Connect with us

Opinion

Abdul Rasheed Bawa To Prosecute Abdulrasheed Maina

Published

on

By Bala Ibrahim.

Anyone familiar with President Muhammadu Buhari, should not only be unsurprised by his surprises, but be ready to understand the meaning “BUHARINOMOVES”. A term that has come to be accepted as the unpredicted outcome of President Buhari’s next move or planned action at any point in time.

Yes, even before he became PMB, as GMB, Muhammadu Buhari had made a name in springing surprises, particularly in moments of national nervousness, when the country is high in tension and pundits are busy with permutations about the next likely line of manoeuvre by the leader. He is known to surprise everyone, by arriving on a horse back, when all eyes are at the aeroplane tarmac.

In his first coming as military Head of State, General Muhammadu Buhari had taken many by surprise, many times. Those with good memory may recall the famous newspaper headlines of ARCHIBONG REPLACES ARCHIBONG, when one Col. “Emmanuel Archibong I think, was substituted by Col. Dan Patrick Archibong, on his way to reporting in Calabar, as the newly appointed military Governor of Cross River State.

The substitution was necessitated by the leakage of information, which gave Col. Emmanuel Archibong advanced and advantaged information of his appointment. To make secrecy sacrosanct, and underscore the priority he attaches to the propensity of springing surprises, General Muhammadu Buhari quickly ordered a search for another Archibong, who was immediately asked to proceed to Calabar, and assume duty as the Governor. While the first Archibong was directed elsewhere. The next day, one of the headlines in the papers was, ARCHIBONG REPLACES ARCHIBONG.

Sometimes in the time of his rein as one of Nigeria’s active and proactive Heads of state also, there was the surprise of Haladu replacing Haladu, as Nigeria’s defence attaché in London. Like the Archibong’s case, the leakage of information in appointment, resulted in the springing of a surprise, that saw Gen. Balarabe Haladu replacing Gen, Haladu Hananiya on the UK defence attaché portfolio. Here also, the headline read, HALADU REPLACES HALADU. When it comes to springing surprises, Buhari’s instincts know no bounds.

Advert

In what has now come to be seen as the norm, PMB has once again taken the nation by another surprise today, this time around, by naming an Abdulrasheed Bawa to head the agency that is prosecuting an Abdulrasheed Maina.

Beware of Match Fixing EFCC Warns NPFL, LMC

Citing Paragraph 2(3) of Part1, CAP E1 of EFCC Act 2004, the Special Adviser to the President on Media and Publicity, Mr Femi Adesina said, President Muhammadu Buhari has nominated Abdulrasheed Bawa as substantive chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, (EFCC). The letter advanced that the President’s nomination was contained in a letter to the President of the Senate, Dr Ahmad Lawan, requesting the Upper Chamber of the National Assembly to screen and confirm Bawa for the position.

The first surprise is the direction from where the President picked the headship of the controversial anti graft agency. While many were expecting the appointment to follow the established tradition of picking from the police, Baba permitted his characteristic conduct of carrying out surprises, to play out. He shopped and picked from within the system, by appointing a young and vibrantly trained cadet detective from the agency.

The second surprise is the near coincidence of nomenclature, between the prosecuting Abdulrasheed, and another Abdulrasheed that is being prosecuted.

For some times now, the EFCC, the agency Abdulrasheed Bawa is due to take over as substantive chairman, is prosecuting Abdulrasheed Maina, the former chairman of the Pension Reform Task Force, alongside the former Head of Service, Steve Oronsaye, Osarenkhoe Afe and Fredrick Hamilton B Global Services Limited, for alleged procurement fraud and obtaining by false pretence, money amounting to over 2Nb.

Maina jumped bail but was re-arrested in Niger Republic, and repatriated to Nigeria by the Interpol, under the leadership of the now AIG Garba Baba Umar. While waiting in prison custody, the same Maina had last month approached Justice Abang for another bail, and like before, saying, the application became necessary over his worsening health. Of course the EFCC had vehemently objected the move.

But while the country is awaiting the next move of the court, in his familiar style of BUHARINOMOVES, PMB has now moved with another surprise: Abdulrasheed Bawa would henceforth be the one to determine the fate of the bail application, and subsequent prosecution of his name sake, Abdulrasheed Maina.

