Connect with us

Opinion

Nigeria’s Democracy on the line as politicians wield media outlets

Published

on

 

By Alhassan A. Bala

As the Fourth Realm of the state as well as the known watchdog of society, a media house is an entity that delivers news, information, or entertainment to the public through various channels.

Nowadays, these channels can include traditional media like newspapers, magazines, radio, and television, as well as newer platforms like websites, social media, and online video platforms.

Therefore, a media outlet acts as a bridge between creators of content and the audience and shoulders the burden of presenting such contents as truthful as they are.

Suffice it to say, however that when a Nigerian politician acquires a radio, newspaper or a broadcast station, he/she is not merely diversifying his/her business portfolio; rather he/she is ostensibility purchasing a direct influence over our national conversation.

As more of our elected officials and political elites secure ownership stakes in media outlets across Nigeria, we witness a dangerous blurring lines between those making policy decisions and those tasked with scrutinising them. This troubling trend poses a serious threat to our still-maturing democracy.

As a journalist that started the carrier with a privately-own media organisation, who later moved to an international media organisation and having covered Nigerian politics for over a decade, I’ve observed this pattern with growing alarm: acquisition is followed by subtle editorial shifts, culminating in the transformation of once-credible news organisations into partisan mouthpieces that serve their owners’ political ambitions.

The evidence surrounds us daily. Major broadcast networks linked to prominent political figures consistently frame national issues to advance specific political agendas. Several newspapers owned by serving or former governors remain conspicuously silent on corruption allegations against their proprietors. Media houses connected to ruling party stalwarts reliably amplify government achievements while downplaying policy failures. Meanwhile, opposition-owned outlets focus exclusively on criticising the government without offering constructive alternatives.

The damage extends beyond mere partisan bias. Journalists working for politically-owned media houses practice self-censorship to protect their livelihoods. Investigations into corruption involving politically-connected figures mysteriously disappear. Critical national issues like security challenges in the North receive shallow coverage shaped by owners’ interests rather than public welfare.

Advert

This represents a fundamental corruption of journalism’s essential role in our society. Some argue the proliferation of online media will solve this problem that Nigerians will recognise bias and find alternative sources. This underestimates how information environments function, particularly in a country where digital literacy and media literacy remains uneven and data costs limit many citizens’ access to diverse news sources.

The economic realities make matters even worse. Independent journalism in Nigeria operates under extreme financial pressure, while politician-owned media houses benefit from government advertising, exclusive access to information, and sometimes, protection from regulatory scrutiny.

The Nigerian Broadcasting Commission and other regulatory bodies often find themselves powerless against media operations backed by powerful political interests. This creates an impossibly uneven landscape for truly independent voices to survive.

What’s at stake isn’t merely abstract journalistic principles. It’s Nigeria’s future as a functional democracy. When politicians control the narratives about their own performance, they effectively shield themselves from accountability. This undermines the very foundation of representative governance that Nigerians fought so hard to establish after decades of military rule.

Consider how this affected our last general elections. Media houses aligned with different political interests presented completely different versions of reality. Facts became malleable, election results contested not based on evidence but on media narratives crafted by politically-owned outlets. How can Nigerians make informed electoral choices when the information environment is so thoroughly polluted by political interests?

Let me be clear about what must change: First, we need stronger enforcement of existing media ownership transparency laws by the Corporate Affairs Commission. Nigerians deserve to know who truly owns the media they consume. Second, the Nigerian Broadcasting Commission must become truly independent, free from political interference when making regulatory decisions. Third, we need specific legislation limiting political figures’ ownership stakes in media enterprises.

Most importantly, we need civic education that helps Nigerians critically evaluate news sources and recognise when political interests shape coverage. And we must support the few remaining independent media organisations through subscriptions and advocacy.

Some will dismiss these concerns as partisan; they’re not. This problem transcends party lines and affects both APC and PDP aligned media equally. Whether media houses serve ruling party interests or opposition agendas, the fundamental issue remains: the corruption of journalism’s essential function as a check on power.

A Nigeria where politicians control significant portions of the media landscape is like a courtroom where judges take instructions from defendants. The appearance of democratic process remains, but the substance of accountability cannot survive. If we value the Nigeria our founding fathers envisioned, a true federation of informed citizens capable of self-governance we must demand information systems that serve the public, not political paymasters.

The choice before us is stark: accept a future where political elites manipulate our understanding of national challenges, or fight for independent journalism that pursues truth regardless of who holds power. Nigeria’s democratic experiment depends on choosing wisely.

