Connect with us

News

Proposed Tax Reform Bills Not Against The North -Presidency

Published

on

 

Governors of 19 Northern States of Nigeria, under the platform of the Northern Governors’ Forum, at their meeting on Monday, October 28, 2024, expressed their opposition to the new derivation-based model for Value-Added Tax (VAT) distribution in the new tax reform bills before the National Assembly.

Chairman of the forum, Governor Muhammed Inuwa Yahaya of Gombe State, read the communiqué.

The Northern Governors’ Forum meeting also had traditional rulers from the region, led by the Sultan of Sokoto, His Eminence Muhammadu Sa’ad Abubakar III, in attendance.

While we commend the Governors and traditional rulers for supporting President Bola Tinubu over the success recorded in addressing the country’s security challenges, we consider it necessary to address the misunderstandings and misgivings around the tax reform already embarked upon by the administration.

President Tinubu and the Federal Executive Council recently endorsed new policy initiatives aimed at streamlining Nigeria’s tax administration processes, enhancing efficiency and eliminating redundancies across the nation’s tax operations.

These reforms emerged after an extensive review of existing tax laws. The National Assembly is considering four executive bills designed to transform and modernise Nigeria’s tax landscape.

First is the Nigeria Tax Bill, which aims to eliminate unintended multiple taxation and make Nigeria’s economy more competitive by simplifying tax obligations for businesses and individuals nationwide.

Second, the Nigeria Tax Administration Bill (NTAB) proposes new rules governing the administration of all taxes in the country. Its objective is to harmonise tax administrative processes across federal, state and local jurisdictions for ease of compliance for taxpayers in all parts of the country.

Third, the Nigeria Revenue Service (Establishment) Bill seeks to rename the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) as the Nigeria Revenue Service (NRS) to better reflect the mandate of the Service as the revenue agency for the entire federation, not just the Federal Government.

Fourth, the Joint Revenue Board Establishment Bill proposes the creation of a Joint Revenue Board to replace the Joint Tax Board, covering federal and all states’ tax authorities.

The fourth bill also suggests establishing the Office of Tax Ombudsman under the Joint Revenue Board, which would serve as a complaint resolution body for taxpayers.

It is instructive to note that these proposed laws will not increase the number of taxes currently in operation. Instead, they are designed to optimise and simplify existing tax frameworks.

The tax rates or percentages will remain the same under these reforms, as they focus on ensuring a more equitable distribution of tax obligations without adding to the burden on Nigerians.

The reforms will not lead to job losses. On the contrary, they are structured to stimulate new avenues for job creation by supporting a dynamic, growth-oriented economy.

Importantly, these laws will not absorb or eliminate the duties of any existing department, agency, or ministry. Instead, they aim to harmonise revenue collection and administration across the federation to ensure efficiency and cooperation.

At the moment, tax administration lacks coordination among federal, state, and local tax authorities, often resulting in overlapping responsibilities, confusion, and inefficiency. Without reform, this inefficiency will persist.

The proposed laws aim to coordinate efforts between different tiers of government, resulting in better tax resource management and greater clarity for taxpayers.

Under existing laws, taxes like Company Income Tax (CIT), Personal Income Tax (PIT), Capital Gains Tax (CGT), Petroleum Profits Tax (PPT), Tertiary Education Tax (TET), Value-Added Tax (VAT), and other taxing provisions in numerous laws are administered separately, with individual legislative frameworks.

The proposed reforms seek to consolidate these multiple taxes, integrating CIT, PIT, CGT, VAT, PPT, and excise duties into a unified structure to reduce administrative fragmentation.

On the proposed derivation-based VAT distribution model, which the Northern Governors oppose, it must be stressed that the new proposal, as enunciated in the Bill, is designed to create a fairer system.

The current model for distributing VAT is based on where the tax is remitted rather than where goods and services are supplied or consumed. The ongoing tax reform seeks to correct the inherent inequity in the current derivation model as a basis for distributing VAT revenue.

The new proposal before the National Assembly outlines a different form of derivation which considers the place of supply or consumption for relevant goods and services. This means that states in the Northern region that produce the food we eat should not lose out just because their products are VAT-exempt or consumed in other states.

In a statement by the special adviser to the President on Information and strategy Bayo Onanuga said the reforms are critical to improving the lives of Nigerians and were not put forward by President Tinubu to undermine any part of the country. There is no better time than now for the National Assembly to give due consideration to these bills that will overhaul our tax systems and create the revenue all the tiers of government require to fund the development our country and people urgently need.

