Connect with us

Opinion

Did Prophet Muhammad (SAW) Permit 100% Interest Rate? A Rejoinder

Published

on

Bello Sani Yahuza,The writer on Interest

 

By Bello Sani Yahuza

 

“He who talks on a matter out of his profession comes with surprises” – Ibn Hajar (d. 852AH/1449CE) It has never been an issue for a person to have a keen interest in any field of study. But it is an outlandish the way things are going and the way people quickly assume expertise on a subject matter that are not familiar with.

 

They instead, come up with a lot of chaos, contradictions and confusion. So, I came across an article, written by one personality called Ali Abubakar Sadiq, a journalist by profession who claims deep knowledge of the Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence where he delves into a delicate and intricate issue of Riba (interest).

Read also: NLC condemns Fuel Price increase, urges FGN to revert to old price

Sadiq alleges that the Prophet Muhammad SAW has permitted a 100% interest rate. So, instead of a solution, he brings more confusion to rather known and well define the concept of Riba in the classical juristic theories and its application in the modern banking system.

 

But, beyond this, the writer creates a world of surprises. In fact, if there is an 8th wonder of the world, I am sure his writing could be the one. I, therefore, write these lines, in order to at least address some of these surprising confusions.

 

I intend to address some technical questions regarding the subject matter. For instance, is it really the Prophet (PBUH) permitted interest? what really interest is? What and what constitutes interest (al-had)? What is the Dhabid of understanding interest? What is the effective cause of and what is the wisdom/Maqasid of prohibiting interest?

 

In sha Allah, I will address these questions along the following surprises itemized based on their importance to the subject matter:

 