Opinion

Borders, Visas and the Beautiful Game: How U.S. Immigration Policies Shaped Global Perceptions During the 2026 FIFA World Cup

Published

on

 

Solomon Emmanuel olamilekan

As the United States welcomed millions of football fans for the 2026 FIFA World Cup, another story unfolded beyond the stadiums. Visa restrictions, border policies, and immigration procedures became central to international discussions, raising questions about whether America’s commitment to security aligned with its image as a nation of openness and inclusivity.

The FIFA World Cup has always represented more than football. Every four years, it brings together people from different cultures, languages, and backgrounds in a celebration of unity through sport. For the United States, co-hosting the 2026 FIFA World Cup alongside Canada and Mexico was an opportunity to reinforce its image as a nation built on diversity, openness, and international cooperation. Yet as millions of supporters prepared to travel, immigration policies and visa restrictions became almost as widely discussed as the matches themselves.

Long before the opening whistle, the global conversation had shifted beyond tactics, team selections, and stadium preparations. Instead, many fans found themselves navigating visa interviews, lengthy processing periods, and uncertainty over whether they would be allowed to enter the United States. The result was a tournament that not only showcased world-class football but also reignited debates about borders, mobility, and the balance between national security and international hospitality.

Beyond the sporting spectacle, the 2026 FIFA World Cup also became a platform for public diplomacy and nation branding. Major sporting events provide host nations with opportunities to communicate their values, strengthen international relationships, and project a positive national image. Consequently, immigration procedures, border experiences, and visa accessibility became part of the broader story through which global audiences evaluated the United States as a host nation.

Visa Policies Put Fans in the Spotlight

According to FIFA, purchasing a World Cup ticket did not automatically grant entry into any of the host countries. The governing body repeatedly advised supporters to apply for visas well in advance, reminding fans that immigration decisions remained the responsibility of each host government. For thousands of supporters from countries requiring U.S. visas, securing a match ticket was only the beginning of the journey.

The Associated Press (AP) reported that, unlike several previous World Cups where host nations introduced simplified entry systems for accredited visitors and supporters, the United States largely maintained its standard immigration procedures. As a result, many fans from Africa, the Middle East, and parts of Asia encountered significant administrative hurdles before they could even think about entering a stadium. The report noted that supporters from countries such as Iraq, Ghana, Haiti, and several African nations faced long visa waiting periods, high refusal rates, and uncertainty despite holding legitimate World Cup tickets.

For African supporters, the challenge was particularly significant. Football occupies a unique place across the continent, where fans are renowned for bringing colour, music, and unmatched enthusiasm to every World Cup. During the tournament preparations, the U.S. government proposed visa bond requirements ranging from $5,000 to $15,000 for certain travellers. The proposal generated widespread concern before eligible FIFA World Cup ticket holders were later exempted. Despite this exemption, visa appointment delays, lengthy processing times, and existing immigration procedures continued to present significant obstacles. Similarly, The Guardian noted that the controversy highlighted broader inequalities in global mobility, with many observers arguing that such restrictions appeared inconsistent with FIFA’s message that football should be accessible to everyone regardless of nationality.

Beyond the Fans: Journalists and Participants Face Challenges

The debate over U.S. immigration policies did not end with football supporters. Journalists, tournament participants, and prominent football personalities also found themselves caught in the complexities of the American immigration system. As a result, discussions about border policies increasingly became part of the World Cup narrative, drawing international attention to how the United States balanced security with its role as host of the world’s biggest sporting event.

Advert

One of the most widely reported incidents involved “Mama Radio,” the celebrated Democratic Republic of Congo superfan known for travelling across the world to support African teams. Reuters reported that she was denied a U.S. visa despite her long history of attending international football tournaments, preventing her from supporting her team at the World Cup. The story attracted global attention because it illustrated how even well-known football ambassadors could struggle to navigate immigration procedures. For many observers, her absence symbolised the barriers faced by ordinary supporters from developing countries.

The Associated Press also reported concerns that lengthy visa processing times could affect accredited journalists travelling from some countries. Although FIFA accreditation grants access to matches and official events, it does not replace national immigration laws. Consequently, journalists were still required to satisfy U.S. visa requirements before entering the country, prompting discussions about equal access to one of the world’s largest sporting events.