 

Alhassan A. Bala is the founder/Editor of Alkalanci, a fact-checking and media literacy platform, writes from Abuja and can be reached at editor@alkalanci.com

Opinion

Beyond the Godfather’s Shadow: Why Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf Chose Kano Over a Provincial Presidential Quest

Published

on

 

​By Kabiru Sani Dogo Maiwanki

​The recent pronouncements by Senator Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso regarding Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf’s strategic political recalibration have finally stripped away the façade, exposing the profound ideological fissures within the NNPP hierarchy. In a caustic address delivered Saturday evening, the Senator characterized the Governor’s newfound autonomy as a “betrayal” of a far more egregious nature than that of his predecessor, Abdullahi Ganduje. However, in this vitriolic attempt to cast himself as the victim of political infidelity, Kwankwaso inadvertently betrayed a disconcerting truth: he viewed the incumbent administration not as a sovereign executive entity, but as a subordinate instrument of his personal political estate.

​Senator Kwankwaso remarked that, as a presidential hopeful, his fundamental expectation was that the administration he purportedly “installed” would function as a geopolitical centrifuge—a financial and logistical catalyst designed to project the Kwankwasiyya hegemony into neighboring Northwestern territories. He expressed profound chagrin that, over two years into this mandate, the machinery of the Kano State government has not been weaponized to “conquer” even Jigawa State for his political brand. This revelation is remarkably candid; it implies that the Senator’s patronage of the current administration was never rooted in the socio-economic advancement of the Kano populace, but was instead a cynical stratagem to treat the state’s commonwealth as a private war chest for a singular, ego-driven presidential odyssey.

Advert

​By resisting this role, Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf has committed what Kwankwaso perceives as an unpardonable “sin,” but what objective observers must recognize as a courageous act of institutional integrity. The Governor’s refusal to allow the Kano State treasury to be cannibalized for regional political expansion is a resounding victory for fiscal prudence and administrative transparency. It represents a principled rejection of the archaic practice where public commonwealth is weaponized to bolster the narrow political interests of a singular godfather at the expense of the citizenry.

​The depth of the Senator’s desperation is now laid bare for all to see. In a striking reversal from his usual posture of absolute authority, Kwankwaso has been reduced to making public appeals for reconciliation. His recent plea—openly asking anyone with access to the Governor to “beg him to come back”—reveals a leader who has finally grasped the magnitude of his loss. It is the sound of a man who realizes that the “innocent aide” he once underrated has not only secured his independence but has taken the soul of the movement with him.

​It is therefore essential for Kwankwaso and other political leaders who pride themselves on their political stature to realize that there is a limit to how long they can continue to deceive and exploit their followers. Respect must be reciprocal; whether between a leader and the led, there is a definitive limit to the amount of insult, manipulation, and contempt any person can endure.

Whenever you push a supporter to the brink and their patience finally runs out, the consequences of their anger will certainly be unpleasant for those in power.
​For the well-meaning people of Kano, this is a moment to offer unalloyed commendation. Governor Abba deserves praise for his steadfastness in protecting the state’s allocations and for prioritizing the welfare of the masses over the expansionist agenda of a political empire. Abba Kabir Yusuf has chosen to be the custodian of the people’s trust rather than a puppet for personal ambition, and in doing so, he has redefined the essence of leadership in Kano.

Continue Reading

Opinion

From Zamfara roots to national vision: Aliyu Muhammad Adamu, seasoned media leader, returns home to serve his people.”

Published

on

 

Aliyu Muhammad Adamu was born on 29th December 1982 in Tsafe Local Government Area of Zamfara State, into the respected Adamu Joji family.

He hails from a lineage that includes notable family members such as Alhaji Sanda Adamu Tsafe (Sarkin Yakin Tsafe), Alhaji Aliyu Adamu (Danmadami), Alhaji Sani Adamu, Hajiya Khadija Adamu (Gwoggo Dala), and Hajiya Amina, among others.

His father, Muhammad Adamu (popularly known as Nata’ala), later relocated to Kano State in pursuit of business expansion. As a result, Aliyu and his siblings were raised in Kano, where he began his early education at Da’awa Primary School, Kano.

Driven by a strong connection to his roots, Aliyu returned to Zamfara State for his secondary education, attending Unity Secondary School, Gummi. He subsequently gained admission into Bayero University, Kano (BUK), where he obtained both his Diploma and Bachelor’s Degree, graduating in 2010.

