grassroots and who is electable.

Their plan was to complement Mr. President by ensuring the nomination of strong candidates. Now, they feel ambushed and frustrated that they may be sidelined from nominating candidates for the National Assembly elections.”

Responding to the reports, the Chairman of the APC Governors’ Forum and Governor of Imo State, Senator Hope Uzodimma, moved to quell the narrative of a rift, stating that governors were not outwitted and remain loyal to the party and national interest.

In a statement released through his Chief Press Secretary and Special Adviser on Media, Hon. Oguwike Nwachuku, Governor Uzodimma described the amendment process as a purely legislative affair. He stressed that the lawmakers acted in the national interest and that the resulting framework is for the overall good of the populace.

“The legislators deliberated on it and arrived at a compromise, which the president assented to,” Governor Uzodimma was quoted as saying. He emphasised that as responsible and responsive members of the party, “they are loyal to every decision of the party.”

He further submitted that the governors have “no reason to feel outwitted,” as the actions were taken “for the well-being and overall good and benefit of the populace.”

President Tinubu signed the Electoral Act Amendment Bill 2026 into law last Wednesday. The signing proceeded despite public debate over another contentious clause that makes the electronic transmission of election results optional. The final version of the Bill notably deleted the indirect primary option, retaining only the direct and consensus modes.

Continue Reading

News

BREAKING: El-Rufai Suffers Nose Bleeding in EFCC Custody, Family Denied Access

Published

on

 

By Yusuf Danjuma Yunusa

Former Kaduna State Governor, Mallam Nasir Ahmad El-Rufai, is currently in custody following his voluntary appearance for questioning at the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

El-Rufai arrived at the EFCC headquarters in Abuja on Monday, February 16, 2026, after returning from Egypt on February 12. According to his media team, he has been detained since his arrival, with no official reports of interrogations been carried out.

A statement released via El-Rufai’s official social media account by his media adviser, Muyiwa Adekeye, raised concerns over the conditions of his detention. Mr. Adekeye alleged that the former governor experienced a nosebleed during the night following his detention.

Advert

The statement further claimed that family members and legal representatives have faced significant difficulties in gaining access to him.

“Ubong Akpan also complained that lawyers and family were having difficulties in securing access to him in detention,” the statement read. “One of his wives was not allowed to deliver his meal directly to him in the evening of 17th February but was asked to pass it to him through one of the commission’s personnel. His lawyers have reported that he suffered an overnight episode of bleeding from his nose.”

It has been confirmed that El-Rufai has been transferred from EFCC custody to the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC). He is scheduled to appear in court on Wednesday, February 25, 2026, in connection with charges related to cybercrime.

As of the time of this report, neither the EFCC nor the ICPC has issued a statement regarding the alleged health incident or the conditions of his detention.

Continue Reading

Trending