 

 

#

News

Justice Egwuatu Steps Down Amid Allegations of Bias in Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan’s Case

Published

on

 

 

Justice Obiora Egwuatu of the Federal High Court Abuja has recused himself from the case filed by the Senator Representing Kogi Central District, Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan.

At the proceedings on Tuesday, Justice Egwuatu announced his decision to withdraw from the matter after the usual court appearances.

He cited the allegation of bias from the third defendant in the case, Senate President Godswilll Akpabio, as the major reason for his decision.

It was gathered that the Senate President had expressed a lack of confidence in the ability of the court to do justice on the matter, hence the reason for the development.

Justice Egwuatu further added that the case file will be returned to the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court, Justice John Tsoho, for reassignment to another judge.

#
Continue Reading

News

Betara Denies Bribery Allegations, Says $5,000 Shared Was a Sallah Gift

Published

on

 

Mukhtar Aliyu Betara, the Chairman of the House of Representatives Committee on the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), has addressed allegations surrounding the distribution of $5,000 to members of his committee. Betara clarified that the funds were shared as a gesture of goodwill to mark the Sallah celebrations and not as a bribe to influence decisions regarding the proposed emergency rule in Rivers State.

The controversy arose after Nigerian investigative journalist Jaafar Jaafar brought the matter to public attention through a post on his X (formerly Twitter) handle. Jaafar’s revelation sparked widespread speculation about the intent behind the monetary distribution, with some questioning whether it was an attempt to sway opinions within the committee.

In his statement, Betara firmly denied any wrongdoing, emphasizing that the funds were purely a festive token. “The $5,000 I shared with my colleagues was a Sallah gift, a tradition of goodwill and celebration during this festive period. It was not, and should not be misconstrued as, an inducement related to the Rivers State emergency rule discussions,” he stated.

The Rivers State emergency rule proposal has been a contentious issue, drawing significant attention and debate within the House of Representatives. Betara’s clarification aims to dispel any doubts about the integrity of his actions and the committee’s deliberations.

As the story continues to unfold, Nigerians are closely watching the developments, with many calling for transparency and accountability in the nation’s legislative processes.

 

#

Continue Reading

News

Coalition Underway to Challenge Tinubu in 2027 Elections, Says APC Chieftain

Published

on

 

Salihu Lukman, the former North-West Vice Chairman of the All Progressives Congress (APC), has disclosed that advanced discussions are ongoing to form a unified opposition coalition aimed at unseating the ruling APC in the 2027 general elections. Lukman made this revelation on Monday, following former Vice President Atiku Abubakar’s recent announcement about the coalition’s formation.

Lukman emphasized that the coalition’s primary objective is to consolidate opposition forces to present a formidable challenge to the APC’s dominance.

He noted that consultations have reached an advanced stage, with leaders from various political parties and movements working to align their strategies. However, he clarified that while progress has been made, no final decisions have been reached regarding the coalition’s structure, leadership, or the political platform it will adopt.

Atiku Abubakar, a prominent opposition figure and former presidential candidate, had earlier confirmed the coalition’s formation during a press conference. He described the initiative as a strategic effort to restore balance to Nigeria’s political landscape and counter what he termed the APC’s “overreach” in governance. Abubakar’s announcement has sparked widespread debate and heightened political tensions, with many viewing the coalition as a potential game-changer in the upcoming elections.

Lukman highlighted two critical issues currently under negotiation: the selection of a political party to serve as the coalition’s platform and the need for prospective members to set aside personal ambitions for the greater good. He acknowledged that these discussions are complex, with zoning and candidate selection emerging as contentious topics among coalition members. Despite these challenges, Lukman expressed optimism that a consensus would be reached in time to mount a robust campaign against the APC.

The coalition’s formation comes amid growing dissatisfaction with the APC’s governance under President Bola Ahmed Tinubu. Critics have accused the administration of undermining democratic principles and consolidating power at the expense of opposition voices. Lukman, who has been vocal about his discontent with the APC’s direction, described the coalition as a necessary step to safeguard Nigeria’s democracy and ensure a competitive political environment.

As the 2027 elections approach, the coalition’s success will depend on its ability to navigate internal disagreements and present a united front. Political analysts have noted that while the coalition has the potential to disrupt the APC’s stronghold, its effectiveness will hinge on its ability to mobilize grassroots support and articulate a compelling vision for Nigeria’s future.

The coming months are expected to see intensified political maneuvering as the coalition finalizes its plans and prepares to challenge the APC’s dominance. For now, the political landscape remains dynamic, with the coalition’s emergence signaling a new chapter in Nigeria’s democratic journey.

#

Continue Reading

Trending