Connect with us

Opinion

Is Buhari Paying Them Back In Their Own Coins?

Published

on

President Muhammad Buhari during his medical trip in 2017

 

Tijjani Muhammad Musa

To become President, they made him publicly cry, swallowed his pride, compromised his principles, made him have dinner with the devil and almost sold his soul to the accursed. If it’s the only way, he walked the shameful path.

When he emerged as the President, the underlying wounds of aye were opened afresh, with many calling him a former dictator, military General, GMB, not a Democrat and many other hurting labels. He took it in his strides and refused to bear his fangs. In fact he went and got them incisors removed.

Then he was taken ill and had to fly abroad for the required medical attention, which wasn’t available in the country. Something he had used in his campaign, had no option but to swallow up his vomit. Speculations and rumors followed that he had died, but the news of his death was being censored.

Many of his party bigwigs welcomed the development and even started reassigning and sharing positions in the government, only for him to return back in one piece. An alarm was raised that a cabal exist in the presidency and were the ones running his government, but he didn’t fret or say a word about that.

His family was used to expose his weakness and humiliate his stance as a man of principles and strong resolve. Concerted efforts were made to breakup his marriage and disgrace him before the world. He barely managed to escape that plot. That too he bore with utmost patience.

Several palliatives he approved, employment and empowerment of youths, monies he signed to be disbursed to the populace, grants he endorsed to be released for the public benefits were mostly stashed away by the greedy Governors, making him look like a supporter of corruption, even if he himself was not.

The Boko Haram insurgency he inherited from the previous government he subdued, only for Banditry, Kidnapping, Extortions and so on to rear their heads and be used by politicians and some of the traditional ruling class to tarnish the achievements of his government with regards to security and good governance. Here too he hurt in silence.

Many of his staunch supporters like your truly were utterly stripped of all their fighting tools, points of defense and arguments in debates, their prides as diehard Buharists quashed, so much so that the Buharists Movement and Ideology ended up as almost nothing, but a still birth. The man showed no public annoyance, but cried for them within.

The so-called “cabal” along with his kitchen cabinet had a field day running the affairs of government as they deem fit. They made his government such a disappointment to the poor people who donated their meager earnings, stood the harsh sun and voted for him twice to be their President, all in hope of a new and better Nigeria, which has yet to see the light of the day.

The oppositions along with the judiciary and legislative arms of government left no stone unturned to frustrate his fight against corruption, thereby ensuring that his stance against reigning in the criminality of many embezzlers and criminals came to an embarrassing caricature of purpose. At a point in time, he became a laughing stock of those who thought of him as a champion of the fight to annihilate looting of the treasury.

Meanwhile, the chess master player and military strategist that he is, Buhari waited until the right moment to checkmate his opponents by making his winning move! For a moment, when he allowed Emefiele to stay on as CBN Governor despite all the corruption allegations levelled agaist him, some analysts thought President Buhari was being the “nonchalant” H.E. as usual. Only for him to surprise all with the aces up his sleeve.

New Naira redesign shocked them all. And with that single master stroke, the stash accumulated over tine to be used in continuing the corruption flight by politicians heading to Elections 2023 was instantly crushed. Those who use to make his government look evil by collecting several billions in ransom for kidnapping and banditry are also left with no cash, but trash.

Cashless policy by the way is not a Buhari government’s call, but a new global agenda. His government is just following orders to implement it and probably as requested now by the puppet masters pulling the strings. Buhari or no Buhari this policy has been designed to come to pass. In fact, it has been long overdue as India towed that line since 2016.

It is just the way that the policy is being implemented that seems to be the problem as the poor masses are becoming the collateral damage of the project, though the process is being used, possibly unintentionally to crash out the government in power. This is because the ones bearing the brunt of the implementation, the populace who happen to be the voters would want to take their pound of flesh at the upcoming polls. The irony of it all is that Buhari is the one implementing it.

And this is what is making some Governors who have prepared to use money to influence the eventual elections outcome lose their calm, cool and composure. Suddenly, they have realised their folly that they have been taken to the cleaners by the old fox they grossly and unfortunately underestimated.

We, core and genuine Buharists often surprise many when we reaffirm that were the old war horse still eligible to run for the presidency of this nation Nigeria, we would have lined up, bear the scorching sun and cast our votes wholeheartedly once again for him despite all said and done.

Why? Because we know for certain in our heart of hearts his good intentions and strive to make Nigeria great was pursued with all the vigor and sincerity on his part. It was the saboteurs of our national progression that made all efforts to see that Nigeria did not emerge out of her countless doldrums.

