Former President Olusegun Obasanjo has faulted the verdicts of the judiciary on electoral disputes, saying three to five judges should not overturn decisions made by millions of voters during an election.
Obasanjo spoke at the high-level consultation on Rethinking Western Liberal Democracy in Africa, held at Green Resort Legacy, Olusegun Obasanjo Presidential Library, Abeokuta, Ogun State, on Monday.
The former president was reacting to the ongoing judgements of the Court of Appeal on the electoral disputes arising from 2023 elections.
Recall that three governors were recently sacked in separate judgements delivered by the Court of Appeal.
Obasanjo faulted what he labelled “cathedral pronouncements” by the judges, describing the powers vested in the hands of a few judges as “totally unacceptable.”
believe whatever form of democracy we have or whatever system of government we have, three or four men in the judiciary should not be able to overturn the decisions of millions that have voted. Now, we have to find a way to handle that. I don’t know what the way will be but, for me, I think it’s totally unacceptable that millions (of votes), maybe 10 million on one side, maybe 9 million on the other side. Then, you have five people sitting down, three of them agree, two disagree. And you come up and make cathedral pronouncements that cannot be changed, I believe that should not be accepted.
How do we do it? I don’t know. But whatever form of democracy we have, we should look at how to handle this. If you say ‘go again for election,’ then, what happened to the previous election? I don’t know.
“So, I personally feel strongly about it. It does not matter what you say about the judiciary, in fact only five people or seven will sit down. If they are five, three may agree, two may not agree, and the decision of three will be final. All that you have done comes to the decision of three or decision of four,” he said.