Advert

After completing his National Youth Service Corps (NYSC), Aliyu faced the realities of life with resilience and determination, navigating through challenges that shaped his character and leadership capacity. In 2014, he returned to Zamfara State and began his professional career in the media industry with Gamji Television and Radio.

Through dedication, hard work, and professional excellence, he served the organization for nearly ten years, rising through the ranks to become the General Manager of the station, an achievement that underscored his leadership, administrative competence, and commitment to public communication.

In 2023, Aliyu voluntarily resigned from the media organization and relocated to Kano State in pursuit of broader opportunities and personal development. Today, driven by a renewed sense of purpose and a lifelong commitment to his people, Aliyu Muhammad Adamu is preparing to return to his hometown to seek the support and mandate of his people. His aspiration is to represent our parents, brothers, and sisters at the federal level, with a clear vision of contributing meaningfully to the development, unity, and overall progress of Zamfara State.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Opinion:The Anatomy Of A Hoax- Setting The Record Straight On Governor Abba Yusuf

Published

on

 

 

​By Ahmed Badamasi Tsaure

​The recent wave of political “scoops” regarding the purported defection of Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf of Kano State to the All Progressives Congress (APC) has moved beyond mere speculation into a coordinated campaign of character assassination. Most notably, reports by Daily Nigerian claiming the Governor’s move was “postponed” are masterpieces of fiction, designed to paint a sitting Governor as indecisive and subordinate. As a witness to the political realities in Kano, I find it necessary to dismantle these fallacies with the facts that the purveyors of this rumor have conveniently ignored. In Nigerian politics, defection is a statutory process requiring a formal resignation from one’s current party. To date, Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf has not submitted any resignation from the New Nigeria Peoples Party (NNPP). To claim that a “finalized arrangement” for a Monday registration existed is a procedural hallucination; one cannot join a new house without first stepping out of the old one.
​Furthermore, the narrative suggests the Governor’s plans were shelved because he failed to seek the “blessings” of local APC bigwigs. This is a laughable distortion of executive power. History is replete with Governors who defected based on executive conviction without the interference of local APC “big wigs.” We have seen this with the Governor of Delta vs. Senator Omo-Agege, the Governor of Bayelsa vs. David Lyon and Minister Heineken Lokpobiri, the Governor of Rivers vs. Nyesom Wike, and the Governor of Plateau vs. the current National Chairman of the APC. More recently, the defections of Governors like Dave Umahi (Ebonyi), Ben Ayade (Cross River), and Bello Matawalle (Zamfara) proved that when a Governor moves, he does so as the new leader of the party in his state. It is also historically hypocritical to label such a move as “betrayal.” When Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso defected from the PDP to the APC in 2013, he did not seek permission from any person or leadership—he led a rebellion based on his own conviction. If it was “principled politics” for the godfather then, it cannot be “betrayal” for the Governor now.

Advert

​What, then, remains for a Governor who already holds the overwhelming mandate of his people? It is a known fact that Governor Abba Yusuf moves with the ironclad support of almost 95% of the Kano State House of Assembly, 50% of the National Assembly members from the state, all 44 Local Government chairmen, and the entire grassroots party structure. The desperate attempt by the NNPP National Working Committee to dissolve the Kano executive committees is a futile, “too-late” maneuver that only confirms their loss of control. When a Governor commands such total loyalty, he does not ask for permission; he leads. The defection of Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf is inevitable if he so wishes, as he carries the entire political soul of Kano with him.
​The theory that the APC postponed this move because Senator Kwankwaso is not coming along simply does not hold water. Kwankwaso’s refusal to join the APC is a settled matter; it is alleged the President offered him a ministerial position or the Chairmanship of the soon-to-be resuscitated Petroleum Trust Fund (PTF), both of which he rejected after his demand to join the Presidential ticket was denied. Using this stalemate as a pretext for the Governor’s “indecision” is a transparent lie aimed at making the Governor look like a political appendage. It is disheartening to see Daily Nigerian abandon objective journalism to frame the Governor as a “betrayer.” If Governor Abba Yusuf chooses to move, he does so as a leader of a massive political movement. The media must stop concocting stories to mislead the public. Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf remains focused on his mandate. These rumors are merely the desperate gasps of those who wish to see Kano in perpetual turmoil.

​Ahmed Badamasi Tsaure writes from Shanono Local Government, Kano State. He can be reached at ahmedtsaure28@gmail.com.

Continue Reading

Trending