  1. The Prophet SAW Accepted Interest: Beyond just surprise, it is rather dangerous to claim that the Prophet (SAW) accepted interest. It can even be sacrilegious. I never read or heard a modernist or an orientalist proclaiming that the Prophet himself accepted and transacted in interest. Had this happen, that could be contradictory, I mean how can Prophet Muhammad SAW prohibits something and practiced it. The legal maxim upholds that, “Prohibition of an issue is by default an enjoinment of its opposite”.
  2. This terminology by jurists fits this context well. Besides, the condemnation of interest in the Qur’anic verses are explicitly clear that, Allah even declare war against devourer of interest (Qur’an 2:179). In another verse He says that the devourers of interest will raise in the day of resurrection in a condition of those beaten by Satan leading him to madness (2:275). Another point is how does the writer reconcile his claim with the verse that says, …and Allah has permitted trade and forbidden interest (riba) “الراب وحرم البيع هللا وأحل .” Qur’an as a legal document and a book of guidance, has unique, distinct, and miraculous style. It is full of laws and principles with a well-defined science of interpretation, in addition to commentaries and exegeses. One cannot interpret it relying upon his weak understanding of the language. Besides, English Qur’anic translated versions like Yusuf Ali and others are not enough to make a person understands the deeper meanings of its verses with their implications. Just as one cannot interpret the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria even if he is what William Shakespeare is to English literature. Only an established court of law can do that.
  3. The only Interest/Riba Prohibited is above 100% Another surprise by the writer is his claim that interest which is not more than 100% is permitted by the Noble Qur’an. The writer builds his novice interpretation of Allah’s saying: “O believers, take not doubled and redoubled interest, and fear Allah so that you may prosper.” (Qur’an 3:130). With this weak, unprecedented interpretation, the writer further exposes his unfamiliarity of what he claims to know. Going by number, how would Qur’an permit 100% interest and forbids something above it? And by volume, does one cup of wine has any difference to two cups, or does stealing ₦100 has any difference to ₦200.
  4. It does not make sense, and that is ridiculous! Simply, the verse prohibited double interest which is 100% and redouble which is more than 100%. Going by the writer’s assertion, how and where does the writer get the permission of 100%? I mean, where does that state in the verse? 3. Riba, Profit, and Gift (Ihsan) Another point the writer seems to lack knowledge of is these three concepts. All of riba, profit, and gift (Ihsan) can come as an increase in repayment, his confusion in understanding the subject matter led him to falsely assume they are the same and equal, and so he messed up with them in his writing. Citing Jabir bin ‘Abdullah’s narration in Sahih al-Bukhari, Vol. 3, No. 579, in which the Prophet repaid him the debt he owed him with an extra amount as evidence for interest.
  5. This is clear misunderstanding of the case. This is not interest, had the writer, instead of assuming knowledge, referred himself to the scholars’ interpretation of the hadith, he would have understood it. The Qur’an says: “But if they had referred it back to the Messenger or to those of authority among them, then the ones who can draw correct conclusions from it would have known about it” (Qur’an 4:83). So, interest is clearly prohibited whereas, the other two are allowed. More so, debt on its own is not, and will never be a mechanism for profit-making in Islam. The trajectories of interest, profit, and gift and how they can interchange in a transaction are dynamic.
  6. Interest is a predetermine unjustified increment which promotes exploitation of the giver upon the receiver of the loan. Giving out loan does not make the money increase. Qur’an says: “That which you give as interest to increase the people’s’ wealth increases not with Allah; but that which you give in charity, seeking the goodwill of Allah, multiplies in manifold.” (Qur’an 30: 39). Paradoxically, profit is a justified return or earning upon which all economic and financial transactions are based. While gift is an act of benevolence (Ihsan). So, in essence, giving loans stipulating an increase in the debt agreement is interest, while selling a commodity with the same increase is profit and any addition of both the two instances without stipulating any condition to it, is a gift (Ihsan). As in hadith he cited, “when he (the Prophet) repaid the loan of a camel giving two back (Muwatta Kitab al-Buyu hadith 1346),
  7. Money and Commodity A very basic knowledge of Islamic finance can help one to know that in Islamic law, there is a world of difference between money and commodity. The writer quoted out of context one tradition in Sahih Muslim of Prophet giving a better-quality camel than the original one.
  8. In Shari’ah, a side of being a recognizable unit of account and means of payment for goods and services, money, has no intrinsic value. Money is only viewed as a mechanism for facilitating trade. A ₦100 notes for instance, a side of being a legal tender in Nigeria, one can hardly draw any benefit from it, and the moment that quality preserved by law is removed it becomes nothing.

All the old paper currencies and coins after they were abolished by law of the land, they are as good as trash. But the commodity on the other hand, has intrinsic value, this means a real economic value. So, naturally one can benefit from food, cloth, shelter by eating, waring, privacy etc.

Advert

 

The implication of that from the jurisprudential perspective is that, one cannot buy and sell money on credit and add anything above the principal. Any increment is interest. The legal maxim says “any loan returns with benefit is interest”. Simply put it, Islam approves Time value in commodity transaction, but prohibits time value of money (TVM).

 

To really understand the concept of Riba in the Islamic jurisprudence, one must know the difference between money and commodity, it is one major yardstick and fantastic point of difference between Islam and the interest-based systems.

 

  1. Collateral as Riba Again, another surprise here, the writer claims that taking collateral in giving loans is also an interest. Citing another narration out of context on Prophet’s taking grain from a Jew on credit and giving him collaterally.

 

The question is how does the collateral in this contract stand as riba? Then, why the Jew had to return back the collateral when the debt was repaid?

 

A clear contradiction and confusion! Collateral is separate rule in the Islamic commercial transaction.

Let the writer refer to Qur’an 2: 282, to know the rules related to collateral.

 

  1. The Definition of Riba The writer here claims that the definition of interest is given in the Noble Qur’an when Allah says “Do not devour riba double and redouble” Qur’an 3:130. This verse does not define interest at all. Rather, it explains one scope, an aspect, and a dimension of interest. Why? because, the cultural context and the prevailing economic system in the Arabia during revelation is that, riba is well known by all and sundry.