FIFA consistently reminded supporters that while it could facilitate information and coordinate with host governments, immigration decisions ultimately remained the responsibility of each sovereign nation. Meanwhile, U.S. officials maintained that the country’s immigration measures were designed to protect national security while ensuring the safe hosting of millions of international visitors. Migration scholars also observed that mega sporting events increasingly expose the tension between border security and global mobility, with visa policies often becoming symbols of a nation’s openness to the world. For many travelling supporters, however, the experience extended beyond football, as months of visa applications, embassy appointments, and travel uncertainty became an integral part of their World Cup journey.

Security or Inclusivity?

As the tournament progressed, international media framed the immigration debate in different ways. BBC Sport highlighted the practical challenges experienced by supporters from countries facing lengthy visa processing times. Reuters focused on personal stories that illustrated the human impact of visa denials, while The Guardian questioned whether restrictive immigration procedures aligned with FIFA’s vision of football as a game that unites the world. Together, these reports shaped global perceptions of the United States, portraying immigration policy as an important part of the World Cup story.

From a strategic communication perspective, immigration procedures became part of America’s international brand narrative, shaping perceptions as much as the tournament itself. Rather than focusing exclusively on football, international media increasingly framed the visitor experience, visa accessibility, and border policies as indicators of America’s openness and inclusivity. This demonstrates how government policies can influence nation branding and public diplomacy, especially during globally televised events that attract billions of viewers.

Supporters of the U.S. government’s approach argued that hosting a global sporting event should not require compromising national security. Every sovereign nation, they maintained, has the responsibility to regulate entry into its territory and protect both citizens and visitors. Others contended that the measures created unnecessary barriers that contrasted with America’s image as a welcoming nation built on immigration and cultural diversity.

More Than a Football Tournament

The immigration debate surrounding the 2026 FIFA World Cup ultimately became a test of America’s global image. While the United States successfully staged one of the biggest sporting events in history, conversations about visas and border access became an enduring part of its legacy.

The tournament demonstrated that global sporting events are judged by more than the quality of football on the pitch. They also influence how host nations are perceived by the international community. Football succeeded in bringing the world together, but immigration policies influenced who could fully participate in that celebration.

From a communication and media studies perspective, the 2026 FIFA World Cup demonstrated that successful event hosting extends beyond logistics and sporting excellence. Public diplomacy is shaped not only by ceremonies and stadiums but also by the experiences visitors have before they arrive. Every visa approval, border interaction, and media report contributes to the construction of a nation’s international reputation. In this sense, immigration policy became a communication tool that influenced how the United States was perceived throughout the tournament.

As future nations prepare to host international sporting events, the lesson is clear: hospitality extends beyond world-class stadiums and efficient organisation. It is also reflected in how accessible a country is to the people who wish to experience its culture, support their teams, and celebrate the universal language of football. In the end, the 2026 FIFA World Cup reminded the world that while football has the power to unite nations, border policies can shape who gets to be part of that shared experience.

 

Solomon Emmanuel olamilekan
Department of development and Strategic communication
University of Abuja

Continue Reading

Opinion

How Social Media Is Creating Jobs for Young Nigerians-Uzoamaka

Published

on

 

By Iheanachor Prosper Uzoamaka

Parents used to scold their children for staring at phone screens all day, warning that scrolling through social media would never pay the bills. Fast forward to today, and those very screens are helping thousands of families stay afloat across Nigeria. Faced with a challenging job market and limited corporate opportunities, many young Nigerians are no longer waiting for traditional employment. Instead, they are building their own digital careers from the ground up.

Walk into any neighbourhood and you will see it happening in real time. A student is scripting a comedy skit for TikTok, a vendor is updating her Instagram clothing store, and a freelance video editor is working on content for a client in London. Armed with little more than a smartphone, an internet connection, and determination, young people are creating opportunities for themselves while bypassing the traditional barriers to employment.

The Rise of the Creator Economy

Content creation is no longer just a hobby or a way to gain likes and followers; it has become a thriving industry. From comedians and dancers to tech reviewers and lifestyle vloggers, young Nigerians are turning everyday content into sustainable sources of income.