Like someone said, the problems of Nigeria are the means through which a lot of its citizens (Nigerians) are making their money, getting their means of livelihood and earning a living. Take any sector of the economy for example; finance, education, health, security, oil sector, housing, civil service, politics, agriculture and many more. It is all the same, systemic corruption!

And there are many other non-citizens and even certain countries whose economies partly depend upon Nigeria’s lack of headway to consolidate their earnings. Thus, how can they allow their means of survival i.e. Nigerian problems be solved? They will do all they can to ensure it never gets sorted out! And that is why we have not been able to solve Nigeria’s limitless quagmires.

Therefore, for us true Buharists the chant and slogan “Sai Baba!!!” re my ains dear to our hearts and still rings from Sokoto to Bayelsa, Maiduguri to Lagos. He has not failed Nigerians, but rather Nigerians have failed themselves.

©2023 Tijjani M. M.

Musa is the chairman Association of Nigerian Authors Kano State Branch

#

Opinion

Izala Sect: Crisis of Leadership, Accusations of Shiism Meddle in Polarising Its Members, History Repeats Itself

Published

on

 

By Yakubu Nasiru Khalid

Formally, the Izala sect was formed in 1978, created to eradicate innovation (bid’a) within the Islamic doctrine. It has a modern structure and leadership both at the state and national levels. Therefore, the leadership of the Izala has come with a well-structured and hierarchical bureau and the feeling that they are different from who they see as the “Conservative Islamic Group.”

The structure comprises three arms: the Council of Ulama, the Administrative Council, and The First Aid Group. Each of the councils has its own head and followers to achieve designed goals. Even with this structure, the sect experienced crises at both levels, which polarised its leadership.

The reasons attached to the polarisation of Izala at the national level later descended to many states where the organization has a large following. The reasons were multifaceted, from jurisprudence, political, financial, and external meddling to sundry issues.

Initially, there was a problem regarding the leadership of the organization, especially the question of who was the supreme leader of the organization between the Administrative Council and the chairman of the Ulama Council. At the time, the head of the Administrative Council was Alhaji Musa Muhammad Maigandu, from Kaduna, and Sheikh Ismail Idris was the chairman of the Ulama Council, Jos faction recognized Ismail Idris.

#

The Jos faction rejected Maigandu for not being a scholar but a businessman, arguing that an Islamic organization should be led by a scholar, not a businessman. This added more fire to the crisis.

Furthermore, the Kaduna faction was very critical of some views and fatwas of Ismail Idris, especially those that dealt with the issue of bid’a. According to Ismail Idris, the followers of Izala would not pray behind an Imam who’s not a member of Izala, they would also not marry from the family of a person who inclined to Sufism and would not eat the meat of an animal slaughtered by a follower of the Sufi group.

The Kaduna faction was outrightly against these views and opposed them. Another vital factor that played a role in the split of the Izala group was the accusations and counter-accusations of financial management. Ismail Idris was accused of organizing in the Arab countries, and he was further accused of personalizing vehicles donated to the Izala sect.

In addition, Ben Amara argued that the eruption of the Gulf War in the 1990s between the USA and Iraq was another important factor in the polarisation of the Izala. The Jos faction supported the American invasion of Iraq because of the Saudi Arabian interest, while Kaduna supported Iraq. The Jos faction called Kaduna “Saddamawa” meaning (supporters of Saddam) while Kaduna called Jos “Bushawa” meaning (supporters of American interest).

The leadership of the Jos faction blamed Shia for the internal crisis of Izala and accused some Ulama of being secret agents of Shiism who were working toward dismantling the group.

yakubunasirukhalid@gmail.com

 

Continue Reading

Opinion

Gov. Yusuf’s executive order extending retirement age for HoS, Kano Assembly Clerk, and others unconstitutional

Published

on

 

Sani Usman-DanAbdullo, a Director of Admin and General Services at the Kano State Agency for the Control of Aids, KSACA, has written to the state assembly, seeking its intervention in the
Executive Order issued by Governor Abba Yusuf.

Mr DanAbdullo, in a petition dated January 6 and addressed to Speaker of the Assembly, Jibrin Ismail Falgore, recalled that the governor had in January 2025 issued Executive Order No. 1 of 2025, extending the service period of some civil servants.

According to him, the governor extended the service year of the Head of Service, Assembly Clerk, some judicial officers, Permanent Secretaries and a host of other staff in the state health sector for 2 years after they were due for retirement as of December 2024.

The lawyer also recalled that the state assembly had enacted a law fixing the retirement of staff at 60 years of age or 35 years of service, depending on whichever comes first.