The known maxim says: “A known matter does not need definition”. Interest is so pervasive that everybody was transacting in it. Perhaps, this is part of the wisdom of its gradual revelation and prohibition. So, let the writer refer to the gradual legislation of interest in the Qur’an.

 

  1. Riba and Mutual Consent The writer says “There is nothing in the Quran or Hadith that prohibits the pre-fixing of the rate of return, as long as it occurs with the mutual consent of the parties and doesn’t exceed 100%, since the prophet’s payment of two camels for one is 100% interest”. Another glaring misconception! When, where and how the mutual consent of the parties constitutes a source of law in Shari’ah? Or when does it make permitted what is prohibited? I need an answer to this please!

 

  1. Originality The technical aspect of the writing is another drawback of the writing. Apart from verses and hadith he cited; the writer uses most of the writings which are from the secondary sources. The writer claims ownership as if he is the original writer of the issues. He did not acknowledge his sources which some of them are just copied and paste from online internet sources such as Wikipedia and so on.

 

The arguments made by the modernists and orientalists like Muhammad Akram Khan, Timur Kuran, Muhammad Omar Faruq who use TVM, inflation, and so on to defend the banking interest.

 

Other scholars who are moved by political fatwas such as Sheikh Tantawi and other scholars from Egypt, their fatwa is controversial not accepted even in Al-Azhar.

 

Another aspect I find also, apart from modernists’ argument on interest, the writer’s claim on Jassas as the first to interpret interest as all increase, Ottoman’s dealing with interest and historical narration of legalizing interest, these and many others, are not acknowledged. Most of them are copied from Wikipedia (source – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riba#Non-orthodox_approach).

 

You can see, getting access to information source does not make a person knowledgeable of the subject matter.

 

  1. Warning My advice to the writer is to call his attention that while knowledge is never a monopoly of anybody, but it has its own standard, discipline, and decorum anybody must adhere to. And while, one will never claim to know everything, the jack of all trade will always be a master of none.

Allah The Almighty says: “You have given all of the knowledge but a little”. That is why professionalism is very important and every person should follow his own profession. Nevertheless, no one is denied the benefit of having an interest in any particular field of study.

 

But that aspect should be handled with maturity and respect of the discipline.

 

  1. Admonition, In conclusion, the entirety of religion is based on admonition (Nasihah). My first and foremost admonition to the writer is to quickly repent from alleging the Prophet of accepting riba.

 

It is a grievous sin to falsely attribute something to Allah or to His Messenger. Some scholars rank it equal with the association (shirk) or more grievous than shirk.

 

I also call him to withdraw his claim and adopt the authentic view accepted by the Muslims ummah. The Prophet says: “My nation will never unite on falsehood” You cannot fault the Ummah in its entirety but, individuals cannot be certain of their personal views.

 

 

Bello Sani Yahuza bellokano2000@gmail.com  International Islamic University, Gombak, Malaysia. 14/07/2020

Opinion

Beyond the Godfather’s Shadow: Why Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf Chose Kano Over a Provincial Presidential Quest

Published

on

 

​By Kabiru Sani Dogo Maiwanki

​The recent pronouncements by Senator Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso regarding Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf’s strategic political recalibration have finally stripped away the façade, exposing the profound ideological fissures within the NNPP hierarchy. In a caustic address delivered Saturday evening, the Senator characterized the Governor’s newfound autonomy as a “betrayal” of a far more egregious nature than that of his predecessor, Abdullahi Ganduje. However, in this vitriolic attempt to cast himself as the victim of political infidelity, Kwankwaso inadvertently betrayed a disconcerting truth: he viewed the incumbent administration not as a sovereign executive entity, but as a subordinate instrument of his personal political estate.