By building loyal audiences on platforms such as TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, and YouTube, creators become valuable partners for brands seeking to reach consumers online. What often begins as a passion project can grow into a full-time career through brand partnerships, sponsored content, advertising revenue, and affiliate marketing.

Advert

Digital Marketing and Social Commerce

Beyond entertainment, social media has transformed the way business is conducted. Entrepreneurs no longer need millions of naira to rent physical shops in markets such as Kubwa or Wuse. Instead, many operate successful online businesses directly from their homes.

The rise of the “WhatsApp status vendor” has become a symbol of modern micro-entrepreneurship. Young Nigerians now sell products ranging from skincare items and thrift clothing to gadgets and food through social media platforms.

At the same time, established businesses increasingly depend on digitally skilled youths to manage their online presence. This has created growing demand for freelance social media managers, digital marketers, content strategists, and online customer service representatives.

Breaking Borders Through Freelancing

Perhaps the greatest advantage of social media and digital platforms is the opportunity to work beyond Nigeria’s borders. Talented graphic designers, writers, video editors, virtual assistants, and customer support agents are securing international clients through online platforms.

By working remotely, many young professionals earn in foreign currencies while living in Nigeria. This not only provides financial stability but also helps them build strong professional portfolios and gain valuable global experience.

Challenges Along the Way

Despite these opportunities, the journey is not without obstacles. High data costs, unreliable electricity, inconsistent internet access, and intense competition continue to pose significant challenges for many digital entrepreneurs. Success in the online space requires persistence, creativity, and continuous learning.

 

Despite the hurdles, Nigerian youths continue to demonstrate remarkable resilience and innovation. Social media has evolved far beyond a platform for communication and entertainment; it has become a powerful tool for entrepreneurship, job creation, and economic empowerment.

As the digital economy continues to expand, social media is proving that opportunities can be created rather than waited for. For many young Nigerians, a smartphone is no longer just a communication device it is an office, a marketplace, and a gateway to a better future.

Iheanachor Prosper
200lv student of Department of Development and strategic communication, University of Abuja

Continue Reading

Opinion

Why Sports Betting Is Becoming a Lifestyle Among Nigerian Youths-Yusuf Faizah 

Published

on

 

By Yusuf Faizah
Sports betting has gradually evolved from a recreational activity into a way of life for many Nigerian youths. What was once a weekend pastime has become a daily routine, with betting shops filled with customers and mobile betting apps recording thousands of users every day. From university campuses to busy city streets, betting has become deeply embedded in youth culture.

One of the major reasons for this growing trend is the promise of quick financial rewards. In a country where unemployment and economic hardship remain significant challenges, many young people see betting as an alternative source of income. The possibility of turning a small stake into a substantial payout makes it particularly attractive to students and job seekers seeking financial relief.

Technology has further accelerated this trend by making betting more accessible than ever. With a smartphone and internet connection, users can place bets within minutes from virtually anywhere. At the same time, betting companies continue to expand their reach through aggressive advertising, sponsorship of sports programmes, and promotional bonuses that attract new customers.

At the centre of this betting culture is football, Nigeria’s most popular sport. Millions of young Nigerians closely follow leagues such as the English Premier League and believe their knowledge of teams, players, and statistics gives them an advantage in predicting match outcomes. This confidence often encourages repeated participation, even after experiencing losses.

Advert

Beyond economic hardship, the widespread promotion of betting and its growing social acceptance have also contributed to its popularity. Constant exposure to betting advertisements, discussions among friends, and success stories shared on social media have helped normalize gambling as part of everyday life for many young people.

However, this growing culture comes with significant risks. Many young people lose money they cannot afford to lose, while others develop gambling habits that negatively affect their education, employment, finances, and personal relationships. The excitement of occasional wins can quickly give way to frustration and financial distress as losses accumulate.

Sports betting can serve as a form of entertainment when approached responsibly, but it should never be viewed as a dependable source of income. As the industry continues to expand, greater efforts are needed to promote responsible gambling, strengthen public awareness, and address the economic conditions that push many young Nigerians toward betting in the first place.

Unless these issues are addressed, sports betting may continue to evolve from a recreational activity into a culture of financial dependence, with far-reaching consequences for Nigeria’s youth and society as a whole.

Yusuf Faizah
200 Level Student, Department of Development and Strategic Communication, University of Abuja.

Continue Reading

Trending