Mr DanAbdullo, therefore, asserted that the governor’s executive order was unconstitutional, “since the House has already made laws which the order seeks to alter”.

He noted that that executive order is not meant to alter, amend, modify or expand the law made by the legislature.

“This act, is, therefore, a clear violation of the principles of rule of law and separation of powers enshrined in our Constitution being not only a clear attempt to usurp the legislative powers of this Honourable House, but to contradict the existing laws already enacted by it in exercise of its powers as such,” the petition added.

While dismissing a claim that the governor issued the order in the spirit of the Doctrine of Necessity, Mr DanAbdullo said there was no justification for extending the service years of the affected retired officers since there are many competent hands with adequate qualifications to be appointed.

“And as for the staff in the health sector, they can be retained on contract arrangement in line with the existing service law of Kano State,” the petition added.

Mr DanAbdullo, therefore, warned that the provisions of the Constitution must not be subordinated to any other law, and must not be subjected to the indignity of deletion of any section or part thereof.

“In view of the foregoing, I urge this esteemed House to employ all legal mechanism at its disposal to overrule the Governor’s decision in the act complained of, which is capable of setting a very dangerous precedent that will ruin the entire public service system of our dear State, if allowed.

“TAKE NOTICE Sir, this act of indiscriminate issuance of executive order, if allowed, will cause the entire Kano State the following catastrophic effects,”

The State Assembly failed to attend to the petition even if it means dismissing it for fear of the governor, if the petition is not attended to we will have no option but to go to court”. He added

#

Continue Reading

Opinion

The Movement (Tafiyar Matasa) and the Very Big Questions to Answer

Published

on

Comr. Habu Hassan Abdullahi

Comr. Habu Hassan Abdullahi

Yes, I am not some sort of social critic who would unfairly denigrate someone’s achievement for personal gain or political interest that I do not have. Thus, this is pre-eminently the right time to speak the truth to the members of my generation in Nigeria whether they care to accept it or not. But remember the truth is always truth and can stand alone.

No doubt that not everyone is happy with how leadership is running in this country, with the exception of those at the corridor of power. But this is not enough to be a raison d’etre to handle our dear nation to the hands of inexperienced youths. Forgive my pen for the use of “inexperienced”. Just because most of them have never been to real leadership. Of course, I am myself opposed to the exclusionary habit of the present politicians, they’ve relegated youths to the mantle of power but we have to cautiously control our faculty of thinking to avoid getting entangled in a lust for power.

I was very happy when I heard the idea of “The Movement” known as “Tafiyar Matasa” in the Hausa language. And of course, the genesis of the movement was attributed to the unavoidable “EndBadGovernance” protest of 1st August, 2024. The movement began immediately after the protest, in fact, it is one of the noticeable outcomes of the protest due to the unity it brought. The idea of the movement was preached and promoted by some prominent northern activists and social media influencers to serve as a last resort to the youths in their effort to bring good governance. No one can deny the fact this is a laudable effort. But the very big question supposed to be asked here is: youthfulness is the only parameter and yardstick to measure the caliber of a good leader? If yes, why Yahaya Bello (Former Governor of Kogi) and Abdurrasheeed Bawa (former EFCC Boss) were arraigned for looting the public treasury! The point I want to make here is, being young or old will not be a determining factor for an individual to be a good leader. We can have corrupt leaders within any range of age.

Another important issue to take into cognizance is the failure of some youths to comprehend the logic and existing distinction between being a good activist and being a good leader. Leadership is quite different from activism, therefore, a good activist may not necessarily be a good leader. It is common knowledge that the conveners of this important movement lack practical leadership acumen and organizational skills that are fundamental for successful leadership. Okay, should we handle our future to the trial and error leaders? We have to exercise extraordinary care when it comes to leadership.

#

Yet another problem faced by this movement is financial constraints. To be sincere and frank, the quantum resources required to run a great national political movement like this oversizes the pockets of the conveners. Another organic question to ask here is: where the movement conveners can solicit humongous financial resources? From the politicians they are castigating? If yes, this is performative contradiction!

Finally, I would like to remind my fellow youths that new breed, as the late Yusuf Maitama said, cannot solve the Nigerian problem. There must be mutual cooperation and understanding between the new breed and old breed. We must work together with them to acquire all necessary experience, knowledge, and practical leadership skills.

Written by
Comr. Habu Hassan Abdullahi
From Bayero University, Kano
Department of Education
Contact via 07065941454 or habu92hassan@gmail.com

 

Continue Reading

Trending