​Senator Kwankwaso remarked that, as a presidential hopeful, his fundamental expectation was that the administration he purportedly “installed” would function as a geopolitical centrifuge—a financial and logistical catalyst designed to project the Kwankwasiyya hegemony into neighboring Northwestern territories. He expressed profound chagrin that, over two years into this mandate, the machinery of the Kano State government has not been weaponized to “conquer” even Jigawa State for his political brand. This revelation is remarkably candid; it implies that the Senator’s patronage of the current administration was never rooted in the socio-economic advancement of the Kano populace, but was instead a cynical stratagem to treat the state’s commonwealth as a private war chest for a singular, ego-driven presidential odyssey.

Advert

​By resisting this role, Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf has committed what Kwankwaso perceives as an unpardonable “sin,” but what objective observers must recognize as a courageous act of institutional integrity. The Governor’s refusal to allow the Kano State treasury to be cannibalized for regional political expansion is a resounding victory for fiscal prudence and administrative transparency. It represents a principled rejection of the archaic practice where public commonwealth is weaponized to bolster the narrow political interests of a singular godfather at the expense of the citizenry.

​The depth of the Senator’s desperation is now laid bare for all to see. In a striking reversal from his usual posture of absolute authority, Kwankwaso has been reduced to making public appeals for reconciliation. His recent plea—openly asking anyone with access to the Governor to “beg him to come back”—reveals a leader who has finally grasped the magnitude of his loss. It is the sound of a man who realizes that the “innocent aide” he once underrated has not only secured his independence but has taken the soul of the movement with him.

​It is therefore essential for Kwankwaso and other political leaders who pride themselves on their political stature to realize that there is a limit to how long they can continue to deceive and exploit their followers. Respect must be reciprocal; whether between a leader and the led, there is a definitive limit to the amount of insult, manipulation, and contempt any person can endure.

Whenever you push a supporter to the brink and their patience finally runs out, the consequences of their anger will certainly be unpleasant for those in power.
​For the well-meaning people of Kano, this is a moment to offer unalloyed commendation. Governor Abba deserves praise for his steadfastness in protecting the state’s allocations and for prioritizing the welfare of the masses over the expansionist agenda of a political empire. Abba Kabir Yusuf has chosen to be the custodian of the people’s trust rather than a puppet for personal ambition, and in doing so, he has redefined the essence of leadership in Kano.

Continue Reading

Opinion

From Zamfara roots to national vision: Aliyu Muhammad Adamu, seasoned media leader, returns home to serve his people.”

Published

on

 

Aliyu Muhammad Adamu was born on 29th December 1982 in Tsafe Local Government Area of Zamfara State, into the respected Adamu Joji family.

He hails from a lineage that includes notable family members such as Alhaji Sanda Adamu Tsafe (Sarkin Yakin Tsafe), Alhaji Aliyu Adamu (Danmadami), Alhaji Sani Adamu, Hajiya Khadija Adamu (Gwoggo Dala), and Hajiya Amina, among others.

His father, Muhammad Adamu (popularly known as Nata’ala), later relocated to Kano State in pursuit of business expansion. As a result, Aliyu and his siblings were raised in Kano, where he began his early education at Da’awa Primary School, Kano.

Driven by a strong connection to his roots, Aliyu returned to Zamfara State for his secondary education, attending Unity Secondary School, Gummi. He subsequently gained admission into Bayero University, Kano (BUK), where he obtained both his Diploma and Bachelor’s Degree, graduating in 2010.

Advert

After completing his National Youth Service Corps (NYSC), Aliyu faced the realities of life with resilience and determination, navigating through challenges that shaped his character and leadership capacity. In 2014, he returned to Zamfara State and began his professional career in the media industry with Gamji Television and Radio.

Through dedication, hard work, and professional excellence, he served the organization for nearly ten years, rising through the ranks to become the General Manager of the station, an achievement that underscored his leadership, administrative competence, and commitment to public communication.

In 2023, Aliyu voluntarily resigned from the media organization and relocated to Kano State in pursuit of broader opportunities and personal development. Today, driven by a renewed sense of purpose and a lifelong commitment to his people, Aliyu Muhammad Adamu is preparing to return to his hometown to seek the support and mandate of his people. His aspiration is to represent our parents, brothers, and sisters at the federal level, with a clear vision of contributing meaningfully to the development, unity, and overall progress of Zamfara State.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Opinion:The Anatomy Of A Hoax- Setting The Record Straight On Governor Abba Yusuf

Published

on

 

 

​By Ahmed Badamasi Tsaure

​The recent wave of political “scoops” regarding the purported defection of Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf of Kano State to the All Progressives Congress (APC) has moved beyond mere speculation into a coordinated campaign of character assassination. Most notably, reports by Daily Nigerian claiming the Governor’s move was “postponed” are masterpieces of fiction, designed to paint a sitting Governor as indecisive and subordinate. As a witness to the political realities in Kano, I find it necessary to dismantle these fallacies with the facts that the purveyors of this rumor have conveniently ignored. In Nigerian politics, defection is a statutory process requiring a formal resignation from one’s current party. To date, Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf has not submitted any resignation from the New Nigeria Peoples Party (NNPP). To claim that a “finalized arrangement” for a Monday registration existed is a procedural hallucination; one cannot join a new house without first stepping out of the old one.
​Furthermore, the narrative suggests the Governor’s plans were shelved because he failed to seek the “blessings” of local APC bigwigs. This is a laughable distortion of executive power. History is replete with Governors who defected based on executive conviction without the interference of local APC “big wigs.” We have seen this with the Governor of Delta vs. Senator Omo-Agege, the Governor of Bayelsa vs. David Lyon and Minister Heineken Lokpobiri, the Governor of Rivers vs. Nyesom Wike, and the Governor of Plateau vs. the current National Chairman of the APC. More recently, the defections of Governors like Dave Umahi (Ebonyi), Ben Ayade (Cross River), and Bello Matawalle (Zamfara) proved that when a Governor moves, he does so as the new leader of the party in his state. It is also historically hypocritical to label such a move as “betrayal.” When Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso defected from the PDP to the APC in 2013, he did not seek permission from any person or leadership—he led a rebellion based on his own conviction. If it was “principled politics” for the godfather then, it cannot be “betrayal” for the Governor now.

Advert

​What, then, remains for a Governor who already holds the overwhelming mandate of his people? It is a known fact that Governor Abba Yusuf moves with the ironclad support of almost 95% of the Kano State House of Assembly, 50% of the National Assembly members from the state, all 44 Local Government chairmen, and the entire grassroots party structure. The desperate attempt by the NNPP National Working Committee to dissolve the Kano executive committees is a futile, “too-late” maneuver that only confirms their loss of control. When a Governor commands such total loyalty, he does not ask for permission; he leads. The defection of Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf is inevitable if he so wishes, as he carries the entire political soul of Kano with him.
​The theory that the APC postponed this move because Senator Kwankwaso is not coming along simply does not hold water. Kwankwaso’s refusal to join the APC is a settled matter; it is alleged the President offered him a ministerial position or the Chairmanship of the soon-to-be resuscitated Petroleum Trust Fund (PTF), both of which he rejected after his demand to join the Presidential ticket was denied. Using this stalemate as a pretext for the Governor’s “indecision” is a transparent lie aimed at making the Governor look like a political appendage. It is disheartening to see Daily Nigerian abandon objective journalism to frame the Governor as a “betrayer.” If Governor Abba Yusuf chooses to move, he does so as a leader of a massive political movement. The media must stop concocting stories to mislead the public. Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf remains focused on his mandate. These rumors are merely the desperate gasps of those who wish to see Kano in perpetual turmoil.

​Ahmed Badamasi Tsaure writes from Shanono Local Government, Kano State. He can be reached at ahmedtsaure28@gmail.com.

Continue Reading

Trending